The Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Model in the Evaluation of Groundwater Quality
Yıl 2021,
Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 165 - 174, 13.01.2021
Zeki Doğan
,
Hamza Yalçin
,
İbrahim Yenigün
,
Ali Volkan Bilgili
Kaynakça
- [1] M. İ. Yeşilnacar vd., “Geomedical assessment of an area having high-fluoride groundwater in southeastern Turkey”, Environmental Earth Sciences, c. 75, sayı 2, s. 162, Oca. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-5002-6.
- [2] P. Sahu, G. C. Kisku, P. K. Singh, V. Kumar, P. Kumar, ve N. Shukla, “Multivariate statistical interpretation on seasonal variations of fluoride-contaminated groundwater quality of Lalganj Tehsil, Raebareli District (UP), India”, Environmental Earth Sciences, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s12665-018-7658-1.
- [3] İ. Yolcubal, Ö. C. Ataş Gündüz, ve N. Kurtuluş, “Origin of salinization and pollution sources and geochemical processes in urban coastal aquifer (Kocaeli, NW Turkey)”, Environmental Earth Sciences, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12665-019-8181-8.
- [4] H. Wold, “Quantitative sociology”, içinde International Perspectives on Mathematical and Statistical Modeling, H. M. Blalock, Ed. New York: Seminar Press, 1975, ss. 307–357.
- [5] J. Hair, G. Hult, C. Ringle, ve M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2017.
- [6] J. F. Hair, C. M. Ringle, ve M. Sarstedt, “PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet”, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, c. 19, sayı 2, ss. 139–152, Nis. 2011, doi: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.
- [7] M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, ve J. F. Hair, “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling”, içinde Handbook of Market Research, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, ss. 1–40.
- [8] R. G. Lomax, “The Effect of Measurement Error in Structural Equation Modeling”, The Journal of Experimental Education, c. 54, sayı 3, ss. 157–162, Nis. 1986, doi: 10.1080/00220973.1986.10806415.
- [9] W. W. Chin ve P. R. Newsted, “Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares”, içinde Statistical strategies for small sample research, R. H. Hoyle, Ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1999, ss. 307–341.
- [10] J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, ve C. M. Ringle, “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM”, European Business Review, c. 31, sayı 1, ss. 2–24, Oca. 2019, doi: 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
- [11] J. Hair, C. L. Hollingsworth, A. B. Randolph, ve A. Y. L. Chong, “An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, c. 117, sayı 3, ss. 442–458, Nis. 2017, doi: 10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130.
- [12] V. S. Rodrigues, R. F. do Valle Júnior, L. F. Sanches Fernandes, ve F. A. L. Pacheco, “The assessment of water erosion using Partial Least Squares-Path Modeling: A study in a legally protected area with environmental land use conflicts”, Science of the Total Environment, c. 691, ss. 1225–1241, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.216.
- [13] N. C. Viswanath, P. G. D. Kumar, ve K. K. Ammad, “Statistical Analysis of Quality of Water in Various Water Shed for Kozhikode City, Kerala, India”, Aquatic Procedia, c. 4, ss. 1078–1085, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.136.
- [14] H. Wold, Model Construction and Evaluation When Theoretical Knowledge Is Scarce. Theory and Application of Partial Least Squares. Academic Press, 1980.
- [15] S. Akter, S. Fosso Wamba, ve S. Dewan, “Why PLS-SEM is suitable for complex modelling? An empirical illustration in big data analytics quality”, Production Planning & Control, c. 28, sayı 11–12, ss. 1011–1021, Eyl. 2017, doi: 10.1080/09537287.2016.1267411.
- [16] D. Ghosh, A. Olewnik, ve K. Lewis, “Application of autoencoders in cyber-empathic design”, Design Science, c. 4, ss. 1–17, 2018, doi: 10.1017/dsj.2018.11.
- [17] C. M. Ringle, S. Wende, ve J.-M. Becker, “SmartPLS 3”. SmartPLS GmbH, 2015.
- [18] M. I. Yesilnacar ve I. Yenigun, “Effect of irrigation on a deep aquifer: a case study from the semi-arid Harran Plain, GAP Project, Turkey”, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, c. 70, sayı 2, ss. 213–221, May. 2011, doi: 10.1007/s10064-010-0299-6.
- [19] D. Marghade, D. B. Malpe, ve A. B. Zade, “Geochemical characterization of groundwater from northeastern part of Nagpur urban, Central India”, Environmental Earth Sciences, c. 62, sayı 7, ss. 1419–1430, Nis. 2011, doi: 10.1007/s12665-010-0627-y.
- [20] M. Loizidou ve E. Kapetanios, “Effect of leachate from landfills on underground water quality”, The Science of The Total Environment, c. 128, sayı 1, ss. 69–81, Oca. 1993, doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(93)90180-E.
- [21] I. Chenini ve S. Khemiri, “Evaluation of ground water quality using multiple linear regression and structural equation modeling”, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2009, doi: 10.1007/BF03326090.
- [22] V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, ve H. Wang, Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.
Kısmi En Küçük Kareler Yapısal Eşitlik Modelinin Yeraltı Suyu Kalitesinin Değerlendirilmesinde Kullanımı
Yıl 2021,
Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1, 165 - 174, 13.01.2021
Zeki Doğan
,
Hamza Yalçin
,
İbrahim Yenigün
,
Ali Volkan Bilgili
Öz
Bu araştırmada su kalitesi ikinci nesil çok değişkenli bir istatistik metodu olan Kısmı En Küçük Kareler Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli (KEKK-YEM) kullanılarak incelenmiştir. KEKK-YEM gözlenen değişkenlerden yola çıkıp doğrudan gözlemlenemeyen (latent) değişkenler arasındaki ilişkileri açıklamaya çalışır. KEKK – YEM modelinde kullanılan gözlenen su kalitesi faktörleri pH, TDS katyonlar (Mg2+, Na+)ve anyonlar (HCO3-, Cl-ve SO4+). Çalışmada kullanılan KEKK-YEM modeli iki aşamada değerlendirilmiştir; ölçüm modelinin uygunluğu farklı uyum indisleri ile birinci aşamada değerlendirildikten sonra ikinci aşamada yapısal model değerlendirilmiştir. YEM model sonuçlarına göre, su kalitesi üzerinde katyonların (γ=0.598, p<0.05) anyonlardan (γ=0.259, P<0.05) daha etkili olduğu ve yine pH üzerinde katyonların (γ=0.643, P<0.05) anyonlardan (γ=-0.512, P>0.05) daha etkili olduğu tahmin edilmiştir. Su kalitesi varyansının %65’i (R2=0.650) ve pH’nin varyansının %19.5’i (R2=0.195) anyonlar ve katyonlar tarafından açıklandığı görülmüştür. Sonuç KEKK-YEM’in su kalitesinin değerlendirilmesinde klasik çok değişkenli ve bazı önkoşullara sahip daha fazla örneğe ihtiyaç duyan geleneksel istatistiksel metotların yerine başarı ile kullanılabileceğini göstermiştir
Kaynakça
- [1] M. İ. Yeşilnacar vd., “Geomedical assessment of an area having high-fluoride groundwater in southeastern Turkey”, Environmental Earth Sciences, c. 75, sayı 2, s. 162, Oca. 2016, doi: 10.1007/s12665-015-5002-6.
- [2] P. Sahu, G. C. Kisku, P. K. Singh, V. Kumar, P. Kumar, ve N. Shukla, “Multivariate statistical interpretation on seasonal variations of fluoride-contaminated groundwater quality of Lalganj Tehsil, Raebareli District (UP), India”, Environmental Earth Sciences, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s12665-018-7658-1.
- [3] İ. Yolcubal, Ö. C. Ataş Gündüz, ve N. Kurtuluş, “Origin of salinization and pollution sources and geochemical processes in urban coastal aquifer (Kocaeli, NW Turkey)”, Environmental Earth Sciences, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s12665-019-8181-8.
- [4] H. Wold, “Quantitative sociology”, içinde International Perspectives on Mathematical and Statistical Modeling, H. M. Blalock, Ed. New York: Seminar Press, 1975, ss. 307–357.
- [5] J. Hair, G. Hult, C. Ringle, ve M. Sarstedt, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 2017.
- [6] J. F. Hair, C. M. Ringle, ve M. Sarstedt, “PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet”, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, c. 19, sayı 2, ss. 139–152, Nis. 2011, doi: 10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.
- [7] M. Sarstedt, C. M. Ringle, ve J. F. Hair, “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling”, içinde Handbook of Market Research, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017, ss. 1–40.
- [8] R. G. Lomax, “The Effect of Measurement Error in Structural Equation Modeling”, The Journal of Experimental Education, c. 54, sayı 3, ss. 157–162, Nis. 1986, doi: 10.1080/00220973.1986.10806415.
- [9] W. W. Chin ve P. R. Newsted, “Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares”, içinde Statistical strategies for small sample research, R. H. Hoyle, Ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1999, ss. 307–341.
- [10] J. F. Hair, J. J. Risher, M. Sarstedt, ve C. M. Ringle, “When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM”, European Business Review, c. 31, sayı 1, ss. 2–24, Oca. 2019, doi: 10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203.
- [11] J. Hair, C. L. Hollingsworth, A. B. Randolph, ve A. Y. L. Chong, “An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, c. 117, sayı 3, ss. 442–458, Nis. 2017, doi: 10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130.
- [12] V. S. Rodrigues, R. F. do Valle Júnior, L. F. Sanches Fernandes, ve F. A. L. Pacheco, “The assessment of water erosion using Partial Least Squares-Path Modeling: A study in a legally protected area with environmental land use conflicts”, Science of the Total Environment, c. 691, ss. 1225–1241, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.216.
- [13] N. C. Viswanath, P. G. D. Kumar, ve K. K. Ammad, “Statistical Analysis of Quality of Water in Various Water Shed for Kozhikode City, Kerala, India”, Aquatic Procedia, c. 4, ss. 1078–1085, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.136.
- [14] H. Wold, Model Construction and Evaluation When Theoretical Knowledge Is Scarce. Theory and Application of Partial Least Squares. Academic Press, 1980.
- [15] S. Akter, S. Fosso Wamba, ve S. Dewan, “Why PLS-SEM is suitable for complex modelling? An empirical illustration in big data analytics quality”, Production Planning & Control, c. 28, sayı 11–12, ss. 1011–1021, Eyl. 2017, doi: 10.1080/09537287.2016.1267411.
- [16] D. Ghosh, A. Olewnik, ve K. Lewis, “Application of autoencoders in cyber-empathic design”, Design Science, c. 4, ss. 1–17, 2018, doi: 10.1017/dsj.2018.11.
- [17] C. M. Ringle, S. Wende, ve J.-M. Becker, “SmartPLS 3”. SmartPLS GmbH, 2015.
- [18] M. I. Yesilnacar ve I. Yenigun, “Effect of irrigation on a deep aquifer: a case study from the semi-arid Harran Plain, GAP Project, Turkey”, Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, c. 70, sayı 2, ss. 213–221, May. 2011, doi: 10.1007/s10064-010-0299-6.
- [19] D. Marghade, D. B. Malpe, ve A. B. Zade, “Geochemical characterization of groundwater from northeastern part of Nagpur urban, Central India”, Environmental Earth Sciences, c. 62, sayı 7, ss. 1419–1430, Nis. 2011, doi: 10.1007/s12665-010-0627-y.
- [20] M. Loizidou ve E. Kapetanios, “Effect of leachate from landfills on underground water quality”, The Science of The Total Environment, c. 128, sayı 1, ss. 69–81, Oca. 1993, doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(93)90180-E.
- [21] I. Chenini ve S. Khemiri, “Evaluation of ground water quality using multiple linear regression and structural equation modeling”, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2009, doi: 10.1007/BF03326090.
- [22] V. Esposito Vinzi, W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, ve H. Wang, Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010.