Yabani Kanatlılarda Salmonella Spp. İzolasyonu ve Serotiplendirilmesi

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2, 125 - 129, 31.12.2020

Mehmet Ali Onbüyük , Oktay Keskin

https://doi.org/10.47027/duvetfd.774843

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu çalışmada yabani olarak yaşayan kanatlı hayvanların dışkılarından Salmonella spp. izolasyonu, identifikasyonu ve serotiplerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaçla, Ocak 2018 – Mayıs 2019 tarihleri arasında Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı Şanlıurfa Doğa Koruma ve Milli Parklar Müdürlüğü rehabilitasyon merkezine getirilen yabani kanatlılardan toplam 180 adet dışkı örneği alınmıştır. Bakteriyolojik kültür sonucunda 13 adedi (%81,25) Salmonella Typhimurium, 3 adedi (%18,75) Salmonella Enteriditis olarak serotiplendirilen toplam 16 adet (%8,9) Salmonella izolasyonu yapıldı. Bu izolasyonlar örnek alınan 8 farklı yabani kanatlı türüne ait dışkılardan gerçekleştirilmiş olup, 7 yabani kanatlı türünden alınan örneklerden izolasyon yapılamamıştır. Sonuç olarak doğada yaralı veya hasta olarak bulunarak rehabilitasyon merkezine getirilen yabani kanatlılardan alınan dışkı örneklerinden gerek hayvanlarda gerekse insanlarda görülen salmonellozis vakalarından sıklıkla sorumlu olan Salmonella Typhimurium ve Salmonella Enteriditis serotipleri izole edilmiştir. Bu nedenle yabani kanatlıların evcil kanatlı ve memeli hayvanlar ile insanlara Salmonella etkenlerinin taşınması açısından risk taşıdığı ve bu bağlamda gerekli sanitasyon önlemlerinin alınmasının hayvan ve halk sağlığı için yararlı olabileceği sonucuna varıldı.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Salmonella, serotip, yabani kuş

Destekleyen Kurum

Herhangi bir kurum tarafından desteklenmemiştir.

Proje Numarası

---

Teşekkür

----

Kaynakça

• 1. Koneman EW, Allen SD, Janda WM, Schreckenberger PC, Wınn WC. (1992). Diagnostic Microbiology. Fourth Edition. JB. Lippinco Company. Philadelphia.
• 2. Quinn P. J, Carter M. E, Markey B. K, Carter G. R. (1994). Mosby-Year Book Europe Limited. p.209-236. Lynton House, London WC1H9LB, England.
• 3. Anon. Salmonellosis Institute for International Cooperation in animal Biologics. 2005.Erişim:https://salmonella360.com/content/files/317/Leaflet_EN_OIE_2005_Salmonellosis. Erişim Tarihi: 05.08.2019.
• 4. Mead PS, Slutsker L, Dietz V, et al. Food –related illness and death in the United States. Emerg. infect. Dis.,1999;5:607-25.
• 5. İzgür M. (2006). Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji (Bakteriyel Hastalıklar) In: Salmonella İnfeksiyonları. N.Aydın, J. Paracıkoğlu (editörler), s.116-21 Ankara: İlk-Emek Matbaacılık ve Yayıncılık.
• 6. Brenner FW, Villar RG, Angulo FJ, Tauxe R. (2000). Swaminathan B. Salmonella nomenclature J. Clin.Microbiol. 38: 2465-2467.
• 7. Ezaki T, Kawamura Y, Yabuuchi E. (2000). Recognition of nomenclatural standing of Salmonella typhi (Approved Lists 1980), Salmonella enteritidis (Approved Lists 1980) and Salmonella typhimurium (Approved Lists 1980), and conservation of the specific epithets enteritidis and typhimurium. Request for an opinion. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology, 50(2): 945-947.
• 8. Le Minor L, Veron M, Popoff MY. (1985). S.cholerae-suis subsp. arizonae comb.nov., S.cholerae-suis subsp.bongori subps.nov.,S.cholerae-suis subsp.S.cholerae-suis subsp. cholerae-suis subspnov.(Smith)Weldin,S.cholerae-suis subsp.diarizonae subsp.nov.,S.cholerae-suis subsp.houtanae subsp.nov., S.cholerae-suis subsp.salamae subsp.nov.in validation of the publication of new names and new combinations previously effectively published outside the IJSB ,List no.18 ,Int.J.Syst.Bacteriol. 35: 375-376.
• 9. Le Minor L, Popoff MY. (1987). Designation of Salmonella enterica sp. Nov., nom.Rev. As the type and only species of the genus Salmonella.Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 37: 465-468.
• 10. Holt JG, Krieg NR, Sneath PHA, Staley JT, Williams ST. (1994). Bergey’s Manuel of Determinative Bacteriology.Chapter. William, R.H.,Williams and Wilkins (editors). 5.Edition. p.186-187. Maryland, USA
• 11. Reeves MV, Evins GM, Heiba AA, Plikaytis BD, Farmerii JJ. (1989). Clonal natüre of Salmonella typhi and its genetic relatedness to other Salmonella as shown by multilocus enyzme electrophoresis and proposal of Salmonella bongori comb. nov. J. Clin.Microbiol. 27: 313-320.
• 12. Popoff MY, Bockemuhl J, Brenner FW. Gheesling LL. (2001). Supplement 2000 (no.44) to the Kauffman-White scheme. Res. Microbiol. 152: 907-909.
• 13. Anon. (2004). Salmonella standart ve ileri tanı. 52(0-2): 975-984. ISBN İstanbul.
• 14. Popoff MY, Bockemuhl J, Brenner FW. (2000). Supplement 1998 (no.42) to the Kauffman-White scheme.Res. Microbiol. 151: 63-65.
• 15. Popoff MY, Bockemuhl J, Gheesling LL. (2004). Supplement 2002 (no.46) to the Kauffman-White scheme. Res. Microbiol. 155: 568-570.
• 16. Bisping W, Amtsberg G. (1988). Farbatlas Zur Diagnose Bacterieller Infectionserreger Der Tiere. Paul Parey Scientific Publishers. p.171-182. Berlin and Hamburg.
• 17. Teşhiste Metot Birliği. Erişim: https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/GKGM/Belgeler/Veteriner%20Hizmetleri/teshiste_metod_birligi/bakteriyoloji.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 12.12. 2018.
• 18. Khidhir Z. K. (2010). Isolation of Salmonella from some species of wild birds in Sulaimania. Al-Mustansiriyah Journal of Science. 21(4): 49-52.
• 19. Andrés S,Vico J. P, Garrido V, Grilló M. J, Samper S, Gavín P, Mainar‐Jaime R. C. (2013). Epidemiology of subclinical salmonellosis in wild birds from an area of high prevalence of pig salmonellosis: phenotypic and genetic profiles of Salmonella isolates. Zoonoses and Public Health. 60(5): 355-365.
• 20. Konicek C, Vodrážka P, Barták P, et al. (2016). Detection of zoonotic pathogens in wild birds in the cross-border region Austria–Czech Republic. Journal of wildlife diseases. 52(4): 850-861.
• 21. Matias CAR, Ingrid AP, Maiarados SA, et. al. (2016). Characteristics of Salmonella spp. Isolated from Wild Birds Confiscated in Illegal Trade Markets, p.7. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
• 22. Peighambari S. M, Yazdani A, Hojjati P. (2011). Salmonella infection in birds kept in parks and pet shops in Tehran, Iran. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 5(3): 145-148.
• 23. Mirzaie S, Hassanzadeh M, Ashrafi I. (2010). Identification and characterization of Salmonella isolates from captured house sparrows. 34(2):181-186.
• 24. Afema, J. A, Sischo W. M. (2016). Salmonella in wild birds utilizing protected and human impacted habitats. 13(3): 558-569. EcoHealth, Uganda.
• 25. Vico JP and Mainar-Jaime RC. (2011). Salmonellosis in wild birds and its relationship with the infection in finishing pigs. p.264-267.
• 26. Kobayashi H, Kanazaki M, Shimizu Y, et al. (2007). Salmonella Isolates from Cloacal Swabs and Footpads of Wild Birds in the Immediate Environment of Tokyo Bay. 69(3): 309–11.
• 27. Al-Aalim AM. (2017). Isolatİon and Identifıcatıon of Salmonella Mİcroorganısms From Pigeons and Their Pathogenicity in Broiler Chicks. 16: 1.
• 28. Millán J, Aduriz G, Moreno B, Juste RA, Barral M. (2004). Salmonella isolates from wild birds and mammals in the Basque Country (Spain). 23(3): 905-11.
• 29. Awadallah MA, Merwad AM, Rehab EM. (2013). Prevalence of Zoonotic Escherichia coli and Salmonellae in Wild Birds and Humans in Egypt with Emphasis on RAPD-PCR Fingerprinting of E. Coli. 11(6): 781-8.
• 30. Hidasi HW, Andrade MA, Linhares GFC, et al. (2015). Detection of Salmonella enterica in Synanthropic Birds in the Metropolitan Area of Goiania-Go; 4: 3.
• 31. Shalaby AG, El-Enbaawy MI, Erfan AM, Nasef SA. (2012). Studies on Salmonella species from migratory and native wild birds. p.539-550.
• 32. Staji H, Zandiar L. (2017). Importance Of Wild Species Kept In Captivity As Reservoirs Of Salmonella Serotypes For Human In Petting Exhibitions And Zoo In Iran Wıth Focus On Antimicrobial Resistance. 40(2): 167-75.
• 33. Hughes LA, Shopland S, Wigley P, et al. (2008). Characterisation of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium isolates from wild birds in northern England from 2005 – 2006. 4(4): 1-10.
• 34. Krawiec M, Pietkiewicz M, Wieliczko A. (2014). Salmonella spp. as a cause of mortality and clinical symptoms in free-living gardenbird species in Poland. 17(4): 729-31.
• 35. Obukhovska O. (2013). The Natural Reservoirs of Salmonella Enteritidis in Populations of Wild Birds. 5(1): 171.