Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University Farabi Campus 2023 Carbon Footprint Analysis and Sustainable Solution Proposals
Abstract
The reduction of emissions and reaching carbon neutrality are implemented by various organisations, institutions, countries, and other associations on national and international levels. Universities are central to promoting sustainability and modelling low-carbon practices. This study assesses the 2023 carbon footprint (CF) of Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University’s Farabi Campus, aiming to quantify its greenhouse-gas impacts, highlight mitigation opportunities and encourage more prudent resource use. Emissions from natural gas, electricity, water and campus-fleet vehicles were estimated using IPCC and UK DEFRA factors. Total emissions reached 2 361.24 t CO₂e (IPCC) and 1 697.35 t CO₂e (DEFRA); the per-person CF, calculated for all staff as of December 2023, provides an additional benchmark. Interpreting these results clarifies current impacts and helps prioritise actions needed to meet the university’s carbon-neutral ambitions. Recommended measures—such as improving energy efficiency, adopting sustainable transport, and strengthening waste-management and offset programmes—offer a practical roadmap for reducing emissions and advancing campus sustainability. The results of the study provide important information for the campus management as a basic guide to determine the steps to be taken for a carbon-neutral campus. In this context, recommendations such as energy efficiency measures, sustainable transportation policies, waste management strategies, etc. contribute to a sustainable future for the campus
Keywords
Carbon footprint , Green campus , Sustainability , Climate change
Kaynakça
- Alagöz, İ., Coşkun, E., Babaoğlu, S., Kaykaç, R., & Cidacı, A. (2022). EÜAŞ Merkez Kampüs 2021 Yılı Karbon Ayak İzinin Hesaplanması. Çevre İklim ve Sürdürülebilirlik, 23(2), 161-166.
- Awanthi, M.G.G., & Navaratne, C.M. (2018). Carbon footprint of an organization: a tool for monitoring impacts on global warming. Procedia Eng., 212: 729-735, Doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.094.
- Bajželj, B., Richards, K. S., Allwood, J. M., Smith, P., Dennis, J. S., Curmi, E., & Gilligan, C. A. (2014). Importance of food-demand management for climate mitigation. Nature Climate Change, 4(10), 924-929.
- Binboğa, G., & Aylin, Ü. N. A. L. (2018). Sürdürülebilirlik Ekseninde Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi’nin Karbon Ayak İzinin Hesaplanmasına Yönelik Bir Araştırma. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 21, 187-202.
- Çerçi, M. (2021). ‘IPCC TIER 1 ve Defra Metodları İle Karbon Ayak İzinin Belirlenmesi: Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi Örneği’ Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Erzincan Binali Yıldırım Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Erzincan
- da Silva, L. A., Dutra, A. R. D. A., Soares, T. C., Birch, R. S., & Guerra, J. B. S. O. D. A. (2023). Trends in research: carbon footprint reduction in universities as a way to achieve a green campus. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(3), 584-601.
- DEFRA, (2023), Greenhouse gas reporting: conversion factors 2023, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/greenhouse-gas-reporting-conversion-factors-2023 (Erişim tarihi: 20.01.2023).
- Gao, T., Q. Liu, & J. Wang. (2014). A comparative study of carbon footprint and assessment standards.International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies 9(3), 237–243. http://ijlct. oxfordjournals.org/content/9/3/237.abstract.
- IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Simon Eggleston, Leandro Buendia, Kyoko Miwa, Todd Ngara & Kiyoto Tanebe). (2006). IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. The National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme.
- IPCC, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Martin Parry, Osvaldo Canziani, Jean Palutikof, Paul van der Linden & Clair Hanson). (2007). Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.