Botanik Bahçelerinde Estetik ve Ekolojik Yaklaşımları Birleştiren Bir Kaya Bahçesi Tasarımı

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 2, 103 - 120, 30.12.2025

Tuba Gül Doğan , Sena Demirci

https://doi.org/10.58816/duzceod.1719396

Öz

Kaya bahçeleri, doğal kayalık ekosistemlerden ilham alan, görsel estetik ile ekolojik işlevselliği bir araya getiren sürdürülebilir peyzaj mimarisinin önemli bileşenlerindendir. Bu çalışma, Düzce Üniversitesi Konuralp Kampüsü’nde yer alan botanik bahçesi içerisindeki bir kaya bahçesi için hem estetik hem de iklim dayanıklı ekolojik stratejileri içeren kapsamlı bir bitkilendirme tasarımı sunmaktadır. Tasarım sürecinde, araziye özgü çevresel değişkenler (topografya, güneş ışığına maruz kalma, drenaj) ile, yerli ve egzotik takson kombinasyonları tercihi, bölgeye uyum sağlama ve mevsimsel dinamikleri içeren bitki seçimi kriterleri entegre edilmiştir. Ortaya çıkan kompozisyon, yalnızca zengin ve çok mevsimli bir görsel deneyim sunmakla kalmayıp, aynı zamanda biyolojik çeşitlilik koridoru ve tozlayıcılar için habitat işlevi de görmektedir. Ayrıca, sürdürülebilir bakım uygulamalarıyla uyumlu olması ve eğitsel bir değer taşıması sayesinde, önerilen kaya bahçesi tasarımı, peyzaj tasarımının ekosistem hizmetleri sunarken ziyaretçi etkileşimini de artırabileceğini göstermektedir. Bu yaklaşım, iklim duyarlı ve eğitimsel işlevselliğe sahip botanik bahçeleri için uygulanabilir bir model sunmaktadır. Önerilen tasarımın mekânsal deneyimi ve uygulanabilirliği, iki boyutlu ve üç boyutlu modelleme araçları ile görselleştirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Bitkilendirme tasarımı , Alan koşullarına uyumlu taksonlar , Kaya Bahçesi

A Rock Garden Design Integrating Aesthetic and Ecological Approaches in Botanical Gardens

Öz

Rock gardens, inspired by naturally occurring rocky ecosystems, are pivotal components of sustainable landscape architecture that combine visual appeal with ecological function. This study presents a comprehensive planting design for a rock garden located within the botanical garden of Düzce University's Konuralp Campus, addressing both aesthetic considerations and climate-resilient ecological strategies. The design process integrated site-specific environmental variables such as topography, sunlight exposure, and drainage, along with plant selection criteria including native species preference, drought tolerance, and seasonal dynamics. The resulting composition not only offers a rich, multi-seasonal visual experience but also functions as a biodiversity corridor and pollinator habitat. Moreover, by aligning with sustainable maintenance practices and exhibiting educational value, the proposed rock garden exemplifies how landscape design can simultaneously deliver ecosystem services and enhance visitor engagement. This approach offers a replicable model for climate-responsive and educationally functional botanical gardens. The proposed design was visualized through both two- and three-dimensional modeling tools to demonstrate its practical applicability and spatial experience.

Anahtar Kelimeler

planting design , site-adapted taxa , rock garden

Kaynakça

• Abdulrazzaq, Z. M., Ahmed, M. S., Moubarak, M., & Abdullah, O. F. (2020). Rock gardens planning and designing-theory and application. Indian Journal of Ecology, 47, 85–91.
• Ayhan, A., & Atabeyoǧlu, Ö. (2022). The examination of Giresun city parks in terms of landscape design criteria. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 59(2),283-295. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.893979
• Basha-Jakupi, A., Hajrizi, D., & Zeka, D. (2021). Rehabilitation of soil through botanical gardens as a practical interplay between learning spaces and healthy places in urban environments. Future Cities and Environment, 7(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5334/fce.132
• Bayındır, D. (2023). Educational Capacity of Botanical Gardens: What do the research results say? Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 17(1), 26-45. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.1301444
• Chang, L. S., Bisgrove, R. J., & Liao, M. Y. (2008). Improving educational functions in botanic gardens by employing landscape narratives. Landscape and Urban Planning, 86(3-4), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.03.003
• Chen, G., & Sun, W. (2018). The role of botanical gardens in scientific research, conservation, and citizen science. Plant Diversity, 40(4), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2018.07.006
• Çiçek Kurdoğlu, B., Seyhan, S., & Bayramoğlu, E. (2022). The evaluation of the national garden concept in environmental design projects with scenarios. Artvin Çoruh Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(2),13–24. https://doi.org/10.17474/artvinofd.1091607
• Çorbacı, Ö. L., & Ekren, E. (2022). Kentsel açık yeşil alanların kurakçıl peyzaj açısından değerlendirilmesi: Ankara Altınpark örneği. Journal of Landscape Research and Practices, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.56629/paud.1137410
• Ekren, E., Çorbacı, Ö. L., Kordon, S. (2024). Evaluation of plants based on ecological tolerance criteria: A case study of urban open green spaces in Rize, Türkiye. Turkish Journal of Forest Science, 8(2), 108–132. https://doi.org/10.32328/turkjforsci.1550116
• Eksi, M., & Rowe, D. B. (2019). Effect of substrate depth and type on plant growth for extensive green roofs in a mediterranean climate. Journal of Green Building, 14(2), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.3992/1943-4618.14.2.29
• Hitchmough, J. (2004) The dynamic landscape: Design, ecology and management of naturalistic urban planting. Spon Press.
• Kahveci, H. (2021). Bilecik Kenti Açık Yeşil Alanlarındaki Bitkilerin Belirlenmesi ve Bitkilendirme Tasarımı Uygulamaları Yönünden İrdelenmesi. Düzce Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Ormancılık Dergisi, 17(1), 76-98.
• Lindemann-Matthies, P., & Marty, T. (2013). Does ecological gardening increase species richness and aesthetic quality of a garden? Biological Conservation, 159, 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.12.011
• Loidi Arregui, J., Biurrun, I., Campos Prieto, J. A., García-Baquero, G., García-Mijangos, I., & Herrera, M. (2012). Climate change and its influence on plant species and terrestrial habitats. International Journal of Geobotanical Research, 2(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.5616/ijgr120002
• Mitra, A. (2018). Rock Gardens – Planning and Visual Perception in Rock Garden Designing. Report number: VII/2018. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.35030.29761
• Nagashima, H., & Hikosaka, K. (2011). Plants in a crowded stand regulate their height growth so as to maintain similar heights to neighbours even when they have potential advantages in height growth. Annals of Botany, 108(1), 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr109
• Norman, P. E., Okoni-Williams, A., James, M. S., Norman, Y. S. G. E., & Luseni, M. M. (2023). The Role of Botanical Gardens in Plant Diversity Conservation of Sierra Leone. Botanical Gardens and Their Role in Plant Conservation: General Topics, African and Australian Botanical Gardens, 1:1, 129–139. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003282150-8
• O’Donnell, K., & Sharrock, S. (2017). The contribution of botanic gardens to ex situ conservation through seed banking. Plant Diversity, 39(6), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2017.11.005
• Özdemir, A. (2007). Kaya bahçesi: Doğru tesis, bitkilendirme ve bakım. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(12), 71-79.
• Rafiee, F., Ejtehadi, H., Farzam, M., Zare, H., & Bashirzadeh, M. (2022). Changes in plant biodiversity facets of rocky outcrops and their surrounding rangelands across precipitation and soil gradients. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13123-2
• Rebek, K., & Holmes, M. V. (1990). Homeowner garden design series: Elements and principles of design. Oregon State University Extension. https://tinyurl.com/yn9kz3pt
• Relf, D., & Appleton, B. (2015). Selecting landscape plants: Ground covers. Virginia Cooperative Extension.
• Robinson, N. (2016). The planting design handbook (3rd ed.). Ashgate.
• Schutzki, R. E. (2005). A guide for the selection and use of plants in the landscape. Michigan State University Extension.
• Sim, J. (2001). Planting design: An exploration of emerging theoretical frameworks to support sustainable landscape design. Faculty of Built Environment and Engineering. 111 pp.
• Simonson, W. D., Miller, E., Jones, A., García-Rangel, S., Thornton, H., & McOwen, C. (2021). Enhancing climate change resilience of ecological restoration — A framework for action. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 19(3), 300–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2021.05.002
• Tan, T.C.L., Wong, N.H., Jusuf, S.K. (2017). Plant selection and placement criteria for landscape design. In T. Karyono, R. Vale, B. Vale (Eds.), Sustainable building and built environments to mitigate climate change in the tropics (pp. 249-260). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49601-6_17
• Tomatis, F., Egerer, M., Correa-Guimaraes, A., & Navas-Gracia, L. M. (2023). Urban gardening in a changing climate: A review of effects, responses and adaptation capacities for cities. Agriculture (Switzerland), 13(2):1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13020502
• Tongyun, W. (2024). The role of landscape design in enhancing environmental sustainability and human well-being. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4180380/v1
• Van Tonder, G. J., & Lyons, M. J. (2005). Visual perception in Japanese rock garden design. Axiomathes, 15(3), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-004-5448-8
• Wang, F., Zhang, Q., Huang, P., Li, C., & Li, Y. (2024). CSR strategy composition and leaf traits for herbaceous plants in garden design. Ecological Indicators, 158:111173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111173
• Wassenberg, C. L., Goldenberg, M. A., & Soule, K. E. (2015). Benefits of botanical garden visitation: A means-end study. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 14(1):148–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2015.01.002
• Yuan, J., & Kim, C. S. (2024). The Ecological Design of Marine Urban Green Space Plant Landscaping Based on the Concept of Sustainability. Plants, 13(7):1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants13070923