Araştırma Makalesi

Evaluation of Patients Who were Referred to Our Outpatient Clinic with Suspicious Sexual Contact

Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3 20 Eylül 2021
PDF İndir
TR EN

Evaluation of Patients Who were Referred to Our Outpatient Clinic with Suspicious Sexual Contact

Öz

Aim: Sexually transmitted infections are preventable, common diseases with serious complications and high morbidity. Patients with suspicious sexual contact in Turkish society, find it difficult to consult a physician due to public pressure. Patients with suspicious sexual contact who applied to the Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology outpatient clinic were analyzed. Material and Methods: Patients (62 patients) over the age of 18, who applied to Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology outpatient clinic with suspicious sexual contact, between March 2018-January 2019, were included in the study. The demographic characteristics of the patients such as age, gender, marital status; also complaints, using of condom, physical examination findings, and all examinations during the six-month follow-up were recorded. Results: In this study, 56 (90%) male and 6 (10%) female patients with a mean age of 33.40 ± 14.11 years were included. High percentage (58;93%) of patients didn’t use condoms during sexual contact, 21(34%) of the patients had more than one partner, the most common diagnosis was urethritis (21; 34%), one patient in a bisexual relationship was diagnosed with acute HIV infection, and was observed that the diagnosis of syphilis (9; 15%) was quite high. Conclusion: Results such as the low rate of use of condoms made us think that there is a lack of knowledge about sexually transmitted diseases in the society. Considering the possibility of increasing infection rates in the coming years; we think that the necessary importance should be given to sexually transmitted diseases and frequent public trainings should be provided.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destekleyen Kurum

Yok

Proje Numarası

Yok

Teşekkür

Due to their contribution, the author would like to thank the employees of .... State Hospital Center Laboratory employees.

Kaynakça

  1. Ünal S, Zarakolu P. Sexually transmitted diseases. In: Wilke Topçu A, Söyletir G, Doğanay M, editors. Infectious diseases and microbiology. Istanbul: Nobel Medical Bookstore; 2002. p. 1111-23.
  2. Paavonen J, Eggert-Kruse W. Chlamydia trachomatis: impact on human reproduction. Human Reproduction Update. 1999; 5(5): 433-47.
  3. World Health Organization. Global incidence and prevalence of selected curable sexually transmitted infections 2008. [Updated: 2012; Cited: 2021January 21 ]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/75181/9789241503839_eng.pdf;jsessionid=40175AFD447C9018E0B60B382CE10687?sequence=1
  4. Siyez DM, Siyez E. Investigation of university students' knowledge of sexually transmitted diseases. Turkish Journal of Urology. 2009; 35(1): 49-55.
  5. Özek B. Sexually transmitted diseases and genital tract infections. In: Fundamentals of family planning. Human resource development foundation. Ankara; 1997.
  6. Pirinççi N, Ozan T, Çarkçı S. Current treatment of sexually transmitted viral diseases: Urological approach. Andrology Bulletin. 2016; 18(66): 150-5.
  7. Doğan S, Altındağ E. Counseling about sexually transmitted diseases. Clinical Medicine Family Medicine-Current and Scientific Medical Journal. 2017; 9(2): 32-6.
  8. Workowski KA, Bolan GA. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recommandations and Reports. 2015; 64(RR-03): 1-137.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

20 Eylül 2021

Gönderilme Tarihi

22 Ocak 2021

Kabul Tarihi

4 Mayıs 2021

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2021 Cilt: 11 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Yekenkurul, D. (2021). Evaluation of Patients Who were Referred to Our Outpatient Clinic with Suspicious Sexual Contact. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(3), 396-401. https://doi.org/10.33631/duzcesbed.866119
AMA
1.Yekenkurul D. Evaluation of Patients Who were Referred to Our Outpatient Clinic with Suspicious Sexual Contact. DÜ Sağlık Bil Enst Derg. 2021;11(3):396-401. doi:10.33631/duzcesbed.866119
Chicago
Yekenkurul, Dilek. 2021. “Evaluation of Patients Who were Referred to Our Outpatient Clinic with Suspicious Sexual Contact”. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 11 (3): 396-401. https://doi.org/10.33631/duzcesbed.866119.
EndNote
Yekenkurul D (01 Eylül 2021) Evaluation of Patients Who were Referred to Our Outpatient Clinic with Suspicious Sexual Contact. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 11 3 396–401.
IEEE
[1]D. Yekenkurul, “Evaluation of Patients Who were Referred to Our Outpatient Clinic with Suspicious Sexual Contact”, DÜ Sağlık Bil Enst Derg, c. 11, sy 3, ss. 396–401, Eyl. 2021, doi: 10.33631/duzcesbed.866119.
ISNAD
Yekenkurul, Dilek. “Evaluation of Patients Who were Referred to Our Outpatient Clinic with Suspicious Sexual Contact”. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 11/3 (01 Eylül 2021): 396-401. https://doi.org/10.33631/duzcesbed.866119.
JAMA
1.Yekenkurul D. Evaluation of Patients Who were Referred to Our Outpatient Clinic with Suspicious Sexual Contact. DÜ Sağlık Bil Enst Derg. 2021;11:396–401.
MLA
Yekenkurul, Dilek. “Evaluation of Patients Who were Referred to Our Outpatient Clinic with Suspicious Sexual Contact”. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, c. 11, sy 3, Eylül 2021, ss. 396-01, doi:10.33631/duzcesbed.866119.
Vancouver
1.Dilek Yekenkurul. Evaluation of Patients Who were Referred to Our Outpatient Clinic with Suspicious Sexual Contact. DÜ Sağlık Bil Enst Derg. 01 Eylül 2021;11(3):396-401. doi:10.33631/duzcesbed.866119