The Role of Turkish TV Series in the Formation of Perception about Turkey and Turkish People: The Cases of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Jordan and Kyrgyzstan

Öz

We can say that television still plays an important role in the area of visual media. TV series, commercials and entertainment programs occupy a large place in the daily life of viewers. In particular, the perception, attitude and, accordingly, attitude change in viewers resulting from television series is a phenomenon that gives rise to curiosity in researchers. Therefore, this study aims to measure the level of perception about Turkey and Turkish people in viewers created by Turkish TV series broadcast abroad. The main claim of our research is that Turkish TV series can lead to a country and nation perception in viewers, while the viewers might develop an interest in and affinity with Turkey and Turkish people. In the framework of these arguments, a fieldwork was conducted in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Jordan and Kyrgyzstan, which was the research universe of the present study. In the light of the data obtained, the perceptions of the viewers about the personality traits of Turkish people, their perceptions of Turkey's power, life in Turkey and Turkey's active role were influential on the wish to have an affinity with Turkey. Increased interest in Turkey was found to have resulted in increased wish to have an affinity with Turkish people and Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Turkish Soap Operas
• Audince researches
• Intercultural communication
• Cultural Diplomacy
• Soft Power

Kaynakça

1. Akyürek, S. (2012). Kazakistan’da Türkiye ve Türk algısı. Bilgesam Yayınları.
2. Akyürek, S., & Bilgiç, M. S. (2012). Kırgızistan’da Türkiye ve Türk Algısı. Bilgesam Yayınları.
3. Aljammazi, A., & Asil, H. (2017). The influence of Turkısh TV dramas on Saudi consumers’ perceptıons, attıtudes and purchase intentions toward Turkish products. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7 (1), 206-224.
4. Anas, O. (2014). Turkey’s soft power challenges in the Arab world. Akademik İncelemeler Dergisi, 6 (2), 233-258.
5. Barnett, G. A., & Lee, M. (2003). Issues in intercultural communication research. In W.B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Cross-Cultural and Intercultural Communication (259-275). Sage Publications.
6. Başar, U. (2020). İran toplumu ve Türk televizyon dizileri. İran Araştırmaları Merkezi Yayınları.
7. Bhutto, F. (2019, September 13). How Turkish TV is taking over the world. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2019/sep/13/turkish-tv magnificent-century-dizi-taking-over-world
8. Bolton, K. (2010). Constructing the global vernacular: American English and the media. In K. Bolton, & J. Olsson (Eds.), Media, Popular Culture, and The American Century (125-155). Falth-Hassler.

9. Busby, G., & Klug, J. (2001). Movie-induced tourism: The challenge of measurement and other issues. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 7 (4), 316–332.
10. Castells, M. (2009). The rise of the network society: Information age: Economy, society, and culture volume 1. Wiley-Blackwell.
11. Chalaby, J. K. (2005). Towards an understanding of media transnationalism. In J. K. Cahalaby (Ed.), Transnational Television Worldwide: Towards a New Media Order (1-14). I.B.Tauris.
12. Dimbley, R., & Burton, G. (1998). More than words an introduction to communication. Publisher Routledge.
13. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., Shanahan, J., & Signorielli, N. (2002). Growıng up wıth televısıon: Cultıvatıon processes. In J. Bryant, & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media Effects Advances in Theory and Research (43-67). Lawrence Erlbaum Assocıates.
14. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Polity Press. Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616 (1), 55-77.
15. Haag Van Den, E. (1963). Of happiness and of despair we have no measure. In B. Rosenberg, & D. M. White (Eds.). Mass Culture The Popular Arts In America (504-537). Free Press.
16. Hall, S. (1989). Ideology and communication theory. In B. Dervin, B. J. O'Keefe, E. Wartella, & L. Grossberg, (Eds.), Rethinking Communication, Volume 1 Paradigm Issues (40-52). Sage Publications.
17. İnan, E. (2016). İzzet Pinto ile Söyleşi. Episode Dergi. 1 (1), 82-83.
18. Katz, E. (1959). Mass communications research and the study of popular culture: An editorial note on a possible future for this journal. Studies in Public Communication, 2, 1-6.
19. Kimmelman, M. (2010, June 18). Turks Put Twist in Racy Soaps. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/18/arts/18abroad.html
20. Kurtuluş, K. (1998). Pazarlama Araştırmaları. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Yayınları.
21. Lundby, K., & Ronning, H., (1991). Media culture communication: Modernity ınterpreted through media culture. In H. Ronning, & K. Lundby (Eds), Readings in Methodology, History and Culture (259-285). Norwegian University Press.
22. Morley, D., & Robins, K. (1995). Spaces of identity global media, electronic landscapes and cultural boundaries. Taylor & Francis.
23. Nye, J. S. (1990). The changing nature of world power. Political Science Quarterly, 105 (2), 177-192.
24. Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. PublicAffairs.
25. Nye, J. S. (2008). Public diplomacy and soft power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616 (1), 94-109.
26. O’Connor, N., Flanagan, S., & Gilbert, D. (2008). The integration of film-induced tourism and destination branding in Yorkshire, UK. International Journal Of Tourism Research, 10 (5), 423–437.
27. Önder, H. B. (2017). Hükümetlerin uluslararası hedef kitlelere ulaşmalarında stratejik halkla ilişkiler faaliyetlerinin etkisi: Alman toplumunda Türkiye algısı üzerine (2010-2013) ampirik bir araştırma. Doktora Tezi. İstanbul Üniversitesi.
28. Parmar, I., & Cox, M. (2010). Soft power and US foreign policy theoretical, historical and contemporary perspectives. Routledge.
29. Rohde, D. (2013). Beyond war: Reimagining America's role and ambitions in a new middle east, Penguin Books.
30. Shuter, R. (2012). Intercultural new media studies: The next frontier in intercultural communication. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 41 (3), 219-237.
31. Sinclair, J. (2009). Latin America’s impact on world television markets. In G. Turner, & J. Tay (Eds.). Television Studies After TV Understanding Television in the Post-Broadcast Era (141-149). Routledge.
32. Storey, J. (2009). Cultural theory and popular culture an introduction. Pearson Longman.
33. Tuna, H. (2017). Medikal turizm kapsamında Türkiye’ye gelen turistlerin tercih nedenleri üzerinde Türk dış politikasının etkisi ve Türkiye algısı. Doktora Tezi. Düzce Üniversitesi.
34. Verlegh, P. W. J. (2001). Country of origin effects on consumer product evaluations. PhD thesis. Wageningen University.
35. Wang, H., & Lu, Y. C. (2008). The conception of soft power and its policy implications: A comparative study of China and Taiwan. Journal of Contemporary China, 17, 425-447.
36. Yanardağoğlu, E., & Imad, N. K. (2013). The fever that hit Arab satellite television: Audience perceptions of Turkish TV series. Global Studies in Culture and Power, 20, 561-579.
37. Yeşil, B. (2015). Transnationalization of Turkish dramas: Exploring the convergence of local and global market imperatives. Global Media and Communication, 11 (1), 43-60.
38. Yılmaz, E., & Yalçın, Y. (2010). Türkiye ve ortadoğu ülkeleri arasında kültürel yakınlaşma aracı olarak popüler kültür ürünleri üzerine bir değerlendirme. In Y. Aktay, P. El-Sharkawy, & A. Uysal (Eds), Değişen Ortadoğuda Kültür ve Siyaset Seçilmiş Tebliğler Kitabı (301-328). Sde Yayınları.
39. Yörük, Z., & Vatikiotis, P. (2013). Soft power or illusion of hegemony: The case of the Turkish soap opera “Colonialism”. International Journal of Communication, 7, 2361-2385.
40. Zhang, L. (2015). Stereotypes of Chinese by American college students: Media use and perceived realism. International Journal of Communication, (9) 1, 1-20.