ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF EARTHQUAKES 1999 MARMARA/TÜRKİYE EARTHQUAKE CASE

Öz

Frequent earthquakes are a reality of Türkiye. It is very important to be prepared for these earthquakes, take the necessary measure before the earthquake and to recover the losses quickly when an earthquake occurs. In this study, the literature on the economic effects of earthquakes is examined and the effects of earthquake on the Kocaeli province, the epicenter of the 1999 Marmara Earthquake, are analyzed. As an important indicator of the level of economic activity, the effects of the earthquake on the city's exports were examined with panel data regression covering the years 1996-2021 and 163 countries. The results of the regression analysis show that despite the big magnitude of the earthquake and the heavy losses, the economy of Kocaeli province recovered rapidly and returned to its export performance rapidly, even surpassing its previous performance in a short time.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Türkiye
• Earthquake
• Kocaeli
• Panel Data
• Exports

Kaynakça

1. Abiad, A., Mishra, P. ve Topalova, P. (2011), “How Does Trade Evolve in the Aftermath of Financial Crises?”, IMF Working Paper, WP/11/3.
2. Adam, A., Moutos, T. (2008), “The Trade Effects of the EU-Turkey Customs Union”, The World Economy, 685-700.
3. Akçay, F. and Saygılı R. F., (2019), “Türkiye’nin Bölgesel Ekonomik Örgütlerle İhracatı Üzerine Çekim Modeli Uygulaması: AB Dışında Alternatifler Mümkün Mü?”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 37(2), 193-214.
4. Akkemik, A. K. ve Göksal, K. (2010), “Do Chinese Exports Crowd-Out Turkish Exports”, İktisat, İşletme ve Finans, 25(287), 9-32.
5. Aktürk, İ. and Albeni, M. (2002), “Doğal Afetlerin Ekonomik Performans Üzerine Etkisi : 1999 Yılında Türkiye’de Meydana Gelen Depremler ve Etkileri”, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, 7(1), 1-18.
6. Aloughareh, I., R., Ashtiany, M. G. And Nasserasadi,, K. (2016), “An Integrated Methodology For Regional Macroeconomıc Loss Estimation of Earthquake: A Case Study Of Tehran”, The Singapore Economic Review, 61(4), 1550025-1_1550025-24.
7. Ayumu, T. (2015), “The Impacts of Natural Disasters on Plants' Growth: Evidence from the Great Hanshin-Awaji (Kobe) Earthquake.” Regional Science and Urban Economics, vol. 50, 2015, pp. 31–41.
8. Bacchetta, M., Beverelli, C., Cadot, O., Fugazza, M., Grether, J. M., Helble, M., Nicita, A., Piermartini, R. (2012), A Practical Guide to Trade Policy Analysis, UNCTAD and WTO Publishing.

9. Bayar, G. (2014), “Türkiye’nin Kalkınmış Ülkelere ve Orta Doğu-Kuzey Afrika Ülkelerine İhracatı : Karşılaştırmalı Yer Çekimi Analizi (Turkey’s Exports to Advanced Countries and Middle East North Africa Countries: A Comparative Gravity Analysis), YDÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, VII(2), 119-164.
10. Bayar, G., Ünal, M., Topunar, S. (2015), “Determinants of Turkish Exports to European Union Countries: A Sectoral Panel Data Analysis”, Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 51, 1307–1325.
11. Bayar, G. (2018), “Export Equations : A Survey of the Literature”, Empirical Economics, 54(2), 629-672. Bhattacharya, R. ve Wolde, H. (2010), “Constraints on Trade in the MENA Region”, IMF Working Paper, WP/10/31.
12. Bilgin, M. H., Gözgör, G. and Demir, E. (2018), “The determinants of Turkey’s exports to Islamic countries: The impact of political risks”, The Journal of Internatıonal Trade & Economıc Development, 27(5), 486–503.
13. Bussiere, M., Fidrmuc, J. ve Schnatz, B. (2008), “EU Enlargement and Trade Integration: Lessons from a Gravity Model”, Review o f Development Economics, 12(3), 562-576.
14. Cuaresma, C. J., Hlouskova, J., Obersteiner, M. (2008), “Natural Disasters as Creative Destruction? Evidence from Developing Countries.” Economic Inquiry, vol. 46, no. 2, 2008, pp. 214–226.
15. Cheng, L., Zhang.j. (2020), “Is Tourism Development a Catalyst of Economic Recovery Following Natural Disaster? An Analysis of Economic Resilience and Spatial Variability.” Current Issues in Tourism, vol. 23, no. 20, 2020, pp. 2602–2623., doi:10.1080/13683500.2019.1711029.
16. Cho, S, P Gordon, JE Moore II, HW Richardson, M Shinozuka and S Chang (2001), “Integrating transportation network and regional economic models to estimate the costs of a large urban earthquake”, Journal of Regional Science, 41(1), 39–65.
17. Cole, S (1998). Decision support for calamity preparedness: Socioeconomic and interregional impacts. In Engineering and Socioeconomic Impacts of Earthquakes, M Shinozuka, A Rose and RT Eguchi (eds.), pp. 125–153. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
18. Cole, S. (2004), “Geohazards in social systems: An insurance matrix approach”, In Modeling Spatial and Economic Impacts of Disasters, Y Okuyama and SE Chang (eds.), pp. 103–118. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
19. Dadakas, D. ve Tatsi, S. (2021), “Global agricultural trade impact of the 2011 triple disaster in Japan: A gravity approach”, The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resources Economics, 65(4), 937-972.
20. Dalziel, P. ve Saunders, C. (2012), “Regional Development Before and After an Earthquake: The Canterbury New Zealand Experıence”, Australasian Journal of Regional Studies Vol. 18, No. 1, 100-127.
21. DPT (1999), “Depremin Ekonomik ve Sosyal Etkileri Muhtemel Finansman İhtiyacı Kısa-Orta ve Uzun Vadede Alınabilecek Tedbirler”, Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı Müsteşarlığı Yayınları, Ankara.
22. Durukal, E. and Erdik, M. (2008), “Physical and economic losses sustained by the industry in the 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake”, Natural Hazards, 46, 153-178.
23. Eberhardt, M., and S. Bond. (2009), “Cross-Section Dependence in Non-Stationary Panel Models: A Novel Estimator.” MPRA Paper no. 17692, Munich University Library.
24. Eberhardt, M., & Teal, F. (2011), “Econometrics for grumblers: A new look at the literature on cross-country growth empirics”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 25(1), 109–155.
25. Egger P. (2002), “An Econometric View on Estimation of Gravity Models and the Calculation of Trade Potential”, The World Economy, 25(2), 297-312.
26. Ekanayake, E. M ve Ledgerwood, J. R. (2009), “An Analysis of the Intra-Regional Trade in the Middle East and North Africa Region”, 3(1), 19-29.
27. Endoh, M. (1999). “Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in the EEC, the LAFTA and the CMEA: 1960-1994”, Applied Economics, 31, 207-16.
28. Ergünay, O. (2009), “Doğal Afetler ve Sürdürülebilir Kalkınma”, Deprem Sempozyumu, 11-12 Kasım 2009, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi.
29. Felbermayr, G., and Gröschl, J. (2014), “Naturally Negative: The Growth Effects of Natural Disasters” Journal of Development Economics, vol. 111, 2014, pp. 92–106.
30. Hadri, H. E., Mirza, D. ve Rabaud, I. (2018), “Natural disasters and countries' exports: New insights from a new (and an old) database”, World Economy, 42, 2668–2683.
31. Hallegatte, S., and Dumas, P. (2009), “Can Natural Disasters Have Positive Consequences? Investigating the Role of Embodied Technical Change.” Ecological Economics, vol. 68, no. 3, 2009, pp. 777–786.
32. Harb, N. (2007), ‘Trade Between Euro Zone and Arab Countries: a Panel Study”. Applied Economics, 2007,39,2099-2107.
33. Hayashi, M. (2012), “A Quick Method for Assessing Economic Damage Caused by Natural Disasters: An Epidemiological Approach”, International Advances in Economic Research, 18, 417–427.
34. Hayrullahoğlu, G., Aliefendioğlu, Y., Tanrıvermiş, H. (2018), “Deprem Sonrası Kentte Oluşacak Sorunlara Dirençli Kent Yaklaşımı İle Çözüm Aranması: Marmara Depremi Örneği”, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328782709
35. Head, K. ve T. Mayer, (2013), “Gravity Equations: Toolkit, Cookbook, Workhorse.”
36. Handbook o f International Economics, Vol. 4, eds. Gopinath, Helpman, and Rogoff, Elsevier.
37. Heckman, J. J. (1979), “Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error”, Econometrica, 47(1), 153-162.
38. Horsewood, N. ve Voicu, A. M. (2012). Does Corruption Hinder Trade for the New EU Members?. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 6, 2012-47.
39. İslam, S. N., İslam, S., İslam, R. and Alam, A. (2023), “The Effect of Financial Development, Tariff, and RTA on Exports: A Structural Gravity Analysis”, Journal of Economic Integration, 39(1), 107-150.
40. Jalan, V. (2022), “A Study of the 2004 Indonesian Tsunami: The Effects on GDP Growth and Tourism Post-Disaster”, Scripps Senior Theses. 1965.
41. Khati, P. and Kim, C. (2023), “Impact of India’s Free Trade Agreement with ASEAN on Its Goods Exports: A Gravity Model Analysis”, Economies, 11, 8, 1-19.
42. Kamel, E. M. (2021). The MENA region's need for more democracy and less bureaucracy: A gravity model controlling for aspects of governance and trade freedom in MENA. World Economy; 44, 1885–1912.
43. Kien, N. T., (2009), “Gravity Model by Panel Data Approach An Empirical Application with Implications for the ASEAN Free Trade Area”, ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 26(3), 266-77.
44. Kolukırık, S., Tuna, M. (2009), “Türk Medyasında Deprem Algısı: Marmara Depremi Örneği”, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, BAHAR-2009 C.8 S.28 (286-298).
45. Lehman, N., Herzer, D., Martinez-Zarzoso, M. I., Vollmer, S. (2007), “The Impact of a Customs Union between Turkey and the EU on Turkey’s Exports to the EU”, Journal o f Common Market Studies, 45(3), 719-743.
46. Mayer, T. & Zignago, S. (2011), “Notes on CEPII’s distances measures : the GeoDist Database”, CEPII Working Paper 2011-25.
47. McPherson, M. Q. ve Trumbull, W. N. (2008), “Rescuing Observed Fixed Effects: Using the Hausman-Taylor Method for Out-of-Sample Trade Projections”, The International Trade Journal, 22(3), 315-340.
48. Nardis, S., De Santis, R. Ve Vicarelli, C. (2008), The Euro’s Effecs on Trade in a Dynamic Setting, The European Journal of Comparative Economics, 5(1), 73-85.
49. Neyaptı, B., Taşkın, F., Üngör, M. (2007), “Has European Customs Union Agreement Really Affected Turkey’s Trade”, Applied Economics, 39, 2121-2132.
50. Ng, S., and P. Perron. (2001), “Lag Length Selection and the Construction of Unit Root Tests with Good Size and Power”, Econometrica 69: 1529–1554.
51. OECD (2000), “Economic Effects of the 1999 Turkish Earthquakes”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 247.
52. Oh, C. H., & Reuveny, R. (2010), “Climatic natural disasters, political risk, and international trade”, Global Environmental Change, 20, 243–254.
53. Özceylan, D., Çoşkun, E. (2012), “Van Depremi Sonrasi Yaşananlar Işığında Sosyal ve Ekonomik Zarar Görebilirlik Çalışmalarının Önemi”, EsklşEhlr Osmangazi Ünlversltesl İİBF Derglsl, 7(1), 167-186.
54. Padli, J., Habibullah, M. S. and Baharom, A.H. (2010), "Economic impact of natural disasters' fatalities," International Journal of Social Economics, Emerald Group Publishing, vol. 37(6), pages 429-441.
55. Pagliacci, F. and Russo, M. (2019), “Socioeconomic effects of an earthquake: does spatial heterogeneity matter?”, Regional Studies, 53(4), 490–502.
56. Peker, E and Orhan, E. (2020), “İklim Krizi ve Deprem Riskleri Karşısında Kentler: Yerel Yönetimler İçin Bütünleşik Politikalar”, İpm–Mercator Politika Notu,
57. Pesaran, M.H. (2004), “General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels”, IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240 and CESifo Working Paper No. 1229.
58. Pesaran, M.H. (2007), “A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross-Section Dependence.” Journal of Applied Econometrics 22: 265–312.
59. Poyhonen, P. (1963), “A Tentative Model for the Volume of Trade between Countries”, Welwirtschaftliches Archiv, 90(1), 93-99.
60. Rojid, S., (2006), “COMESA Trade Potential: A Gravity Approach”, Applied Economics Letters, 13, 947-951.
61. Rose, A and GSH Guha (2004), “Computable general equilibrium modeling of electric utility lifeline losses from earthquakes”, In Modeling Spatial and Economic Impacts of Disasters, Okuyama and SE Chang (eds.), pp. 119–142. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
62. Saputra, P. M. (2019). Corruption perception and bilateral trade flows: Evidence from developed and developing countries. Journal of International Studies, 12(1), 65-78. doi:10.14254/2071-8330.2019/12-1/4
63. Shepherd, B. (2016). The Gravity Model of International Trade: A User Guide (An updated version). United Nations ESCAP, T/ESCAP/2766. https://www.unescap.org/resources/gravity-model-international-trade-user-guide-updated-version
64. SBB-Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı (2023), “Türkiye Earthquakes Recovery and Reconstructıon Assessment”, Ankara, 2023.
65. Selçuk, F. and Yeldan, E. (2001), “On the macroeconomic impact of the August 1999 earthquake in Turkey: a first Assessment”, Applied Economics Letters, 8, 483-488.
66. Silva Santos JMC and Tenreyro S (2006) The log of gravity. Rev Econ Stat 88(4), 641–658.
67. Soeng, R. ve Cuyvers, L. (2018). Domestic institutions and export performance: Evidence for Cambodia. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 27(4), 389-408.
68. Sohn, J, GJD Hewings, TJ Kim, JS Lee and SG Jang, (2004). Analysis of economic impacts of an earthquake on transportation network. In Modeling Spatial and Economic Impacts of Disasters, Y Okuyama and SE Chang (eds.), pp. 233–256. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
69. Tamaș, A., & Miron, D., (2021). The governance impact on the Romanian trade flows. An augmented gravity model. Amfiteatru Economic, 23(56), 276-289.
70. Tinbergen, J. (1962). Shaping the World Economy: Suggestions for an International Economics Policy, The Twentieth Century Fund. New York.
71. Trotignon, J. (2010), “Does Regional Integration Promote the Multileralization of Trade Flows? A Gravity Model Using Panel Data”, Journal of Economic Integration, 25(2), 223-251.
72. Tumbarello, P. (2007), “Are Regional Trade Agreements in Asia Stumbling or Building Blocks? Implications for the Mekong-3 Countries”, IMF Working Paper, WP/07/53.
73. Türkiye Ministry of Trade (2023), https://ticaret.gov.tr/dis-iliskiler/serbest-ticaret-anlasmalari/yururlukte-bulunan-stalar
74. UNISDR (2010), “Making cities resilient: my city is getting ready!, 2010-2015 Disaster Risk Reduction Campaign”.
75. Suvankulov, F. ve Güç, Y. (2012), “Who is Trading Well in Central Asia? A Gravity Analysis of Exports from the Regional Powers of the Region”, Eurosian Journal of Business and Economics, 5(9), 21-43.
76. Şahin, A. U. (2020), “Afet Yönetimi ve Planlaması Perspektifinden Türkiye Afet Müdahale Planının Değerlendirilmesi”, Dirençlilik Dergisi 4(1), 129-158.
77. The World Bank (1999), “Turkey Marmara Earthquake Assessment”, Turkey Country Office The World Bank, Eylül 1999.
78. Weichselgartner, J. (2001), “Disaster mitigation: the concept of vulnerability revisited”, Disaster Prevention and Management, 10(4), 85–94.
79. Westerlund, J. (2008), “Panel Cointegratıon Tests of the Fisher Effect”, Journal of Applied Econometrics 23: 193–233.
80. Westerlund, J., Wilhelmsson, F. (2011), “Estimating the Gravity Model without Gravity Using Panel Data”, Applied Economics, 43, 641-649.
81. Xie, W., Rose, A., Shantong, L., Jianwu, H., Ning, L., Tariq, A., (2018), “Dynamic Economic Resilience and Economic Recovery from Disasters: A Quantitative Assessment.” Risk Analysis, vol. 38, no. 6, 1306–1318., doi:10.1111/risa.12948.
82. Zarzoso, I. M., & Lehmann, F. N. (2003). Augmented gravity model: an empirical application to Mercosur-European union trade flows. Journal of Applied Economics, 2, 291-316.