Gramscian Theories of Hegemony: Class Politics Eclipsed?

Yıl 2025, , 221 - 240, 04.02.2025

Mustafa Küçük

https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.20250114

Öz

Gramsci's concept of hegemony remains a highly contested topic, sparking a diverse body of literature that debates its historical, political, and theoretical relevance. This paper focuses on the theoretical debates surrounding hegemony, examining three key Gramscian frameworks: dominant ideology, discourse theory, and the neo-Gramscian approach in International Relations (IR) and International Political Economy (IPE). The central concern is how class and class struggle, central to Gramsci’s original concept, have been marginalized or eclipsed in these interpretations. The paper argues that class struggle is often substituted with ideology, culture, and discourse in both theoretical frameworks and concrete analyses of hegemony, which limits the understanding of contemporary politics despite claims to the contrary. This shift toward the ideational and consensual aspects of hegemony results in a limited theorization, offering a one-sided and partial view that leaves aside its structural, material, and coercive dimensions. By critically engaging with these approaches, the paper highlights the need to reintegrate class struggle into contemporary Gramscian theories, allowing a comprehensive understanding of hegemony to address the evolving, structural and class-based dynamics of politics in both national and global contexts.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Gramsci, Hegemony, Class, Ideology, Discourse, Neo-Gramscian Approach, Political Theory, International Relations Theory, International Political Economy

Kaynakça

• Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an investigation). In Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, (pp. 127-186), translated by Ben Brewster. London: New Left Books.
• Anderson, P. (1976-1976). The Antinomies of Antonio Gramsci. New Left Review, 100, 5-78.
• Augelli, E. & Murphy, C. N. (1988). America’s Quest for Supremacy and the Third World. London: Pinter Publishers.
• Augelli, E., & Murphy, C. N. (1993). Gramsci and International Relations: A General Perspective and Example from Recent US Policy. In S. Gill (Ed.) Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations, (pp. 127-147). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Babic, M. (2020). Let's Talk About the Interregnum: Gramsci and the Crisis of the Liberal World Order. International Affairs, 96(3), 767-786.
• Barnett, M. N., & Duvall, R. (2005). Power in International Politics. International Organization, 59(1), 39–75.
• Bellamy, R. (1990). Gramsci, Croce and the Italian Political Tradition. History of Political Thought, 11(2), 313-337.
• Bellamy, R. (2001). A Crocean Critique of Gramsci on Historicism, Hegemony and Intellectuals. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 6(2), 209-229.
• Bellamy, R. and Schecter, D. (1993) Gramsci and the Italian State. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
• Bieler, A. (2002). The Struggle over EU Enlargement: A Historical Materialist Analysis of European Integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(4), 575-97.
• Bieler, A. & Morton, A. D. (Eds.) (2006). Images of Gramsci: Connections and Contentions in Political Theory and International Relations. London:Routledge.
• Bieler, A., & Morton, A. D. (2004). A Critical Theory Route to Hegemony, World Order and Historical Change: Neo-Gramscian Perspectives in International Relations. Capital & Class, 82, 85-113.
• Bieler, A., & Morton, A. D. (2018). Global Capitalism, Global War, Global Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Blackburn, R. (2014). Stuart Hall. New Left Review, 86(Mar Apr), 75-93. Bruff, I. (2008). Culture and Consensus in European Varieties of Capitalism: A 'Common Sense' Analysis. London: Palgrave.
• Buci-Glucksmann, C. (1980). Gramsci and the State, translated by David Fernbach. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
• Budd, A. (2013). Class, State and International Relations: A Critical Appraisal of Robert Cox and Neo-Gramscian Theory. London: Routledge.
• Burawoy, M. (2003). For a Sociological Marxism: The Complementary Convergence of Antonio Gramsci and Karl Polanyi. Politics and Society, 31(2), 193-261.
• Burnham, P. (1991). Neo-Gramscian Hegemony and the International Order. Capital and Class, 15(3), 73-92.
• Burnham, P. (1999). The Politics of Economic Management in the 1990s. New Political Economy, 4(1), 37-54.
• Burnham, P. (2000). Globalization, Depoliticization and ‘Modern’ Economic Management. In K. Psychopedis & W. Bonefeld (Eds.) The Politics of Change: Globalization, Ideology and Critique, (pp. 9-30). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Cammack, P. (1990). Statism, New Institutionalism and Marxism. In R. Miliband & L. Panitch & J. Saville (Eds.), Socialist Register 1990, (pp. 147-170). London: The Merlin Press.
• Carnoy, M. (1984). The State and Political Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Carpentier, N., & Cammaerts, B. (2006). Hegemony, Democracy, Agonism and Journalism: An Interview with Chantal Mouffe. Journalism Studies, 7(6), 964-975.
• Chibber, V. (2006). On the Decline of Class Analysis in South Asia. Critical Asian Studies, 38(4), 357-87. Clark, I. (1999). Globalization and International Relations Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Cox, R. W. (1981). Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126-155.
• Cox, R. W. (1983). Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations: An Essay in Method. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 12(2), 162-175.
• Cox, R. W. (1987) Production, Power and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Cox, R. W. with Sinclair, T. J. (1996) Approaches to World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Cox, R. W. (1992). Global Perestroika. Socialist Register, 28, 26-43.
• Cox, R. W. (1993). Structural Issues of Global Governance: Implications for Europe. In S. Gill (Ed.), Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations, (pp. 259-289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Cox, R. W. (1999). Civil Society at the Turn of the Millennium: Prospects for an Alternative World Order. Review of International Studies, 25(1), 3-28.
• Cox, R. W. (2004). Beyond Empire and Terror: Critical Reflections on the Political Economy of World Order. New Political Economy, 9(3), 307–323.
• Eagleton, T. (1994). Ideology and Its Vicissitudes. In S. Zizek (Ed.), Mapping Ideology, (pp. 179-226). London: Verso and New Left Books.
• Femia, J. (1981). Gramsci’s Political Thought: Hegemony, Consciousness and the Revolutionary Process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Femia, J. (2005). Gramsci, Machiavelli, and International Relations. Political Quarterly, 76(3), 341-49.
• Femia, J. (2009). Gramsci, Epistemology and International Relations Theory. In M. McNally & J. Schwarzmantel (Eds.), Gramsci and Global Politics: Hegemony and Resistance, (pp. 32-41). London: Routledge.
• Saad-Filho, A., & Ayers, A. J. (2008). Production, Class, and Power in the Neoliberal Transition: A Critique of Coxian Eclecticism. In A. J. Ayers (Ed.), Gramsci, Political Economy, and International Relations Theory (pp. 147-172). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Filippini, M. (2017). Using Gramsci: A New Approach. (P. J. Barr, Trans.) London: Pluto Press.
• Fiori, G. (1970) Antonio Gramsci: Life of a Revolutionary. London: New Left Books.
• Fontana, B. (1993). Hegemony and Power: On the Relation Between Gramsci and Machiavelli. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
• Germain, R. (1997). The International Organization of Credit: States and Global Finance in the World-Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Germain, R. D., and Kenny, M. (1998). Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians. Review of International Studies, 24(1), 3-21.
• Gill, S. (1990) American Hegemony and the Trilateral Commission. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Gill, S. (1993). Epistemology, Ontology and the ‘Italian School’. In S. Gill (Ed.), Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations, (pp. 21-48). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Gill, S. (1995). Globalisation, Market Civilisation, and Disciplinary Neoliberalism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 24(3), 399-423.
• Gill, S. (1998). European Governance and New Constitutionalism: Economic and Monetary Union and Alternatives to Disciplinary Neoliberalism in Europe. New Political Economy, 3(1), 5-26.
• Gill, S. (2000). Towards a Postmodern Prince? The Battle in Seattle as a Moment in the New Politics of Globalisation. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29(1), 131-140.
• Gill, S. (2002) Constitutionalizing Inequality and the Clash of Globalizations. International Studies Review, 4(2): 47-65.
• Gill, S. & Mittelman, J. H. (Eds.). Innovation and Transformation in International Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Gill, S., & Law, D. (1988). The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems and Policies. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
• Gill, S. and Law, D. (1989). Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital. International Studies Quarterly, 33(4), 475-499.
• Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks, edited and translated by Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell-Smith. London: Lawrence and Wishart.
• Hall, S. (1986). The Problem of Ideology: Marxism without Guarantees. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10(2), 28–44.
• Hall, S. (1988a). The Hard Road to Renewal: Thatcherism and the Crisis of the Left. London: Verso.
• Hall, S. (1988b). Gramsci and Us. In S. Hall, The Hard Road to Renewal: Thatcherism and the Crisis of the Left (pp. 161-173). London: Verso.
• Hall, S. (1996). Gramsci’s Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity. In D. Morley and K. Chen (Eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies, (pp. 411-440). London: Routledge.
• Hall, S., Lumley, B. and McLennan, G. (1978). Politics and Ideology: Gramsci. In Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (Ed.), On Ideology, (pp. 45-76). London: Hutchinson & Co.
• Hay, J., Hall, S., & Grossberg, L. (2013). Interview with Stuart Hall. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 10(1), 10-33.
• Ives, P. (2004). Language and Hegemony in Gramsci. London: Pluto.
• Ives, P., & Short, N. (2013). On Gramsci and the International: A Textual Analysis. Review of International Studies, 39(3), 621-642.
• Jessop, B. (1982). The Capitalist State: Marxist Theories and Methods. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
• Jessop, B. (1985). Nicos Poulantzas: Marxist Theory and Political Strategy. London: Macmillan.
• Jessop, B. (2002). The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Jessop, B., Bonnett, K., Bromley, S., & Ling, T. (1984). Authoritarian Populism, Two Nations, and Thatcherism. New Left Review, 147(1), 32-60.
• Jessop, B., Bonnett, K., Bromley, S., & Ling, T. (1985). Thatcherism and the Politics of Hegemony: A Reply to Stuart Hall. New Left Review, 153(1), 87-101.
• Jessop, B., & Overbeek, H. (Eds.) (2019). Transnational Capital and Class Fractions. London: Routledge.
• Jones, S. (2006). Antonio Gramsci: Routledge Critical Thinkers. London: Routledge.
• Joseph, J. (2002). Hegemony: A Realist Analysis. London: Routledge.
• Joseph, J. (2008). Hegemony and the Structure-Agency Problem in International Relations: A Scientific Realist Contribution. Review of International Studies, 34(1), 109-128.
• Laclau, E. (1977). Politics and Ideology in Marxist Theory. London: New Left Books.
• Laclau, E. & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics, 2nd ed. London: Verso.
• Larrain, J. (1991). Stuart Hall and the Marxist Concept of Ideology. Theory, Culture & Society, 8(4), 1-28.
• Lukács, G. (1971). History and Class Consciousness, translated by R. Livingstone, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A Radical View, 2nd edition. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Martin, J. (1998). Gramsci's Political Analysis : A Critical Introduction. London: Macmillan Press.
• Martin, J. (2023) Antonio Gramsci. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/gramsci/ (access on 21 Dec 2024)
• Montalbano, G. (2022). Gramsci in Amsterdam: A Critique and Re-appraisal of the Neo-Gramscian Transnationalism. Globalizations, 19(2), 337-351.
• Morley, D., & Chen, K.-H. (1996). Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. London: Routledge.
• Morton, A. D. (2003). Historicizing Gramsci: Situating Ideas In and Beyond Their Context. Review of International Political Economy, 10(1), 118-146.
• Morton, A. D. (2007). Unravelling Gramsci: Hegemony and Passive Revolution in the Global Economy . London: Pluto Press.
• Morton, A. D. (2010). The Continuum of Passive Revolution. Capital and Class, 34(3), 315-342.
• Mouffe, C. (1979). Hegemony and Ideology in Gramsci. In C. Mouffe (Ed.) Gramsci and Marxist Theory, (pp. 168-204). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
• Mouffe, C. & Sassoon, A. S. (1977). Gramsci in France and Italy – A Review of the Literature. Economy and Society, 6(1), 31-68.
• Panitch, L. (1994). Gloabalisation and the State. In R. Miliband &L. Panitch (Eds.) The Socialist Register 1994, (pp. 60-93). London: The Merlin Press.
• Panitch, L. (2000). The New Imperial State. New Left Review, 2(March-April), 5-20.
• Panitch, L. & Gindin, S. (2005). Superintending Capital. New Left Review, 35(September-October), 101-123.
• Pass, J. (2018). Gramsci Meets Emergentist Materialism: Towards a Neo Neo-Gramscian Perspective on World Order. Review of International Studies, 44(4), 595-618.
• Poulantzas, N. (1973). Political Power and Social Classes. London: New Left Books.
• Poulantzas, N. (1975). Classes in Contemporary Capitalism. London: New Left Books.
• Poulantzas, N. (2000). State, Power, Socialism. London: Verso.
• Robinson, W. I. (1996). Promoting Polyarchy: Globalisation, US Intervention and Hegemony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Robinson, W. I. (2004) A Theory of Global Capitalism: Production, Class, and State in a Transnational World. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Robinson, W. I. (2005). Gramsci and Globalisation: From Nation-State to Transnational Hegemony. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 8(4), 559-574.
• Robinson, W. I. & Harris, J. (2000). Towards a Global Ruling Class. Science and Society, 64(1): 11–54. Rojek, C. (2003). Stuart Hall. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Rupert, M. (1995). Producing Hegemony: The Politics of Mass Production and American Global Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Rupert, M. (2000) Ideologies of Globalisation: Contending Visions of a New World Order. London: Routledge.
• Rupert, M. (2003). Globalising Common Sense: A Marxian-Gramscian (Re-)vision of the Politics of Governance/Resistance. Review of International Studies 2,181-198.
• Rupert, M. (2005). Class Power and the Politics of Global Governance. In M. Barnett, & R. Duvall, Power in Global Governance (pp. 205-228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Sassoon, A. S. (1987). Gramsci’s Politics 2nd Edition. London: Hutchinson.
• Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven and London: Princeton University Press.
• Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the Arts of Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
• Shields, S. (2004). Global Restructuring and the Polish State: Transition, Transformation, or Transnationalization. Review of International Political Economy, 11(1), 132-154.
• Shields, S. (2012). The International Political Economy of Transition: Neoliberal Hegemony and Eastern Central Europe's Transition. London: Routledge.
• Shilliam, R. (2004). Hegemony and the Unfashionable Problematic of “Primitive Accumulation”. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(1), 59–88.
• Shock, M. (2020). To Address Ourselves “Violently” Towards the Present as It Is: Stuart Hall, Marxism Today and Their Reception of Antonio Gramsci in the long 1980s. Contemporary British History, 34(2), 251-272.
• Strange, S. (1996). The Retreat of the State: The Diffusion of Power in the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Thomas, P. D. (2013). Hegemony, Passive Revolution and the Modern Prince. Thesis Eleven, 117(1), 20-39.
• Thompson, E.P. (1966). The Making of the English Working Class. New York: Vintage Books.
• Thompson, E. P. (1978). Eighteenth-Century English Society: Class Struggle without Class? Social History, 3(2), 133–165.
• Van Apeldoorn, B. (2003). Transnational Capitalism and the Struggle over European Integration. London: Routledge.
• Van der Pijl, K. (1998). Transnational Classes and International Relations. London: Routledge.
• Van der Pijl, K. (2012). The Making of An Atlantic Ruling Class. London: Verso.
• Willis, P. (2001). The Ethnographic Imagination. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Wood, E. M. (1983). Marxism Without Class Struggle?. The Socialist Register, 20, 239–271.
• Wood, E. M. (1995). Democracy Against Capitalism: Renewing Historical Materialism. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
• Wood, E. M. (1998) The Retreat of Class: A New True Socialism. London: Verso.