EN
THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE CORPORATE REPUTATION ATTRIBUTES THAT ACADEMICS ASCRIBE TO THEIR UNIVERSITIES WITH THEIR PERCEPTIONS OF CORPORATE REPUTATION AND PRESTIGE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR
Öz
The primary determinant of academics' perceptions of reputation towards the institution they work for is the attributes possessed by the institution. Positive perceptions of reputation shaped by these attributes enhance academics' behaviors that support the institution. The current study examines how the corporate reputation attributes ascribed to their institutions by academics working at state universities in Turkey are reflected in their perceptions of reputation and prestige and the effects of this on organizational citizenship behavior. The 'Corporate Reputation Attributes (CRA)' measurement tool, developed specifically for culture and context, was used to test the determinants of reputation. According to the holistic research model that tests perceived corporate reputation with its antecedents and consequences, the (partial) mediating effect of perceived corporate reputation (PCR) and perceived organizational prestige (POP) was determined in the effect of the corporate reputation attributes (CRA) on organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Furthermore, multiple (full) mediating effects of perceived corporate reputation and organizational prestige were revealed.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Adler, N. J., & Harzing, A.-W. (2009). When knowledge wins: Transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(1), 72–95. https://doi.org/10.5465/ amle.2009.37012181
- Alessandri, S. W., Yang, S.-U., & Kinsey, D. F. (2006). An integrative approach to university visual identity and reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(4), 258– 270. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550033
- Ali, R., Lynch, R., Melewar, T. C., & Jin, Z. (2015). The moderating influences on the relationship of corporate reputation with its antecedents and consequences: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 1105–1117. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.10.013
- Alloza-Losana, Á., & Carreras-Romero, E. (2021). Invariance of the Reputation Emotional Index RepTrak Pulse: A study validation on generational change. Corporate Reputation Review, 24(3), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-020-00099-w
- Angliss, K. (2022). An alternative approach to measuring university reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 25, 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41299-021- 00110-y
- Argenti, P. (2000). Branding B-schools: Reputation management for MBA programs. Corporate Reputation Review, 3(2), 171–178. https://doi. org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1540111
- Argenti, P. A., & Druckenmiller, B. (2004). Reputation and the corporate brand. Corporate Reputation Review, 6(4), 368–374. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave. crr.1540005
- Barnett, M. L., Jermier, J. M., & Lafferty, B. A. (2006). Corporate reputation: The definitional landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 9(1), 26–38. https://doi. org/10.1057/palgrave.crr.1550012
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
İşletme
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Erken Görünüm Tarihi
4 Mart 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi
8 Mayıs 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi
1 Şubat 2025
Kabul Tarihi
21 Şubat 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2025 Cilt: 25 Sayı: 2
APA
Tulpar, G., & Özer, P. (2025). THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE CORPORATE REPUTATION ATTRIBUTES THAT ACADEMICS ASCRIBE TO THEIR UNIVERSITIES WITH THEIR PERCEPTIONS OF CORPORATE REPUTATION AND PRESTIGE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR. Ege Academic Review, 25(2), 321-340. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.20250205
AMA
1.Tulpar G, Özer P. THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE CORPORATE REPUTATION ATTRIBUTES THAT ACADEMICS ASCRIBE TO THEIR UNIVERSITIES WITH THEIR PERCEPTIONS OF CORPORATE REPUTATION AND PRESTIGE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR. eab. 2025;25(2):321-340. doi:10.21121/eab.20250205
Chicago
Tulpar, Gizem, ve Pınar Özer. 2025. “THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE CORPORATE REPUTATION ATTRIBUTES THAT ACADEMICS ASCRIBE TO THEIR UNIVERSITIES WITH THEIR PERCEPTIONS OF CORPORATE REPUTATION AND PRESTIGE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR”. Ege Academic Review 25 (2): 321-40. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.20250205.
EndNote
Tulpar G, Özer P (01 Mayıs 2025) THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE CORPORATE REPUTATION ATTRIBUTES THAT ACADEMICS ASCRIBE TO THEIR UNIVERSITIES WITH THEIR PERCEPTIONS OF CORPORATE REPUTATION AND PRESTIGE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR. Ege Academic Review 25 2 321–340.
IEEE
[1]G. Tulpar ve P. Özer, “THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE CORPORATE REPUTATION ATTRIBUTES THAT ACADEMICS ASCRIBE TO THEIR UNIVERSITIES WITH THEIR PERCEPTIONS OF CORPORATE REPUTATION AND PRESTIGE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR”, eab, c. 25, sy 2, ss. 321–340, May. 2025, doi: 10.21121/eab.20250205.
ISNAD
Tulpar, Gizem - Özer, Pınar. “THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE CORPORATE REPUTATION ATTRIBUTES THAT ACADEMICS ASCRIBE TO THEIR UNIVERSITIES WITH THEIR PERCEPTIONS OF CORPORATE REPUTATION AND PRESTIGE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR”. Ege Academic Review 25/2 (01 Mayıs 2025): 321-340. https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.20250205.
JAMA
1.Tulpar G, Özer P. THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE CORPORATE REPUTATION ATTRIBUTES THAT ACADEMICS ASCRIBE TO THEIR UNIVERSITIES WITH THEIR PERCEPTIONS OF CORPORATE REPUTATION AND PRESTIGE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR. eab. 2025;25:321–340.
MLA
Tulpar, Gizem, ve Pınar Özer. “THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE CORPORATE REPUTATION ATTRIBUTES THAT ACADEMICS ASCRIBE TO THEIR UNIVERSITIES WITH THEIR PERCEPTIONS OF CORPORATE REPUTATION AND PRESTIGE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR”. Ege Academic Review, c. 25, sy 2, Mayıs 2025, ss. 321-40, doi:10.21121/eab.20250205.
Vancouver
1.Gizem Tulpar, Pınar Özer. THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE CORPORATE REPUTATION ATTRIBUTES THAT ACADEMICS ASCRIBE TO THEIR UNIVERSITIES WITH THEIR PERCEPTIONS OF CORPORATE REPUTATION AND PRESTIGE AND ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR. eab. 01 Mayıs 2025;25(2):321-40. doi:10.21121/eab.20250205
Cited By
Is free also fair? Justice perceptions and sustainability in public healthcare delivery
Journal of Health Organization and Management
https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-11-2025-0814