Öz

This study aims to define the differences in interpreting the information gathered from the applicants during the selection process. In this context, the main focus of the study is how organizations differ in terms of selection methods. According to the field studies and qualitative studies conducted, it can be stated that although organizations mostly use the same traditional selection techniques, they have significant differences regarding the process. In the light of these findings, complementary and debatable issues and suggestions have been taken into consideration in detail

İŞE ELEMAN SEÇME YÖNTEMLERİNDE ÖRGÜTSEL FARKLILIKLAR ve ÖZGÜNLÜK TARTIŞMALARI

Öz

Çalışma, işe eleman seçme sürecinin çeşitli aşamalarında adaylardan, toplanan bilgilerin yorumlanmasındaki farklılıkları belirlemeyi hedeflemiştir. Bu bağlamda, örgütlerin hangi seçme yöntemleri ile birbirlerinden farklılıklar gösterdiğinin saptanması çalışmanın temel amacını oluşturmaktadır. Yapılan alan çalışması ve niteliksel araştırma yöntemleri ile elde edilen bulgulara göre, örgütlerin daha çok geleneksel seçim yöntemlerine bağlı kaldığı, ancak seçim süresince birbirlerinden anlamlı farklılıklar gösterdiği bulunmuştur. Bu bulgulara yönelik bütünsel, katkı sağlayıcı ve eleştirel tartışmalar ve önermeler detaylı bir şekilde ele alınmıştır

Kaynakça

1. ADKINS, Cheryl L.; RUSSELL, Craig J. ve WERBEL, James D. (1994): “Judgments of Fit in the Selection Process: The Role of Work Value Congruence”, Personnel Psychology, Cilt 47, Sayı 3, ss. 605-623.
2. ARVEY, Richard. D., ve CAMPION, James E. (1982): “The Employment Interview: A Summary and Review of Recent Research”, Personnel Psychology, Cilt 35, Sayı 2, ss. 281-322.
3. BARCLAY Jean M. (1997): “Employee Selection: A Question of Structure”, Personnel Review, Cilt 28, Sayı 1/2, ss. 134-150.
4. BARCLAY Jean M. (2001): “Improving Selection Interviews With Structure: Organisations’ Use of “Behavioural” Interviews”, Personnel Review, Cilt 28, Sayı 1/2, ss. 134-150.
5. BERNARDIN, John H. ve RUSSEL A.E.Joyce, (1998): Human Resource Management: An Experiental Approach, İkinci Baskı, McGraw-Hill International Studies,
6. CALLINAN Militza ve ROBERTSON, Ivan T. (2000): “Work Sample Testing”, International Journal of Selection and Assesment, Cilt 8, Sayı 4, ss. 248-260.
7. CAMPION, Michael A.; PALMER, David K. ve CAMPION James A. (1997): “A Review of the Structure In The Selection Interview”, Personel Psychology, Cilt 50, Sayı 3, ss. 655-701.
8. CAMPION, Michael A.; PURSELL, Elliot. D. ve BROWN, K. Barbara (1988): “Structured interviewing: Raising the Psychometric Properties of the Employment Interview”, Personnel Psychology, Cilt 41, ss. 25-42.

9. DIMAGGIO, Paul J. ve POWELL Walter W. (1983): “Iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”, American Sociological Review, Cilt 48, ss. 147-160.
10. DREHER, George F.; ASH, Ronald. A. ve HANCOCK, P. (1988): “The Role of the Traditional Research Design in Underestimating the Validity of the Employment Interview”. Personnel Psychology, Cilt 41, ss. 315-327.
11. DUNNET Michael D. ve BORMAN W. Chris (1979): “Personnel Selection and Classification Systems”, Annual Review of Psychology, Cilt 30, ss. 477-525.
12. FARNHAM, David ve STEVENS, Amanda (2000): “Developing and Implementing Competence Based recruitment and Selection In A Social Services Department”, The International Journal of Public Sector Management, Cilt 13, Sayı 4, 369-382.
13. FERRIS, Gerald R.; BERKSON, Howard M. ve HARRIS, Michael. M. (2002): “The Recruitment Interview Process: Persuasion and Organization Reputation Promotion in Competitive Labor Markets”, Human Resource Management Review, Cilt 12, Sayı 3, ss. 359-375.
14. GILMORE, David C. ve FERRIS, Gerald R. (1989): “The Effects of Applicant Impression Management Tactics on Interviewer Judgements”, Journal of Management, Cilt 15, Sayı 4, ss. 557-564.
15. GOLDHAR, Damudar, Y. ve DESHPANDE, Satish P. (1993): “An Emprical Investigation of HRM Practices in JIT Firms”, Production and Inventory Management Journal, Fourth Quarter, ss. 28-32.
16. GUION, M. Robert M. (1987): “Changing Views for Personel Selection”, Personel Psychology, Cilt 40, Sayı 2, ss. 199-213.
17. HENNESSEY Jr., H.W. ve BERNARDIN, John H. (2003): “The Relationship between Performance Appraisal Criterion Specificity and Statistical Evidence of Discrimination”, Human Resource Management, 42, Sayı 2, 143-158.
18. HILTON, David M. (2000): “Hiring and Retaining Top Talent”, Credit Union Executive Journal, Cilt 40, Sayı 5, ss. 12-17.
19. JUDGE, Thomas A.; CABLE, Daniel M. ve HIGGINS, Chad A. (2000): “The Employment Interview: A Review of Recent Research and Recommendations for Future Research”, Human Resource Management Review, Cilt 10, Sayı 4, ss. 383-406.
20. LIN, Yei-Feng ve KLEINER, Brian H. (1999): “How To Hire Employees Effectively?”, Management Research News, Cilt 22, Sayı, 9, ss. 18- 29.
21. MOTOWIDLO, Stephan J. (1999): “Asking About Past Behavior versus Hypothetical Behavior”, der. Eder, R. W. ve Harris, M. M., The Employment Interview Handbook içinde, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, ss. 179-190.
22. PARSONS, Charles K. ; CABLE, Daniel M. ve LIDEN, Robert C. (1999) : “Establishing PersonOrganization Fit”, der. Eder, R. W., Harris, M. M., The Employment Interview Handbook içinde, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, ss. 125-141.
23. ROBERTSON, Ivan T. ve KANDOLA, Richard S. (1982): “Work Sample Tests: Validity, Adverse Impact and Applicant Reaction”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, Cilt 55, ss. 171-183.
24. SHOTLAND, Allison; ALLIGER M. George ve SALES, Tom (1998): “Face Validity in the Context of Personel Selection: A Multimedia Approach”, International Journal of Selection and Assesment, Cilt 4, Sayı 6, ss. 124-130.
25. TULLAR, William L. ve KAISER, Pula. R. (1999): “Using New Technology: The Group Support System”, der. Eder, R. W., Harris, M. M., The Employment Interview Handbook içinde, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, ss. 279-292.
26. WILK Stefaniel L. ve CAPPELLI, Peter (2003): “Understanding the Determinants of Employer Use of Selection Methods”, Personnel Psychology, Cilt 56, ss. 103-124.