MEASURING OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY RISKS IN TOURISM COMPANIES

Öz

The present paper focuses on a particular methodology for measuring the occupational health and safety risks in tourism companies by numerical risk coefficients. The methodology is based on the achievements of several US and international research and innovation development programs, such as: “SSP”, “ISSP”, “F/A-18” and “AFMC”. Under this methodology, the occupational health and safety risks are regarded as a function of three variable factors: the likelihood of occurrence of a negative, risk event; the consequences from the realization of this very same risk event and the immediacy of occurrence of the risk event in respect of time. The values of each of these three variables are being measured by the help of score card estimation tables and are being presented as per a zero-referent scale of 1 to 10 or of 1 to 100. Thus a final estimation of the value of a certain occupational health and safety risk can be achieved. The advantages and the opportunities for improving of this methodology on an enterprise level are reviewed as well. The main advantage which is pointed out is that the methodology could by used even by inexperienced tourism company which has small or small or no past record of health and safety risk measurement In the addition to the risk measurement and quantification methodology, a set of criteria for acceptance of the occupational health and safety risks are also presented. This includes: the usage of risk matrixes, the “f-N” curves and the “ALARP” principle.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• risk measurement and quantification, risk components, numeric risk coefficients

Kaynakça

1. Andrews, H., (2005), “Health and safety as a strategic issue”, Managing Business Risk, 2nd Edition, Jonathan Reuvid (edit.), Kogan Page, London and Sterling, VA: 187-191
2. Australian Standard AS/NZS 4360:1999 – Risk management
3. Brinkley, R., Stone, D., (1996), “International Space Station Program Directive – Program Risk Management Emphasis System”, ISS-PD-011, NASA, Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA
4. Brooks, W. M., (1994), “Project Risk Management (a presentation given at Johnson Space Center, May 9-11, 1994)”, Johnson Space Center, Houston, Texas, USA
5. Cushway, B., (2005), “Creating a safe working environment”, Managing Business Risk, 2nd Edition, Jonathan Reuvid (edit.), Kogan Page, London and Sterling, VA: 179-185
6. Dimitrov, D., Hadzhiev, E., (2003) “Analysis of Place of Work and Labour Process Risk in Transport”, Scientific Journal “Mechanics, Transport, Communication”, Issue: 1/2003, Article No. 0007, http://www.mtc-aj.com
7. Dimitrov, P., (2003), “Risk Management in Tourism Innovations”, Heron Press, Sofia, Bulgaria
8. Dimitrov, P., (2006), “Tourism Innovations”, “Neofit Rilski” University Press, Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria

9. Hayan, J. A., (1996), F/A-18 “Risk management plan”, Report MDC 960074, McDonnel Douglas Aerospace, St. Luis, USA
10. Lyons, S., (2005), “Managing your most valuable asset, protecting your most vulnerable resource”, Managing Business Risk, 2nd Edition, Jonathan Reuvid (edit.), Kogan Page, London and Sterling, VA: 192-197
11. NORSOK STANDARD, “Risk and Emergency Preparedness Analysis”, Z-013, Rev.1, March 1998, Annexe A “Risk Acceptance Criteria”, Norwegian Technology Standards Institution, Oslo, Norway
12. Risk Management Advisory Standard 2000: Department of Employment, Training and Industrial Relations – Workplace Health and Safety, http://www.detir.qld.gov.au/hs/hs.htm
13. The Economist, (1996), A Game of Risk – The Economist Survey, Corporate Risk Management, 10th February, 1996;
14. The University of Queensland, Occupational Health & Safety Unit, (2009), Occupational Health & Safety Risk Assessment and Management Guideline, http://www.uq.edu.au/ohs/pdfs/ohsriskmgt.pdf
15. Turner, J. V. and Hunsucker, J. L. (1999), “Effective risk management, a goal- based approach”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol. 17, No.4: 438-458