Türkiye Ekonomisi İçin Efektif Vergi Oranlarının Hesaplanması

Öz

Bu çalışma milli gelir hesapları ve vergi hasılatı istatistiklerini kullanarak Mendoza vd. (1994) ile Carey ve Rabesona (2002)’nin geliştirdiği yöntemlerden hareketle Türkiye ekonomisi için 1980–2006 dönemi itibariyle, tüketim, hanehalkı geliri, işgücü geliri ve sermaye geliri üzerindeki efektif vergi oranlarının hesaplanmasını amaçlamıştır. Mendoza – Razin Tesar ve Carey - Rabesona yönteminin sosyal güvenlik katkılarının indirilemediği ve indirilebildiği duruma göre elde edilmiş hesaplama sonuçları, vergi kompozisyonundaki ağırlığın dolaylı vergilere kaymasının etkisiyle tüketim üzerindeki vergi yükünün ilgili dönemde yükselme eğiliminde, hanehalkı geliri üzerindeki vergi yükünün de düşme eğiliminde olduğunu vurgulamaktadır. Diğer yandan söz konusu sonuçlar hem işgücü hem de sermaye geliri üzerindeki efektif vergi oranlarının artma eğiliminde olduğunu, çalışanlar üzerindeki vergi yükünü temsil eden, işgücü geliri üzerindeki efektif vergi oranının sermaye geliri üzerindeki efektif vergi oranından yüksekte seyrettiğini göstermektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Efektif vergi oranları, Mendoza – Razin Tesar yöntemi, Carey - Rabesona yöntemi

Computing Effective Tax Rates for Turkish Economy

Öz

This study aims at computing effective tax rates on consumption, household income, labour income and capital income for Turkish economy from the viewpoints of the methods powered by Mendoza et al (1994) and Carey and Rabesona (2002) using national income accounts and tax revenue statistics for the 1980 – 2006 period.The computation results performed both with Mendoza - Razin - Tesar and Carey - Rabesona methods, where social security contributions are deductible and non – deductible indicate the tendency to increase in the tax burden on the consumption and decrease in the tax burden on the household income as a result of the significant change in the tax burden from direct to indirect taxation in Turkish economy. Moreover, the results of the study suggest the existence of the tendency to increase in the effective tax rates on both labour income and capital income also by implying effective tax rate on labour income remains higher than effective tax rate on capital income

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Effective tax rates, Mendoza – Razin - Tesar method, Carey - Rabesona method

Kaynakça

1. Amusa, A. (2004) “A Macroeconomic Approach to Estimating Effective Tax Rates in South Africa”, South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 7(1): 117-131.
2. Barro, R. J. ve Sahasakul, C. (1986) “Average Marginal Tax Rates from Social Security and the Individual Income Tax”, Journal of Business, 59:555-566.
3. Carey, D. ve Tchilinguirian, H. (2000) “Average Effective Tax Rates on Capital, Labour and Consumption”, OECD Econo- mics Department Working Papers, 258.
4. Carey, D. ve Rabesona, J. (2002) “Tax Ratios on Labour and Capital Income and Consumption”, OECD Economic Studies, 35: 129-174.
5. Cooley, T. F. ve Hansen, G. D. (1992) “Tax Distortions in a Ne- oclassical Monetary Economy”, Journal of Economic Theory, 58: 290- 316.
6. Easterly, W. ve Rebelo, S. (1993) “Marginal Income Tax Rates and Economic Growth in Developing Countries”, European Economic Review, 37: 409-417.
7. Frenkel, J. A., Razin, A. ve Sadka, E. (1991) International Taxa- tion in an Integrated World, Cambridge, MIT Press.
8. Greenwood, J. ve Huffman, G. W. (1991) “Tax Analysis in a Real Business Cycle Model: On Measuring Harberger Tri- angles and Okun Gaps”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 94: 167-190.

9. Haan, J. D., Volkerink, B. (2000) “Effective Tax Rates in Mac- roeconomics: A Note”, 56th IIPF Conference, Sevilla, Spain, August 28-31, 2000.
10. Haan, J. D., Sturm, J. B. Volkerink, B. (2003) “How to Measure the Tax Burden on Labour at the Macro-level?”, Cesifo Con- ference on Measuring the Tax Burden on Labour and Capital, Venice, July 2002.
11. Joines, D. H. (1981) “Estimates of Effective Marginal Tax Rates on Factor Incomes”, University of Chicago Journal of Business 54(2): 191-226.
12. King, M. A. ve Fullerton, D. (1984) The Taxation of Income from Capital: A Comparative Study of the United States, United Kingdom. Sweden, and West Germany, King et all (eds.), Chi- cago, University of Chicago Press.
13. Lucas, R. E. Jr. (1990) “Supply-side Economics: An Analytical Review”, Oxford Economic Papers, 42: 293-316.
14. Lucas, R. E. Jr. (1991) “Topics in Public Finance”, Unpublished Lecture Notes, Chicago, University of Chicago.
15. McDaniel, C. (2007) “Average Tax Rates on Consumpti- on, Investment, Labor and Capital in the OECD 1950- 2003”, http://www.caramcdaniel.com/mcdaniel_tax_2007. pdf?attredirects=0 (21.04.2010)
16. Mendoza, E. G., Razin, A. ve Tesar, L. L. (1994) “Effective Tax Rates in Macroeconomics: Cross-country Estimates of Tax Rates on Factor Incomes and Consumption”, Journal of Mo- netary Economics, 34(3): 297-323.
17. Mendoza, E. G. ve Tesar, L. L. (1994) “Supply-side Economics in an Integrated World Economy”, Mimeo, Research Depart- ment - International Monetary Fund, Washington. DC.
18. OECD (2000) “Tax Burdens: Alternative Measures”, Tax Policy Studies, No:2.
19. OECD (2001) “Tax Ratios: A Critical Survey”, Tax Policy Stu- dies No:5.
20. OECD (2009) “Revenue Statistics 1965 – 2008”, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development Publication.
21. Razin, A. ve Sadka, E. (1993) The Economy of Modern Israel: Malaise and Promise, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
22. Seater, J. J. (1982) “Marginal Federal Personal and Corporate Income Tax Rates in the United States: 1909-1975”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 10(3): 361-381.
23. TÜİK (2007) “Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, İstatistiksel Gösterge- ler: 1923-2006”. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/yillik/Ist_gostergeler. pdf (04.04.2010).