Yöneticilerin Kültürel Değerleri ve İzleyici Davranışı Tercihleri

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı yöneticilerin kültürel değerleri ve tercih ettikleri izleyicilik tipi arasındaki ilişki incelemektir. Araştırmada bireycilik, güç mesafesi, belirsizlikten kaçınma, eril değerler ve babacan davranış beklentisi (paternalizm) kültürel değer çerçevesi olarak ele alınmıştır. İzleyici davranışlarında ise Kelley’nin ortaya koyduğu iki boyutlu izleyicilik modeli kullanılmıştır. Boyutlar bağımsız ve eleştirel düşünme ve aktif katılımdır. Araştırmada eril ve bireyci değerler açısından yüksek olan yöneticilerin astlarının daha fazla bağımsız ve eleştirel düşünmesini isteyecekleri, fakat bellisizlikten kaçınma, güç mesafesi ve babacan davranış beklentisi yüksek yöneticiler açısından ise tam tersi olacağı tartışılmıştır. Yine, yöneticilerin eril ve bireyci değerleri arttıkça astlarından aktif ve kendi kendine hareket edebilir olması beklentisinin artacağı fakat belirsizlikten kaçınma, güç mesafesi ve babacan davranış beklentisi değerleri arttıkça yöneticiler astlarının aktif ve kendi kendine hareket edebilir olmasını istememeyecekleri tartışılmıştır. Araştırmada 316 yöneticiden veri toplanmıştır. Araştırmada bireycilik açısından yüksek olan yöneticilerin astlarının daha fazla bağımsız ve eleştirel düşünmesini istemekte olduğu, güç mesafesi ve babacan davranış beklentisi yüksek yöneticilerin ise astlarından bağımsız ve eleştirel olarak düşünmesini istememekte oldukları, yine, yöneticilerin bireyci değerleri arttıkça astlarından aktif ve kendi kendine hareket edebilir olmasını istedikleri fakat belirsizlikten kaçınma ve babacan davranış beklentisi değerleri arttıkça yöneticiler astlarının aktif ve kendi kendine hareket edebilir olmasını istememekte oldukları ortaya çıkmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kültürel değerler, izleyicilik, izleyici davranışı tercihleri

Cultural Values and Followership Style Preferences of Managers

Öz

The aim of this research is to investigate the relationship between the cultural values of managers and their preference of followership styles. In this research cultural value dimensions of individualism, power distance, uncertatinity avoidance and masculinity is utilized as cultural values framework. In terms of followership styles Kelley’s two dimensional model of followership style is used. The dimensions of the followership model are the independent critical thinking and activeness. In the theoretical framework it is proposed that, the higher the individualism and masculine values of managers the more they want their followers to be independent critical thinkers and the opposite for uncertatinity avoidance, power distance and paternalism values. Furthermore, it is also discussed that the higher the individualism and masculine values of managers the more they want their followers to be an active engager and the opposite for uncertatinity avoidance, power distance and paternalism values. In this research data is collected from 316 managers. And, it is discovered that the managers who are high on individalism values prefer independent critacal thinkers as followers; conversely the managers who are high on power distance and paternalism do not want from their followers to think critically and independently. In terms of activity of followers, it is founded that the managers who are high on individalism values prefer active followers; conversely the managers who are high on uncertainity avoidance and paternalism do not want from their followers to actively engage and to be proactive

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Cultural values, followership, followership style preference

Kaynakça

1. Aycan, Z., Kanungo, R.N. and Sinha, J,B.P. (1999) “Organizational Culture and Human Resource Management Practices: The Model of Culture Fit” review, theoretical rationale, and Globe Project goals”, Journal of Cross Cultural Psychology, 30(4):501-526. House et all (eds.) Culture, Leadership and Organizations:
2. Aycan, Z. (2001) “Paternalizm: Liderlik Anlayışına İlişkin Üç Görgül Çalışma” Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1):11-33.
3. Aycan, Z. (2006) “Paternalism: Towards Conceptual Refinement and Operationalization” Kim et all (eds.) Scientific Advances in Indigenous Psychologies: Empirical, Philosophical, and Cultural Contributions, London, Cambridge University Press.
4. Baker, S. D. (2007) “Followership: Theoretical The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications. Foundation of A Contemporary Construct” Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 14(1):50-60.
5. Banutu-Gomez, M. B. (2004) “Great Leaders Teach Exemplary Followership and Serve As Servant Leaders” Journal of American Academy of Business, Cambridge, 4(1/2):143-153.
6. Bjugstad, K., Thach, E.C., Thompson, K.J. and Morris, A. (2006) “A Fresh Look At Followership: A Model for Matching Followership and Leadership Styles” Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 7:304-319.
7. Carl, D., Gupta, V. and Javidan, M. (2004) “Power Distance” House et all (eds.) Culture, Leadership, and Organizations - The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.
8. Carsten, M.K., Uhl-Bien M., West, B.J, Patera, J.L. ve McGregor, R. (2010) “Exploring Social Constructions of Followership: A Qualitative Study” Leadership Quarterly, 21(3):543-562.

9. Daft, R. (1999) Leadership, Forth Worth, New York, The Dryden Press.
10. Den Hartog, D.N. (2004) “Assertiveness” House et all(eds.) Leadership, culture, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societie, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.
11. De Luque, S.M., M. Javidan (2004) “Uncertainty Avoidance” House eat all(eds.) Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.
12. Dickson, M .W., Den H. D.N. and Mitchelson, J.K. (2003) “Research on Leaderhip in A Cross-Cultural Context: Making Progress and Raising New Questions” Leadership Quarterly, 14(6):729-768.
13. Dorfman, P. W. ve House, R. J. (2004) “Cultural influences on organizational leadership: Literature The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.
14. Dvir, T., Shamir, B. (2003) “Follower Developmental Characteristics as Predicting Transformational Leadership: A Longitudinal Field Study” Leadership Quarterly 14(3):327-344.
15. Gelfand, M.J., Bhawuk, D.P.S., Nishii, L.H. and Bechtold, D.J. (2004) “Individualism and Collectivism” House et all (eds.) Culture, Leadership and Organizations:
16. Haslam, S.A., Platow, M.J. (2001) “The Link Between Leadership and Followership: How Affirming Social Identity Translates Vision into Action” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27:1469-1479.
17. Hersey, P., Blanchard, K. H. (1982) Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources, Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice-Hall.
18. Hofstede, G. (1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work Related Values, Newbury Park, Sage Publications.
19. Hofstede, G. (1984) Culture’s Consequences: International Differencesi in Work-Related Values, Beverly Hills, Sage Publications.
20. Hollander, E.P. (1992) The Essential Interdependence of Leadership and Followership, American Psychological Society, Cambridge Press.
21. House, R.J., Wright, N.S., Aditya, Ram N. (1997) “Cross-Cultural Research on Organizational Leadership: A Critical Analysis and A Proposed Theory” Earley et all (eds.) New Perspectives on International Industrial/ Organizational Psychology, San Francisco, CA Jossey-Bass.
22. Jago, A. (1982) “Leadership: Perspectives in theory and research” Management Science, 28(3):315-336.
23. Javidan, M. (2004) “Performance Orientation” House et all (eds.) Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.
24. Kabasakal, H., Bodur, M. (2004) “Humane Orientation in Societies, Organizations, and Leader Attributes” House et all (eds.) Culture, Leadership and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, Thousand Oaks, Sage Publications.
25. Kelley, R. E. (1988) “In Praise of Follower” Harvard Business Review, 66(6):142-148.
26. Kelley, R. E. (1992) The Power of Followership, 1st Edition, New York, Doubleday.
27. Lee, C. (1991) “Followership: The Essence of Leadership” Rosenbach et all (eds.) Contemporary Issues In Leadership, Boulder, C.O Westview Press.
28. Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. (1991) “Culture and The Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation” Psychological Review, 98(2):224-253.
29. McGrath, R.G., MacMillan, I.C. and Scheinbert, S. (1992) “Elitist, Risk Takers and Rugged Individualists? An Exploratory Analysis of Cultural Differences Between Entrepreneurs and Non-Entrepreneurs” Journal of Business Venturing, 7(2):115-136.
30. Phalet, K. ve Schönpflugh, U. (2001) “Intergenerational Transmission of Collectivism and Achievement Values in Two Acculturation Contexts: the Case of Turkish Families in Germany and Turkish and Moroccan Families in the Netherlands” Journal of Cross- Cultural Psychology, 32(2):186-201.
31. Sargut, A.S. (2001) Kültürlerarası Farklılaşma ve Yönetim, Ankara, İmge Yayıncılık.
32. Shamir, B., Eilam, G. (2005) “What’s Your Story? A Life-Stories Approach to Authentic Leadership Development” Leadership Quarterly, 16:395-417.
33. Smith, P.B., Peterson M.F, Schwartz. S.H, Ahmad, A.H, Akande. D. (2002) “Cultural Values, Sources of Guidance and Their Relevance to Managerial Behaviors: A 47 Nation Study” Journal of Cross-Culural Psychology, 33:188-208.
34. Triandis, H.C. (1985) “Collectivism vs. Individualism: A Reconceptualization of a Basic Concept in Cross-Cultural Psychology” Bagley et all (eds.) Personality, Cognition, and Value: Cross-Cultural Perspectives of Childhood and Adolescence, London, MacMillan.
35. Triandis, H. C. (2001) “Individualism-Collectivism and Personality” Journal of Personality 69(6):907-924.
36. Triandis, H., Suh, E.M. (2002) “Cultural Influences on Personality” Annual Review of Psychology, 53:133- 160.
37. Washbush, J. (1999) “The Two Faces of Leadership: Considering The Dark Side Leader-Follower Dynamics” Journal of Workplace Learning, 11(5):170-180.