The Factors Affecting Firm Performance: The Case of Turkey

Öz

In this study, there has been intended to analyze the factors affecting the performance of firms. Year end closing price of stocks and rate of stock return were used to measure performance of the firm. There has been analyzed the relationships between the variables of year-end closing price of the stock, rate of stock return and cash dividend payout ratio, return on assets, price/earnings ratio, earnings per share, net profit growth, market to book value ratio, market value and return on equity. In the study, there have been analyzed 16 companies included in ISE 30 Index for 1998-2010 years using the panel regression model. There were created two models in the research and according to this, whereas Closing Price of the Stock (CLS) was increased by the change in Dividend Payout Ratio (DPR) and Earnings Per Share (EPS) in Model 1, it increased the change in Return on Assets (ROA) and it did not affect the Market to Book value (M_B) and Market Value Increase (MVI) and Closing Price of Stock (CLS). In Model 2, there has been observed that whereas Market Value Increase (MVI) and Earnings Per Share (EPS) have increased the Rate of Stock Return (RSR), it has not affected Return on Assets (ROA)

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Firm performance, panel regression, closing price of stock, rate of stock return

Firma Performansını Etkileyen Faktörler ve Türkiye Örneği

Öz

Bu çalışmada, firma performansını etkileyen faktörler incelenmek istenmiştir. Firma performansının ölçülmesinde hisse senedinin yılsonu kapanış fiyatı ve hisse getiri oranı kullanılmıştır. Hisse senedinin yılsonu kapanış fiyatı ve hisse getiri oranı ile nakit kar payı dağıtım oranı, aktif karlılığı, fiyat/kazanç oranı, hisse başına kar, net kar büyümesi, piyasa değeri /defter değeri, piyasa değeri ve özsermaye karlılığı değişkenleri arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. Çalışmada, İMKB 30 Endeksine dâhil olan 16 şirket 1998-2010 yılları için panel regresyon modeli ile incelenmiştir. Çalışmada iki model oluşturulmuş ve buna göre, Model 1’de hisse kapanış fiyatını, Temettü Ödeme Oranındaki (DPR) ve Hisse Başına Kardaki (EPS) değişimi artırırken, Aktif Karlılığındaki (ROA) değişimin azalttığı ve Piyasa Değeri Defter Değeri (M_B) ve Piyasa Değeri Artışı (MVI) ise Hisse Kapanış Fiyatını (CLS) etkilemediği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Model 2’de ise Hisse Getiri Oranını (RSR), Piyasa Değeri Artışı (MVI) ve Hisse Başına Kar (EPS) artırırken, Aktif Karlılığı (ROA) ise etkilemediği gözlenmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Firma performansı, panel regresyon, hisse kapanış fiyatı, hisse getiri oranı

Kaynakça

1. Aydoğan, K. ve Muradoğlu, G. (1998) “Do Markets Learn From Experience? Price Reaction To Stock ve Büyüme İlişkisi: OECD Ülkelerine İlişkin Bir Panel Dividends in The Turkish Market” Applied Financial Veri Analizi” Enerji, Piyasa ve Düzenleme, 1(2):172-193. Economics, 8:41-49.
2. Basu, S.(1977) “Investment Performance of “Dividend Policy and Share Price Volatility: Evidence from Pakistan” Global Journal Of Management And Common Stocks in Relation to Their Price-Earnings Ratios: A Test of The Efficient Market Hypothesis” The Journal of Finance, 32(3):663-682.
3. Batchelor, R. ve I. Orakcıoğlu (2003) “Event-Related Garch: TheImpact of Stock Dividends in Turkey” Applied Financial Economics, 13(4):295-307.
4. Breitung, J.(2000) “The Local Power of Some Unit Root Tests for Panel Data” Baltagi. B(ed.) Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels, Amsterdam, JAI Press.
5. Breusch, T. ve Pagan, A. (1980) “The Lagrange Multiplier Test and Its Application to Model Specifications in Econometrics” Reviews of Economics Studies, 47:239-253. ve Maryam, I.K (2011) “Can Dividend Decisions Affect The Stock Prices: A Case of Dividend Paying Companies of KSE” International Research Journal Of Finance and Economics, 76:67-74.
6. Canbaş, S., Düzakın, H. ve Kılıç, S.B., (2002) “Fundamental and Macroeconomic Information for Common Stock Valuation: TheTurkish Case” Yapı Kredi Economic Review, 13(1):55-64.
7. Choi, I.(2002) “Unit Root Tests for Panel Data” Journal of International Money and Finance, 20:249-72.
8. Chang, Y. (2002) “Nonlinear IV Unit Root Tests In Panels With Cross-section Dependency” Journal of Econometrics,110:261-92.

9. Chang, Y. (2004) “Bootstrap Unit Root Tests in Panels With Cross Sectional Dependency” Journal of Econometrics, 120:263-293.
10. Crowder, W.J ve Mark E.W. (1998) “Stock Prıce Effects of Permanent and Transıtory Shocks” Economic Inquiry, 36:540-552.
11. Dehaun, J. ve Jin, Z.(2008) “Fırm Performance and Stock Returns: An Empirical Study of the Top Performing Stocks Listed on Shanghai Stock Exchange” Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 12(1):79-85.
12. Ege, İ. ve Bayrakdaroğlu, A. (2009) “An Analysis of the Performance of ISE Companies Stock Yields Using The Logistic Regression Method” ZKU Journal of SocialSciences, 5(10):139-158.
13. Günalp, B., Kadıoğlu, E ve Kılıc, S. (2010) “Nakit Temettü Bilgisinin Hisse Senedi Getirisi Üzerinde Önemli Bir Etkisi Olup Olmadığının İMKB’de Test Edilmesi” Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Return and Financial Ratios” Social Science Research Bilimler Dergisi, 28(2):47-69.
14. Güvenek, B. ve Alptekin, V. (2010) “Enerji Tüketimi ve Büyüme İlişkisi: OECD Ülkelerine İlişkin Bir Panel Veri Analizi” Enerji, Piyasa ve Düzenleme, 1(2):172-193.
15. Habib, Y. Zernigah, I.K. ve Muhammad A.K (2012) Business Research, 12(5):78-84.
16. Hadri, K. (2000) “Testing for Stationarity in Heterogeneous Panel Data” Econometric Journal, 3: 148-161.
17. Hatiboglu, Z. (1993) Temel İsletme Finansmanı, İstanbul, Yeni İktisadi ve İsletme Yönetim Dizisi No:10.
18. Im, K., Pesaran, H. ve Shin, Y. (2003) “Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogenous Panels” Journal of Econometrics, 115(1):53-74.
19. Khan, K.I, Muhammad, A., Arslan, Q., Adeel, N.
20. Korkmaz, T. (2010) “FVFM’nin İMKB Ulusal 100 Endeksindeki Geçerliliğinin Panel Veri Analizi İle Test Edilmesi” İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 30(1):95-105.
21. Moon, R. ve B. Perron (2004) “Testing For A Unit Root in Panels With Dynamic Factors” Journal of Econometrics, 122: 81-126.
22. Lewellen. J (2002) “Predicting Returns with Financial Ratios” Social Science Research Network Working Paper Series, No:4371-02.
23. Levin, A., Lin, C.F. ve Chu, C. (2002) “Unit Root Tests in Panel Data: Asymptotic and Finitesample Properties” Journal of Econometrics, 108:1-24.
24. Miller, M ve Rock, K. (1985) “Dividend Policy Under Asymetric Information” Journal Of Finance, 11(4):1031-1050.
25. Miller M.H. ve Modigliani, F. (1961) “Dividend Policy, Growth, and The Valuation of Shares” Journal of Business, 34(4):411-433.
26. Maddala, G.S. ve Wu, S. (1999) “A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and A New Simple Test” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61:631-652.
27. Modares, A,, Sajjad, A ve Mozhgan M. (2008) “Testing Linear Relationships Between Excess Rate of
28. Mukherji S., Manjeet S.D. ve Yong H.K. (1997) “ A Fundamental Analysis of Korean Stock Returns” Financial Analysts Journal, 53(3):75-80.
29. Nargeleçekenler M. (2011) “Hisse Senedi Fiyatları ve Fiyat/Kazanç Oranı İlişkisi: Panel Verilerle Sektörel Bir Analiz” Business And Economics Research Journal, 2(2):165-184.
30. Oh K.Y, Kim B ve Kim H. (2006) “An Empirical Study of The Relation Between Stock Price and EPS in Panel Data: Korea Case” Applied Economics, 38:2361- 2368.
31. Okafor, C.A., Mgbame, C.O ve Mgbame, A.M.C (2011) “Dividend Policy and Share Price Volatility in Nigeria” Jorind, (9)1:202-210.
32. Omran, M ve Ragab, A. (2004) “Linear Versus Non-Linear Relationships Between Financial Ratios and Stock Returns: Emprical Evidence From Egyptian Firms” Review of Accounting and Finance, 3 (2):84-102.
33. Pesaran M.H. (2004) “General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels” Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No: 0435.
34. Phillips, P.C.B. ve Sul, D. (2003) Dynamic Panel Estimation and Homogeneity Testing Under Crosssection Dependence” Econometrics Journal, 6:217- 259.
35. Shen, P (2000) “The P/E Ratio and Stock Market Performance” Economic Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 85(4):23-36.
36. Shen, P (2000) “The P/E Ratio and Stock Market Performance” Economic Review-Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 85(4):23-36.
37. Şamiloğlu, F. (2005) “Hisse Getirileri ve Fiyatlarıyla, Kazanç ve Nakit Akımları Arasındaki İlişki: Deri ve Gıda Şirketlerinde Ampirik Bir İnceleme” İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 26:120-126.
38. Tatoğlu F.Y. (2012) İleri Panel Veri Analizi, İstanbul, Beta Yayınevi.
39. Weston, J.F. ve Copeland, T.E (1992) Managerial Finance, International Edition, New York, The Dryden Pres.