A New Social Contract: Rethinking the Role of the State Towards Post- 2015 Development Agenda

Öz

As the target date for achieving the Millennium Development Goals ends in 2015 a broad consultative process headed by UN is being conducted all around the world in order to formulate new goals/targets within the broader framework of sustainable human development. The main argument of this paper is founded on the major fault line in neoliberal thinking with its belief in self regulating markets and its anti-state rhetoric whose harmful consequences have been exposed by the current economic crisis. We argue that there is a need for reconsidering the potential for the role of the modern State which is adapted to the challenges of the 21st century. We suggest that the concept of social contract in discussing the role of the State may be very helpful as it broadens the concern for development beyond the State versus Economy dichotomy. The essence of any social contract is a consensus among the members of a society with regards the regulation of collective life which is grounded upon the utmost values. As such it legitimizes the roles of the State in promoting these goals, and also the structures of interaction between the State and the civil society. Therefore we argue that, the concept of social contract may provide a basic framework into the post-Millenium debates which seek to construct a new global development agenda based upon globally agreed values and goals

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Social contract, welfare state, sustainable development, millenium development goals, economic liberalism

A New Social Contract: Rethinking the Role of the State Towards Post- 2015 Development Agenda

Öz

Binyıl kalkınma hedefleri için belirlenen son tarih olan 2015 yılına yaklaşıldıkça BM önderliğinde uluslararası düzeyde çok çeşitli toplantı ve zirveler yapılmaktadır. Bu toplantıların amacı bir yandan geçmiş on beş yılın değerlendirmesini yapmak diğer yandan sürdürülebilir kalkınma genel çerçevesi içinde 2015 sonrası genel kalkınma hedeflerini belirlemektir. Bu makalenin temel argümanı; son büyük iktisadi krizin gösterdiği gibi, serbest piyasaların etkin işlediği ve minimum devlet tezleri üzerine kurulu neoliberal görüşün ciddi yetersizlikleri ve eleştirisi üzerine odaklanarak, devletin rolünün yeniden tanımlanmasının gerekliliğidir. Bu kapsamda 21 yüzyıldaki ciddi tehditlerle mücadele edebilmek için modern devletin rolünün neler olabileceği tartışılmaktadır. Toplumların kalkınmasında devletin rolünün ne olabileceğine ilişkin tartışmada , tartışmada, devletpiyasa ikileminin dar çerçevesini aşmamıza yardımcı olabilecek olan, toplumsal “sözleşme” kavramını temel almaktayız. Her toplumsal sözleşme toplumsal hayatın nasıl düzenleneceğine ve yönetileceğine ilişkin toplumdaki öznelerin konsensüsünü içerir ve o toplamca benimsenmiş temel değerler ve hedefler üzerine kuruludur. Bu temel değerlerin ve hedeflerin gerçekleşmesi doğrultusunda gerek devletin rolünü gerekse devlet-sivil toplum arasındaki ilişkiler ile hak ve yükümlülükleri tanımlar. Buna bağlı olarak toplumsal sözleşme kavramının küresel olarak benimsenmiş değer ve hedeflere dayalı 2015 sonrası kalkınma gündeminin oluşturulmasında temel bir çerçeve sağlayacağını savunuyoruz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Toplumsal sözleşme, refah devleti, Sürdürülebilir kalkınma, bin yıl kalkınma hedefleri, iktisadi liberalizm

Kaynakça

1. Alexander, J. M. (2008), Capabilities and Social Justice, Ashgate Publishing ltd., UK
2. Andersen, G. E (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
3. Baum, G. (1996) Karl Polanyi, Ethics and Economics. McGill-Queens University Press.
4. Ban Ki-moon, (2014), “The Road to Dignity by 2030”, Synthesis Report of the Secretary General on the Post 2015 Development Agenda, New York
5. Becker, G.S. (1976) The Economic Approach to Human Behaviour, University of Chicago.
6. Beiner, R. (1992) What’s the Matter with Liberalism, Berkeley, University of California Press.
7. Bentham, J. (1963) An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislations. New York: Hafner.
8. Berlin, I. (1958) Two Concepts of Liberty. Oxford: Clarendon Press,

9. Blin, A and G. Marin (2012), “The Commons and World Governance, toward a global social contract” ,Forum for a New World Governance, http://www.worldgovernance.org/IMG/pdf_862_AB_GM_Communs_ GM_EN_v2_oct12-2.pdf (12. 01.2015)
10. Crotty, J. (2000) ‘Trading State-Led Prosperity for Market Led Stagnation: From the Age to Global Neoliberalism’, Political Economy Research Centre, PERI. http:// www.peri.umass.edu/fileadmin/pdf/published_study/ PS7.pdf (accessed 17.09 2013)
11. Fleischacker, S. (2005) A Short History of Distributive Justice. Harvard University Press FNWG- Forum for a New World Governance, web site http://www.worldgovernance.org/rubrique48.html?lang=en (09.02.2015)
12. Gooin, R.E; P.A. Pettit and T. Pogge (2007) Companion To Contemporary Politic Philosophy. Blackwell Publishing Ltd International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (1980), World Conservation
13. Strategy . Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development, Chapter 18, “The Global Commons” Jevons, W.S. (1957) The Theory on Political Economy. New York: Kelley and Millian Inc.
14. Lessnoff, M. (1990) The Social Contract Theory. NY: New York Unviversity Press.
15. Marshall, T.H. and T. Bottomore (2006) Yurttaşlık ve Toplumsal Sınıflar. İstanbul: Bilgi University Press
16. Marshall, T.H. (2006) Yurttaşlık ve Toplumsal Sınıflar, in Marshall T.H & T. Bottomore (1-50) Mill, J.S. (1989) On Liberty. S. Colilini (Ed) Cambridge University Press 264
17. Meneviş UZBAY PİRİLİ, Mustafa PIRILI Mouffe, C. (1992) Dimension Of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community.(Ed)UK: Verso Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
18. Offe, C. (1984) Contradictions of the Welfare State. Hutchinson & Co. Publisher
19. Pettit, .P (1995) The Virtual Reality of ‘Homo Economicus , Monist, 78 (3)
20. Pettit, P. (1996) Freedom and Anti-power, Ethics 106: 576–604
21. Pettit, P. (1997) Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government, New York: Oxford University Press
22. Pettit, P. (2003) ‘Agency-Freedom and Option-Freedom’. Journal of Theoretical Politics 15: 387–403.
23. Petitt, P. (2006) ‘Freedom in The Market’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics, Sage Publication 5 (2): 131-149
24. Pettit, P. (2008) “Republican Political Theory”, in Marc Fleurbaey, Maurice Salles, and John A. Weymark (eds.), Justice. Political Liberalism, and Utilitarianism: Themes from Harsanyi and Rawls. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 389-410
25. Pettit, P. (2012) “Legitimacy and Justice in Republican Perspective”, Current Legal Problems Vol. 65: 59–82 Available at: http://clp.oxfordjournals.org/ (17.September.2013)
26. Polanyi, K. (1944) The Great Transformation. New York: Rinehart.
27. Rawls, J.A. (1971) Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Rosanvallon, P. (2000) The New Social Question: Rethinking the Welfare State. Princeton University Press
29. Rosanvallon, P. (2004) Refah Devletinin Krizi. Ankara: Dost Kitabevi.
30. Rosanvallon P (2006) Democracy Past And Future (Ed), Samuel Moyn, Columbi University Press.
31. Ronald, D. (1989) Liberal Community. California Law Review 77 (3): 479-504
32. Sachs, J (2015) “What Bankers Must do to Help Save the Earth”, in Market Watch, http://www.marketwatch. com/story/what-bankers-must-do-to-help-save-theearth-2015-02-16?page=1, (12.02.2015)
33. Sandel, M. (2009) What’s The Right Things To Do. Canada: D&M Publishers inc.
34. Sen, A. (1992) Inequality Re examined. Cambridge: Mass. Harvard University Press,
35. Skinner, Q. (1998) Liberty Before Liberalism. Cambridge University Press,UK.
36. Stiglitz, J.E. (1995), “The theory of International Public Goods and the Architecture of International Organizations”, United Nations Background Papers, 7, New York
37. Stiglitz J.E.., (2004) “The Future of Global Governance”, Initiative for Policy Dialoge Working Paper Series, University of Colombia
38. Swan, K. (2012), “Republican Equality”, Social Theory and Practice, 38 (3): 432-454
39. UNCSD (2012) , The Future We Want, The Rio+20 Outcome Document, UN.
40. UNCTAD (2009) The Least Developed Countries: The State and Development Governance. Report of United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
41. UNDP (2000) Human Rights and Human Development . Human Development Report 2000 of UN. http:// hdr.undp.org/en/media/HDR_2000_EN.pdf (accessed 17.September.2013)
42. UNDP (2013) The Rise of the South, Human Development Report 2013 of UN. http://hdr.undp.org/en/ reports/global/hdr2013/ (17.October.2013)
43. United Nations, (2013a) A New Global Partnership: Eradicate Poverty And Transform Economies Through Sustainable Development, Report of UN. Available at: http:// www.post2015hlp.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/ UN-Report.pdf (17.10.2013)
44. United Nations, (2013b) Follow up of to the Outcome of Millennium Summit. Report of the Secretary General, http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/pdf/A%20Life%20 of%20Dignity%20for%20All.pdf (17.10.2013)
45. Viroli, M. (2002) ‘The Concept of Order and The Language of Classical Republicanism in Jean-Jacues Rousseau’, The Language of Political Theory in Early Modern Europe, ed. A. Pagden Cambridge University Press, pp.159-178