Reflection of Neuroscience on Organizational Behaviour: Orgazational Neuroscience

Öz

From the years 1990s -that management and organization field laid its foundations- to today, various of studies have been done in different units and levels of analysis which were inspired directly or indirectly by metaphorical approaches conducted at the level of individual, group, organizations and the population. These studies take into account of the interactions in human brain and fill a hole in the literature of management and organization. Organizational neuroscience, a science which has gained importance and secured its position recently, brought a much richer perspective to the management and organization field as using neuroimaging techniques. Particularly, using neuroimaging techniques beside psycho-technique evaluations will broaden the perspectives of managerial and scientific perspectives and will open new doors

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Organizational behaviour, neuroscience, organizational neuroscience

Nörobilimin Örgütsel Davranışa Yansıması: Örgütsel Nörobilim

Öz

Örgüt ve yönetim biliminin temellerinin atıldığı 1900’lü yılların başından günümüze kadar birey, grup, örgüt ve popülasyon düzeyinde doğrudan ve dolaylı olarak metaforik yaklaşımlardan esinlenen sayısız analiz birimi ve analiz düzeyinde çeşitli çalışmalar yapılmıştır. Bu farklı çalışmaların, insan beynindeki etkileşimleri dikkate almaması örgüt ve yönetim alanı içerisinde bir eksiklik olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Son günlerde önemi iyice açığa çıkan ve yazında yerini sağlamlaştıran örgütsel nörobilimin, nörogörüntüleme tekniklerinden faydalanarak bu alana çok daha zengin bir bakış açısı getirdiği bir gerçektir. Özellikle psikoteknik değerlendirmelerin yanında kullanılacak olan nörogörüntüleme tekniklerinin yönetimci ve bilimci bakış açılarını genişletecek ve yeni kapılar aralayacaktır

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Örgütsel Davranış, Nörobilim, Örgütsel Nörobilim

Kaynakça

1. Adolphs, R. (2003) “Cognitive neuroscience of hu- man social behaviour” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(3): 165-178.
2. Agor, W. (1983) “Brain Skills Development in Ma- nagement Training” Training and Development Journal, 37(4): 78-83.
3. Akpunar, B. (2011). Biliş Ve Üstbiliş (Metabiliş) Kav- ramlarının Zihin Felsefesi Açısından Analizi.  Electronic Turkish Studies, 6(4): 353-365.
4. Aziz‐Zadeh, L., Kaplan, J. T., ve Iacoboni, M. (2009) “ “Aha ”: The Neural Correlates of Verbal Insight Soluti- ons” Human Brain Mapping, 30(3): 908-916.
5. Bagozzi, R. P., Verbeke, W. J., Dietvorst, R. C., Bels- chak, F. D., van den Berg, W. E., ve Rietdijk, W. J. (2013) “Theory of Mind and Empathic Explanations of Machia- vellianism A Neuroscience Perspective” Journal of Mana- gement, 39(7): 1760-1798.
6. Balthazard, P. A., Waldman, D. A., Thatcher, R. W., ve Hannah, S. T. (2012) “Differentiating Transformati- onal and Non-Transformational Leaders on the Basis of Neurological Imaging” The Leadership Quarterly, 23(2): 244-258.
7. Bandura, A. (1977) “Social Learning Theory. General Learning Press” New York City 10016.
8. Bandura, A. (1988) “Organisational Applications of Social Cognitive Theory” Australian Journal of Manage- ment, 13(2): 275-302.

9. Bear, M. F., Connors, B. W., ve Paradiso, M. A. (2007). “Neuroscience” Cilt:2, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
10. Becker, W. J., ve Cropanzano, R. (2010) “Organi- zational Neuroscience: The Promise and Prospects of an Emerging Discipline” Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(7): 1055-1059.
11. Becker, W. J., Cropanzano, R., ve Sanfey, A. G. (2011) “Organizational Neuroscience: Taking Organi- zational Theory Inside the Neural Black Box” Journal of Management, 37(4): 933-961.
12. Becker, W. ve Menges, J. I. (2013) “Biological Impli- cit Measures in HRM and OB: A Question of How Not if” Human Resource Management Review, 23(3):219–228.
13. Beugré, C. D. (2009) “Exploring The Neural Basis of Fairness: A Model of Neuro-Organizational Justice” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Proces- ses,110(2): 129-139.
14. Beugré, C.D. (2010) “Brain and Human Behavior in Organizations: A Field of Neuro-Organizational Behavi- or” Edited by Angela A. Stanton, Mellani Day and Isabell M.Welpe. Edward Elgar Publishing: Massachusetts USA 289-305.
15. Bevan, W. (1991) “Contemporary Psychology: A Tour Inside the Onion” American Psychologist, 46(5): 475-483.
16. Blakemore, S. J., Winston, J., ve Frith, U. (2004) “So- cial Cognitive Neuroscience: Where Are We Heading?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(5): 216-222.
17. Boyatzis, R. E., Passarelli, A. M., Koenig, K., Lowe, M., Mathew, B., Stoller, J. K., ve Phillips, M. (2012). Examination of the Neural Substrates Activated in Me- mories of Experiences with Resonant and Dissonant Lea- ders. The Leadership Quarterly, 23(2): 259-272.
18. Braeutigam, S. (2005) “Neuroeconomics—From Ne- ural Systems to Economic Behaviour” Brain Research Bul- letin, 67(5): 355-360.
19. Butler, M., ve Senior, C. (2007) “Toward an Organi- zational Cognitive Neuroscience” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1118(1): 1-17.
20. Cacioppo, J. T., ve Berntson, G. G. (1992) “Social Psychological Contributions to the Decade of the Brain: Doctrine of Multilevel Analysis” American Psychologist, 47(8): 1019-1028.
21. Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., ve Prelec, D. (2005) “Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Eco- nomics” Journal of Economic Literature, 18: 9-64.
22. Campbell, A., Whitehead, J., ve Finkelstein, S. (2009) “Why Good Leaders Make Bad Decisions” Harvard Busi- ness Review, 87(2): 60-66.
23. Cropanzano, R., ve Becker, W. J. (2013) “The Promi- se and Peril of Organizational Neuroscience Today and Tomorrow” Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(3): 306- 310.
24. Dietrich, A. (2004) “The Cognitive Neuroscience of Creativity” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11(6): 1011- 1026.
25. Ergen, M., ve Y., Ülman. (2012) “Nörobilim, Nö- roteknoloji, Yalan Tespiti ve Etik” Acıbadem Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(3): 149-157.
26. Finkelstein S ve D. C. Hambrick (1996) “Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organi- zations” West Publishing Company.
27. Fugate, D. L. (2007) “Neuromarketing: A Layman’s Look at Neuroscience and its Potential Application to Marketing Practice” Journal of Consumer Marketing, 24(7): 385-394.
28. Glimcher, P. W., ve Rustichini, A. (2004) “Neuroeco- nomics: The Consilience of Brain and Decision” Science, 306(5695): 447-452.
29. Hammond, D. C. (2011). “What is Neurofeedback: An Update” Journal of Neurotherapy, 15(4): 305-336.
30. Hammond, D. C., Bodenhamer-Davis, G., Gluck, G., Stokes, D., Harper, S. H., Trudeau, D. ve Kirk, L. (2011). “Standards of Practice for Neurofeedback and Neurotherapy: A Position Paper of The International Society for Neurofe- edback & Research” Journal of Neurotherapy, 15(1): 54-64.
31. Hills, J. (2012) “Neuroscience and talent: How neu- roscience can increase successful execution of talent stra- tegy”. Human Resource Management International Digest, 20(3), 34-37.
32. Hills, J. (2013) “What should HR professionals know about neuroscience?” http://www.hrzone.com/talent/ retention/what-should-hr-professionals-know-about- neuroscience (Erişim Tarihi: 17.03.2015)
33. Hines, T. (1987) “Left Brain/Right Brain Mythology and İmplications for Management and Training” Aca- demy of Management Review, 12: 600–606.
34. Jeffery, R. (2013) “Neuroscience: HR’s new secret we- apon” http://www.cipd.co.uk/pm/peoplemanagement/b/ weblog/archive/2013/11/01/neuroscience-hr-s-new- secret-weapon.aspx (Erişim Tarihi: 17.03.2015)
35. Kenning, P., ve Plassmann, H. (2005) “Neuroecono- mics: An Overview from an Economic Perspective” Brain Research Bulletin, 67(5): 343-354.
36. Keysers, C. (2010) “Mirror Neurons” Current Biology, 19 (21): 971–973.
37. King, R. G., & Levine, R. (1993). Finance, entrep- reneurship and growth. Journal of Monetary economics, 32(3), 513-542.
38. Lee, N., Broderick, A. J., ve Chamberlain, L. (2007) “What is ‘Neuromarketing’? A Discussion and Agenda for Future Research” International Journal of Psychophysi- ology, 63(2): 199-204.
39. Leshner, A. I. (1991) “Psychology Research and NIMH: Opportunities and Challenges” American Psycho- logist, 46(9): 977-979.
40. Levine, D. K. (2011) “Neuroeconomics?” Internatio- nal Review of Economics, 58(3): 287-305.
41. Lindebaum, D. (2013) “Pathologizing the Healthy but Ineffective Some Ethical Reflections on Using Neu- roscience in Leadership Research” Journal of Management Inquiry, 22(3): 295-305.
42. Lieberman, M. D. (2007) “Social Cognitive Neuros- cience: A Review of Core Processes” Annu. Rev. Psychol, 58: 259-289.
43. Lord, R. ve Maher, K. (1991) Leadership and Infor- mation Processing: Linking Perception and Performance. Boston, MA: Unwin Hyman.
44. Martindale, K. (2014) “How can HR use neuroscien- ce?” http://www.hrmagazine.co.uk/hr/features/1143430/ hr-neuroscience (Erişim Tarihi: 17.03.2015)
45. Meisinger, R. S. (2013) “Linking Neuroscience and HR”. http://www.hreonline.com/HRE/view/story. jhtml?id=534355838 (Erişim Tarihi: 17.03.2015)
46. Miller, N. E. ve Dollard J. (1941) http://psycnet. apa.org/psycinfo/1942-00109-000 (Erişim Tarihi: 01/09/2014)
47. Mintzberg, H. (1976) “Planning on the Left and Ma- naging on the Right” Harvard Business Review, 54(4): 49- 58.
48. Ochsner, K. N. (2004) “Current Directions in Social Cognitive Neuroscience” Current Opinion in Neurobio- logy, 14(2): 254-258.
49. Ochsner, K. N., ve Lieberman, M. D. (2001) “The Emergence of Social Cognitive Neuroscience” American Psychologist, 56(9): 717.
50. Palmeri, T. J. (2013) “An Exemplar of Model-Based Cognitive Neuroscience” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 67- 69
51. Pennington, D. C. (2000). Social cognition. Psychology Press. https://www.google.com.tr/books?hl=tr&lr=&id=9 5kfaysaFu8C&oi=fnd&pg=PR13&dq=Pennington+cog nition&ots=sx5kM1TxzQ&sig=S1a6hmtORUect0eGU ray8qhIdo&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Pennington%20 cognition&f=false (Erişim Tarihi: 16.03.2015)
52. Peterson, R. L. (2005) “The Neuroscience of Inves- ting: FMRI of The Reward System” Brain Research Bulle- tin, 67(5): 391-397.
53. Poldrack, R. A. (2006) “Can Cognitive Processes be Inferred from Neuroimaging Data?” Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2): 59-63.
54. Redish, A. D., Jensen, S., ve Johnson, A. (2008) “A Unified Framework for Addiction: Vulnerabilities in The Decision Process” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(04): 415-437.
55. Rizzolatti, G., ve Craighero, L. (2004) “The Mirror- Neuron System” Annu. Rev. Neurosci, 27: 169-192.
56. Rustichini, A. (2005) “Introduction – Neuroecono- mics: Present And Future” Games and Economic Behavior, 52: 201-212.
57. Sadler-Smith, E., Hodgkinson, G. P., ve Sinclair, M. (2008) “A Matter of Feeling? The Role of Intuition in Entrepreneurial Decision-Making and Behavior” Research on Emotion in Organizations, 4: 35-55.
58. Scherg, M. (1990) “Fundamentals Of Dipole Source Potential Analysis Auditory Evoked Magnetic Fields And Electric Potentials” Advances in Audiology, 6: 40-69.
59. Senior, C., Lee, N., ve Butler, M. (2011) “Organiza- tional Cognitive Neuroscience” Organization Science 22: 804–815.
60. Sherrington, C. (1947) “The Integrative Action of The Nervous System” CUP Archive.
61. Waldman, D. A., Balthazard, P. A., ve Peterson, S. J. (2011) “Social Cognitive Neuroscience And Leadership” The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6): 1092-1106.
62. Waldman, D. A., Balthazard, P. A., ve Peterson, S. J. (2011b) “Leadership and Neuroscience: Can We Revolu- tionize The Way That Inspirational Leaders are Identified and Developed?” The Academy of Management Perspecti- ves, 25(1): 60-74.
63. Waytz, A. ve Mason, M. “Your Brain at Work” Har- ward Business Review, https://hbr.org/2013/07/your- brain-at-work/ar/1 (Erişim Tarihi: 17.03.2015)
64. http://www.columbia.edu/cu/psychology/co- urses/1010/mangels/neuro/history/history.html (05/06/204)
65. https://www.humanbrainproject.eu/ (22/08/2014)
66. http://www.nih.gov/science/brain/ (22/08/2014)