ADALETE VERİLEN DEĞERİN ADALET ALGILARI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNİN SORGULANMASINA İLİŞKİN BİR ARAŞTIRMA

Year 2007, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 19 - 35, 01.05.2007

Ömür N. T. Özmen Yasemin Arbak Pınar Süral Özer

Abstract

Örgütsel adalet ile ilgili çalışmalarda adaletin bireyler için değerli olduğu varsayımından hareket edilmektedir, adaletin bireyler için ne kadar değerli olduğu ise sorgulanmamaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, yazında yeterince üzerinde durulmamış olan, değerler ile örgütsel adalet algısının farklı boyutları arasındaki ilişkileri sorgulamak ve özellikle adalete atfedilen göreli değerin, adalet algılarını farklılaştırıp farklılaştırmadığını incelemektir. Araştırma sonuçları işlemsel adalet algısı boyutu için bu farklılaşmayı doğrulamamakla birlikte, dağıtım adaleti ve etkileşim adaleti algılarının, adalete atfedilen göreli değere göre farklılaştığını göstermektedir. Adalete atfettikleri göreli değer yükseldikçe kişilerin adalet algıları olumsuzlaşmaktadır. Bu ilişkiyle ilgili daha çok sayıda araştırmaya gereksinim olmakla birlikte, bu sonuca dayanarak, bundan sonra yapılacak adalet algılarına ilişkin çalışmalarda, adalete atfedilen göreli değerin dikkate alınması, özellikle adalet algılarının sonuçlarının incelendiği çalışmalarda adalete atfedilen değerin moderatör olarak etkisinin sorgulanması yararlı olabilecektir

Keywords

Örgütsel Adalet, Dağıtım Adaleti, İşlemsel Adalet, Etkileşim Adaleti, Adalet Değeri.

AN INQUIRY ABOUT THE EFFECT OF JUSTICE VALUE ON JUSTICE PERCEPTION

Abstract

Organizational justice researches assumed is that justice is valuable for everyone. But these researches never examined how justice is valuable and how values affect organizational justice perceptions. The aim of this research is to examine the relations between justice value and organizational justice perceptions. The results of this research don’t confirm the relation for the procedural justice dimension. But the relation is confirmed for the other two dimensions. People who find justice more valuable, percept distributive and interactional justice more negatively. Justice value should be examined at least as a moderator in further studies

Keywords

Organizational Justice, Distributive Justice, Procedural Justice, Interactional Justice, Justice Value

References

• ABU-SAAD, Ismael (2003): ‘The Work Values of Arab Teachers in Isael in a Multicultural Context’, Journal of Beliefs and Values, 24: 1, 39-51.
• ADKİNS, Cheryl L. ve Craig J. Russel (1997): ‘Supervisor-Subordinate Work Value Congruence and Subordinate Performance: a Pilot Study’. Journal of Business and Psychology, 12:2, 205-218.
• ARYEE, Samuel, Pawan S. Budwar and Zhen Xiong Chen (2002): ‘Trust as a Mediator of The relationship Between Organizational Justice and Work Outcomes: Test of a Social Exchange Model’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23:3, 267-285.
• BEUGRE, Constant D. (2002): ‘Understanding Organizational Justice and Its Impact on Managing Employees: An African Perspective’, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13:7 November, 1091-1104.
• BIES, Robert J. ve Debra L. Shapiro, (1988): Voice and Justification: Their Influence on Procedural Fairness Judgements. Academy of Management Journal, Vol: 31, No: 3, 676-685.
• BROWN, Duane (2002): ‘The Role of Work and Cultural Values in Occupational Choice, Satisfaction and Succes: A Theoritical Statement’. Journal of Counseling & Development, 80, 48-56.
• COHEN-CHARASH, Yochi ve Paul E. Spector (2001): ‘The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta Analysis’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes’, 86:2, 278-321.
• COLQUITT, J. A. (2001): ‘On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of a Measure’, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86:3, 386-400.
• COLQUITT, Jason A., CONLON, Donald E., PORTER, Christopher O.L.H., WESSON, Micheal J., NG, K. Yee (2001): ‘Justice at the Millennium: A Meta Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research’, Journal of Applied Physicology, 86:3, 425-445.
• De CONİNG, James B. ve C. Dean Stiwell (2004): ‘Incorporating Organizational Justice, Role States, Pay Satisfaction an Supervisor Satisfaction in a Model of Turnover Intentions’, Journal of Business Research, 57, 225-231.
• De CREMER, David (2002). ‘The Self-Relevant Implications of Distribution Rules: When Self-Esteem and Acceptance Are Influenced by Violations of Equity Rule’, Social Justice Research, 15: 4 327-339.
• DİECKMANN, Kristina A., Zoe I. Barsness ve Haris Sondack (2004): ‘Uncertainity, Fairness Perceptions, and Job Satisfaction: A Field Study’, Social Justice Research, 7:3, 237-255.
• ELİZUR, D. (1984): ‘Facets of Work Values: A Structural Analices of Work Outcomes’, Journal of Applied Physicology, 69, 379-389.
• ELİZUR, D. ve A. Sagie (1999): ‘Facet of Personal Values: A Structural Analysis of Life and Work Values’. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48:1, 73-87.
• FEATHER, N. T. (1994): ‘Human Values and Their Relation to Justice’, Journal of Social Issues, 50, 129-151.
• FEATHER, N.T ve Katrin Rauter (2004): ‘Organizational Citizanship Behaviors in Relation to Job Status, Job İnsecurity, Organizational Commitment and Identification and Work Values’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77, 81-94.
• FINEGAN, John E. (2000): ‘The Impact of Person and Organizational Values on Organizational Commitment’, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 149-169.
• FOLEY, Sharon, Deborah L. Kidder ve Gary N. Powell (2002): ‘The Perceived Glass Ceiling and Justice Perceptions: An Investigation of Hispanic Law Associates’, Journal of Management, 28:4, 471-496.
• FOLGER, Robert ve Mary A. Konovski (1989): ‘Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice On Reactions To Pay Raise Decisions’, Academy of Management Journal, 32:1, 111-130.
• FURNHAM, A. (1984): ‘Work Values and Beliefs in Britain’, Journal of Occupational Behavior, 5, 281-291.
• GREENBERG, Jerald (1987): ‘Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories’, The Academy of Management Review, January, 12:1, 9-22.
• GREENBERG, Jerald (1990): ‘Organizational Justice: Yesterday, Today and Tomorrow’, Journal of Management, 16: 2, 399-432.
• GREENBERG, Jerald, Robert J. Bies (1992): ‘Establishing the Role of Empirical Studies of Organizational Justice in Philosophical Inquiries into Business Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics, May, 11: 5-6, 433-444.
• HOFSTEDE, G. (1980): Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work related Values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• HOLBROOK, Robert L. Jr. (1999): ‘Managing Reactions to Performance Appraisal: The Influence of Multiple Justice Mechanism’, Social Justice Research, 12:3, 205-221.
• İŞBAŞI, Janset Özen. (2001): ‘Çalışanların Yöneticilerine Duydukları Güvenin ve Örgütsel Adalete İlişkin Algılamalarının Vatandaşlık Davranışının Oluşumundaki Rolü’, Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, Ekim 1 (1), 51-73.
• İŞCAN, Ömer Faruk, Atılhan Naktiyok (2004): ‘Çalışanların Örgütsel Bağdaşımlarının Belirleyicileri Olarak Örgütsel Bağlılık ve Örgütsel Adalet Algıları’, S.B.F Dergisi.
• JASO, G. ve B. Wegener (1997): ‘Methods for Emprical Justice Analyses: Part 1. Frameworks, Models and Quantities’, Social Justice Research, 10, 393-430.
• JONES, David A. (2004): ‘Counterproductive Work Behavior Toward Supervisors & Organizations: Injustice, Revenge, & Context’, Academy of Management Best Conference Paper.
• KNOOP, R. (1994). ‘Work Values and Job Satisfaction’, The Journal of Psychology, 128:6, 683-690.
• KONOVSKY, Mary A. (2000): ‘Understanding Procedural Justice and Its Impact on Business Organizations’. Journal of Management, Vol. 26, No. 3, 489-511.
• LAM, Simon S. K., John Schaubroeck, Samuel Aryee (2002): ‘Relationship Between organizational Justice and Employee Work Outcomes: A Cross national Study’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, February, 23:1, 1-18.
• LEE, Cynthia, Madan Pillutla ve Kenneth S. Law (2000): ‘Power-Distance, Gender and Organizational Justice’, Journal of Management, 26:4, 685-704.
• LEE, Cyntia ve Jıng-Lıh Farh (1999): ‘The Effects of Gender in Organizational Justice Perception’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, January, 20:1, 133-143.
• LIPPOPEN, Jukka, Maria-Elena Olkkonen and Liisa Myyry (2004): ‘Personal Value Orientation as a Moderator in the Relationship Between Perceived Organizational Justice and Its Hypothesized Consequences’, Social Justice Research, 17: 3 September, 275-292.
• MARKOVSKY, b. (1985): ‘Towards a Multilevel Theory of Justice’, American Sociology Review, 50, 822-839.
• MARTTOCCHİO, J.J ve T. A. Judge (1995): ‘when We Don’t See Eye to Eye: Discrepancies Between Supervisors and Subordinates in Absence Disciplinary Procedures’, Journal of Management, 21, 251-278.
• MOORMAN, R.H. (1991): ‘Relationship between Organizational Justice and Organizational CitizenshipBehaviors: Do Fairness Perceptions Influence Employee Citizenship?’ Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 845-855.
• MUELLER, Charles W. ve Tor Wynn (2000): ‘The Degree to Which Justice Is Valued in The Workplace’, Social Justice Research, 13:1, 1-24.
• NIEHOFF, Brian P. ve Robert H. Moorman (1993): ‘Justice as A Mediator of the Relationship between Methods of Monitoring and Organizational Citizenship Behavior’, Academy of Management Journal, 36:3, 527-556.
• ROBİNSON, K. L. (2004): The Impact of Individual Differences on The Relationship between Employee Perceptions of Organizational Justice and Organizational Outcome Variables, PhD dissertation, California School of Organizational Studies Alliant International University, San Diego.
• ROE, Robert A. ve Peter Ester (1999): ‘Values and Work: Emprical Finding and Theoritical Perspective’, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48:1, 1-21.
• ROS M., Shalom H. Shvartz ve Shoshana Surkiss (1999): ‘Basic Individual Values, Work Values, and the Meaning of Work’, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48:1, 49-71.
• SCHIMNKE, Marshall, Mureen L. Ambrose, Terry W. Noel (1997): ‘The Effect of Ethical Framework on Perception of Organizational Justice’, Academy of Management Journal, 40:5, 1190-1207.
• SHWARTZ, S. H. (1999): ‘A Theory of Cultural Values and Some Implications for Work’, Applied Psychology: An International Review, 48:1, 23-47.
• SİLAH, Mehmet (2005): Sosyal Psikoloji Davranış Bilimi. 2. Baskı. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• SKITKA, L.J. ve Crosby, F. J. (2003): ‘Trends in the social psychological study of justice’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 282 - 285.
• SKİTKA, L. J. (2002): ‘Do the Means Always Justify The Ends Or Do the Ends Sometimes Justify The Means? A Value Protection Model Of Justice’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 588 -597.
• SKİTKA, L. J. ve Mullen, E. (2002): Understanding judgments of fairness in a real-world political context: A test of the value protection model of justice reasoning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28,1419 – 1429.
• SWEENEY, P. D. Ve D. B. Mc. Farlin (1997): ‘Process and Outcome: Gender Differences in the Assesment of Justice’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 83-98.
• TANG, Thomas Li-Ping ve Baldwin, Linda J. Sarsfield (1996): ‘Distributive and Procedural Justice as Related to Satisfaction and Commitment’, S.A.M Advanced Management Journal, 61:3, 25-31.
• WANBERG, Connie R., Larry W. Bunce ve Mark B. Gavin (1999): ‘Perceived Fairness of Layoffs Among Individauls Who Have Been Laid Off: A Longitudinal Study’, Personnel Psychology, 52:1, 59-84.
• WELBOURNE, T.M, D.B. Balkin ve L.R. Gomez Mejia (1995): ‘Gainsharing and Mutual Monitoring: A Combined Agency-Organizational Justice Interpretation’, Academy of Management Journal, 38, 881-899.
• YILDIRIM, Fatma. (2002): Çalışma Yaşamında Örgüte Bağlılık ve Örgütsel Adalet İlişkisi. Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Psikoloji (Sosyal Psikoloji)Anabilim Dalı, Doktora Tezi, Ankara.