Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi ile Fabrika İmalat Performansının Ölçümü

Year 2012, Volume: 12 Issue: 3, 323 - 338, 01.07.2012

Gökhan Akyüz

Abstract

İmalat sistemlerinin rekabetçiliğini artırmada performans ölçüm sistemleri kritik rol oynamaktadır. Bu nedenle imalatçılar, mevcut durumlarını analiz etmek, iyileştirilebilir ve geliştirilebilir alanları belirlemek için çeşitli yöntemlerle performans ölçümleri yapmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, cam endüstrisindeki bir fabrikanın imalat performansını ölçen bir model önerilmiştir. Modelde kullanılan performans boyut ve göstergelerinin katsayıları Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (BAHP) yöntemi ile belirlenmiştir. Önerilen model ile fabrikanın altı aylık imalat performansı ölçülmüş, performans ölçüm sonuçları karşılaştırılmıştır

Keywords

İmalat performansı, bulanık analitik hiyerarşi prosesi, bulanık sıralama

The Measurement of Plant Manufacturing Performance with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process

Abstract

The performance measurement system plays a critical role in achieving the competitiveness of manufacturing systems. For that reason the manufacturers are conducting performance measurements via several methods in order to analyze their current situations and determine recoverable and improvable fields. In present study, a model which can measure manufacturing performance of a plant in glass industry has been proposed. The coefficients of the performance dimensions and indicators used in this model have been detected via Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process method. The six-month manufacturing performance of the plant has been measured via proposed method; performance measurement results have been compared

Keywords

Manufacturing performance, fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, fuzzy ranking

References

• Abdel-Kader, M.G. ve Dugdale, D. (2001) “Evaluating Investments in Advanced Manufacturing Technology: A Fuzzy Set Theory Approach” British Accounting Review, 33 (4): 455-489.
• Agrell, P.J. ve West, B.M. (2001) “A Caveat on the Measurement of Productive Efficiency” International Journal of Production Economics, 69(1):1-14.
• Ahmad, M. ve Dhafr, N. (2002) “Establishing and Improving Manufacturing Performance Measures” Organizational Performance: An Empirical Investigation” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 18(3- 4):171-176.
• Bamber, C.J., Castka, P., Sharp, J.M. ve Motara, Y. (2003) “Cross-Functional Team Working for Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE)” Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 9 (3):223-238.
• Bititci, U.S., Suwignjo, P. ve Carrie, A.S. (2001) “Strategy Management Through Quantitative Modelling of Performance Measurement Systems” International Journal of Production Economics, 69(1):15-22.
• Bozbura, F.T., Beskese, A. ve Kahraman, C. (2007) “Prioritization of Human Capital Measurement with Applications, 36 (1): 702-715. Indicators Using Fuzzy AHP” Expert Systems with Applications, 32(4):1100-1112.
• Buckley, J.J. (1985) “Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis” Fuzy Sets and Systems, 17(3): 233-247.
• Çakır, O. ve Canbolat, M.S. (2008) “A Web-Based Decision Support System for Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using Fuzzy AHP Methodology” Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3):1367-1378.
• Chamodrakas, I., Batis, D. ve Martakos, D. (2010) “Supplier Selection in Electronic Marketplaces Using Satisficing and Fuzzy AHP” Expert Systems with Applications, 37(1): 490-498.
• Chan, D.C.K., Yung, K.L. ve Ip, A.W.H. (2002) “An Application of Fuzzy Sets to Process Performance Evaluation” Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 13(4):237-246.
• Chan, F.T.S., Kumar, N., Tiwari, M.K. Lau, H.C.W. ve Choy, K.L. (2008) “Global Supplier Selection: Attribute Comparison of Catering Service Companies A Fuzzy-AHP Approach” International Journal of Using Fuzzy AHP: The Case of Turkey” International Production Research, 46(14): 3825-3857.
• Chang, D.Y. (1996) “Applications of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP” European Journal of Operational Research, 95(3): 649-655.
• Chen, C.C. (2008) “An Objective-Oriented and Product- Line-Based Manufacturing Performance Measurement” International Journal of Production Economics, 112(1):380-390.
• Chen, S.H. (1985) “Ranking Fuzzy Numbers with Maximizing Set and Minimizing Set” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17(2):113-129.
• Cheng, C.H. (1998) “A New Approach for Ranking Fuzzy Numbers by Distance Method” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 95(3):307-317.
• Chenhall, R.H. (1996) “Strategies of Manufacturing Flexibility, Manufacturing Performance Measures and
• Dağdeviren, M., Yavuz, S. ve Kılınç, N. (2009) “Weapon Selection Using the AHP and TOPSIS Methods Under Fuzzy Environment” Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4): 8143-8151.
• Durán, O. ve Aguilo, J. (2008) “Computer-Aided Machine-Tool Selection Based on A Fuzzy-AHP Approach” Expert Systems with Applications, 34 (3):1787-1794.
• Ertuğrul, İ. ve Karakaşoğlu, N. (2009) “Performance Evaluation of Turkish Cement Firms with Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS Methods” Expert Systems
• Göksu, A. ve Güngör, İ. (2008) “Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşik Proses ve Üniversite Tercih Sıralamasında Uygulanması” Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdariBilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(3):1-26.
• Gümüş, A.T. (2009) “Evaluation of Hazardous Waste Transportation Firms by Using A Two Step Fuzzy- AHP and TOPSIS Methodology” Expert Systems with Applications, 36(2):4067-4074.
• Hon, K.K.B. (2005) “Performance and Evaluation of Manufacturing Systems” CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 54(2):139-154.
• Jain, S., Triantis, K. P. ve Liu, S. (2011) “Manufacturing Performance Measurement and Target Setting: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach” European Journal of Operational Research, 214: 616-626.
• Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U. ve Ruan, D. (2004) “Multi- Journal of Production Economics, 87(2):171-184.
• Kaptanoğlu, D. ve Özok, A.F. (2006) “Akademik Performans Değerlendirmesi için Bir Bulanık Model” İTÜ Dergisi/d mühendislik, 5(1):193-204.
• Kim, K. ve Park, K.S. (1990) “Ranking Fuzzy Numbers With Index of Optimism” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 35(2):143-150.
• Kodali, R., Sangwan, K.S. ve Sunnapwar, V.K. (2004) “Performance Value Analysis for The Justification of World-Class Manufacturing Systems” Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, 3(1): 85-102.
• Li, T.S. ve Huang, H.H. (2009) “Applying TRIZ and Fuzzy AHP to Develop Innovative Design for Automated Manufacturing Systems” Expert Systems with Applications, 36(4): 8302-8312.
• Liou, T.S. ve Wang, M.J.J. (1992) “Ranking Fuzzy Numbers with Integral Value” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 50(3):247-255.
• Liu, X.W. ve Han, S.L. (2005) “Ranking Fuzzy Numbers with Preference Weighting Function Expectations” Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 49(11-12):1731-1753.
• Lo, E.K. ve Pushpakumara, C. (1999) “Performance and Partnership in Global Manufacturing-Modelling Frameworks and Techniques” International Journal of Production Economics, 60-61: 261-269.
• Ma, L.C. ve Li, H.L. (2008) “A Fuzzy Ranking Method with Range Reduction Techniques” European Journal of Operational Research, 184 (3):1032-1043.
• Popplewell, K. ve Bing, Y. (1995) “Reporting Requirements and Performance Measures in Integrated Approximate Factory Modeling” Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 6(5):4-12.
• Sarkis, J. (2003) “Quantitative Models for Performance Measurement Systems-Alternate Considerations” International Journal of Production Economics, 86(1):81-90.
• Seçme, N.Y., Bayrakdaroğlu, A. ve Kahraman, C. (2009) “Fuzzy Performance Evaluation in Turkish Banking Sector Using Analytic Hierarchy Process And TOPSIS” Expert Systems with Applications, 36(9):11699- 11709.
• Sekreter, M. S., Akyüz, G. ve Çetin, E. İ. (2004) “Şirketlerin Derecelendirilmesine İlişkin Bir Model Önerisi: Gıda Sektörüne Yönelik Bir Uygulama” Akdeniz Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(8):139-155.
• Sun, H. ve Wu, J. (2006) “A New Approach for Ranking Fuzzy Numbers Based on Fuzzy Simulation Analysis Method” Applied Mathematics and Computation, 174(1):755-767.
• Tsubone, H. ve Horikawa, M. (1999) “Impact of Various Flexibility Types in A Hybrid Fabrication/ Assembly Production System” International Journal of Production Economics, 60-61:117-123.
• Wang, L., Chu, J. ve Wu, J. (2007) “Selection of Optimum Maintenance Strategies Based on A Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process” International Journal of Production Economics, 107 (1): 151-163.
• Wang, T.C. ve Chen, Y.H. (2008) “Applying Fuzzy Linguistic Preference Relations to The Improvement of Consistency of Fuzzy AHP” Information Sciences, 178 (19):3755-3765.
• Wheelwright, S.C. (1978) “Reflecting Corporate Strategy in Manufacturing Decisions” Business Horizons, 21(1):57-66.
• Yang, C.L, Chuang, S.-P. ve Huang, R.H. (2009) “Manufacturing Evaluation System Based On AHP/ ANP Approach for Wafer Fabricating Industry” Expert Systems with Applications, 36(8):11369-11377.
• Yao, J.S. ve Wu, K. (2000) “Ranking Fuzzy Numbers Based on Decomposition Principle and Signed Distance” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 116(2):275-288.
• Youndt, M.A., Snell, S.A., Dean, J.W. ve Lepak, D.P. (1996) “Human Resource Management, Manufacturing Strategy, and Firm Performance” Academy of Management Journal, 39(4):836-866.
• Yu, V.F. ve Hu, K.J. (2010) “An İntegrated Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Approach for The Performance Evaluation of Multiple Manufacturing Plants” Computers & Industrial Engineering, 58(2):269-277.
• Yurdakul, M. (2002) “Measuring A Manufacturing System’s Performance Using Saaty’s System With Feedback Approach” Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 13(1):25-34. EKLER