The Effects of Different Normalization Methods to Decision Making Process in TOPSIS

Year 2013, Volume: 13 Issue: 2, 245 - 258, 01.05.2013

Aşkın Özdağoğlu

Abstract

Existing of many different alternatives has revealed a decision making problem. The analysis of many different evaluation criteria when comparing the alternatives is an inevitable situation. There are various multi criteria decision making methods which can be used in these decision making problems. Normalization methods have been used for analyzing the evaluation criteria which have got different measurement units in some multi criteria decision making methos. However, different normalization methods can be used for the same multi criteria decision making method. The purpose of this study is to compare of the results by trying of all normalization methods in TOPSIS method via sample data sets

Keywords

Normalization methods, multi criteria decision making, TOPSIS method

Farklı Normalizasyon Yöntemlerinin TOPSIS’te Karar Verme Sürecine Etkisi

Abstract

Çok sayıda alternatifin olması durumu bir karar verme problemini ortaya çıkarmaktadır. Bu alternatiflerin karşılaştırılırken de birden çok değerlendirme ölçütünün bir arada incelenmesi kaçınılmaz bir durumdur. Bu tür karar verme problemlerinde kullanılabilen çeşitli çok ölçütlü karar verme yöntemleri mevcuttur. Bazı çok ölçütlü karar verme yöntemlerinin işleyiş aşamalarında ölçüm birimleri birbirinden farklı olan değerlendirme ölçütlerinin birlikte incelenmesini sağlamak amacıyla normalizasyon yöntemleri kullanılmaktadır. Ancak aynı çok ölçütlü karar verme yönteminde farklı normalizasyon yöntemlerinin kullanıldığı da görülmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, çok ölçütlü karar verme yöntemlerinden biri olan TOPSIS yöntemi için tüm normalizasyon yöntemlerinin örnek veri setleri üzerinde denenip sonuçlarının karşılaştırılmasıdır

Keywords

Normalizasyon yöntemleri, çok ölçütlü karar verme, TOPSIS yöntemi

References

• Aalami, H.A.,Moghaddam, M.P. ve Yousefi, G.R. (2010) “Modeling and Prioritizing Demand Response Programs in Power Markets” Electric Power Systems Research, 80:426-435.
• Ayala, J.G. (2012) “Selecting Irrigation Water Pricing Alternatives Using A Multi-Methodological Approach” Mathematical And Computer Modelling, 55:861-883.
• Balezentis, A.,Balezentis, T. ve Brauers, W.K.M. (2012) “Personnel Selection Based on Computing With Words and Fuzzy MULTIMOORA” Expert Systems With Applications, 39: 7961-7967.
• Chakraborty, S. (2011) “Applications of The MOORA Method for Decision Making in Manufacturing Environment” Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 54:1155-1166.
• Chatterjee, P. Chakraborty, S. (2012) “MaterialSelection Using Preferential Ranking Methods” Materials And Design, 35:384-393.
• Chen, M.F. ve Tzeng, G.H. (2004) “Combining Grey Relation and TOPSIS Concepts For Selecting an Expatriate Host Country” Mathematical And Computer Modelling, 40:1473-1490.
• Dai, L. ve Wang, J. (2011) “Evaluation of The Profitability of Power Listed Companies Based on Entropy Improved TOPSIS Method” Procedia Engineering, 15:4728 -4732.
• Huang, W. veHuang, Y.Y. (2012) “Research on The Performance Evaluation of Chongqing Electric Power Supply Bureaus Based on TOPSIS” Energy Procedia, 14:899-905
• Hwang, C.L. ve Yoon, K. (1981)Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Berlin,Springer-Verlag.
• Kalaycı, Ş. (2010)SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik Teknikleri, Ankara, Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
• Kaklauskas, A., Zavadskas, E.K., Naimaviciene, J.,Krutinis, M.,Plakys, V. ve Venskus, D. (2010) “Model For A Complex Analysis of IntelligentBuilt Environment”Automationin Construction, 19:326-340.
• Kaklauskas, A.,Zavadskas, E.K. veTrinkunas, V. (2007) “A MultipleCriteriaDecisionSupport On- LineSystemFor Construction” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 20:163-175.
• Karande, P. ve Chakraborty, S. (2012) “Application of Multi-Objective Optimization on The Basis of Ratio Analysis (MOORA) Method For Materials Selection” Materials And Design, 37:317–324
• Kiran, C.P.,Clement, S. ve Agrawal, V.P. (2011) “Coding, Evaluation and Optimal Selection of A Mechatronic System”Expert Systems With Applications, 38:9704-9712.
• Lozano-Minguez, E., Kolios, A.J. ve Brennan, F.P. (2011) “Multi-Criteria Assessment of Offshore Wind Turbine Support Structures” Renewable Energy, 36:2831- 2837.
• Mela, K.,Tiainen, T. ve Heinisuo, M. (2012) “Comparative Study of Multiple Criteria Decision Making Methods For Building Design”Advanced Engineering Informatics. (Baskıda)
• Ouattara, A., Pibouleau, L., Azzaro-Pantel, C., Domenech, S.,Baudet, P. veYao, B. (2012) “Economic And Environmental Strategies For Process Design”Computers And Chemical Engineering, 36:174- 188.
• Peng, Y., Zhang, Y., Tang, Y. ve Li, S. (2011) “An Incident Information Management Framework Based on Data İntegration, Data Mining, And Multi-Criteria Decision Making” Decision Support Systems, 51:316-327.
• Sadeghzadeh, K. ve Salehi, M.B. (2011) “Mathematical Analysis of Fuel Cell Strategic Technologies Development Solutions in The Automotive Industry by The TOPSIS Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method” International Journal Of Hydrogen Energy, 36:13272-13280.
• Shih, H.S.,Shyur, H.J. ve Lee, E.S. (2007) “An Extension of TOPSIS For Group Decision Making” Mathematical And Computer Modelling, 45:801-813.
• Streimikiene, D., Balezentis, T., Krisciukaitien, I. veBalezentis, A. (2012) “Prioritizing Sustainable Electricity Production Technologies:MCDM Approach”Renewable And Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16:3302-3311.
• Sun, Y.F.,Liang, Z.S., Shan, C.J., Viernstein, H. ve Unger, F. (2011) “Comprehensive Evaluation of Natural Antioxidants and Antioxidant Potentials in Ziziphus Jujuba Mill. Var. Spinosa (Bunge) Hu Ex H. F. Chou Fruits Based On Geographical Origin By TOPSIS Method”Food Chemistry, 124:1612-1619.