Male Alcohol Use, Intimate Partner Violence, and Female Autonomy: The Turkish Case

Year 2023, Volume: 23 Issue: 4, 667 - 684, 22.10.2023

Zeynep Elitaş , Hakan Ulucan

https://doi.org/10.21121/eab.1317343

Abstract

This study analyzes the effect of intimate partner violence on female autonomy, defined as the decision-making capability of a woman who is married or cohabiting with a partner, by using Turkish micro-level data sets on domestic violence against women. The study employs the instrumental variable methodology to estimate the causal impact of the occurrence and level of intimate partner violence on female decision-making autonomy. The estimation shows that experiencing intimate partner violence in the last twelve months diminishes the female decision-making autonomy significantly. A further estimation is implemented to find out whether the source of autonomy reduction is employment loss caused by partner violence, which can discourage women from work. IV estimations show that intimate partner violence, instead, pushes women towards work for the sample, which is not restricted to married women. This may indicate that participation in employment is not sufficient alone to ensure freedom in households and should be accompanied by legislative and institutional measures targeting direct prevention of intimate partner violence.

Keywords

Intimate Partner Violence, Female Autonomy, Alcohol Use, Household Bargaining, Instrumental Variable

Supporting Institution

-

Project Number

-

Thanks

-

References

• Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., & Robinson, J.A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91, 1369–1401.
• Agarwal, B. & Panda P. (2007). Toward freedom from domestic violence: The neglected obvious. Journal of Human Development, 8, 359–388.
• Aizer, A. (2010). The gender wage gap and domestic violence. American Economic Review, 100, 1847–59.
• Aizer, A. (2011). Poverty, violence, and health the impact of domestic violence during pregnancy on newborn health. Journal of Human Resources, 46, 518–538.
• Anderberg, D., Rainer, H., Wadsworth J., & Wilson T. (2016). Unemployment and domestic violence: Theory and evidence. The Economic Journal, 126, 1947–1979.
• Anderson, S. & Eswaran M. (2009). What determines female autonomy? Evidence from Bangladesh. Journal of Development Economics, 90, 179–191.
• Bloch, F. & Rao V. (2002). Terror as a bargaining instrument: A case study of dowry violence in rural India. American Economic Review, 2, 1029–1043.
• Chin, Y.-M. (2012). “Male backlash, bargaining, or exposure reduction?: Women’s working status and physical spousal violence in India. Journal of Population Economics, 25, 175–200.
• Dildar, Y. (2020). Is economic empowerment a protective factor against intimate partner violence? Evidence from Turkey. The European Journal of Development Research, 1–34.
• Ducci, F. & Goldman D. (2008). Genetic approaches to addiction: genes and alcohol. Addiction, 103, 1414–1428.
• Duvvury, N., Callan A., Carney P., & Raghavendra S. (2013). Intimate partner violence: Economic costs and implications for growth and development. Gender Equality and Development. Women's voice, agency, and participation research series; no. 3. World Bank, Washington, DC.
• Erten, B. & Keskin P. (2018). For better or for worse?: Education and the prevalence of domestic violence in Turkey. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 10, 64–105.
• Erten, B. & Keskin (2020). Female employment and intimate partner violence: Evidence from Syrian refugee inflows to Turkey, IZA Discussion Papers 14066, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
• Eswaran, M. & Malhotra N. (2011). Domestic violence and women’s autonomy in developing countries: theory and evidence. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’´economique, 44, 1222–1263.
• Fajardo-Gonzalez, J. (2020). Domestic violence, decision-making power, and female employment in Colombia. Review of Economics of the Household, 1–22.
• Fakir, A. M., Anjum A., Bushra F., & Nawar N. (2016). The endogeneity of domestic violence: Understanding women empowerment through autonomy. World Development Perspectives, 2, 34–42.
• Fals-Stewart, W. (2003). The occurrence of partner physical aggression on days of alcohol consumption: A longitudinal diary study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71, 41.
• Farmer, A. & Tiefenthaler J. (1996). Domestic violence: the value of services as signals. The American Economic Review, 86, 274–279.
• Fearon, J. & Hoeffler A. (2014). Benefits and costs of the conflict and violence targets for the post-2015 development agenda. Conflict and Violence Assessment Paper, Copenhagen Consensus Center: 1–65.
• Foran, H. M. & O’Leary K. D. (2008). Alcohol and intimate partner violence: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1222–1234.
• Heath, R. (2012). Women’s access to labor market opportunities, control of household resources, and domestic violence, The World Bank.
• Hoaken, P. N. & Stewart S. H. (2003). Drugs of abuse and the elicitation of human aggressive behavior. Addictive Behaviors, 28, 1533–1554.
• Iyengar, R. (2009). Does the certainty of arrest reduce domestic violence? Evidence from mandatory and recommended arrest laws. Journal of Public Economics, 93, 85–98.
• Karim, K. R. (2006). Men’s arrack drinking and domestic violence against women in a Bangladeshi village. International Quarterly of Community Health Education, 25, 367–380.
• Klostermann, K. C. & Fals-Stewart W. (2006). Intimate partner violence and alcohol use: Exploring the role of drinking in partner violence and its implications for intervention. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 11, 587–597.
• Krug, E. G., Mercy J. A., Dahlberg L. L., & Zwi A.B. (2002). The world report on violence and health. The Lancet, 360, 1083–1088.
• Leonard, K. E. & Quigley B. M. (1999). Drinking and marital aggression in newlyweds: An event-based analysis of drinking and the occurrence of husband marital aggression. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 6, 537–545.
• Luca, D.; Owens L.E., & Sharma G. (2015). Can alcohol prohibition reduce violence against women? American Economic Review, 105, 625–29.
• McCloskey, L. A., Figueredo A. J., & Koss M. P. (1995). The effects of systemic family violence on children’s mental health. Child Development, 66, 1239–1261.
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2005). Women’s bodies: Violence, security, capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6, 167–183.
• Panda, P. & Agarwal B. (2005). Marital violence, human development and women’s property status in India. World Development, 33, 823–850.
• Pollak, R. A. (2004). An intergenerational model of domestic violence. Journal of Population Economics, 17, 311–329.
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. J.T. Roberts, A.B. Hite, & N. Chorev (Ed.), The globalization and development reader: Perspectives on development and global change (525-549). Wiley Blackwell.
• Sharaunga, S., Mudhara S. M., & Bogale A. (2019). Conceptualisation and measurement of women’s empowerment revisited. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 20, 1–25.
• Smith, L. C., Ramakrishnan U., Ndiaye A., Haddad L., & Martorell R. (2003). The importance of women’s status for child nutrition in developing countries: International Food Policy Research Institute (Ifpri) research report abstract 131. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 24, 287–288.
• Stark, E. (2012). Looking beyond domestic violence: Policing coercive control. Journal of Police Crisis Negotiations, 12, 199–217.
• Tumen, S. & Ulucan H. (2019), Empowered or impoverished: The impact of panic buttons on domestic violence. IZA Discussion Papers 12847, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
• UN-Women, U. (2016). Economic Cost of Violence against Women. A speech by UN Assihjbstant Secretary General and Deputy Executive Director of UN Women.
• UN-Women, U. (2020). COVID-19 and ending violence against women and girls. A speech by UN Assistant Secretary General and Deputy Executive Director of UN Women.
• Yilmaz, O. (2018). Female autonomy, social norms and intimate partner violence against women in Turkey. The Journal of Development Studies, 54, 1321–1337.