Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Entrepreneurs' Social Identity

Öz

This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Turkish adaptation of the Entrepreneurial Social Identity Scale developed by Sieger et al. (2016). The factor structure, construct validity, and reliability of the Turkish version were analyzed. Convergent validity was examined in relation to entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial career motivations. Discriminant validity was tested by examining its relationship with locus of control, subjective norm, risk perception, and uncertainty avoidance. A total of 216 startup founders in technoparks participated. Findings indicated acceptable goodness-of-fit indices for the scale's factor structure, supporting its three-factor structure. In conclusion, there is substantial evidence supporting the psychometric properties of the Entrepreneurial Social Identity Scale.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Entrepreneurship
• Startup
• Entrepreneurial Social Identity Scale
• Validity
• Reliability
• Psychometric Properties
• Turkish Version

Kaynakça

1. Akarsu, O., & Döven, M. S. (2022). Girişimcilik yönelimini etkileyen faktörler: Teknoparklarda bir araştırma. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 23(1), 143- 164.
2. Alsos, G. A., Clausen, T. H., Hytti, U., & Solvoll, S. (2016). Entrepreneurs’ social identity and the preference of causal and effectual behaviours in start-up processes. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(3-4), 234-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2016.1155742
3. Brändle, L., Berger, E. S., Golla, S., & Kuckertz, A. (2018). I am what I am-How nascent entrepreneurs’ social identity affects their entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 9, 17-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbvi.2017.12.001
4. Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity theory. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ acprof:oso/9780195388275.001.0001
5. Cardon, M. S., Wincent, J., Singh, J., & Drnovsek, M. (2009). The nature and experience of entrepreneurial passion. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 511-532. https:// doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.40633190
6. De Noble, A. F., Jung, D., & Ehrlich, S. B. (1999). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy: The development of a measure and its relationship to entrepreneurial action. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1999(1), 73-87.
7. Estrada-Cruz, M., Verdú-Jover, A.J., Gómez-Gras, J.M., & Guaita Martinez, J.M. (2020). Entrepreneurial social identity and stakeholders: the socio-economic implications. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 14(1), 128-144. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-10- 2019-0103
8. Fauchart, E., & Gruber, M. (2011). Darwinians, communitarians, and missionaries: The role of founder identity in entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal, 54(5), 935-957. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0211

9. Franke, N., Gruber, M., Harhoff, D., & Henkel, J. (2006). What you are is what you like - similarity biases in venture capitalists’ evaluations of start-up teams. Journal of Business Venturing. 21(6), 802-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbusvent.2005.07.001
10. Gruber, M., & MacMillan, I. C. (2017). Entrepreneurial behavior: A reconceptualization and extension based on identity theory. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(3), 271-286. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1262
11. Hinkin,T.R.(1995).Areviewofscaledevelopmentpracticesin the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21(5), 967-988. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639502100509
12. Hinkin, T.R. (2005). Scale development principles and practices. In: Swanson, R.A., Holton, E.F. (Eds.), Research in Organizations: Foundations and Methods of Inquiry. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, CA, pp. 161-179.
13. Hisrich, R.D., & Peters, M.P., (2002). Entrepreneurship, McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
14. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.
15. Howard, J. A. (2000). Social psychology of identities. Annual Review of Sociology, 26(1), 367-393. https://doi. org/10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.367
16. Insights H. (2020) Compare countries. Available at: https:// www.hofstede-insights.com/product/compare- countries/ , 07.03.2023
17. Jenkins, R. (2008). Social identity. (3rd edition). Routledge, USA
18. Kalkan, A. (2011). Kişisel tutum, öznel norm ve algılanan davranış kontrolünün girişimcilik niyeti üzerindeki etkisi: Üniversite öğrencileri üzerine bir uygulama. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (14), 189-206.
19. Kıral, E. (2012). İlköğretim okulu yöneticilerinin mükemmeliyetçilik algısı ve kontrol odağı ile ilişkisi. Yayınlanmış Doktora Tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
20. Leaper, C. (2011). More Similarities than Differences in contemporary Theories of social development? Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 337-378. https://doi. org/10.1016/b978-0-12-386491-8.00009-8
21. Leitch, C. M., & Harrison, R. T. (2016). Identity, identity formation and identity work in entrepreneurship: conceptual developments and empirical applications. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28(3-4), 177- 190. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2016.1155740
22. Levenson, H. (1973). Multidimensional locus of control in psychiatric patients. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 41(3), 397. https://doi.org/10.1037/ h0035357 Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and cross– cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593-617. https://doi.org/10.1111 /j.1540-6520.2009.0031
23. McGee, J. E., Peterson, M., Mueller, S. L., & Sequeira, J. M. (2009). Entrepreneurial self–efficacy: Refining the measure. Entrepreneurship theory and Practice, 33(4), 965-988. https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00304.x
24. Mueller, S. L. (2004). Gender gaps in potential for entrepreneurship across countries and cultures. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 9(3), 199-220.
25. Naktiyok, A., Nur Karabey, C., & Caglar Gulluce, A. (2010). Entrepreneurial selfefficacy and entrepreneurial intention: the Turkish case. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(4), 419-435. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11365-009-0123-6
26. Ören, K., & Biçkes, D. M. (2011). Kişilik özelliklerinin girişimcilik potansiyeli üzerindeki etkileri (Nevşehir’deki yüksek öğrenim öğrencileri üzerinde yapılan bir araştırma). Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 16(3), 67-86.
27. Pennings, J. M., & Wansink, B. (2004). Channel contract behavior: The role of risk attitudes, risk perceptions, and channel members’ market structures. The Journal of Business, 77(4), 697-724. https://doi.org/10.1086/422633
28. Powell, E.E., & Baker, T. (2014). It’s what you make of it: founder identity and enacting strategic responses to adversity. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1406-1433. https:// doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0454
29. Ratner, B. (2009). The correlation coefficient: Its values range between+ 1/− 1, or do they? Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, 17(2), 139-142. https://doi.org/10.1057/jt.2009.5
30. Saylık, A. (2019). Hofstede’nin kültür boyutları ölçeğinin türkçeye uyarlanması; geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim (TEKE) Dergisi, 8(3), 1860-1881.
31. Sezer, C. (2013). Kariyer olarak girişimcilik ve girişimcilik niyetini etkileyen faktörlerin içerik analizi ile belirlenmesi. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2(2), 49-60.
32. Sieger, P., Gruber, M., Fauchart, E., & Zellweger, T. (2016). Measuring the social identity of entrepreneurs: Scale development and international validation. Journal of Business Venturing, 31(5), 542-572. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.07.001
33. Startup, www.hofstede-insights.com/country/turkey/, 10.01.2023
34. Startup, www.getir.com, 10.01.2023
35. Startup, www.icimdekihazine.com/tr/, 10.01.2023 Startup, www.ihtiyacharitasi.org, 10.01.2023
36. Startupblink, Global Startup Ecosystem Index 2023 https:// www.startupblink.com/startupecosystemreport, 15.09.2023
37. StartupCentrum, 2022 Turkish Startup Ecosystem Investment Report. https://startupcentrum.com/report/2022-turkish- startup-ecosystem-investment-report ,15.09.2023
38. Swierczek, F. W., & Ha, T. T. (2003). Entrepreneurial orientation, uncertainty avoidance and firm performance: an analysis of Thai and Vietnamese SMEs. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 4(1), 46-58. https://doi. org/10.5367/000000003101299393
39. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In J. A. Williams & S. Worchel (Eds.). The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
40. Tang, J., Kacmar, K. M. M., & Busenitz, L. (2012). Entrepreneurial alertness in the pursuit of new opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbusvent.2010.07.001
41. Turkish Statistical Institute, https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/ Index?p=Kucuk-ve-Orta-Buyuklukteki-Girisim- Istatistikleri-2021-45685, 15.09.2023
42. Van Someren, M., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. (1994). The think aloud method: a practical approach to modelling cognitive. London: AcademicPress, 11, 29-41.
43. Zhao, H., Hills, G.E., Seibert, S.E. (2005). The mediating role of self-efficacy in the development of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1265-1272. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1265