The Contributions of Higher Education System to The Innovation Production Performance of Turkey: An Empirical Analysis

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 1, 13 - 21, 01.03.2017

İsmail Seki

Öz

The functions of universities are changing while the regional innovation systems have a greater importance in development policies. The economic roles of universities can be classified into two groups. These are classical roles and complex roles. Universities, as the most important institutions of knowledge-based economic systems, are determinants of regional and national development, especially by their complex roles. In this context, the aim of the study is to clarify the roles of universities in innovation production processes in Turkey. The study uses random coefficient model as a method for econometric analyse. According to the empirical analyse, public universities, technology development centers and technology development regions have positive contributions to the level of innovation production of Turkey. In addition, the contribution of higher education system is more than the contributions of other factors

Anahtar Kelimeler

Economics of University, Triple Helix Model, Innovation, Regional Development, Knowledge Governance

The Contributions of Higher Education System to The Innovation Production Performance of Turkey: An Empirical Analysis

Öz

Bölgesel yenilik sistemleri kalkınma politikaları içerisinde giderek önem kazandıkça üniversitelerin fonksiyonları da değişmektedir. Üniversitelerin ekonomik rolleri iki grup altında sınıflandırılabilir. Bunlar klasik roller ve kompleks rollerdir. Bilgi tabanlı ekonomik sistemlerin en önemli kurumları olarak üniversiteler, özellikle kompleks rolleri vasıtasıyla, bölgesel ve ulusal kalkınmanın belirleyicileridirler. Bu bağlamda çalışmanın amacı üniversitelerin Türkiye’deki yenilik üretim süreçlerindeki rollerini ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda yapılan ekonometrik analizde yöntem olarak rassal katsayı modeli kullanılmıştır. Ampirik analize göre, kamu üniversiteleri, teknoloji geliştirme merkezleri ve teknoloji geliştirme bölgeleri Türkiye’nin yenilik üretme seviyesine pozitif katkıda bulunmaktadırlar. Ayrıca analizde yüksek eğitim sektörünün yenilik üretim süreçlerine katkısının diğer faktörlerin katkısından daha fazla olduğu görülmüştür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Üniversite Ekonomisi, Üçlü Sarmal Modeli, Yenilik, Bölgesel Kalkınma, Bilgi Yönetişimi

Kaynakça

• Antonelli, C. (2006). “The Economics of University: A Knowledge Governance Approach”, Working Paper No. 02/2006, Department of Economics ‘S. Cognetti de Martis, University of Torino.
• Autio, E., & Acs, Z. (2009). “Determinants of Entrepreneurial Growth Aspirations: Multi – Level Model”, Paper presented at the DRUID-DIME Academy Winter 2009 PhD Conference on Economics and Management of Innovation, Technology and Organizational Change, Aalborg, Denmark.
• Baltagi, B. H. (2005), “Econometric Analysis of Panel Data 3rd Edition”, West Sussex: A John Wiley & Sons.
• Cerquera, D. (2008), “ICT, Consulting and Innovative Capabilities”, Discussion Paper No. 08- 127, Centre for European Economic Research.
• Cerulli, G., & Poti, B. (2010), “On Profit Differentials between Persistent and Occasional Innovators: A Random-Coefficient Treatment Model Approach”, Paper presented at the 13th Conference of the International Joseph A. Schumpeter Society Innovation, Organisation, Sustainability and Crises, Aalborg, Denmark.
• Dunne, P., & Watson, D. (2005), “Manufacturing Growth, Technological Progress, and Military Expenditure”[ http://carecon.org.uk/DPs/0511.pdf], (Accessed 5 January, 2011).
• Eizenberg, A. (2008), “Upstream Innovation and Product Variety in the U.S. Home PC Market”, [http://econ.la.psu.edu/seminars/UIPV_Nov09.pdf ], (Accessed 6 July 2010).
• Etzkowitz, H. (2002), “The Triple Helix of University – Industry – Government: Implications for Policy and Evaluation”, Working Paper No. 11/2002, Swedish Institute for Studies in Education and Research.
• Genakos, C. D. (2004), “Differential Merger Effects: The Case of the Personal Computer Industry”,. Paper presented at the EI, 39. Suntory and Toyota International Centers for Economics and Related Disciplines, London, UK.
• Grab, J., & Grimm, M. (2008), “Spatial Inequalities – Evidence from Burkina Faso”, Discussion Paper No. 173, Ibero-America Institute for Economic Research.
• Gumprecht, D. (2005), “”Spatial Methods in Econometrics: An Application to R&D Spillovers”, Research Report No. 16, University of Wirtschafts.
• Hsiao, C., & Peseran, M. H. (2004), “Random Coefficient Panel Data Models”, Working Paper No. 1233, CESIFO.
• Jensen, P.H., & Thomson, R. & Yong, J. (2009), “Estimating the Patent Premium: Evidence from the Australian Inventor Survey”, Melbourne: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, and Intellectual Property Research Institute of Australia (IPRIA), University of Melbourne.
• Kim, B. W. (2008), “R&D Investment and Job Creation in Korea”, Working Paper No. 04/2008, STEPI.
• Knott, A. M. (2008), “R&D/Returns Causality: Absorptive Capacity or Organizational IQ”, Management Science, 54(12), 2054-2067.
• Lenger, A. (2007), “Türkiye’de Bölgesel Yenilik Sistemi ve Devlet Üniversiteleri. [Regional Innovation Systems and State Universities in Turkey]”, Working Paper No. 04/2007, Department of Economics, University of Ege.
• Negassi, S. (2004), “R&D Co-Operation and Innovation a Microeconometric Study on French Firms”, Research Policy, 33, 365-384.
• OECD, (2007), “Understanding the Regional Contribution of Higher Education Institutions: A Literature Review”, Working Paper No. 9, Department of Education, OECD.
• Oh, C. H. (2007), “Markets, Resources and Their Interplay: A Multi-level Random Coefficient Model Approach”, [http://s3.amazonaws.com/zanran_storage/uk.cbs.dk/ContentPages/13130036.pdf], (Accessed 15 November 2010).
• Pirili, M., & Lenger, A. (2012), “Bölgesel Kalkınmada Kamu Sermayesi ve Sosyal Altyapı: Türkiye Üzerine Bir Uygulama [Public Capital and Social Infrastrucure in Regional Development: An Empirical Analyse for Turkey]”, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 27(312), 09-37.
• Salim, R. A., & Kalirajan, K. P. (1999), “Sources of Output Growth in Bangladesh Food Processing Industries: A Decomposition Analysis”, The Developing Economies, 37(3), 355–74.
• Xiao, W. (2008), “The Competitive and Welfare Effects of New Product Introduction: The Case of Crystal Pepsi”, [http://www.ckgsb.com/userfiles/doc/ck_faculty_researchSeminar_08.pdf], (Accessed 17 May 2010).