BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Direct R&D Effect and Technological Diffusion: The Case of Turkey

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 4, 609 - 624, 01.12.2017

Özlem Fikirli Mustafa Emir Yücel

Öz

In this study, the cointegration relationship between total factor productivity (TFP) and direct R&D effect and technological diffusion is investigated by applying ARDL method in period of 1990-2015 years in Turkey. Direct R&D effect is analyzed with total R&D capital stock which is derived from total R&D investment expenditure. Technological diffusion is investigated with variables of İth rate and foreign direct investment. In Turkey the effect of R&D investment expenditures and the technology diffusion on total factor productivity arise from the coexistence of these two channels

Anahtar Kelimeler

Direct R&D effect technological diffusion TFP ARDL

Kaynakça

  • Augier, P., Cadot, O. ve Dovis, M. (2013). “İmports and TFP at the Firm Level: The Role of Absorptive Capacity”. Canadian Journal of Economics, 46(3):956-981.
  • Aghion, P. ve Howitt, P. (1992). “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction”. Econometrica, 60:323-351.
  • Aitken, B. ve Harrison, A. (1999). “Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela”. American Economic Review, 89(3):605-618.
  • Ballot, G.,Fakhfakh, F. ve Taymaz, E. (2001). “Firms’ Human Capital, R&D andPerformance: A Study on French andSwedishFirms”. LabourEconomics, 8: 443-462.
  • Bell,S.veMorse,S.(2008).SustainabilityIndicatorsMeasuringtheImmeasurable?.Earthscan, London.
  • Borensztein, E., Gregorio, J.D. ve Lee, J-W. (1998). “How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth?”. Journal of International Economics, 45: 115–135.
  • Cameron, G., Proudman, J. ve Redding, S. (2005). “Technological Convergence, R&D, Trade and Productivity Growth”. European Economic Review, 49:775–807.
  • Cecchini, L. ve Lai-Tong, C. (2008). “The Links BetweenOpennessand Productivity in MediterraneanCountries”. AppliedEconomics, 40: 685-697.
  • Chuang, Y.C. ve Lin, C.M. (1999). “Foreign Direct Investment, R&D and Spillover Efficiency: Evidence from Taiwan's Manufacturing Firms”. The Journal of Development Studies, 35(4):117-137.
  • Ciruelos, A. ve Wang, M. (2005). “International TechnologyDiffusion: Effects of Tradeand DYY”. AtlanticEconomicJournal, 33:437-449.
  • Coe, D. T. ve Helpman, E. (1995). “International R&D Spillovers”. EuropeanEconomicReview, 39: 859-887.
  • Damijan, J.P.,Knell, M., Majcen, B. ve Rojec, M. (2003). “The role of DYY, R&D AccumulationandTrade in TransferringTechnologytoTransitionCountries: EvidencefromFirm Panel Data forEightTransitionCountries”. EconomicSystems, 27:189-204.
  • Djankov, S. ve Hoekman, B. (1998). “Avenue of Technology Transfer: Foreign Investment and Productivity Change in the Czech Republic”. CEPR Discussion Paper, No:1883.
  • Fikirli, Ö. ve Çetin, A.K. (2015). “Ar-Ge Sermaye Birikiminin Toplam Faktör Verimliliğine Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği”. Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisif, 4(2): 147-166.
  • Frantzen, D. (2000). “R&D, Human Capital and International Technology Spillovers: A Cross- country Analysis”. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 102(1):57-75.
  • Girma, S. (2005). “Absorptive Capacity and Productivity Spillovers from FDI: A Threshold Regression Analysis”. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67(3): 281-306.
  • Griliches, Z. (1980). “R&D andthe Productivity Slowdown”. NBER WorkingPaper Series, WorkingPaper No:434.
  • Griliches, Z. ve Lichtenberg, F. (1984). “InterindustryTechnologyFlowsand Productivity Growth: A Reexamination”. Review of EconomicsandStatistics, 66 (2) : 324-329.
  • Grossman, G. M. ve Helpman, E. (1991). “InnovationandGrowth in the Global Economy”. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Ha, J. ve Howitt, P. (2007). “Accounting forTrends in Productivity and R&D: A SchumpeterianCritique of Semi-EndogenousGrowthTheory”. Journal of Money, CreditandBanking, 39(4):733-774.
  • Higόn, D.A. (2007). “TheImpact of R&D Spillovers on UK Manufacturing TFP: A Dynamic Panel Approach”. ResearchPolicy, 36:964–979.
  • Jerzmanowski, M. (2007). “Total Factor Productivity Differences: AppropriateTechnology vs. Efficiency”. EuropeanEconomicReview, 51:2080-2110.
  • Keller, W. (2002). “TradeandtheTransmission of Technology”. Journal of EconomicGrowth, 7: 5-24.
  • Keller, W. (2010). International Trade, Foreign Direct Investment, and Technology Spillovers. Kenneth J. Arrow ve Michael D. Intriligator (Ed.), Handbooks In Economics 2 :. 793- 829 , UK: Elsevier.
  • Kim, T. ve Park, C. (2003). “R&D, Tradeand Productivity Growth in KoreanManufacturing”. Review of World Economics, 139(3):460-483.
  • Kim, S., Lim, H. ve Park, D. (2009). “İths, Exports and Total Factor Productivity in Korea”. Applied Economics, 41:1819–1834.
  • Kinoshita, Y. (2000). R&D and Technology Spillovers Via FDI: Innovation and Absorptive Capacity. CEPR/WDI Annual Conference on Transition Economies, Moskova.
  • Konings, J. (2000). “The Effects of Foreign Direct Investment on Domestic Firms: Evidence from Firm Level Panel Data in Emerging Economies”. CEPR Discussion Paper, No:2586.
  • Krugman, P. (1994). “The Myth of Asia's Miracle”. Foreign Affairs, 73: 62-78.
  • Kugler, M. (2006). “Spillovers From Foreign Direct Investment: Within Or Between Industries?”. Journal of Development Economics, 80: 444– 477.
  • Lichtenberg, F.R. ve Siegel, D. (1991). “TheImpact of R&D Investment on Productiviy - New Evidence Using Linked R&D – LRD Data”. EconomicInquiry, 29(2):203-229.
  • Liu, X. ve Wang, C. (2003). “Does Foreign Direct Investment Facilitate Technological Progress? Evidence From Chinese Industries”. Research Policy, 32: 945–953.
  • Los, B. ve Verspagen, B. (2000). “R&D Spilloversand Productivity: Evidencefrom U.S. ManufacturingMicrodata”. EmpiricalEconomics, 25: 127-148.
  • Lucas, R.E. (1988). “On the Mechanics of Economic Development”. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22:3-42.
  • Maskus, K.E. ve McDaniel, C. (1999). “Impacts of TheJapanese Patent System on Productivity Growth”. Japan andthe World Economy, 11:557-574.
  • Miller, S.M. ve Upadhyay, M.P. (2002). “Total Factor Productivity andtheConvergenceHypothesis”. Journal of Macroeconomics, 24:267–286.
  • Narayan, P. K., & Smyth, R. (2006). What Determines Migration Flows From Low-Income to High-Income Countries? An empirical Investigation of FJI-US. Migration 1972-2001. Contemporary Economic Policy, 332-342.
  • Park, W.G. (2013). “International Patenting, Patent Rights, andTechonolgyGaps”. Review of EconomicsandInstitutions, 4(1): 1-25.
  • Pesaran,M. H. ve Shin, Y. (1999). “An AutodistributedLagModelingApproachtoCointegration Analysis”. Strom, S. (Ed.). EconometricsandEconomicTheory in the 20th Century: TheRagnarFrischCentennialSymposium, Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambridge.
  • Pesaran, M. H.,Shin, Y. ve Smith, R. (2001). “BoundsTestingApproachestothe Analysis of Level Relationships”. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289–326.
  • Prescott, E.C. (1998). “Lawrence R. KleinLecture 1997 Needed: A Theory of Total Factor Productivity”. International EconomicReview, 39(3):525-551.
  • Romer, P. (1986). “Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth”. Journal of Political Economy, 94:1002-1037.
  • Romer, P. (1990). “Endogenous Technical Change”. Journal of Political Economy, 98:71-102.
  • Rouvinen, P. (2002). “R&D - Productivity Dynamics: Causality, Lags, and ‘DryHoles’”. Journal of AppliedEconomics, V(1): 123-156.
  • Solow, R. M. (1957). “Technical ChangeandtheAggregateProductionFunction”. Review of EconomicsandStatistics, 39: 312-320.
  • Verspagen, B. (1995). “R&D and Productivity: A Broad Cross-Section Cross- Country Look”. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 6: 119-135.
  • Verspagen, B. (1997). “MeasuringIntersectoralTechnologySpillovers: EstimatesfromtheEuropeanand US Patent Office Databases”. EconomicSystemsResearch, 9(1):47-65.
  • Voutsinas, I. ve Tsamadias, C. (2014). “DoesResearchand Development CapitalAffect Total Factor Productivity? EvidencefromGreece”. Economics of Innovationand New Technology, 23: 631-651.
  • Wang, J.C. ve Tsai, K.H. (2004). ”Productivity Growthand R&D Expenditure in Taiwan’sManufacturingFirms”. In Growthand Productivity in East Asia,NBER-East AsiaSeminar on Economics, 13:277-296.
  • Wu, Y. (2000). “Is China'sEconomicGrowthSustainable? A Productivity Analysis”. ChinaEconomicReview, 11: 278 – 296.
  • Xu, B. ve Chiang, E.P. (2005). “Trade, Patents and International Technology Diffusion”. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 14 (1): 115-135.
  • Zhu, L. ve Jeon, B.N. (2007). “International R&D Spillovers: Trade, FDI and Information Technology as Spillover Channels”. Review of International Economics, 15(5): 955– 976.
  • www.conference-board.org, Erişim Tarihi: 23.06.2017.
  • www.oecd.org, Erişim Tarihi: 23.06.2017.
  • www.tuik.gov.tr, Erişim Tarihi: 23.06.2017.

Doğrudan AR-GE Etkisi ve Teknolojinin Difüzyonu: Türkiye Örneği

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 4, 609 - 624, 01.12.2017

Özlem Fikirli Mustafa Emir Yücel

Öz

Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de 1990-2015 yılları arasında toplam faktör verimliliği (TFV) ile doğrudan Ar-Ge etkisi ve teknolojinin difüzyonu arasındaki ilişki incelenmektedir. Doğrudan Ar-Ge etkisi, toplam Ar- Ge yatırım harcamalarından oluşturulan toplam Ar-Ge sermaye birikimi değişkeni ile analiz edilmiştir. Teknolojinin difüzyonu ise, ithalat oranı ve doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar değişkenleri ile incelenmiştir. Türkiye’de Ar-Ge yatırım harcamaları ve teknoloji difüzyonunun toplam faktör verimliliği üzerindeki etkisi, bu iki kanalın bir arada bulunması ile ortaya çıkmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Doğrudan Ar-Ge etkisi teknolojinin difüzyonu TFV ARDL

Kaynakça

  • Augier, P., Cadot, O. ve Dovis, M. (2013). “İmports and TFP at the Firm Level: The Role of Absorptive Capacity”. Canadian Journal of Economics, 46(3):956-981.
  • Aghion, P. ve Howitt, P. (1992). “A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction”. Econometrica, 60:323-351.
  • Aitken, B. ve Harrison, A. (1999). “Do Domestic Firms Benefit from Direct Foreign Investment? Evidence from Venezuela”. American Economic Review, 89(3):605-618.
  • Ballot, G.,Fakhfakh, F. ve Taymaz, E. (2001). “Firms’ Human Capital, R&D andPerformance: A Study on French andSwedishFirms”. LabourEconomics, 8: 443-462.
  • Bell,S.veMorse,S.(2008).SustainabilityIndicatorsMeasuringtheImmeasurable?.Earthscan, London.
  • Borensztein, E., Gregorio, J.D. ve Lee, J-W. (1998). “How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth?”. Journal of International Economics, 45: 115–135.
  • Cameron, G., Proudman, J. ve Redding, S. (2005). “Technological Convergence, R&D, Trade and Productivity Growth”. European Economic Review, 49:775–807.
  • Cecchini, L. ve Lai-Tong, C. (2008). “The Links BetweenOpennessand Productivity in MediterraneanCountries”. AppliedEconomics, 40: 685-697.
  • Chuang, Y.C. ve Lin, C.M. (1999). “Foreign Direct Investment, R&D and Spillover Efficiency: Evidence from Taiwan's Manufacturing Firms”. The Journal of Development Studies, 35(4):117-137.
  • Ciruelos, A. ve Wang, M. (2005). “International TechnologyDiffusion: Effects of Tradeand DYY”. AtlanticEconomicJournal, 33:437-449.
  • Coe, D. T. ve Helpman, E. (1995). “International R&D Spillovers”. EuropeanEconomicReview, 39: 859-887.
  • Damijan, J.P.,Knell, M., Majcen, B. ve Rojec, M. (2003). “The role of DYY, R&D AccumulationandTrade in TransferringTechnologytoTransitionCountries: EvidencefromFirm Panel Data forEightTransitionCountries”. EconomicSystems, 27:189-204.
  • Djankov, S. ve Hoekman, B. (1998). “Avenue of Technology Transfer: Foreign Investment and Productivity Change in the Czech Republic”. CEPR Discussion Paper, No:1883.
  • Fikirli, Ö. ve Çetin, A.K. (2015). “Ar-Ge Sermaye Birikiminin Toplam Faktör Verimliliğine Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği”. Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisif, 4(2): 147-166.
  • Frantzen, D. (2000). “R&D, Human Capital and International Technology Spillovers: A Cross- country Analysis”. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 102(1):57-75.
  • Girma, S. (2005). “Absorptive Capacity and Productivity Spillovers from FDI: A Threshold Regression Analysis”. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67(3): 281-306.
  • Griliches, Z. (1980). “R&D andthe Productivity Slowdown”. NBER WorkingPaper Series, WorkingPaper No:434.
  • Griliches, Z. ve Lichtenberg, F. (1984). “InterindustryTechnologyFlowsand Productivity Growth: A Reexamination”. Review of EconomicsandStatistics, 66 (2) : 324-329.
  • Grossman, G. M. ve Helpman, E. (1991). “InnovationandGrowth in the Global Economy”. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Ha, J. ve Howitt, P. (2007). “Accounting forTrends in Productivity and R&D: A SchumpeterianCritique of Semi-EndogenousGrowthTheory”. Journal of Money, CreditandBanking, 39(4):733-774.
  • Higόn, D.A. (2007). “TheImpact of R&D Spillovers on UK Manufacturing TFP: A Dynamic Panel Approach”. ResearchPolicy, 36:964–979.
  • Jerzmanowski, M. (2007). “Total Factor Productivity Differences: AppropriateTechnology vs. Efficiency”. EuropeanEconomicReview, 51:2080-2110.
  • Keller, W. (2002). “TradeandtheTransmission of Technology”. Journal of EconomicGrowth, 7: 5-24.
  • Keller, W. (2010). International Trade, Foreign Direct Investment, and Technology Spillovers. Kenneth J. Arrow ve Michael D. Intriligator (Ed.), Handbooks In Economics 2 :. 793- 829 , UK: Elsevier.
  • Kim, T. ve Park, C. (2003). “R&D, Tradeand Productivity Growth in KoreanManufacturing”. Review of World Economics, 139(3):460-483.
  • Kim, S., Lim, H. ve Park, D. (2009). “İths, Exports and Total Factor Productivity in Korea”. Applied Economics, 41:1819–1834.
  • Kinoshita, Y. (2000). R&D and Technology Spillovers Via FDI: Innovation and Absorptive Capacity. CEPR/WDI Annual Conference on Transition Economies, Moskova.
  • Konings, J. (2000). “The Effects of Foreign Direct Investment on Domestic Firms: Evidence from Firm Level Panel Data in Emerging Economies”. CEPR Discussion Paper, No:2586.
  • Krugman, P. (1994). “The Myth of Asia's Miracle”. Foreign Affairs, 73: 62-78.
  • Kugler, M. (2006). “Spillovers From Foreign Direct Investment: Within Or Between Industries?”. Journal of Development Economics, 80: 444– 477.
  • Lichtenberg, F.R. ve Siegel, D. (1991). “TheImpact of R&D Investment on Productiviy - New Evidence Using Linked R&D – LRD Data”. EconomicInquiry, 29(2):203-229.
  • Liu, X. ve Wang, C. (2003). “Does Foreign Direct Investment Facilitate Technological Progress? Evidence From Chinese Industries”. Research Policy, 32: 945–953.
  • Los, B. ve Verspagen, B. (2000). “R&D Spilloversand Productivity: Evidencefrom U.S. ManufacturingMicrodata”. EmpiricalEconomics, 25: 127-148.
  • Lucas, R.E. (1988). “On the Mechanics of Economic Development”. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22:3-42.
  • Maskus, K.E. ve McDaniel, C. (1999). “Impacts of TheJapanese Patent System on Productivity Growth”. Japan andthe World Economy, 11:557-574.
  • Miller, S.M. ve Upadhyay, M.P. (2002). “Total Factor Productivity andtheConvergenceHypothesis”. Journal of Macroeconomics, 24:267–286.
  • Narayan, P. K., & Smyth, R. (2006). What Determines Migration Flows From Low-Income to High-Income Countries? An empirical Investigation of FJI-US. Migration 1972-2001. Contemporary Economic Policy, 332-342.
  • Park, W.G. (2013). “International Patenting, Patent Rights, andTechonolgyGaps”. Review of EconomicsandInstitutions, 4(1): 1-25.
  • Pesaran,M. H. ve Shin, Y. (1999). “An AutodistributedLagModelingApproachtoCointegration Analysis”. Strom, S. (Ed.). EconometricsandEconomicTheory in the 20th Century: TheRagnarFrischCentennialSymposium, Cambridge UniversityPress, Cambridge.
  • Pesaran, M. H.,Shin, Y. ve Smith, R. (2001). “BoundsTestingApproachestothe Analysis of Level Relationships”. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16, 289–326.
  • Prescott, E.C. (1998). “Lawrence R. KleinLecture 1997 Needed: A Theory of Total Factor Productivity”. International EconomicReview, 39(3):525-551.
  • Romer, P. (1986). “Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth”. Journal of Political Economy, 94:1002-1037.
  • Romer, P. (1990). “Endogenous Technical Change”. Journal of Political Economy, 98:71-102.
  • Rouvinen, P. (2002). “R&D - Productivity Dynamics: Causality, Lags, and ‘DryHoles’”. Journal of AppliedEconomics, V(1): 123-156.
  • Solow, R. M. (1957). “Technical ChangeandtheAggregateProductionFunction”. Review of EconomicsandStatistics, 39: 312-320.
  • Verspagen, B. (1995). “R&D and Productivity: A Broad Cross-Section Cross- Country Look”. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 6: 119-135.
  • Verspagen, B. (1997). “MeasuringIntersectoralTechnologySpillovers: EstimatesfromtheEuropeanand US Patent Office Databases”. EconomicSystemsResearch, 9(1):47-65.
  • Voutsinas, I. ve Tsamadias, C. (2014). “DoesResearchand Development CapitalAffect Total Factor Productivity? EvidencefromGreece”. Economics of Innovationand New Technology, 23: 631-651.
  • Wang, J.C. ve Tsai, K.H. (2004). ”Productivity Growthand R&D Expenditure in Taiwan’sManufacturingFirms”. In Growthand Productivity in East Asia,NBER-East AsiaSeminar on Economics, 13:277-296.
  • Wu, Y. (2000). “Is China'sEconomicGrowthSustainable? A Productivity Analysis”. ChinaEconomicReview, 11: 278 – 296.
  • Xu, B. ve Chiang, E.P. (2005). “Trade, Patents and International Technology Diffusion”. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 14 (1): 115-135.
  • Zhu, L. ve Jeon, B.N. (2007). “International R&D Spillovers: Trade, FDI and Information Technology as Spillover Channels”. Review of International Economics, 15(5): 955– 976.
  • www.conference-board.org, Erişim Tarihi: 23.06.2017.
  • www.oecd.org, Erişim Tarihi: 23.06.2017.
  • www.tuik.gov.tr, Erişim Tarihi: 23.06.2017.
Toplam 55 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Research Article
Yazarlar

Özlem Fikirli Bu kişi benim

Mustafa Emir Yücel Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Aralık 2017
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2017 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA Fikirli, Ö., & Yücel, M. E. (2017). Doğrudan AR-GE Etkisi ve Teknolojinin Difüzyonu: Türkiye Örneği. Uluslararası Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(4), 609-624.
AMA Fikirli Ö, Yücel ME. Doğrudan AR-GE Etkisi ve Teknolojinin Difüzyonu: Türkiye Örneği. UEAD. Aralık 2017;3(4):609-624.
Chicago Fikirli, Özlem, ve Mustafa Emir Yücel. “Doğrudan AR-GE Etkisi Ve Teknolojinin Difüzyonu: Türkiye Örneği”. Uluslararası Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi 3, sy. 4 (Aralık 2017): 609-24.
EndNote Fikirli Ö, Yücel ME (01 Aralık 2017) Doğrudan AR-GE Etkisi ve Teknolojinin Difüzyonu: Türkiye Örneği. Uluslararası Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi 3 4 609–624.
IEEE Ö. Fikirli ve M. E. Yücel, “Doğrudan AR-GE Etkisi ve Teknolojinin Difüzyonu: Türkiye Örneği”, UEAD, c. 3, sy. 4, ss. 609–624, 2017.
ISNAD Fikirli, Özlem - Yücel, Mustafa Emir. “Doğrudan AR-GE Etkisi Ve Teknolojinin Difüzyonu: Türkiye Örneği”. Uluslararası Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi 3/4 (Aralık 2017), 609-624.
JAMA Fikirli Ö, Yücel ME. Doğrudan AR-GE Etkisi ve Teknolojinin Difüzyonu: Türkiye Örneği. UEAD. 2017;3:609–624.
MLA Fikirli, Özlem ve Mustafa Emir Yücel. “Doğrudan AR-GE Etkisi Ve Teknolojinin Difüzyonu: Türkiye Örneği”. Uluslararası Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, c. 3, sy. 4, 2017, ss. 609-24.
Vancouver Fikirli Ö, Yücel ME. Doğrudan AR-GE Etkisi ve Teknolojinin Difüzyonu: Türkiye Örneği. UEAD. 2017;3(4):609-24.