Fizyoterapi Öğrencilerinin Postüral Alışkanlık, Postüral Farkındalık ve Fiziksel Aktivite Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı fizyoterapist adaylarının postüral alışkanlık, postüral farkındalık ve fiziksel aktivite düzeylerini incelemektir. Yöntem: Çalışmaya fizyoterapi ve rehabilitasyon bölümünde öğrenimine devam eden 394 lisans öğrencisi dahil edildi. Gönüllü olan öğrencilere anket formları çevrimiçi olarak sosyal medya platformu üzerinden gönderildi. Bireylerin sosyodemografik bilgileri araştırmacılar tarafından oluşturulan veri formuna kaydedildi. Postüral alışkanlıkları ve farkındalıklarını değerlendirmek amacı ile Postüral Alışkanlık ve Farkındalık Ölçeği (PHAS), fiziksel aktivite düzeylerini değerlendirmek amacı ile Uluslararası Fiziksel Aktivite Anketi Kısa Form (IPAQ-SF) kullanıldı. Bulgular: Katılımcıların postüral farkındalık ve postüral alışkanlıkları arasında (r=0,124), postüral alışkanlık ve fiziksel aktivite düzeyleri arasında (r=0,145) pozitif yönde anlamlı zayıf korelasyon bulundu. Sınıf düzeyleri arasında postüral alışkanlık (p=0,006), postüral farkındalık (p=0,019) skorları arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark bulundu. Sınıf düzeylerine göre fiziksel aktivite skorları arasında fark yoktu (p<0,05). Cinsiyetler arası karşılaştırmalarda erkek öğrencilerin postüral alışkanlık ve fiziksel aktivite skorlarının kız öğrencilere göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark oluşturacak derecede yüksek olduğu bulundu (p=0,000). Sonuç: Lisans eğitimine devam eden fizyoterapist adaylarının postüral farkındalık ve fiziksel aktivite düzeylerinin arttığı, postüral alışkanlıklarının da iyi yönde arttığı, erkek öğrencilerin postüral alışkanlıklarının ve fiziksel aktivite düzeylerinin kız öğrencilere göre daha iyi olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• postüral alışkanlık
• postüral farkındalık
• fizyoterapi ve rehabilitasyon
• öğrenci
• fiziksel aktivite

Investigation of Postural Habit, Postural Awareness and Physical Activity Levels of Physiotherapy Students

Öz

Purpose: The purpose of this research is to investigate the postural habits, postural awareness and physical activity levels of physiotherapist candidates. Methods: 394 undergraduate students attending in the department of physiotherapy and rehabilitation included in study. Survey forms were sent to the volunteer students online via a social media platform. Sociodemographic information of the individuals was recorded in the data form created by the researchers. The Postural Habit and Awareness Scale (PHAS) was used to assess postural habits and awareness, and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF) was used to assess physical activity levels. Results: There were significant weak positive correlations between postural awareness and postural habits (r=0.124) and between postural habits and physical activity levels (r=0.145). There was a statistically significant difference between postural habits (p=0.006) and postural awareness (p=0.019) scores between grade levels. There was no difference between physical activity scores according to grade levels (p<0.05). In comparisons between genders, it was found that postural habit and physical activity scores of male students were statistically significantly higher than female students (p=0,000). Conclusion: Postural awareness and physical activity levels of physiotherapist candidates attending undergraduate education increased, their postural habits also increased in a good direction, and the postural habits and physical activity levels of male students were better than female students.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• postural habits
• postural awareness
• physiotherapy and rehabilitation
• student
• physical activity

Kaynakça

1. 1. Rosario LR. What is posture? a review of the literature in search of a definition. EC Orthopaedics. 2017; 6(3): 111-33.
2. 2. Kousar R, Mir SS, Sarfaraz S, Fatima K, Islam F, Raza A. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Survey on Body Posture Among Undergraduate Physiotherapy Students. Pak-Euro Journal of Medical and Life Sciences. 2022; 5(2): 399- 404.
3. 3. Bayar B, Güp AA, Özen Oruk D, İpek Dongaz Ö, Doğu E, Bayar K. Development of the postural habits and awareness scale: a reliability and validity study. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics. 2023; 29(2): 815-20.
4. 4. Cramer H, Mehling WE, Saha FJ, Dobos G, Lauche R. Postural awareness and its relation to pain: Validation of an innovative instrument measuring awareness of body posture in patients with chronic pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018; 19: 109.
5. 5. Kasırga Z, Odabaşıoğlu ME, Dedeoğlu T. Investigation of Physical Activity Level and Perceived Exercise Benefits/Barriers in University Students. Journal of Social Research and Management. 2021; 13(1): 83-95.
6. 6. World Confederation of Physical Therapy. Physical therapists as exercise and physical activity experts across the life span. https://world.physio/sites/default/files/2020- 09/PS-2019-Exercise-experts.pdf. 2019
7. 7. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services. 2018.
8. 8. Boshnjaku A, Arnadottir SA, Pallot A, Wagener M, Äijö M. Improving the Evidence-Based Practice Skills of Entry-Level PhysiotherapyStudents through Educational Interventions: A Scoping Review of Literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(16): 6605.

9. 9. Jankowicz-Szymańska A, Wódka K, Kawa J, Kwiek B. Comparison of trunk alignment and postural habits of high school adolescents and university students. Health Promotion & Physical Activity. 2022; 20(3): 11-22.
10. 10. Saglam M, Arikan H, Savci S, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: Reliability and validity of the Turkish version. Percept Mot Skills. 2010; 111(1): 278-284.
11. 11. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191
12. 12. Glista J, Pop T, Weres A, Czenczek- Lewandowska E, Podgórska-Bednarz J, Rykała J, Leszczak J, Sova K, Rusek, W. Change in anthropometric parameters of the posture of students of physiotherapy after three years of professional training. BioMed research international, 2014; 719837
13. 13. Navaid-us-Saba, Khan AA, Farooqui SI, Omar Z. The association of sitting posture and cervicogenic pain among the students of physical therapy. Pak. j. rehabil. 2012; 1(1): 28-31.
14. 14. Ezzatvar Y, Calatayud J, Andersen LL, Aiguadé R, Benítez J, & Casaña J. Professional experience, work setting, work posture and workload influence the risk for musculoskeletal pain among physical therapists: a cross- sectional study. International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2020; 93: 189-196.
15. 15. Yagcı G, Bek N. The Investıgatıon of The Effects of Posture on Health Related Qualıty of Lıfe in Young Adult Populatıon. Turkish Journal of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, 2021; 32(3): 70-77.
16. 16. Ogunlana MO, Govender P, Oyewole OO. Prevalence and patterns of musculoskeletal pain among undergraduate students of occupational therapy and physiotherapy in a South African university. Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal, 2021; 41(01), 35-43.
17. 17. Hasan MM, Yaqoob U, Ali SS, Siddiqui AA. Frequency of musculoskeletal pain and associatedfactors among undergraduate students. Case RepClin Med 2018; 7(2): 131-145.
18. 18. Holder NL, Clark HA, DiBlasio JM, Hughes CL, Scherpf JW, Harding L, Shepard KF. Cause, prevalence, and response to occupational musculoskeletal injuries reported by physical therapists and physical therapist assistants, Physical Therapy. 1999; 79(7): 642-652. 19. Boguszewski D, Ochala A, Adamczyk J, Jasiński P, Szymańska A, Obszyńska-Litwiniec A, Białoszewski D. Physical activity of physiotherapy students at the Medical University of Warsaw. Health Problems of Civilization. 2021; 15(1): 48-53.
19. 20. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. World Health Organization. 2020.
20. 21. Kgokong D, Parker R. Physical activity in physiotherapy students: Levels of physical activity and perceived benefits and barriers to exercise. The South African journal of physiotherapy. 2020; 76(1): 1399
21. 22. Khan BZ, Sheth M. Physical activity level and physical fitness parameters in physiotherapy students. Int J Physiother Res. 2019; 7(5): 3247- 51