THE ROLE OF “RINGI” APPROACH TO GAIN CONSENSUS IN STRATEGIC DECISION-MAKING PROCESS: AN OVERVIEW

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 134 - 148, 29.10.2023

Can Biçer

Öz

The objective of this conceptual research study is to provide a framework on the importance of Japanese Ringi system on building consensus in strategic decision-making process. The effects of post COVID-19 period, and vast technological developments have been dramatically changing the today’s business world recently. Due to continuous promises of new scientific breakthroughs and their reflections on business models, organizations must rethink, reshape, and reinvent themselves in order to keep up with the latest transformations taking place in the business world. Thus, these dynamics are forcing leaders to rethink about the importance of strategic decision-making in daily organizational operations. Because it’s obvious that strategic decision-making is a crucial tool to enhance business growth and key to raise awareness of external threats while preventing from global risks and unforeseen events in business world. In sum, in this study strategic-decision making process is outlined within the concept of the Japanese management system “Ringi”, and recommendations will be made in terms of building consensus in strategic decision- making process.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Consensus, Strategic Decision-Making Process, The Ringi System

Kaynakça

• Ala, M., & Cordeiro, W. P. (1999). Can we learn management techniques from the Japanese Ringi process?. Business Forum, 24(1-2), 22-25.
• Berman, B., & Pollack, D. (2021). Strategies for the successful implementation of augmented reality. Business Horizons, 64(5), 621-630.
• Blenko, M. W., Mankins, M. C., & Rogers, P. (2010). The decision-driven organization. Harvard Business Review, 88(6), 54-62.
• Cosenz, F., & Noto, G. (2016). Applying system dynamics modelling to strategic management: A literature review. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 33(6), 703-741.
• Elbanna, S. (2006). Strategic decision‐making: Process perspectives. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 1-20.
• Hartnett, T. (2011). Consensus-oriented decision-making: The CODM model for facilitating groups to widespread agreement. New Society Publishers.
• Hauser, A., Eggers, F., & Güldenberg, S. (2020). Strategic decision-making in SMEs: effectuation, causation, and the absence of strategy. Small Business Economics, 54, 775-790.
• Hayashi, K. (1978). Corporate planning practices in Japanese multinational. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2), 211-226.
• Isac, C. (2003). Characteristic of Japanese decision making by consensus. Annals of the University of Petroşani, Economics, 3(2003), 123-126.
• Jyoti, S., & Sarthak, S. (2019). Human resource management in Japan. Advances in Management, 12(1), 48-53.
• Lampel, J. (2018). Strategic decision-making. In Augier, M., & Teece, D. J. (Eds.), The palgrave encyclopedia of strategic management (pp. 1600-1603). Palgrave Macmillan.
• Leone, M. (2021). How to make tough business decisions easier. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/forbesbusinesscouncil/2021/04/21/how-to-make-tough-business-decisions-easier/?sh=769435ae41d9 [Accessed: 23rd March 2023].
• MacColl, M. D. (1995). A model of Japanese corporate decision making. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(4), 375-393.
• Martinsons, M. G., & Davison, R. M. (2007). Strategic decision making and support systems: Comparing American, Japanese and Chinese management. Decision Support Systems, 43(1), 284-300.
• Nickerson, J., & Argyres, N. (2018). Strategizing before strategic decision making. Strategy Science, 3(4), 592-605.
• Online Etymology Dictionary. (2023). www.etymonline.com [Accessed: 12th February 2023].
• Roberto, M. A. (2004). Strategic decision-making processes: Beyond the efficiency-consensus trade-off. Group & Organization Management, 29(6), 625-658.
• Sagi, D. (2015). 'Ringi System' The decision making process in Japanese management systems: An overview. International Journal of Management and Humanities, 1(7), 10-11.
• Schippers, M. C., & Rus, D. C. (2021). Optimizing decision-making processes in times of COVID-19: using reflexivity to counteract information-processing failures. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 650525.
• Senot, C., Chandrasekaran, A., & Ward, P. T. (2016). Role of bottom‐up decision processes in improving the quality of health care delivery: A contingency perspective. Production and Operations Management, 25(3), 458-476.
• Shiohara, H. (2023). The Japanese economic miracle. Berkeley Economic Review. https://econreview.berkeley.edu/the-japanese-economic-miracle/ [Accessed: 18th March 2023].
• Smith, W. K. (2014). Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of management Journal, 57(6), 1592-1623.
• Takagi, K. (1969). A social psychological approach to the Ringi-system. International Review of Applied Psychology, 18(1), 53-58.
• Vrontis, D., Christofi, M., Pereira, V., Tarba, S., Makrides, A., & Trichina, E. (2022). Artificial intelligence, robotics, advanced technologies and human resource management: A systematic review. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(6), 1237-1266.
• Wamba-Taguimdje, S. L., Fosso Wamba, S., Kala Kamdjoug, J. R., & Tchatchouang Wanko, C. E. (2020). Influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on firm performance: the business value of AI-based transformation projects. Business Process Management Journal, 26(7), 1893-1924.
• Warren, K. (2008). Strategic management dynamics. John Wiley & Sons.
• Wibowo, S., & Deng, H. (2013). Consensus-based decision support for multicriteria group decision making. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66(4), 625-633.
• Zhang, H., Dong, Y., Chiclana, F., & Yu, S. (2019). Consensus efficiency in group decision making: A comprehensive comparative study and its optimal design. European Journal of Operational Research, 275(2), 580-598.