Finansal Gelişme, İnovasyon ve CO2 Emisyonları: ARDL Sınır Testi Yaklaşımı

Öz

Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de finansal gelişme, inovasyon ve ekonomik büyümenin karbon emisyonları üzerindeki etkisi araştırılmaktadır. Bu kapsamda 1980-2020 döneminde yıllık veriler değerlendirilerek, ele alınan değişkenler arasındaki uzun dönem ilişki ARDL sınır testi yaklaşımı kullanılarak test edilmiştir. Değişkenler arasındaki nedensel ilişkilerin belirlenmesi aşamasında ise Toda-Yamamoto nedensellik yaklaşımı kullanılmıştır. Gerçekleştirilmiş olan ARDL sınır testinden elde edilen bulgular, söz konusu değişkenler arasında uzun dönemli ilişkinin var olduğunu göstermektedir. Finansal gelişme ve ekonomik büyüme karbon emisyonlarında artışa sebep olurken, inovasyonun karbon emisyonlarında azalışa neden olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Toda-Yamamoto testinden elde edilen sonuçlar, finansal gelişme ve karbon emisyonları arasında çift yönlü nedensellik olduğunu gösterirken, kişi başı gayri safi yurtiçi hâsıla ve inovasyon değişkenlerinden karbon emisyonlarına tek yönlü nedensellik var olduğunu göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• CO2 Emisyonları
• Finansal Gelişme
• İnovasyon
• ARDL
• Nedensellik

Financial Development, Innovation and CO2 Emissions: ARDL Bound Test Approach

Öz

In this study, it has been examinated the impact of financial development, economic growth and innovation on carbon emissions in Turkey. In this context, it has been used annual data covering the period 1980-2020 and it has been tested the long-run relationship between the variables by the ARDL bounds test approach. In addition, this was used Toda-Yamamoto causality approach for the purpose of determination of the causal relationships between the variables. The results of the ARDL test performed show that there is a long-term relationship between these variables considered. It has been concluded that financial development and economic growth cause an increase in carbon emissions, on the contrary, innovation causes a decrease in carbon emissions. The results from the Toda-Yamamoto test show that there is bidirectional causality between financial development and carbon emissions, while there is unidirectional causality from per capita gross domestic product and innovation variables to carbon emissions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Financial Development
• Inovation
• 〖CO〗_2 Emissions
• ARDL
• Casuality

Kaynakça

1. Abid, A., Mehmood, U., Tariq, S. & Haq, Z. U. (2022). The effect of technological innovation, FDI, and financial development on emission: Evidence from the G8 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(8), 11654–11662 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15993-x
2. Adebayo, T. S. & Kirikkaleli, D. (2021). Impact of renewable energy consumption, globalization, and technological innovation on environmental degradation in Japan: Application of wavelet tools. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(11), 16057-16082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01322-2
3. Adebayo, T., Oladipupo, S. D., Adeshola, I. & Rjoub, H. (2022). Wavelet analysis of impact of renewable energy consumption and technological innovation on Emissions: Evidence from Portugal. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(16), 23887–23904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17708-8
4. Akca, H. (2021). Environmental Kuznets Curve and financial development in Turkey: evidence from augmented ARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 69149–69159.
5. Ali, H. S., Law, S. H. & Zannah, T. I. (2016). Dynamic impact of urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and trade openness on CO2 emissions in Nigeria. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(12), 12435–12443. DOI 10.1007/s11356-016-6437-3
6. Al-Mulali, U., Saboori, B.& Ozturk, I. (2015). Investigating the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis in Vietnam. Energy Policy, 76(C), 123-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.019.
7. Aydın, M. & Değirmenci, T. (2021). Ekonomik Büyüme, inovasyon, verimlilik ve yenilenebilir enerji tüketiminin çevre kirliliği üzerine etkisi: Türkiye için çevresel kuznets hipotezinin analizi. Düzce İktisat Dergisi, 2(2), 138-151.
8. Bölük, G. & Mert, M. (2015). The renewable energy, growth and environmental Kuznets curve in Turkey: an ARDL approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 587–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.138 BP Statistical Review, 2022

9. Brown, R. L., Durbin, J. & Evans, J. M. (1975). Techniques for testing the constancy of regression relationships over time. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 37(2), 149-192.
10. Charfeddine, L. & Kahia, M. (2019). Impact of renewable energy consumption and financial development on CO2 emissions and economic growth in the MENA region: A panel vector autoregressive (PVAR) analysis. Renewable Energy, 139, 198-213 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.010
11. Copeland, B. R. & Taylor, M. S. (2004). Trade, growth, and the environment. Journal of Economic Literature. 42 (1), 7–71.
12. Çetin, M., Ecevit, E. & Yücel, A. G. (2018). The impact of economic growth, energy consumption, trade openness, and financial development on carbon emissions: empirical evidence from Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(36), 36589–36603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356- 018-3526-5
13. Çoban, M. N. & Özkan, O. (2022). Çevresel Kuznets Eğrisi: Türkiye’de küreselleşme ve ekonomik büyümenin çevre üzerindeki etkisinin yeni dinamik ARDL simülasyon modeli ile incelenmesi. Akademik Hassasiyetler, 9(19), 207-228.
14. Danish, Saud, S., Baloch M. A. & Lodhi, R. N. (2018). The nexus between energy consumption and financial development: estimating the role of globalization in Next-11 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(19), 18651–18661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2069-0
15. Dickey, D. A. & Fuller, W. A. (1981). Likelihood ratio statistics for autoregressive time series with unit root. Econometrica, 49(4), 1057-1072.
16. Doğan, E., Ulucak, R. Koçak, E. & Işık, C. (2020). The use of ecological footprint in estimating the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis for BRICST by considering cross-section dependence and heterogeneity. Science of the Total Environment, 723, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138063
17. Doğanlar, M., Mike, F., Kızılkaya, O. & Karlılar, S. (2021). Testing the long-run effects of economic growth, financial development and energy consumption on CO 2 emissions in Turkey: new evidence from RALS cointegration test. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 1–10. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11356-021-12661-y
18. Gokmenoglu, K. K. & Sadeghieh, M. (2019). Financial Development, CO2 Emissions, Fossil Fuel Consumption and Economic Growth: The Case of Turkey. Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment, 38(4), 7-28, DOI:10.1080/10485236.2019.12054409
19. Kasman, A. & Duman, Y. S. (2015). CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries: A panel data analysis. Economic Modelling, 44(C) , 97-103.
20. Katircioğlu, S. T. & Taşpinar, N. (2017). Testing the moderating role of financial development in an environmental Kuznets curve: empirical evidence from Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 572–586. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.127
21. Khan M. T. I., Yaseen, M. R. & Ali, Q. (2017). Dynamic relationship between financial development, energy consumption, trade and greenhouse gas: comparison of upper middle income countries from Asia, Europe, Africa and America. Journal of cleaner production, 161, 567–580. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.129
22. Khan, Z., Ali, M., Kirikkaleli, D., Wahab, S. & Jiao, Z. (2020). The impact of technological innovation and public-privatepartnership investment on sustainable environment in China: Consumption-based carbon emissions analysis. Sustainable Development, 28, 1317–1330. DOI: 10.1002/sd.2086.
23. Kılıç, R. ve Akalın, G. (2016). Türkiye’de çevre ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki: ARDL sınır testi yaklaşımı. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16(2), 49-60.
24. Kihombo, S., Ahmed, Z., Chen, S., Adebayo, T. S., Kirikkaleli, D. (2021). Linking financial development, economic growth, and ecological footprint: what is the role of technological innovation?. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(43), 61235-61245.
25. Kirikkaleli, D. & Adebayo, T. S. (2020). Do renewable energy consumption and financial development matter for environmental sustainability? New global evidence. Sustainable Development, 29(4), 583-594. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2159
26. Lai, X., Liu, J., Shi, Q., Georgiev, G. & Wu, G. (2017). Driving forces for low carbon technology innovation in the building industry: a critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 74(C), 299–315.
27. Lin, B., Omoju, O. E., Nwakeze, N. M., Okonkwo, J. U. & Megbowon, E. T. (2016). Is the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis a sound basis for environmental policy in Africa?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 133(C), 712-724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.173
28. Long, X., Luo, Y., Wu, C. & Zhang, J. (2018). The influencing factors of CO2 emission intensity of Chinese agriculture from 1997 to 2014. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 13093–13101.
29. Özcan, B., Apergis, N. & Shahbaz, M. A. (2018). Revisit of the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis for Turkey: New evidence from bootstrap rolling window causality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25, 32381–32394
30. Öztürk, I. & Acaravci, A. (2013). The long-run and causal analysis of energy, growth, openness and financial development on carbon emissions in Turkey. Energy Economics, 36, 262-267.
31. Özokcu, S. & Özdemir, Ö. (2017). Economic growth, energy, and environmental kuznets curve, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 639-647 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.059
32. Pata, U. K. (2018). Renewable energy consumption, urbanization, financial development, income and CO2 emissions in Turkey: Testing EKC hypothesis with structural breaks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 770-779.
33. Phillips, P. C. B. & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75, 335-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.2.335
34. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. & Smith, J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships, Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326.
35. Sarkodie, S. A. & Öztürk, I. (2020). Investigating the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis in Kenya: A multivariate analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 117, 109481, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109481.
36. Shahbaz, M., Uddin, G. S., Rehman, I. U. ve Imran, K. (2014). Industrialization, electricity consumption and CO2 emissions in Bangladesh. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31, 575–586.
37. Shahzad, S. J. H., Kumar, R. R. Zakaria, M. & Hurr M. (2017). Carbon emission, energy consumption, trade openness and financial development in Pakistan: A revisit. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 185-192
38. Shoaib, H. M., Rafique, M. Z., Nadeem, A. M. & Huang, S. (2020). Impact of financial development on CO2 emissions: A comparative analysis of developing countries (D8) and developed countries (G8). Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 12461–12475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06680-z Suki, N. M., Sharif, A., Afshan, S. & Suki, N. M. (2020). Revisiting the environmental kuznets curve in Malaysia: The role of globalization in sustainable environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 264, 121669.
39. Şeker, F., Ertuğrul, H. M. & Çetin, M. (2015). The impact of foreign direct investment on environmental quality: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Turkey. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 347–356.
40. Toda, H. Y. & Yamamoto, T. (1995). Statistical inference in vector autoregressions with possibly integrated processes. Journal of Econometrics, 66(1-2), 225-250.
41. Umar, M., Ji, X., Kirikkaleli, D. & Xu, Q. (2020). COP21 Roadmap: Do innovation, financial development, and transportation infrastructure matter for environmental sustainability in China?. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 111026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111026
42. Qoyasha, F. K. & Eren, M. (2022). Türkiye’de teknolojik inovasyon ve yenilenebilir enerji tüketiminin çevre kirliliği üzerine etkisi. Ardahan Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 4(2), 110–118.
43. Wang, R., Mirza, N., Vasbieva, D. G., Abbas, Q. & Xiong, D. (2020). The nexus of carbon emissions, financial development, renewable energy consumption, and technological innovation: What should be the priorities in light of COP 21 Agreements?. Journal of Environmental Management, 271, 111027.
44. Yii, K.-J. & Geetha, C. (2017). The nexus between technology innovation and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: Evidence from granger causality test. Energy Procedia, 105, 3118–3124.
45. Zivot, E.& Andrews, D. W. K. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251-270.
46. Zhang, Y. -J., Liu, Z., Zhang, H. & Tan, T. -D. (2014). The impact of economic growth, industrial structure and urbanization on carbon emission intensity in China. Natural Hazards, 73, 579–595. DOI 10.1007/s11069-014-1091-x
47. İnternet Kaynakları https://data.oecd.org/
48. https://data.imf.org/
49. https://data.worldbank.org/
50. https://data.worldbank.org/