A New Fuzzy Based Marketing Performance Measurement Model with a Real Case Study

Öz

The level of efficiency for business and process control is based on performance measurements. Performance measurement is a mixed system that contains many different criteria such as customer behaviour, sales, employees and product range. Businesses need to measure sales performance to maintain sustainable competition lines and improve their strategies. In this paper, a performance measurement in the clothing industry has been carried out and a pioneering company data has been utilized as the application area. In the paper, Interval Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (IV-PFAHP) method and Interval Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy TOPSIS (IV-PFTOPSIS) method have been suggested to deal with marketing performance assessment process with a real case study. The paper focuses on IV-PFAHP and IV-PFTOPSIS methods to handle uncertainty in the marketing performance assessment process for clothing industry. The results revealed that the proposed approach produces reliable outcomes representing the vagueness of the decision-making process. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Marketing Performance,Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets,AHP,TOPSIS,Buyer Behavior

Kaynakça

1. Akal, Z. (2000). Isletmelerde Performans Olcum ve Denetimi, Cok Yonlu Performans Gostergeleri. Milli Produktivite Merkezi Yayınları, Ankara.
2. Aydiner, A. S., Tatoglu, E., Bayraktar, E., Zaim, S., & Delen, D. (2019). Business Analytics and Firm Performance: The Mediating Role of Business Process Performance. Journal of Business Research, 96, 228–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.028
3. Bayyurt, N. (2007). Isletmelerde Performans Degerlendirme Onemi ve Performans Gostergeleri Arasindaki Iliskiler. Sosyal Siyaset Konferanslari Dergisi, 0(53), 577 - 592.
4. Beer, M. (1981). Performance Appraisal: Dilemmas and Possibilities. Organizational Dynamics, 9(3), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(81)90036-X
5. Cakmak, N. (2008). Performans Degerlendirmesi Gerekli Midir? Neden?. Bilimsel İletisim ve Bilgi Yonetimi Sempozyumu (s. 212-230). Ankara: Universite ve ArastırmaKutuphanecileri Dernegi.
6. DeNisi, A. S., Cafferty, T. P., & Meglino, B. M. (1984). A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: A model and research propositions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33(3), 360–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(84)90029-1
7. Franco-Santos, M., Kennerly, M., Micheli, P., Martinez, V., Mason, S., Marr, B., … Neely, A. (2007). Towards a Definition of a Business Performance Measurement System. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 27(8), 784–801. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570710763778
8. Garg, H. (2016). A Novel Accuracy Function Under Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Environment for Solving Multicriteria Decision Making Problem. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31(1), 529-540.

9. Karaman, R. (2009). Isletmelerde Performans Olcumunun Onemi ve Modern Bir Performans Olcme Araci Olarak Balanced Scorecard. Sosyal ve Ekonomik Arastırmalar Dergisi, 411-427.
10. Yuregir, O., & Nakiboglu, G. (2007). Performans Olcumu ve Olcum Sistemleri: Genel Bir Bakis. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 16(2), 545-562.Kubali D. (1999). Performans Denetimi. Amme Idaresi Dergisi, 35(1), 31-62.
11. Kumru, M., & University, D. (2012). Kurumsal Performans Degerlendirmenin Onemi, Gelisimi ve Uygulama Ornekleri, 7.
12. Kuo, Y.-F., & Chen, P.-C. (2008). Constructing Performance Appraisal Indicators for Mobility of The Service Industries Using Fuzzy Delphi Method. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(4), 1930–1939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.068
13. Naidoo, M., & Gasparatos, A. (2018). Corporate Environmental Sustainability in The Retail Sector: Drivers, Strategies and Performance Measurement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 203, 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.253
14. Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance Measurement System Design: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579510083622
15. Okoshi, C. Y., Pinheiro de Lima, E., & Gouvea Da Costa, S. E. (2019). Performance Cause and Effect Studies: Analysing High Performance Manufacturing Companies. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.003
16. Onar, S. C., Oztaysi. B., Otay, I & Kahraman, C. (2015). Multi-Expert Wind Energy Technology Selection Using Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Energy, 90, s. 274-285.
17. Peng, X. & Yang, Y. (2015). Fundamental properties of interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 31(5), 444-487, Performance Measurement Guide. (1993). Sayistay Yayin İsleri Mdrlg. (H. Demirkaya, Trans.) ABD.
18. Rahman, K., Abdullah, S., Shakeel, M., Khan, M. S. A. & Ullah, M. (2017). Interval-Valued Pythagorean Fuzzy Geometric Aggregation Operators and Their Application to Group Decision Making Problem. Cogent Mathematics, 4, s.1-20.
19. Speklé, R. F., & Verbeeten, F. H. M. (2014). The Use of Performance Measurement Systems in The Public Sector: Effects on Performance. Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.004
20. Tepe, S. (2018). Risk Assessment Using A Fuzzy Logic Approach and Neutrosophic Set Approaches: An Application on The Asphalt Production Process, Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul.
21. Tepe, S. & Kaya, I (2019). A Fuzzy Based Risk Assessment Model to Evaluations of Hazards With A Real Case Study. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment. An International Journal, 15(1), 1-27.
22. Tuncer, P. (2013). Orgutlerde Performans Degerlendirme ve Motivasyon. Sayistay Dergisi(88), 87-108.
23. Yenice, E. (2006). Kamu Kesiminde Performans Degerlendirilmesi. Maliye Dergisi(150), 122-132.
24. Yuregir, O., & Nakıboglu , G. (2007). Performans Olcumu ve Olcum Sistemleri: Genel Bir Bakis. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi, 16(2), 545-562.
25. Zerenler, M., & University, S. (2005). The Performance Measurement System Design and A Study on Performance Measurement of Manufacturing Systems. Ekonomik ve Sosyal Arastirmalar Dergisi, 36.