Márquez ve Le Guin’in Eserlerinde Etik, Vasatlık ve Kayıtsız Hoşnutluk Eleştirisi

Öz

Kocaman Kanatlı İhtiyar Adam, Nobel ödüllü romancı Gabriel García Márquez tarafından yazılmıştır ve Omelas'ı Terk Edip Gidenler, öncelikle bilim kurgu eserleriyle tanınan Ursula Le Guin tarafından kaleme alınmıştır. Bu çalışmada seçilen ve tartışılan örnek eserlerin türleri ve üslupları belirgin bir şekilde farklılık gösterseler de, makaledeki ilgili eserlerin tematik izlekleri ve toplumu ve kamu ahlakını eleştirme biçimlerinin oldukça benzer olduğu ileri sürülmektedir. Hikâyelerin kurgusal dünyasında, hem Márquez'in kanatlı adamı hem de Le Guin'in zavallı çocuğu, toplumlarının üyeleri tarafından kötü muameleye maruz kalır; bu da bize toplum eleştirisi, ahlaki karmaşıklık, kendinden hoşnutluk ve vasatlık gibi hikâyelerin örtük kaygılarını anlatır. Kanatlı adam alışılmadık olduğu ve toplumun kültürel ve dini beklentilerine uymadığı için istismar edilirken, çocuk tüm toplumun bencil refahı için sömürülür ve aşağılanır. Bu çalışma, iki farklı türde ve sarsıcı iki kurguyu bir araya getirip eleştirel bir gözle okuyarak, kendinden hoşnutluğun, vasatlığın, halk bilgeliği ve toplumun düşünce kalıplarının kültür, politika, ekonomi ve hatta dini-kapitalist teodise gibi geniş kapsamlı değişkenlerle nasıl iç içe geçtiğini göstermeyi ve tartışmayı amaçlar.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Márquez
• Le Guin
• Kamu Ahlakı
• Kayıtsız Hoşnutluk
• Vasatlık

The Critique of Ethics, Mediocrity and Complacency in Márquez and Le Guin’s Fictions

Öz

A Very Old Man With Enormous Wings is published by the Nobel laureate novelist Gabriel García Márquez and The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas is authored by Ursula Le Guin who is known primarily for her works of science fiction. While the genres and the tones of the sample works chosen and discussed in this study markedly differ, their thematic trajectories and the way they criticize society and public morality is argued to resemble considerably. In the fictional world of the stories, both Márquez’s winged-man and Le Guin’s miserable child are mistreated by the members of their societies the fact of which relates us the stories’ undercurrent concerns of the critique of society, moral complexity, complacency and mediocrity. While the winged-man is abused as he is unfamiliar and does not comply with the cultural and religious expectations of the society, the child is exploited and degraded for the selfish prosperity of an entire community. In bringing together two different generic and unsettling fictions and reading them critically, this study aims to demonstrate and argue how complacency, mediocrity, thought patterns of society, folk wisdom and superstition are entangled with far-reaching variables of culture, politics, economics and even religious-capitalist theodicy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Márquez
• Le Guin
• Public Morality
• Complacency
• Mediocrity

Kaynakça

1. Adams, C. R. (1995). “The Endless Rains of Death and Desolation in García Márquez’s Short Stories”, ed, Climate and Literature Reflections of Environment, Pérez, J., Aycock, W., Lubbock: Texas Tech University Press.
2. Barlett, S. J. (2011). Normality Does Not Equal Mental Health: The Need to Look Elsewhere for Standards of Good Psychological Health, Santa Barbara/California: ABC-CLIO/Greenwood, Praeger, Libraries.
3. Bentham, J. (1823). An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Oxford: Oxford Universty Press & W. Pickering.
4. Brennan, G., Sayre-McCord, G. (2021). “Real World Theory, Complacency, and Aspiration”, Philos Stud, 178, 2365-2384.
5. Davie, M.; Grass, T. Holmes, S. R. McDowell, J. Noble, T. A. (2016). New Dictionary of Theology: Historical and Systematic, Lisle: Inter-Varsity Press.
6. Davis, L. (2005). “The Dynamic and Revolutionary Utopia of Ursula K. Le Guin”, The New Utopian Politics of Ursula K. Le Guin’s The Dispossessed, ed. Davis, L., Stillman, P., Lanham: Lexington Books.
7. De Wagter, C. (2013). Mouths on Fire with Songs: Negotiating Multi-ethnic Identities on the Contemporary North American Stage, Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi BV.
8. Dostoyevsky, F. (1976). The Brothers Karamazov, trans. Garnett, C., rev&ed. R. E. Matlaw, R. E., New York: Norton and Co.

9. Faris, W. B. (2004). Ordinary Enchantments: Magical Realism and the Remystification of Narrative, Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
10. Hartmann, N. (2002). Ethics: Moral Values, London: Routledge.
11. Ingenieros, J. (2018). Mediocre Man, trans. Picone C. E., Independently published.
12. James, W. (1891). “The Moral Philosopher and the Moral Life”, International Journal of Ethics, 1(3), 330-354.
13. Kahan, A. S. (1992). Aristocratic Liberalism: The Social and Political Thought of Jacob Burckhardt, John Stuart Mill, and Alexis de Tocqueville, New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Kawall, J. (2006). “On Complacency”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 43(4), 343-355.
15. Le Guin, U. K. (1991). “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas”, (Variations on a theme by William James), Utopian Studies, 2 (1/2), 1-5.
16. Márquez, G. J. C. G. (1971). “A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings”, In James McCourt, A. R. Ammons, Milton Klonsky; C. K Solotaroff (Ed), New American Review, Vol.13, 70-77. New York: New American Library.
17. Mill, J. S. (1869). On Liberty, London: Longmans; Green Reader and Dyer.
18. Morehead, P.D. (2002). New American Roget's College Thesaurus in Dictionary Form, New York: Penguin Publishing Group.
19. Nietzsche, F. (2009). Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future, trans. Johnston, I., Arlington: Richer Resources Publications.
20. Pelayo, R. (2001). Gabriel García Márquez: A Critical Companion, Westport: Greenwood Press.
21. Roemer, K. M. (1991). “The Talking Porcupine Liberates Utopia: Le Guin's Omelas as Pretext to the Dance”, Utopian Studies, 2(1), 1-5.
22. Sardo, M. C. (2018). “From Utopia to Everyday Injustices: Omelas as Psychomyth”, Short Stories and Political Philosophy, Power, Prose, and Persuasion, ed. Peabody, B., Dolgoy, E. A., Hale, K. H., Lanham: Lexington Books.
23. Sartre, J.P. (2018). Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Penomenological Ontology, trans. Richmond, S., London: Routledge.
24. Szabados, B., Soifer, E. (2004). Hypocrisy Ethical Investigations, Peterborough: Broadview Press.
25. Uçar, A.S. (2024). “The Failure of Imagination and its Redemption: John Banville’s The Book of Evidence”, Critique: Studies in Contemporary Fiction, 65(5), 864-871.
26. Unwin, N. (1985). “Relativism and Moral Complacency”, Philosophy, 60(232), 205-2014.