EN
TR
Archaeological Evidence for Late Neolithic/Early Chalcolithic Marble Vessel Making at Ada Höyük
Öz
Stone vessels generally appear in chronological order dating back to the Epipaleolithic period. Although several chronological and typological evaluations of vessels made of different types of stones have been made so far, there is little information about their production techniques.
The focus of this study is the production of marble vessels as well as on some other finds of Ada Höyük, a settlement, which was investigated as part of the Uşak Protohistoric Period Survey Project (UPDAP). They are generally defined as grave goods or daily use objects according to their context. This article aims to date marble vessels from Ada Höyük through typological analogies and to assess their chaîne opératoire and production technology.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- ARNOLD AND PISCHIKOVA 1999: D. Arnold - E. Pischikova, “Stone vessels: luxury items with manifold implications” In: Egyptian Art in the Age of the Pyramids, The Metropolitan Museum of Art O’NeilL, J.P., Fuerstein, C., Childs Allison, E., Donovan, M. & Howard, K. (Eds.), New York, 121-131.
- ASGARİ 1981: N, Asgari, “Uşak Selçikler ve Çevresinden Roma Çağı Lahitleri ve Mermer Ocakları” Türk Arkeoloji Dergisi XXV-2, 11-47.
- ATASOY 2017: A. Atasoy, Uşak Atlası. Kayseri.
- AYAD 2014: E. A. M. Ayad, Drilling Tools and Stone Vessels of Heit el-Ghurab, Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, The American University of Cairo, School of Humanities and Social Science.
- BAYSAL et al. 2015: E. Baysal, A. Baysal, A. U. Türkcan and A. Nazaroff, “Early Specialized Production? A Chalcolithic Stone Bracelet Workshop at Kanlıtaş, Turkey” Oxford Journal of Archaeology 34(3), 235-257.
- BİLGİ 1980: Ö. Bilgi, “Yeni Bulunmuş Eserlerin Işığı Altında Anadolu’da Bronz Çağı Öncesi İnsan Figürleri Hakkında Yeni Gözlemler” Belleten XLIV, 173, 1-24.
- COSTIN 1991: C. Lynne Costin, “Craft Specialization: Issues in Defining, Documenting, and Explaining the Organization of Production” Archaeological Method and Theory, 3, 1-56.
- DEDEOĞLU et al. 2017: F. Dedeoğlu, H.H. Baysal, A. Ozan, E. Konakçı and B. Temür, “Ekşi Höyük 2015 Yılı Kazı Çalışmaları”. KST 38 (2), 389-402.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Arkeoloji
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Yayımlanma Tarihi
30 Nisan 2022
Gönderilme Tarihi
5 Ekim 2021
Kabul Tarihi
23 Şubat 2022
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2022 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 28
APA
Yılmaz, M. A. (2022). Archaeological Evidence for Late Neolithic/Early Chalcolithic Marble Vessel Making at Ada Höyük. Arkeoloji Dergisi, 1(28), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.51493/egearkeoloji.1005223
AMA
1.Yılmaz MA. Archaeological Evidence for Late Neolithic/Early Chalcolithic Marble Vessel Making at Ada Höyük. ADerg. 2022;1(28):1-21. doi:10.51493/egearkeoloji.1005223
Chicago
Yılmaz, Mehmet Ali. 2022. “Archaeological Evidence for Late Neolithic/Early Chalcolithic Marble Vessel Making at Ada Höyük”. Arkeoloji Dergisi 1 (28): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.51493/egearkeoloji.1005223.
EndNote
Yılmaz MA (01 Nisan 2022) Archaeological Evidence for Late Neolithic/Early Chalcolithic Marble Vessel Making at Ada Höyük. Arkeoloji Dergisi 1 28 1–21.
IEEE
[1]M. A. Yılmaz, “Archaeological Evidence for Late Neolithic/Early Chalcolithic Marble Vessel Making at Ada Höyük”, ADerg, c. 1, sy 28, ss. 1–21, Nis. 2022, doi: 10.51493/egearkeoloji.1005223.
ISNAD
Yılmaz, Mehmet Ali. “Archaeological Evidence for Late Neolithic/Early Chalcolithic Marble Vessel Making at Ada Höyük”. Arkeoloji Dergisi 1/28 (01 Nisan 2022): 1-21. https://doi.org/10.51493/egearkeoloji.1005223.
JAMA
1.Yılmaz MA. Archaeological Evidence for Late Neolithic/Early Chalcolithic Marble Vessel Making at Ada Höyük. ADerg. 2022;1:1–21.
MLA
Yılmaz, Mehmet Ali. “Archaeological Evidence for Late Neolithic/Early Chalcolithic Marble Vessel Making at Ada Höyük”. Arkeoloji Dergisi, c. 1, sy 28, Nisan 2022, ss. 1-21, doi:10.51493/egearkeoloji.1005223.
Vancouver
1.Mehmet Ali Yılmaz. Archaeological Evidence for Late Neolithic/Early Chalcolithic Marble Vessel Making at Ada Höyük. ADerg. 01 Nisan 2022;1(28):1-21. doi:10.51493/egearkeoloji.1005223