Descriptive Analysis of Prospective Teachers' Attitudes and Anxiety Towards Artificial Intelligence in Terms of Several Variables

Öz

Artificial intelligence is a technology which carries the potential to create revolutions in many areas including education. In the field of education, artificial intelligence has begun to be used in processes such as personalizing learning processes, analyzing student data, and providing support to teachers. However, the effects of this new technology on education and teacher canditates’ attitudes towards it have not been fully comprehended yet. Therefore, the aim of this study is to examine the attitudes and anxiety levels of prospective teachers towards artificial intelligence in terms of gender, the field of teaching, grade level, and experience through descriptive survey research. According to the findings, prospective teachers with AI experience attribute the AI to a role that will do the work for them and trust the outputs. However, some prospective teachers see the AI as an assistant and feel the need to check their answers. According to the results obtained, male teacher candidates have more positive attitudes than female teacher candidates, while female candidates have higher anxiety levels. In addition, having experience with artificial intelligence has a positive effect on attitude and reduces the anxiety level. The field of teaching and the level of the class does not create a significant difference in the attitude and anxiety levels of teacher candidates. As a result of the findings, it is recommended that courses on artificial intelligence should be added to teaching programs and that female teacher candidates should be encouraged to use artificial intelligence.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Artificial intelligence
• Anxiety
• Attitude
• Teacher Candidates
• Experience

Öğretmen Adaylarının Yapay Zekâya Yönelik Tutum ve Kaygılarının Çeşitli Değişkenler Açısından Betimsel Analizi

Öz

Yapay zekâ (YZ), günümüzde eğitim dahil birçok alanda devrim yaratma potansiyeli taşıyan bir teknolojidir. Özellikle eğitimde, öğrenme süreçlerini kişiselleştirme, öğrenci verilerini analiz etme ve öğretmenleri destekleme gibi pek çok alanda kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Ancak, bu yeni teknolojinin eğitimdeki etkileri ve öğretmen adaylarının bu duruma yönelik tutumları henüz tam olarak anlaşılmış değildir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, öğretmen adaylarının YZ’ya yönelik tutum ve kaygı düzeylerini belirlemek ve bu düzeyleri etkileyen faktörleri betimsel bir tarama araştırması ile incelemektir. Araştırmada, öğretmenlerin YZ’ya yönelik tutum ve kaygıları cinsiyet, öğretmenlik alanı, sınıf düzeyi ve deneyim sahibi olma değişkenleri açısından incelenmiştir. Elde edilen bulgulara göre YZ deneyimi olan öğretmen adayları, YZ'ya daha çok kendi yerlerine iş yapacak bir rol yüklerken, çıktılara da güvenmektedir. Ancak bazı adaylar, YZ'yı yardımcı olarak görüp yanıtlarını kontrol etme ihtiyacı duymaktadır. Ölçeklerden elde edilen sonuçlara göre; erkek öğretmen adayları kadınlara göre YZ’ya daha olumlu yaklaşmaktadır. Kadın öğretmen adayları ise daha fazla kaygı duymaktadır. YZ’yı daha önce deneyimleyen öğretmen adayları, bu teknolojiye karşı daha olumlu tutum sergilemekte ve daha az kaygı duymaktadır. Öğretmenlik alanı ve sınıf düzeyi ise öğretmenlerin tutum ve kaygı düzeyleri üzerinde anlamlı bir farklılık yaratmamaktadır. Elde edilen bulgular neticesinde öğretmenlik programlarına YZ’ya yönelik derslerin eklenmesi ve YZ’yı kullanmada kadın öğretmen adaylarının teşvik edilmesi önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yapay zeka
• Kaygı
• Tutum
• Öğretmen adayları
• Deneyim

Kaynakça

1. Aghaziarati, A., Nejatifar, S., & Abedi, A. (2023). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Investigating Teacher Attitudes. AI and Tech in Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1(1), 35-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.aitech.1.1.6
2. Ahmad, S. F., Rahmat, M. K., Mubarik, M. S., Alam, M. M., & Hyder, S. I. (2021). Artificial intelligence and its role in education. Sustainability, 13(22), 12902. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su132212902
3. Akgün, M., & Greenhow, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Addressing ethical challenges in K-12 settings. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(4), 381-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00096-7
4. Aliabadi, R., Singh, A., & Wilson, E. (2023, June). Transdisciplinary AI education: The confluence of curricular and community needs in the instruction of artificial intelligence. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education Technology (pp. 137-151). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7947-9_11
5. Alotaibi, N. S., & Alshehri, A. H. (2023). Prospers and Obstacles in Using Artificial Intelligence in Saudi Arabia Higher Education Institutions—The Potential of AI-Based Learning Outcomes. Sustainability, 15(13), 10723. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310723
6. Ardıç, M. A. (2021). Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin eğitimde teknoloji kullanımına yönelik tutumlarının incelenmesi. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 10(2), 649-675. http://dx.doi.org/10.30703/cije.748219
7. Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484.
8. Banaz, E., & Maden, S. (2024). Türkçe Öğretmen Adaylarının Yapay Zekâ Tutumlarının Farklı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. Trakya Eğitim Dergisi, 14(2), 1173-1180. https://doi.org/10.24315/tred.1430419

9. Benhamou, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence and the future of work. Revue d'économie industrielle, (169), 57-88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/rei.8727
10. Berner, J., Dallora, A. L., Palm, B., Sanmartin Berglund, J., & Anderberg, P. (2023). Five-factor model, technology enthusiasm and technology anxiety. Digital Health, 9. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076231203.
11. Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2014). The ethics of artificial intelligence. In K. Frankish & W. M. Ramsey (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of artificial intelligence (pp. 316–334). Cambridge University Press
12. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011) Sosyal Bilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı. 14. Baskı, Pegem Akademi.
13. Cai, Z., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2017). Gender and attitudes toward technology use: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 105, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.003
14. Chassignol, M., Khoroshavin, A., Klimova, A., & Bilyatdinova, A. (2018). Artificial Intelligence trends in education: a narrative overview. Procedia computer science, 136, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.233
15. Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2017). Readiness for integrating mobile learning in the classroom: Challenges, preferences and possibilities. Computers in human Behavior, 76, 112-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.01
16. Cooper, J. (2006). The digital divide: The special case of gender. Journal of computer assisted learning, 22(5), 320-334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00185.x
17. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed method approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
18. Çam, M. B., Çelik, N. C., Güntepe, E. T., & Durukan, Ü. G. (2021). Öğretmen adaylarının yapay zekâ teknolojileri ile ilgili farkındalıklarının belirlenmesi. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18(48), 263-285.
19. Davis, F. D. (1989). Technology Acceptance Model: TAM. In M. N. Al-Suqri, & A. S. Al-Aufi (Eds.), Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption (pp. 205-219). IGI Global.
20. Denis, D. J. (2019). SPSS data analysis for univariate, bivariate, and multivariate statistics. John Wiley & Sons.
21. Deniz, S. S. (2022). Yapay zekâ kaygısının incelenmesine ilişkin bir araştırma. Socıal Mentalıty And Researcher Thınkers Journal (SMART JOURNAL), 8(63), 1675-1677. https://doi.org/10.29228/smryj.64393
22. Dikmen, S., & Bahçeci, F. (2024). Eğitim Bilimleri Alanında Yapay Zekâ Konulu Bilimsel Yayınların Eğilimleri: Bibliyometrik Bir İnceleme. Socrates Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Researches, 10(46), 98-112. Doi: 10.5281/zenodo.13981118
23. Erdoğan, Ş., & Bozkurt, E. (2023). Examining the Perceptions of Prospective Physics Teachers on the Concept of “Artificial Intelligence”: A Metaphor Study. Journal of Civilization and Society, 7(2), 152-163. http://dx.doi.org/10.51117/metder.2023.41
24. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior. New York: Wiley
25. Fošner, A. (2024). University Students’ attitudes and perceptions towards AI tools: Implications for sustainable Educational practices. Sustainability, 16(19), 8668. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16198668
26. Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Pearson.
27. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. W. (1997). Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quarterly, 21(4), 389-400. https://doi.org/10.2307/249720
28. Gocen, A., & Aydemir, F. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education and schools. Research on Education and Media, 12(1), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.2478/rem-2020-0003
29. Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The qualitative report, 8(4), 597-607.
30. Guilherme, A. (2019). Considering AI in Education: Erziehung but Never Bildung. In: Knox, J., Wang, Y., Gallagher, M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Inclusive Education. Perspectives on Rethinking and Reforming Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8161-4_10
31. Harry, A. (2023). Role of AI in Education. Interdiciplinary Journal and Hummanity (INJURITY), 2(3), 260-268. https://doi.org/10.58631/injurity.v2i3.52.
32. Haseski, H. I. (2019). What do Turkish pre-service teachers think about artificial intelligence?. International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 3(2), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v3i2.55
33. Hengstler, M., Enkel, E., & Duelli, S. (2016). Applied artificial intelligence and trust—The case of autonomous vehicles and medical assistance devices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 105, 105-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.014
34. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
35. Holmes, W., Bidarra, J., & Simonsen, H. K. (2021). Artificial intelligence in higher education: a roadmap and future perspectives. Forsøg med uddannelsesdigitalisering og hybride formater, 121-138.
36. Hopcan, S., Türkmen, G., & Polat, E. (2024). Exploring the artificial intelligence anxiety and machine learning attitudes of teacher candidates. Education and Information Technologies, 29(6), 7281-7301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12086-9
37. Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
38. İşler, B., & Kılıç, M. (2021). Eğitimde Yapay Zekâ Kullanimi ve Gelişimi. Yeni Medya Elektronik Dergisi, 5(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.17932/IAU.EJNM.25480200.2021/ejnm_v5i1001
39. Karimi, H., & Khawaja, S. (2023). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Higher Education in England. Creative Education, 14, 2405-2415. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2023.1412154
40. Kaya, F., Aydin, F., Schepman, A., Rodway, P., Yetişensoy, O., & Demir Kaya, M. (2022). The Roles of Personality Traits, AI Anxiety, and Demographic Factors in Attitudes toward Artificial Intelligence. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(2), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2151730
41. Kim, S., Kim, S., Lee, M., & Kim, H. (2020). Review on artificial intelligence education for K-12 students and teachers. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 23(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.32431/kace.2020.23.4.001
42. Köse, B. B., Radıf, H., Uyar, B., Baysal, İ., & Demirci, N. (2024). Öğretmen Görüşlerine Göre Eğitimde Yapay Zekânın Önemi. Journal Of Socıal, Humanıtıes And Admınıstratıve Scıences (JOSHAS), 9(71), 4203-4209. https://doi.org/10.29228/JOSHAS.74125
43. Latif, E., Zhai, X., & Liu, L. (2023). Ai gender bias, disparities, and fairness: Does training data matter?. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.10833.
44. Li, J., & Huang, J. S. (2020). Dimensions of artificial intelligence anxiety based on the integrated fear acquisition theory. Technology in Society, 63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101410
45. Li, N., & Kirkup, G. (2007). Gender and cultural differences in Internet use: A study of China and the UK. Computers & Education, 48(2), 301-317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.007
46. Liu, M., Ren, Y., Nyagoga, L. M., Stonier, F., Wu, Z., & Yu, L. (2023). Future of education in the era of generative artificial intelligence: Consensus among Chinese scholars on applications of ChatGPT in schools. Future in Educational Research, 1(1), 72-101. https://doi.org/10.1002/fer3.10
47. Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education.
48. Lund, B. D., Mannuru, N. R., & Agbaji, D. (2024). AI anxiety and fear: A look at perspectives of information science students and professionals towards artificial intelligence. Journal of Information Science, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515241282001
49. Manyika, J., Lund, S., Chui, M., Bughin, J., Woetzel, J., Batra, P., Ko, R., Sanghvi, S. McKinsey & Company. (2017). What the future of work will mean for jobs, skills, and wages, McKinsey Global Institute, https://www.mckinsey.com/ featured-insights/future-of-work/jobs-lost-jobs-gained-what-the-futureof-work-will-mean-for-jobs-skills-and-wages
50. Mart, M., & Kaya, G. (2024). Okul öncesi öğretmen adaylarının yapay zekâya yönelik tutumları ve yapay zekâ okur yazarlığı arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Edutech Research, 2(1), 91-109.
51. Maxwell, J. A. (2016). The validity and reliability of research: A realist perspective. In D. Wyse, L. E. Suter, E. Smith, & N. Selwyn (Eds.), The BERA/SAGE Handbook of Educational research (pp. 116–140). Sage
52. Mellinger, C. D., & Hanson, T. A. (2020). Methodological considerations for survey research: Validity, reliability, and quantitative analysis. Linguistica Antverpiensia, New Series–Themes in Translation Studies, 19. https://doi.org/10.52034/lanstts.v19i0.549
53. Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54. Nguyen, A., Ngo, H. N., Hong, Y., Dang, B., & Nguyen, B. P. T. (2023). Ethical principles for artificial intelligence in education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(4), 4221-4241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11316-w
55. Pokrivcakova, S. (2019). Preparing teachers for the application of AI-powered technologies in foreign language education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 7(3), 135-153. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2019-0025
56. Pokrivcakova, S. (2023). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes towards artificial intelligence and its integration into EFL teaching and learning. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 11(3), 100-114. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2023-0031
57. Rosen, L. D., & Weil, M. M. (1995). Computer availability, computer experience, and technophobia among public school teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 11(1), 9-31.
58. Russell, S. J., & Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. Pearson.
59. Schepman, A., & Rodway, P. (2020). Initial validation of the general attitudes towards Artificial Intelligence Scale. Computers in human behavior reports, 1, 100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2020.100014
60. Seyrek, M., Yıldız, S., Emeksiz, H., Şahin, A., & Türkmen, M. T. (2024). Öğretmenlerin Eğitimde Yapay Zekâ Kullanımına Yönelik Algıları. International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR), 11(106), 845-856. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11113077
61. Shirin, A. (2022). Artificial Intelligence Technology on Teaching-Learning: Exploring Bangladeshi Teachers’ Perceptions. Embedded Selforganising Systems, 9(4), 3-9. https://doi.org/10.14464/ess.v9i4.553
62. Stein, J. P., Messingschlager, T., Gnambs, T., Hutmacher, F., & Appel, M. (2024). Attitudes towards AI: measurement and associations with personality. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 2909. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-53335-2
63. Suh, W., & Ahn, S. (2022). Development and validation of a scale measuring student attitudes toward artificial intelligence. Sage Open, 12(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221100463.
64. Tang, L., & Su, Y. S. (2024). Ethical Implications and Principles of Using Artificial Intelligence Models in the Classroom: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia & Artificial Intelligence, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2024.02.010.
65. Tekin, N. (2023). Eğitimde yapay zekâ: Türkiye kaynaklı araştırmaların eğilimleri üzerine bir içerik analizi. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Ereğli Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(Özel Sayı), 387-411. https://doi.org/10.51119/ereegf.2023.49
66. Teo, T. (2010). A path analysis of pre-service teachers’ attitudes to computer use: Applying and extending the technology acceptance model in an educational context. Interactive Learning Environments, 18(1), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820802231327
67. Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2432-2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008
68. Terzi, R. (2020). An Adaptation of Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Scale into Turkish: Reliability and Validity Study. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 7(4), 1501-1515.
69. Uygun, D. (2024). Teachers' perspectives on artificial intelligence in education. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 4(1), 931-939. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2024.01.005
70. VanLehn, K. (2011). The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369
71. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
72. Wang, Y. Y., & Wang, Y. S. (2019). Development and validation of an artificial intelligence anxiety scale: An initial application in predicting motivated learning behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(4), 619-634. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1674887
73. Yeşilyurt, S., Dündar, R., & Demir, R. Z. (2024). Türkiye’de yapay zekâ ve eğitim ilişkisini inceleyen lisansüstü tezlerin analizi: Bir meta sentez çalışması. Journal of Innovative Research in Social Studies. 7(1), 47-73. https://doi.org/10.47503/jirss.1484848
74. Yue, M., Jong, M. S. Y., & Ng, D. T. K. (2024). Understanding K–12 teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge readiness and attitudes toward artificial intelligence education. Education and Information Technologies, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12621-2
75. Yue, M., Jong, M. S.-Y., & Dai, Y. (2022). Pedagogical Design of K-12 Artificial Intelligence Education: A Systematic Review. Sustainability, 14(23), 15620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315620
76. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
77. Zhai, X., Chu, X., Chai, C. S., Jong, M. S. Y., Istenic, A., Spector, M., ... & Li, Y. (2021). A Review of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Education from 2010 to 2020. Complexity, 2021(1), 8812542. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8812542
78. Zhang, B., & Dafoe, A. (2019). Artificial intelligence: American attitudes and trends. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3312874.