The Investigation of University Students’ Views towards E Learning Tools: A International Comparison

Öz

-

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Üniversite Öğrencilerinin E öğrenme Araçlarına Yönelik Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi: Uluslararası Bir Karşılaştırma

Öz

Bu çalışmada ERASMUS tematik ağ kapsamında AB Komisyonu tarafından desteklenen “Enhancing Lifelong Learning for the Electrical and Information Engineering Community” ELLEIEC isimli projenin alt görevlerinden olan “e öğrenme araçlarının geleneksel araçlar ile karşılaştırılması ve etkinliklerinin araştırılması” çalışması sonucu toplanan veri üzerinden Türkiye ile diğer ülkelerde öğrenim gören öğrencilerin e öğrenme araçları konusundaki görüşleri incelenmiştir Altı ülkeden 110 öğrencinin katıldığı araştırmada öğrencilerin e öğrenme araçlarına yönelik görüşleri proje araştırmacıları tarafından geliştirilen anket yardımı ile toplanmıştır Toplanan veriler anketin alt boyutlarında ülkeler bazında karşılaştırılarak analiz edilmiştir Anketin 4 alt boyutunda e öğrenme araçlarının kullanılabilirliği e öğrenme araçlarının etkililiği e öğrenme araçlarına yönelik memnuniyet ve e öğrenme araçların öğrenme üzerine etkisi öğrencilerin e öğrenme araçlarına yönelik görüşleri incelenmiş ve alt boyutların ortalamaları 5 üzerinden sırasıyla 4 3 82 92 3 72 olarak tespit edilmiştir E öğrenme araçlarına yönelik öğrenci görüşleri ülkelere göre tüm alt boyutlarda istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıklar göstermektedir p

Anahtar Kelimeler

• E- Öğrenme, e-öğrenme araçları, öğrenci görüşleri

Kaynakça

1. Ardito, C., De Marsico, M., Lanzilotti, R., Levialdi, S., Roselli, T., Rossano, V. ve Tersigni, M. (2004). “Usability of E-Learning Tools”, Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, pp. 80-84, ISBN:1- 58113-867-9, ACM New York, NY, US.
2. Barrett, H. C. (2009). Electronic Portfolios – A chapter in Educational Technology: An Encyclopedia to be published by ABC-CLIO 2001. [Online]. http://www.helenbarrett.com/portfolios/encyclopediaentry.htm).
3. Bausch, P., Haughey, M. ve Hourihan, M. (2002). We Blog: Publishing Online with Weblogs, Chichester:Wiley.
4. Bilén, S.G., Lee, D., Messner, J.I., Nguyen, H.T., Simpson, T.W., Techetassanesoontorn, Devon R.F. (2009). Tablet PC Use and Impact on Learning in Technology and Engineering Classrooms: A Preliminary Study. Workshop on the Impact of Pen-Based Technology on Education, pp. 11-19.
5. Blood, R. (2004). How Blogging Software Reshapes the Online Community. Communications of the ACM, 47(12), 53-55.
6. Border, J., Stoudt, K. ve Warnock, M. (2006). E-Learning Concepts and Techniques, http://iit.bloomu.edu/Spring2006_eBook_files/chapter4.htm#h4_2 adresinden Ağustos 2011’de elde edildi. [Online].
7. Cohen J., (1988). Statistical Power and Analysis for The Behavioral Science (2. Baskı). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8. Concannon, F., Flynn, A., ve Campbell, M. (2005). What Campus-Based Students Think About The Quality and Benefits Of E-Learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 501-12.

9. Conole, G. ve Oliver, M. (2002). Embedding Theory into Learning Technology Practice with Toolkits.Journal of Interactive Media in Education, Special issue on learning technology theory, Open University, 2002(8),http://www- jime.open.ac.uk/ adresinden elde edildi.
10. Danielson, C. L., Abrutyn, L. (2000). An Introduction to Using Portfolios in the Classroom. Alexandria : Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
11. Davis, I. (2005). Talis, Web 2.0 and All That, [Online]. (URL http://blog.iandavis.com//2005/07/talis-web-20-and-all-that adresinden Ağustos 2011’de elde edildi.
12. Ellis, R. K. (2009). Field Guide to Learning Management Systems, the American Society for Training & Development, ASTD Learning Circuits.
13. Gravoso, R., Pasa, A., Labra, J. ve Mori, T. (2008). Design and use of instructional materials for student-centered learning: a case in learning ecological concepts. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 17(1), 109-120.
14. Honey, P., Mumford A. (1982). The Manual of Learning Styles, Peter Honey Maidenhead Berkshire.
15. Horton W., Horton K. (2003), “E-learning Tools and Technologies”, ISBN: 0-471- 44458-8, Wiley Publishing, USA.
16. Karasar, N. (1999). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. Ankara: Nobel yayın, ISBN 975- 591-046-8.
17. Klamma, R., Chatti, M. A., Duval, E., Hummel, H., Hvannberg, E. H., Kravcik, M., Law, E., Naeve, A. ve Scott, P. (2007). Social Software for Life-long Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 72-83.
18. Klamma, R., Spaniol, M., Cao, Y. ve Jarke, M. (2006). Pattern-Based Cross Media Social Network Analysis for Technology Enhanced Learning in Europe. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4227, 242-256.
19. Koile, K., Singer, D. (2008). Assessing the Impact of a Tablet-PC-based Classroom Interaction System. Monograph of the 3rd Workshop on the Impact of Tablet PCs and Pen-based Technology on Education. Evidence and Outcomes, Purdue Univ., West Lafayette, Indiana, USA, pp. 73-80.
20. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development, Prentice Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
21. Kulieke, M., Bakker, J., Collins, C., Fennimore, T., Fine, C.,Herman, J., Jones, B.F., Raack, L. ve Tinzmann, M.B. (1990). Why Should Assessment be Based on a Vision of Learning?. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
22. Liccardi, I., Ounnas, A., Pau, R., Massey, E., Kinnunen, P., Lewthwaite, S., Midy, M., Sarkar, C., (2007). The role of social networks in students' learning experiences. ITiCSE-WGR '07 Working group reports on ITiCSE on Innovation and technology in computer science education ACM New York.
23. Littlejohn, A. ve McGill, L. (2004), ‘Detailed report for e-learning and pedagogy research study: effective resources for e-learning’, commissioned review report as part of the JISC-funded e-pedagogy desk study reviewing resources, tools and services for e-learning.
24. Martinez-Torres, M. R., Toral Marin, S.L., Garcia, F. Barrero, Vazquez, S. Gallardo, Oliva, M. Arias, Torres, T. (2008) “A technological acceptance of e-learning tools used in practical and laboratory teaching, according to the European higher education area”, Behaviour and Information Technology, Volume 27, Number 6, pp. 495-505(11).
25. Mohamad, A. (2009). Mobile Learning, Transforming the Delivery of Education and Training. AU Press, Athabasca University, ISSN 1919-4390 Issues in Distance Education Series.
26. O’Hear, S. (2010). e-learning 2.0 - how Web technologies are shaping education, [Online]. URL learning_20.php adresinden Ağustos 2011’de elde edildi.
27. http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/e
28. Oliver, M., McBean, J., Conole, G. ve Harvey, J. (2002). Using a Toolkit to Support the Evaluation of Learning.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Volume 18. Issues 2. 199-208.
29. Rennie, F. ve Mason, R. (2008). Learning and Social Networking Handbook. ISBN 0- 273-92776-1.
30. Riding, R. (1996). Learning Styles and Technology-Based Training. University of Birmingham Department of Education and Employment, UK.
31. Rogers, C. R., Frieberg, H. (1999). Freedom to Learn Third Edition, Macmillan College Publishing Company New York.
32. Sadler-Smith, E. (1996). Learning Styles: A Holistic Approach.Journal of European Industrial Training, 20(7), 29 – 36.
33. Sneller, J. (2007). The Tablet PC Classroom: Erasing Borders, Stimulating Activity, Enhancing Communication. Proceedings of the 37th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, IEEE. doi: 10.1109/FIE.2007.4417929.
34. Tanner, J., Noser, T. ve Totaro, M. (2009). Business Faculty And Undergraduate Students' Perceptions of Online Learning: A Comparative Study. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(1), 29-40.
35. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
36. Wall, J. S, Debra, K., Betts, M., Vian, A. (2005). An International Comparison Of E-Learning In Action – An Interactive Graphical on Line Teaching Resources for Residential Construction in Australia and a Blended Programme to Support Irish Entrepreneurs in Ireland. In: QUT Research Week 2005, 4-5 July 2005, Brisbane.
37. Wang, T. (2010). Web-based dynamic assessment: Taking assessment as teaching and learning strategy for improving students' E-Learning effectiveness. Computers & Education,54(4), 1157-1166.
38. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.