Examining Pre-Service Teachers' Experiences in the Learning by Teaching Process

Öz

The idea that teaching is a way of learning is not new and there is a big difference between learning for oneself and teaching for others. The factor that creates this difference is the teaching effect, in other words, the teaching expectancy. Studies have reported that the expectation of teaching others contributes to better learning of educational content and helps deeper learning. However, this method has attracted a little attention in teacher training. This study reports the findings from a case study that investigated the experiences of pre-service teachers within the learning-by-teaching activities. Learning-by-teaching entails a set of methods and mediums. In this study, a non-interactive video-producing approach was employed. A total of 23 pre-service teachers participated in the study. Research data were collected using semi-structured interviews. Three main themes and twenty codes have emerged from the analysis. The results indicated that producing instructional videos for peers positively affects students' learning, increases motivation, improves teaching skills, digital skills, self-assessment skills and promotes deep learning. In addition, the results have also revealed that learning by teaching is an effective learning method at the university level and in teacher education.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Learning by teaching
• Peer tutoring
• Student-generated videos
• Participation in teaching

Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğreterek Öğrenme Sürecine İlişkin Deneyimlerinin İncelenmesi

Öz

Öğretmenin bir öğrenme yolu olduğu fikri yeni değildir ve kendi kendine öğrenme ile başkaları için öğretme arasında büyük bir fark vardır. Bu farkı oluşturan faktör ise öğretme etkisi, diğer bir ifadeyle öğretme beklentisidir. Araştırmalar, başkalarına öğretme beklentisinin öğretim içeriğinin daha iyi öğrenilmesine katkı sağladığını ve daha derin öğrenmelerin gerçekleşmesine yardımcı olduğunu raporlamıştır ancak bu yöntem bugüne kadar öğretmen eğitiminde çok az ilgi görmüştür. Bu çalışma, öğretmen adaylarının öğreterek öğrenme etkinlikleri kapsamındaki deneyimlerini araştıran bir vaka çalışmasından elde edilen bulguları rapor etmektedir. Öğreterek öğrenme, bir dizi yöntem ve ortam gerektirir. Bu çalışmada, etkileşimli olmayan bir video üretim yaklaşımı kullanılmıştır. Araştırmaya toplam 23 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Araştırma verileri yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Analiz sonucunda üç ana tema ve yirmi kod ortaya çıkmıştır. Sonuçlar, akranlar için eğitici videolar üretmenin öğrencilerin öğrenmesini olumlu etkilediğini, motivasyonu artırdığını, öğretme becerilerini, dijital becerileri, öz değerlendirme becerilerini geliştirdiğini ve derin öğrenmeyi desteklediğini göstermiştir. Ayrıca araştırma sonuçları, öğreterek öğrenmenin üniversite düzeyinde ve öğretmen eğitiminde etkin bir öğrenme yöntemi olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Öğreterek öğrenme
• Akran öğretimi
• Öğrenci videoları
• Öğretime katılım

Kaynakça

1. Annis, L. F. (1983). The processes and effects of peer tutoring. Human Learning: Journal of Practical Research & Applications, 2(1), 39-47. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1984-21611-001
2. Arıkan, Y. D. (2009). Bilişim teknolojileri öğretmen adayları ve öğretmenlik uygulaması dersi. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 10(1), 1-23. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/egeefd/issue/4910/67241 adresinden elde edildi.
3. Arruabarrena, R., Sanchez, A., Dominguez, C., & Jaime, A. (2021). A novel taxonomy of student-generated video styles. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(68). doi: 10.1186/s41239-021-00295-6
4. Aslan, S. (2015). Is learning by teaching effective in gaining 21st century skills? The views of pre-service science teachers. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(6), 1441-1457. doi: 10.12738/estp.2016.1.0019
5. Aslan, S. (2017). Learning by teaching: Can it be utilized to develop inquiry skills? Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(12), 190-198. doi: 10.11114/jets.v5i12.2781
6. Becker, B., Dawson, P., Devine, K., Hannum, C., Hill, S., Leydens, J., Matuskevich, D., Traver, C., & Palmquist, M. (2005). Designing and conducting case studies. Retrieved from https://writing.colostate.edu/guides/guide.cfm?guideid=60
7. Bergande, B., Weilemann, E., & Brune, P. (2020). Exploring students perspectives on learning by teaching. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education. 12(5), 1221-1231. doi: 10.1108/JARHE-05-2019-0112
8. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university. Berkshire, England: McGraw-hill Education.

9. Biswas, G., Leelawong, K., Schwartz, D., Vye, N., & The Teachable Agents Group at Vanderbilt (2005). Learning by teaching: A new agent paradigm for educational software. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 19(3-4), 363-392. doi: 10.1080/08839510590910200
10. Brockfeld, T., Müller, B., & de Laffolie, J. (2018). Video versus live lecture courses: A comparative evaluation of lecture types and results. Medical education online, 23(1), 1555434. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2018.1555434
11. Campbell, L. O., Heller, S., & Ulse, L. (2020). Student-created video: An active learning approach in online learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments. 30(6), 1-10. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1711777
12. Chien, S., Zhu, X., & Chen, T. (2015). Self-learning through teaching: Singapore's land development policy transfer experience in China. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(6), 1639-1656. doi: 10.1177/0263774x15614443
13. Creswell, J. W. (2008). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London, United Kingdom: Sage.
14. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). London, United Kingdom: Sage.
15. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. London, United Kingdom: Sage.
16. Daou, M., Lohse, K. R., & Miller, M. W. (2018). Does practicing a skill with the expectation of teaching alter motor preparatory cortical dynamics? International Journal of Psychophysiology, 127, 1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.02.013
17. Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York, USA: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315134543
18. Duran, D. (2017). Learning-by-teaching. Evidence and implications as a pedagogical mechanism. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54, 476-484. doi: 10.1080/14703297.2016.1156011
19. Durán Gisbert, D., & Vázquez Rivas, A. (2021). Implementing peer tutoring for the development of empathy in nursing education. Investigacion y Educacion en Enfermeria, 39(2), e07. doi: 10.17533%2Fudea.iee.v39n2e07
20. Epps, B. S., Luo, T., & Muljana, P. S. (2021). Lights, camera, activity! A systematic review of research on learner-generated videos. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 20, 405-427. doi: 10.28945/4874
21. Evans, M. J., & Moore, J. S. (2013). Peer tutoring with the aid of the Internet. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(1), 144-155. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01280.x
22. Feijóo-García, P. G., & Gardner-McCune, C. (2020). Using student-created instructional videos in CS upper-level courses: A successful strategy in a functional programming course. In 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education. doi: 10.5220/0009416404120419
23. Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2013). The relative benefits of learning by teaching and teaching expectancy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 281-288. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.06.001
24. Fiorella, L., & Kuhlmann, S. (2020). Creating drawings enhances learning by teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(4), 811-822. doi: 10.1037/edu0000392
25. Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., & Hyun, H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
26. Frager, S., & Stern, C. (1970). Learning by teaching. The Reading Teacher, 23(5), 403-417. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20196333
27. Frank-Bolton, P., & Simha, R. (2018, February). Docendo discimus: Students learn by teaching peers through video. In Proceedings of the 49th ACM technical symposium on computer science education (pp. 473-478). doi: 10.1145/3159450.3159466
28. Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597-607. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2003.1870
29. Gündoğdu, K., Altın, M., Üstündağ, N., & Altay, B. (2018). Öğretmen adayları öğretmenlik uygulamasında yeterli mi? (Bir olgubilim çalışması). Adnan Menderes University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 5(1), 150-166. doi: 10.30803/adusobed.338417
30. Hoogerheide, V., Deijkers, L., Loyens, S. M., Heijltjes, A., & van Gog, T. (2016). Gaining from explaining: Learning improves from explaining to fictitious others on video, not from writing to them. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 44, 95-106. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.02.005
31. Jarrett, C. (2018). Learning by teaching others is extremely effective - a new study tested a key reason why. British Psychological Society Research Digest. Retrieved from https://digest.bps.org.uk/2018/05/04/learning-by-teaching-others-is-extremely-effective-a-new-study-tested-a-key-reason-why/
32. Galbraith, J., & Winterbottom, M. (2011) Peer-tutoring: What’s in it for the tutor? Educational Studies, 37(3), 321-332. doi: 10.1080/03055698.2010.506330
33. Jordan, J. T., Box, M. C., Eguren, K. E., Parker, T. A., Saraldi-Gallardo, V. M., Wolfe, M. I., & Gallardo-Williams, M. T. (2016). Effectiveness of student-generated video as a teaching tool for an instrumental technique in the organic chemistry laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 93, 141-145. doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00354
34. Ketamo, H., & Suominen, M. (2008, June). Learning-by-teaching in educational games. In EdMedia+ Innovate Learning (pp. 2954-2969). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/28785/
35. Kobayashi, K. (2019a). Learning by preparing to teach and teaching: A meta‐analysis. Japanese Psychological Research, 61(3), 192-203. doi: 10.1111/jpr.12221
36. Kobayashi, K. (2019b). Interactivity: A potential determinant of learning by preparing to teach and teaching. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 2755. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02755
37. Kobayashi, K. (2021). Effects of collaborative versus individual preparation on learning by teaching. Instructional Science, 49, 811-829. doi: 10.1007/s11251-021-09561-6
38. Koh, A. W. L., Lee, S. C., & Lim, S. W. H. (2018). The learning benefits of teaching: A retrieval practice hypothesis. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(3), 401-410. doi: 10.1002/acp.3410
39. Kohleffel, R. (1996). Docendo discimus. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 39(8), 650-653. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40015656
40. Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J. L., Buckley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature (Vol. 8). Washington, DC: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/npec/pdf/kuh_team_report.pdf
41. Lachner, A., Hoogerheide, V., van Gog, T., & Renkl, A. (2021). Learning-by-teaching without audience presence or interaction: When and why does it work? Educational Psychology Review, 34, 575-607. doi: 10.1007/s10648-021-09643-4
42. Lee, M. J. W., & McLoughlin, C. (2007). Teaching and learning in the web 2.0 era: Empowering students through learner-generated content. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 4(10), 21–34. Retrieved from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Oct_07/article02.htm
43. Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(3), 517-528. doi: 10.2224/sbp.7054
44. Lu, J. J., D’Angelo, K. A., & Willett, J. (2019). Learning through teaching: A study of social work PhD students in their roles as educators and learners of research. Journal of Social Work Education, 55(1), 128-140. doi: 10.1080/10437797.2018.1508390
45. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Moghavvemi, S., Sulaiman, A., Jaafar, N. I., & Kasem, N. (2018). Social media as a complementary learning tool for teaching and learning: The case of youtube. The International Journal of Management Education, 16(1), 37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijme.2017.12.001
47. Murray, D. E., McGill, T. J., Toohey, D., & Thompson, N. (2017). Can learners become teachers? Evaluating the merits of student generated content and peer assessment. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 14, 21-33. Retrieved from http://www.informingscience.org/Publications/3698
48. Nestojko, J. F., Bui, D. C., Kornell, N., & Bjork, E. L. (2014). Expecting to teach enhances learning and organization of knowledge in free recall of text passages. Memory & Cognition, 42(7), 1038-1048. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0416-z
49. Orus, C., Barles, M. J., Belanche, D., Casalo, L., Fraj, E., & Gurrea, R. (2016). The effects of learner-generated videos for YouTube on learning outcomes and satisfaction. Computers & Education, 95, 254-269. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.007
50. Ou, C., Joyner, D. A., & Goel, A. K. (2019). Designing and developing video lessons for online learning: A Seven-principle model. Online Learning, 23(2), 82-104. doi: 10.24059/olj.v23i2.1449
51. Pahl, M. O. (2019). Learning by teaching: Professional skills and new technologies for university education. IEEE Communications Magazine, 57(11), 74-80. doi: 10.1109/MCOM.001.1900248
52. Pi, Z., Zhang, Y., Zhou, W., Xu, K., Chen, Y., Yang, J., & Zhao, Q. (2021). Learning by explaining to oneself and a peer enhances learners’ theta and alpha oscillations while watching video lectures. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(2), 659-679. doi: 10.1111/bjet.13048
53. Pirhonen, J., & Rasi, P. (2017). Student-generated instructional videos facilitate learning through positive emotions. Journal of Biological Education, 51(3), 215-227. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2016.1200647
54. Ramlogan, S., Raman, V., & Sweet, J. (2014). A comparison of two forms of teaching instruction: Video vs. live lecture for education in clinical periodontology. European Journal of Dental Education, 18(1), 31-38. doi: 10.1111/eje.12053
55. Riyanto, A., & Yunani, E. (2020). The effectiveness of video as a tutorial learning media in muhadhoroh subject. Akademika: Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 9(2), 73-80. doi: 10.34005/akademika.v9i02.1088
56. Roscoe, R. D. (2014). Self-monitoring and knowledge-building in learning by teaching. Instructional Science, 42(3), 327-351. doi: 10.1007/s11251-013-9283-4
57. Roscoe, R., & Chi, M. (2007). Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors’ explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research, 77, 534-574. doi: 10.3102%2F0034654307309920
58. Starman, A. B. (2013). The case study as a type of qualitative research. Journal of Contemporary Educational Studies / Sodobna Pedagogika, 64(1), 28-43. Retrieved from https://www.sodobna-pedagogika.net/en/archive/load-article/?id=899
59. Stollhans, S. (2016). Learning by teaching: Developing transferable skills. In E. Corradini, K. Borthwick, & A. Gallagher-Brett (Eds.), Employability for languages: A handbook (pp. 161-164). doi: 10.14705/rpnet.2016.cbg2016.478
60. Suri, H. (2011). Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Research Journal, 11(2), 63-75. doi: 10.3316/QRJ1102063
61. Thomas, K. A., & Marks, L. (2014). Action!: Student-generated videos in social work education. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 32(4), 254-274. doi: 10.1080/15228835.2014.922912
62. Tortumlu-Kaya, N. (2019). İlkokul matematik eğitiminde çocuktan ebeveyne öğreterek öğrenme. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Atatürk Üniversitesi, Erzurum.
63. Velasco, J. B., & Stains, M. (2015). Exploring the relationships between perceptions of tutoring and tutoring behaviours: A focus on graduate students serving as peer tutors to college-level chemistry students. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 16(4), 856-868. doi: 10.1039/C5RP00103J
64. Wang, Y., Lin, L., & Chen, O. (2021). The benefits of teaching on comprehension, motivation, and perceived difficulty: Empirical evidence of teaching expectancy and the interactivity of teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, e12416. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12416
65. Zhou, X., Chen, L. H., & Chen, C. L. (2019). Collaborative learning by teaching: A pedagogy between learner-centered and learner-driven. Sustainability, 11(4), 1174. doi: 10.3390/su11041174