Metamorphosis of English Preparatory Program Instructors as Researchers

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 2, 101 - 113, 31.07.2024

Sezgin Ballıdağ , Kenan Dikilitaş

https://doi.org/10.12984/egeefd.1431816

Öz

Transformation of the Turkish EFL teachers working at tertiary level as researchers has received relatively little attention in the relevant literature. Furthermore, most studies in the field sought to explain the transformation of the teachers through interventions. Therefore, drawing on the underpinnings of transformative learning theory proposed by Mezirow, this study aims to investigate how the three EFL teachers have changed since starting their research careers. Unlike most of the studies in the literature, this study aims to find out the transformation of the participants as researchers with no specific intervention. This is a qualitative study, and the data were collected online through semi-structured interviews. In order to see if the participants went through the stages suggested by the theory, the recorded interviews was analyzed deductively. The results revealed that despite not following a linear order, the participants pass through all the suggested stages. The participants were found to pass through transformation at distinct stages, and how they changed was presented under the steps of the theory. Overall, this study sheds light on the longitudinal development of researchers initiated by a disruptive event, which is followed by iterative reflections which leads to the feeling of confidence in their researcher identities.

Anahtar Kelimeler

critical reflection, transformative learning theory, teacher research, teacher transformation

Etik Beyan

This study was produced from the PhD Thesis prepared by Sezgin Ballıdağ under the supervision of Prof. Dr. Kenan Dikilitaş.

Destekleyen Kurum

This publication was produced from the doctoral thesis supported by TUBITAK Scientist Support Programs Directorate (BIDEB) 2211-Domestic Graduate Scholarship Program.

İngilizce Hazırlık Programı Öğretim Görevlilerinin Araştırmacı Olarak Dönüşümü

Öz

Yükseköğretim düzeyinde araştırmacı olarak çalışan Türk yabancı dil öğretmenlerinin dönüşümü, ilgili literatürde nispeten az ilgi görmüştür. Ayrıca alanda yapılan çalışmaların çoğu öğretmenlerin dönüşümünü müdahalelerle açıklamaya çalışmıştır. Bu nedenle, Mezirow tarafından önerilen dönüştürücü öğrenme teorisinin temellerinden yararlanan bu çalışma, üç İngilizce öğretmeninin araştırma kariyerlerinin başlangıcından bu yana nasıl değiştiklerini araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Literatürdeki çoğu çalışmadan farklı olarak bu çalışma, katılımcıların herhangi bir özel müdahale olmaksızın bir araştırmacı olarak dönüşümünü ortaya çıkarmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu nitel bir çalışmadır ve veriler çevrimiçi olarak yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yoluyla toplanmıştır. Katılımcıların teorinin önerdiği aşamalardan geçip geçmediğini görmek için, kaydedilen görüşmeler tümdengelim yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, doğrusal bir sıra izlememesine rağmen, üç katılımcının da önerilen tüm aşamalarda dönüşüm yaşadığını ortaya koymuştur. Katılımcıların farklı aşamalarda dönüşüm geçirdiği görülmüş ve nasıl değiştikleri teorinin adımları altında sunulmuştur. Genel olarak bu çalışma, araştırmacıların yıkıcı bir olayla başlatılan ve bunu tekrarlayan yansımalarla devam eden, araştırmacı kimliklerine güven duymalarına yol açan boylamsal gelişimine ışık tutmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

eleştirel yansıma, dönüştürücü öğrenme teorisi, öğretmen araştırması, öğretmen dönüşümü

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma, Sezgin Ballıdağ tarafından Prof. Dr. Kenan Dikilitaş danışmanlığında hazırlanan doktora tezinden üretilmiştir.

Destekleyen Kurum

Bu yayın TÜBİTAK Bilim İnsanı Destek Programları Müdürlüğü (BIDEB) 2211-Yurtiçi Lisansüstü Burs Programı tarafından desteklenen doktora tezinden üretilmiştir.

Kaynakça

• Adams, W. (2015). Conducting semi-structured interviews. In J. Wholey, H. Hatry, & K. Newcomer (Eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation (4th ed., pp. 492-505). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Ari, A., & Kurnaz, E. A. (2018). Transformative learning in English as a foreign language. International Journal of Afro-Eurasian Research, 6, 381- 346.
• Başar, S., Çomoğlu, I., & Dikilitaş, K. (2023). Teacher study groups as a collaborative platform for action research: An ecological perspective. Professional Development in Education, 1-14.
• Beauchamp, M. R., Barling, J., & Morton, K. L. (2011). Transformational teaching and adolescent self-determined motivation, self-efficacy, and intentions to engage in leisure time physical activity: A randomized controlled pilot trial. Applied psychology: Health and Well-Being, 3, 127–150.
• Borg, S. (2013). Teacher research in language teaching: A critical analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Brock, S. E. (2010). Measuring the importance of precursor steps to transformative learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 60(2), 122–142.
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
• Burns, A. (2005). Action research: An evolving paradigm?. Language Teaching, 38(2), 57-74.
• Cranton, P. (1996). Professional development as transformative learning. New perspectives for teachers of adults. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Cranton, P., & Carusetta, E. (2004). Perspectives on authenticity in teaching. Adult Education Quarterly, 55, 5–22.
• Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston: Pearson Education.
• Dikilitaş, K., & Çomoğlu, I. (2022). Pre-service English teachers’ reflective engagement with stories of exploratory action research. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(1), 26-42.
• Eğinli, I., & Dikilitaş, K. (2022). Examining the interplay between English language teachers’ mindset and researcher self-efficacy beliefs in the use of action research. I.E.: Inquiry in Education, 14(1), 1-25. Emslie, N. (2016). Transformative learning and ministry formation. Journal of Adult Theological Education, 13(1), 48-63.
• Fasli, E., & Fasli, F. G. (2019). Transformative learning theory through the incorporation of Edublogs: The experiences of prospective teachers. Folklor/edebiyat, 25(97), 478-501.
• Gravett, S. (2004). Action research and transformative learning in teaching development. Educational Action Research, 12(2), 259-272. doi: 10.1080/09650790400200248
• Hoggan, C., & Cranton, P. (2015). Promoting transformative learning through reading fiction. Journal of Transformative Education, 13(1), 6-25. doi: 10.1177/1541344614561864
• Johnson, S. M., & Nelson, B. M. (2010). Above and beyond the syllabus. Transformation in an adult foreign language classroom. Language Awareness 19, 35-50.
• Joslyn, C. H., & Hynes, M. M. (2022). Using transformative learning theory to explore student points of view in a second-year mechanical engineering design course: A collaborative action research approach. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(5), 698-711. doi: 10.1080/03043797.2022.2031894
• King, K. P. (2004). Both sides now: Examining transformative learning and professional development of educators. Innovative Higher Education, 29, 155–174. doi: 10.1023/B: IHIE.0000048796.60390.5f
• Manson, B., Poitras, E., & Hong, Y. Y. (2010). Enhancing language skills and fostering perspective transformation in adult ESL education: A transformative learning approach. Proceedings of the 51st Annual Adult Education Research Conference (AERC), Sacramento, CA, USA.
• Meyers, S. A. (2008). Using transformative pedagogy when teaching online. College Teaching, 56(4), 219-224. Moran, C., & Moloney, A. (2022). Transformative learning in a transformed environment. Journal of Transformative Learning, 9(1), 80-96.
• Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: John Wiley.
• Mezirow, J. (1996). Contemporary paradigms of learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 46, 158–172.
• Mezirow, J., & Associates. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Roberts, S. K., Crawford, P. A., & Hickmann, R. (2010). Teacher research as a robust and reflective path to professional development. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 31(3), 258-275, doi: 10.1080/10901027.2010.500557
• Schwartz, T. (2013). Examination of factors that promote transformative learning experiences of college-level adult learners of foreign languages (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Auburn University, Alabama.
• Senyshyn, R. M. (2018). Teaching for transformation: converting the intercultural experience of preservice teachers into intercultural learning. Intercultural Education, 29(2), 163-184. doi: 10.1080/14675986.2018.1429791
• Senyshyn, R. M., & Chamberlin-Quinlisk, C. (2009). Assessing effective Partnerships in intercultural education: Transformative learning as a tool for evaluation. Communication Teacher, 23(4), 167–178. doi: 10.1080/17404620903232529
• Snyder, C. (2008). Grabbing hold of a moving target: Identifying and measuring the transformative learning process. Journal of Transformative Education, 6(3), 159-181.
• Sprow Forte, K., & Blouin, D. (2016). Fostering transformative learning in an online ESL professional development program for K-12 teachers. The Qualitative Report, 21(4), 781-797. doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2317
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Stiles, W. B. (2013). Using case studies to build psychotherapeutic theories. Psychothérapies, 33(1), 29‑35. doi: 10.3917/psys.131.0029.
• Şahin, M., Erişen, Y., & Çeliköz, N. (2016). The transformational learning of three adult academicians. Mediterranean Journal of Humanities, 6(1), 299-307. doi: 10.13114/MJH.2016119306
• Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
• Zhu, G., Iglesia, P. M., & Wang, K. (2020). Examining Chinese and Spanish preservice teachers’ practicum experiences: A transformative learning perspective. Journal of Education for Teaching: International Research and Pedagogy, 46(1). doi: 10.1080/02607476.2019.1708623.