THE TRAP OF PRESENT-DAY: PRESENTISM AS AN ISSUE AND ITS BOUNDARIES IN HISTORICAL METHODOLOGY

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 39 Sayı: 2, 881 - 898, 27.12.2024

İbrahim Yorgun

https://doi.org/10.18513/egetid.1543287

Öz

Historical events and past actions often have long-term effects and distant consequences that extend beyond their immediate context. This article argues that historians must be entitled to consider these far-reaching impacts when analyzing historical events and actions, thereby enhancing their understanding of the past. By reassessing presentism, which is the anachronistic imposition of modern perspectives on historical analysis, the article seeks to address a significant challenge in the discipline of history writing. Presentism distorts our understanding of the past by projecting contemporary values and ideas onto historical events. To counteract this tendency, the study also emphasizes the importance of contextual analysis, advocating for a rigorous examination of the cultural, social, economic, and political environments in which historical events occurred. The study also found that extracting historical events and actions from their temporal, contextual, cultural, or geographical settings often leads to presentism, making it crucial for historians to maintain a disciplined approach to understanding the past within its proper context.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Anachronism, Presentism, Whig History, Objectivity, Racism, Slavery

Etik Beyan

Bu çalışma konusu, alanı itibariyle etik kurul izni gerektiren bir çalışma değildir.

Kaynakça

• Abadía 2008 Oscar M. Abadia, “Beyond the Whig History Interpretation of History: Lessons on ‘Presentism’ from Hélène Metzger”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part A, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp. 194-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2008.03.005
• Abadi 2009 Oscar M. Abadia, “Thinking about 'Presentism' from a Historian's Perspective: Herbert Butterfield and Hélène Metzger” History of Science. 47, pp. 55-77. 10.1177/007327530904700104.
• Barseghyan 2022 Hakob Barseghyan, “Selection, Presentism, and Pluralist History”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. 92. Pp. 60-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2022.01.003.
• Bashkow 2019 Ira Bashkow, “On History for the Present: Revisiting George Stocking's Influential Rejection of “Presentism”, American Anthropologist. 121(3), pp. 709-720.
• Butterfield 1931 Herbert Butterfield, The Whig Interpretation of History. G. Bell and Sons.
• Davies 2003 Stephen Davies, Empiricism and History. Palgrave Macmillan. Basingstoke.
• Fischer 1970 D. Hackett Ficher, Historians' Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought. New York: Harper Torchbooks.
• Garg 2005 Anu Garg, “Presentism in A Word A Day”, Wordsmith. Retrieved from http://www.wordsmith.org/words/presentism.html.
• Historical Pres. 2008 Retrieved from https://wigwags.wordpress.com/2008/02/08/historical-presentism/
• Hobsbawm 1999 Eric Hobsbawm, Tarih Uzerine. Bilim ve Sanat Yayınları, Ankara.
• Hunt 2022 Lynn Hunt, “Against Presentism”, American Historical Association Perspectives. Retrieved from https://www.historians.org/research-and-publications/ perspectives-on-history/may-2002/against-presentism.
• Jardin 2003 N Jardin, “Whigs and Stories: Herbert Butterfield and the Historiography of Science”, History of Science, 61. pp.125-140.
• Hartley 1953 L.P. Hartley, The Go-Between. Penguin Books.
• Marwick 2001 A Marwick, The New Nature of History: Knowledge, Evidence, Language. Palgrave.
• Pickstone 1995 J.V. Pickstone, “Past and Present Knowledge in the Practices of the History of Science”, History of Science 33. pp.203-224.
• Presentism 2024 Presentism_historical_analysis, Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presentism_(historical_analysis).
• Tosh 2006 John Tosh, The Pursuit of History. Pearson Longman Publishing, London.
• Walsham 2017 Alexandra Walsham, “Introduction: Past and Presentism”, Past & Present. 234, pp. 213-217.
• Wiencek 2001 Henry Wiencek, “Yale and the Price of Slavery” on 18 August The New York Times.