Effectiveness of E-School System Application: Meta Synthesis Study

Öz

This research aimed to investigate the effectiveness of e-school system application by meta synthesis method. The paradigm of this research, which was carried out in the qualitative research approach, is interpretive paradigm based on the philosophy of nominalism. Qualitative studies conducted between 2010-2022 on the effectiveness of the e-school system, which was selected by criterion sampling, one of the purposive sampling methods, were included in the research. For this purpose, in order to reach the thesis and articles on the internet, "e-school" keyword was searched in the Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center, TR Index, Turkish Education Index, Academic Index databases. It was seen that the studies planned to be included in the research were qualitatively educational studies between 2010 and 2022, had a sampling within the borders of Turkey, the articles were published in peer-reviewed journals, and the thesis was included in the thesis bank. Studies that could be suitable for meta-synthesis were carefully examined, and a total of 7 studies, 2 Articles and 5 Theses, which met the inclusion criteria of the research, were included in the research. The studies included in the study were examined by thematic analysis, descriptive analysis and content analysis in terms of publication year and type, purpose, research model, sampling selection, data collection tools, data analysis methods, distribution of working and processes of the e-school system and the results achieved. In the study, it was found out that the majority of studies were carried out in the recent decade, their objectives generally included the evaluation of e-school application in line with the opinions of stakeholders, a holistic single case and embedded multiple case designs were used in the context of the research model, sampling method were purposive sampling, semi-structured interview form were used for data collection tools, data were analyzed based on content analysis and the effectiveness of the application of the e-school system were at high level.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• E-school
• Educational Technologies
• Effectiveness
• Meta Synthesis

Kaynakça

1. *Arican, S. (2021). Opinions of secondary education institutions stakeholders on the working process of the e-school education management information system (Unpublished graduate thesis). Gazi Üniversitesi/Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, Turkey.
2. *Cetinoglu, R. (2011). The opinions and satisfaction levels of elementary student parents on the e-school parent informing system (Unpublished graduate thesis). Kilis 7 Aralık Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kilis, Turkey. Available from the Council of Higher Education, National Dissertation Center, Dissertation ID: 297949.
3. *Dogu, Z. (2012). Ortaöğretim kurumları paydaşlarının e-okul eğitim yönetimi bilgi sisteminin işleyiş sürecine ilişkin görüşleri (Unpublished graduate thesis). Harran Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Şanlıurfa, Turkey.
4. *Gunbayi, İ. & Turan, F. (2013). School principals, teachers, students and their parents’ views on e-school implementation in the ministry of national education information management system: A case study. Elementary Education Online, 12(1), 1-22
5. *Kizilboga, R. (2010). The evaluation of ministry of the national education e-school application with the administrators’, teachers’, students’ and parents’ views (Unpublished graduate thesis). Marmara Üniversitesi/Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, Turkey.
6. *Kizilboga, R. & Erdoğan, Y. (2012). The evaluation of ministry of the national education e-school application with the administrators’, teachers’, students’ and parents’ views . Milli Eğitim, 193,5-15.
7. *Turan, F. (2010). School principals, teachers, students and their parents’ views on e-school implementation in the ministry of national education information management system: A case study (Unpublished graduate thesis). Akdeniz Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Antalya, Turkey.
8. Akin, M., Bastug, A. (2005). Erzincan eğitim fakültesi ilköğretim bölümü sınıf öğretmenliği anabilim dalı öğrencilerinin bilgisayar ve internet teknolojilerinden yararlanma düzeylerini belirlemeye yönelik bir ön çalışma  A pre-investigation intended to determine the sufficiency levels of the students at Erzincan education faculty, primary education department in the use of computer and internet Technologies . Erzincan Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), 47-58.

9. Akkoyunlu, B. (2001). Öğretmenlerin internet kullanımı üzerine bir çalışma A Study on Teachers' Internet Usage. Journal of Qafqaz University, 8, 57-66 Aydogan, N. (2011). The survey of the habits of the administrators and the teachers in the primary schools to use the e-school system: specimen of city Kocaeli (Unpublished graduate thesis). Sakarya Üniversitesi/Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Sakarya, Turkey.
10. Basaran, E. İ. (2000). Eğitim yönetimi Educational administration. Ankara: Feryal Matbaası.
11. Chalmers, I., Hedges, L. V., & Cooper, H. (2002). A brief history of research synthesis. Evaluation & The Health Professions, 25(1), 12-37.
12. Connett, D.F. (2018). A guide to qualitative meta-synthesis. New York: Routledge
13. Creswell, J.W. (2015). A concise ıntroduction to mixed methods research. London: Sage.
14. Carikci, O, (2010). A study on e-state practices in Turkey. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 12, 95-122.
15. Cukurcayir, M.A. & Eşki, H, (2001). New methods in public service. Selçuk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 1 (2), 89-109.
16. Given, L. M. (Ed.) (2008). The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Los Angeles: Sage.
17. Gokdas, İ. & Kayri, Ö. M. (2005). E-learning, the problems and solution recommends in terms of Turkey situation. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Elektronik Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2), 1-20.
18. Gokdogan, S. (2017). E-dönüşüm Süreci İçinde E-fatura ve E-defter Uygulamaları ve Güvenliği  In the e-conversion process, e-invoice and e-ledger applications and safety (ILBANK expertise thesis). İller Bankası Anonim Şirketi, Ankara.
19. Gunbayi, I. & Turan, F. (2013). School principals, teachers, students and their parents’ views on e-school ımplementation in the ministry of national education ınformation management system: A case study. Elementary Education Online, 12(1), 1-22
20. Gunbayi, I. (2018). Social paradigms in guidings social research desing: the functional, ınterpretive, radical humanist and radical structural paradigms. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 9(2), 57-76.
21. Gunbayi, I. (2019). Nitel Araştırmada veri analizi: tema analizi, betimsel analiz, içerik analizi ve analitik genelleme Data analysis in qualitative research: Thematic analysis, descriptive analysis, content analysis and analytical generalization. http://www.nirvanasosyal.com/h-392-nitel-arastirmada-veri-analizi-tema-analizi-betimsel-analiz-icerik-analizi-ve-analitik-genelleme.html adresinden 03.02.2022 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
22. Gunbayi, I. (2020). Knowledge-constitutive interests and social paradigms in guiding mixed methods research (MMR). Journal of Mixed Methods Studies,1, 44-56 [Online] www.jomesonline.com DOI: 10.14689/jomes.2020.1.3
23. Gunbayi, I. & Sorm, S. (2020). Social paradigms in guiding management, social development and social research. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Gurel, E. (2016). E-okul sisteminin ilkokul yöneticileri ve öğretmenleri tarafından değerlendirilmesi Evaluation of E-school system by school masters and teachers (Unpublished graduate thesis). İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul, Turkey. Available from the Council of Higher Education, National Dissertation Center, Dissertation ID: 432518.
24. Isman, A. (2005). The implementation results of new instructional design model: Isman model. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(4), 47-53. Jones, M.L. (2007). Overview of methods, reviewing research evidence for nursing practise: Systematic reviews (Editors: Webb, C., Roe, B.). London: Oxford Blackwell Publishing.
25. Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174.
26. MEB (2008). E-Okul Sisteminin Ortaöğretim Kurumlarında da Uygulanması (2008/76 Sayılı Genelge) Implementation of E-School System in Secondary Education Institutions (Circular No. 2008/76). http://mevzuat.meb.gov.tr/dosyalar/1237.pdf adresinden 07.03.2022 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
27. Merriam, S.B. (2009). Qualitative research a guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. Meydanli, M.A. (2010). E-Devlet ve Türkiye’de E-Devlet Uygulamalarının Kamu Hizmetleri Üzerindeki Etkisi: İçişleri Bakanlığı MERNİS Uygulaması  E-government and the effect of e-government applications in Turkey on public services: ministry of domestic affairs MERNIS application  (Unpublished graduate thesis). Gazi Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
29. Patton, M. Q. (2018). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri. (Çev. Eds. M. Bütün & S. B. Demir). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
30. Poggenpoel, M. & Myburgh, C. P. H. (2008). A meta-synthesis of completed qualitative research on learners’ experience of aggression in secondary schools in South Africa, International Journal of Violence and School, 8,60-84.
31. Polat, M. (2011). Yönetim bilgi sistemi olarak e-okul uygulamalarının değerlendirilmesi  Evaluation of E-School Applications as a Management Information System  (Unpublished graduate thesis). Fırat Üniversitesi/Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü/Elâzığ, Turkey. Available from the Council of Higher Education, National Dissertation Center, Dissertation ID: 289677.
32. Sandelowski, M. & Barroso, J. (2003). Toward a metasynthesis of qualitative findings on motherhood in HIV-positive women, Res Nurs Health, 26(2), 153-170.
33. Sandelowski, M. & Barroso, J. (2007). Handbook for synthesizing qualitative research. New York: Springer Publishing.
34. Saritas, T., Sarıtas, M. T., Yıldız, E. & Durusoy, O. (2013). E-okul sisteminin okullarda kullanılmasına ilişkin öğretmen ve yönetici görüşleri Perspectives of Teachers and Administrators on the Use of ESchool System at Schools. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 7(2), 178-194.
35. Varlik, S. & Gunbayi, I. (2020). E-okul sisteminin uygulamasının etkililiği: Meta analiz çalışması Effectiveness of e-school system application: Meta analysis study. Akdeniz Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14(34), 573-590.
36. Walsh, D. & Downe, S. (2005). Meta-synthesis method for qualitative research: A literature review, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50(2), 204-211.
37. Walters, K. & De Gagne, J.C. (2009). Online teaching experience: A qualitative metasynthesis (QMS), MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 577-589.
38. Welch, S. K. (2008). Metasynthesis of the transition from novice to expert: can instructional interventions shorten the process? (Unpublished doctoral thesis), Capella University, Minnesota. Dissertation ID: 3339032.
39. Xu, Y. (2008). Methodological issues and challenges in data collection and analysis of qualitative meta-synthesis, Asian Nursing Research, 2(3),173-183.
40. Yin, R. K. (2017). Durum çalışması araştırması uygulamaları Applications of Case Study Research. (Translated by İ. Günbayı). Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.