Araştırma Makalesi

Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Publications on Environmental Sustainability in Operating Rooms

Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2 31 Aralık 2025
PDF İndir
EN

Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Publications on Environmental Sustainability in Operating Rooms

Abstract

This study aims to conduct a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on environmental sustainability in operating rooms, identifying key research trends, country-author collaborations, influential publications, and thematic structures in the field. A bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Web of Science Core Collection, which serves as both a database and an indexing platform. The dataset was obtained by searching English-language articles using the keywords “operating room,” “environmental sustainability,” and “green surgery”. A total of 162 eligible articles published between 1998 and 2025 were included. Data were analyzed using quantitative bibliometric techniques and visualized through VOSviewer software (version 1.6.19). The analysis included 162 publications, with a notable increase in research output over the last decade. The United States emerged as the most productive country, while Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques was identified as the most prolific journal. The most cited article was by Thiel et al. (2017), focused on cataract surgery and life cycle assessment, with 173 citations. Co-citation and co-authorship analyses revealed that authors such as McGain, Sherman, and Eckelman played central roles in the field. Two main thematic clusters were identified: (1) environmental impacts of surgical processes, (2) carbon footprint and life cycle assessments. The average number of citations per publication was 13.84. The findings highlight an increasing academic interest in sustainable operating room practices, with growing focus on reducing the carbon footprint, optimizing waste management, and implementing life cycle assessment methodologies. Future studies should aim to adopt a more holistic sustainability perspective, incorporating ethical, economic, and political dimensions. Interdisciplinary collaborations and policy-level engagements will be crucial for advancing green practices in surgical environments.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. 1. Almukhtar, A., Batcup, C., Bowman, M., Winter-Beatty, J., Leff, D., Demirel, P., Porat, T., & Judah, G. (2024). Barriers and facilitators to sustainable operating theatres: a systematic review using the Theoretical Domains Framework. International journal of surgery (London, England), 110(1), 554–568. https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000829
  2. 2. Beloeil, H., & Albaladejo, P. (2021). Initiatives to broaden safety concerns in anaesthetic practice: The green operating room. Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology, 35(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2020.07.010
  3. 3. Dolcini, M., Ferrè, F., Brambilla, A., & Capolongo, S. (2025). Integrating environmental sustainability into hospitals performance management systems: a scoping review. BMC health services research, 25(1), 764. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-12928-x
  4. 4. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  5. 5. Johnson, S. M., Marconi, S., Sanchez-Casalongue, M., Francis, N., Huo, B., Alseidi, A., Alimi, Y. R., Pietrabissa, A., Arezzo, A., Frountzas, M., Bellato, V., Potapov, O., Barach, P., Rems, M., Bello, R. J., Nijhawan, S., Oslock, W. M., Sathe, T. S., Hall, R. P., Miller, B., … Sylla, P. (2024). Sustainability in surgical practice: a collaborative call toward environmental sustainability in operating rooms. Surgical endoscopy, 38(8), 4127–4137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10962-0
  6. 6. Kara, Ö., & Ak, E. S. (2025). Carbon footprint and sustainability in the operating room: What to know on the road to becoming a green operating room. Lokman Hekim Journal of the History of Medicine and Folk Medicine, 15(2), 389–399. https://doi.org/10.31020/mutftd.1549201
  7. 7. Karliner, J., Slotterback, S., Boyd, R., Ashby, B., & Steele, K. (2019). Health care’s climate footprint: How the health sector contributes to the global climate crisis and opportunities for action. Health Care Without Harm. https://noharm-global.org/documents/health-care-climate-footprint-report
  8. 8. MacNeill, A. J., Lillywhite, R., & Brown, C. J. (2017). The impact of surgery on global climate: A carbon footprinting study of operating theatres in three health systems. The Lancet Planetary Health, 1(9), e381–e388. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30162-6

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Sağlık ve Ekolojik Risk Değerlendirmesi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Aralık 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Eylül 2025

Kabul Tarihi

18 Aralık 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kaya, N., & Yavuz Van Giersbergen, M. (2025). Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Publications on Environmental Sustainability in Operating Rooms. Eurasian Journal of Health Technology Assessment, 9(2), 108-116. https://doi.org/10.52148/ehta.1776186

Açık erişimli ve çift-kör hakemli bir dergidir.

Dergi içeriği tüm kullanıcılara ücretsiz olarak sunulmaktadır.
Dergideki yazıların bilimsel sorumluluğu yazarlarına aittir.
Dergimizde yayınlanmış makaleler kaynak gösterilmeden kullanılamaz
© T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü Araştırma, Geliştirme ve Sağlık Teknolojisi Değerlendirme Daire Başkanlığı
Tüm Hakları Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlık Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğüne aittir.