Üniversitelerde Kişiselleştirilmiş Öğrenme ve Yenilikçi Öğretim Yaklaşımları: Yapay Zeka Destekli Fen Eğitimi

Öz

Bu çalışma, mevcut literatürden yararlanarak üniversite fen bilimleri eğitiminde yapay zeka destekli kişiselleştirilmiş öğrenme uygulamalarını ve bunların yenilikçi öğretim yaklaşımlarıyla entegrasyonunu analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışma, yapay zekanın öğrenme ortamlarını nasıl dönüştürdüğünü, bireysel öğrenci ihtiyaçlarına göre öğrenme süreçlerini nasıl optimize ettiğini ve öğretmenlerin pedagojik yaklaşımlarını nasıl etkilediğini incelemektedir. Kullanılan metodoloji, ilgili literatürün derinlemesine bir analizi olup, yapay zeka destekli sistemlerin fen eğitimindeki rolünü ve kişiselleştirilmiş ve uyarlanabilir öğrenme sistemlerinin etkinliğini değerlendirmiştir. Bulgular, yapay zekanın kavramsal anlama ve problem çözme becerilerini geliştirdiğini, ancak literatürde uzun vadeli etki, ölçeklenebilirlik, farklı sosyoekonomik bağlamlarda uygulanabilirlik ve öğretim üyelerinin dijital pedagojik yeterlilikleri konusunda önemli boşluklar ve çelişkiler kaldığını göstermektedir. Dahası, öğrenci özerkliği ve yapay zekaya aşırı güvenme riski konusunda daha fazla araştırmaya ihtiyaç duyulduğunu vurgulamaktadır. Bu boşlukları gidermek için kapsamlı ampirik çalışmalar, disiplinlerarası iş birlikleri ve öğrenci özerkliğini destekleyen tasarımlar önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Yapay zeka
• Kişiselleştirilmiş öğrenme
• Yenilikçi öğrenme
• Fen eğitimi

Personalized Learning and Innovative Teaching Approaches in Universities: Artificial Intelligence-Supported Science Education

Öz

This study aims to analyze AI-supported personalized learning applications in university science education and their integration with innovative teaching approaches, drawing on existing literature. The study examines how AI transforms learning environments, optimizes learning processes based on individual student needs, and impacts teachers' pedagogical approaches. The methodology employed was an in-depth analysis of relevant literature, assessing the role of AI-supported systems in science education and the effectiveness of personalized and adaptive learning systems. The findings indicate that AI enhances conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills, but significant gaps and contradictions remain in the literature regarding long-term impact, scalability, applicability across diverse socioeconomic contexts, and faculty members' digital pedagogical competencies. Moreover, it emphasizes the need for further research on student autonomy and the risk of over-reliance on AI. Comprehensive empirical studies, interdisciplinary collaborations, and designs that support student autonomy are recommended to address these gaps.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Artificial intelligence
• Personalized learning
• Science education
• Innovative learning

Kaynakça

1. Adli, M., Suriani, A. B., Ibrahim, M. M., Azzam, A. B., Fatiatun, Kusuma, H. H., Dwandaru, W. S. B., & Muhammad Dhanil. (2024). Comprehensive review on technology-based learning using artificial intelligence for science subjects and its implications in teaching and learning. EDUCATUM Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology, 11(2), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.37134/ejsmt.vol11.2.11.2024.
2. Aflal, S.M., Shamugarajah, S., Thiruthanigesan, K., Balasubramaniam, B., Samarakoon, U., & Ragel, R.G. (2024). The impact of AI-driven educational transformation in Sri Lanka's higher education. 2024 6th International Conference on Advances in Computing (ICAC).
3. Akyüz, H.İ., & Erdemir, M. (2022). Preservice science teachers' views of a web-based intelligent tutoring system. International Journal Of Technology In Education, 5 (1), 67-87.
4. Alejandro, I.M.V., Sanchez, J.M.P., Sumalinog, G.G., Mananay, J.A., Goles, C.E., & Fernandez, C.B. (2024). Pre-service teachers' technology acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) applications in education. STEM Education. 4(4): 445-465. doi:10.3934/steme.2024024.
5. Aydın, F., & Yurdugül, H. (2021). Examining the trend in postgraduate theses on intelligent tutoring systems: the case of Turkey. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 11(2), 421-444. DOI: 10.17943/etku.892680
6. Ayanwale, M. A., Sanusi, I. T., Adelana, O. P., Aruleba, K. D., & Oyelere, S. S. (2022). Teachers’ readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100099.
7. Azimkhan, S., Abildinova, G., Khamzina, A., Karymsakova, A., & Karaca, C. (2025). Developing teacher digital competence through mobile and interactive technologies: a systematic review using the TPACK framework. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy. 15(3).
8. Bawaneh, A. K., Al-Salman, S. M., Ali Salem, T. M., & Altarawneh, A. F. (2025). AI shaping the future of education: Science and math teachers’ satisfaction level and motivating factors towards integrating artificial intelligence in teaching and learning. Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol, 15, 496-509.

9. Bitzenbauer, P. (2023). ChatGPT in physics education: A pilot study on easy-to-implement activities. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(3), ep430. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13176
10. Bond, M., Khosravi, H., De Laat, M., Bergdahl, N., Negrea, V., Oxley, E., ... & Siemens, G. (2024). A meta systematic review of artificial intelligence in higher education: A call for increased ethics, collaboration, and rigour. International journal of educational technology in higher education , 21 (1), 4.
11. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
12. Burns, N., & Grove, S. K. (2007). Understanding nursing research: Building an evidence based practice (4th ed.). Saunders Elsevier.
13. Chan, C. K. Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal Of Educational Technology In Higher Education, 20(1), 38.
14. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE access, 8 , 75264-75278.
15. Choi, Y. S. (2025). Earth science simulations with generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 22(1), 1-24.
16. Chuang, CH, Lo, J. H., & Wu, Y. K. (2023). Integrating chatbot and augmented reality technology into biology learning during COVID-19. Electronics, 12(1), 222.
17. Cooper, G. (2022). Examining Science Education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32, 444–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10039-y
18. Coşgun-Demirdağ, M., & Taşgin, A. (2025). The relationship between teachers' digital literacy levels and research literacy skills. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science. 18(1).
19. Cuijpers, P., Miguel, C., Papola, D., Harrer, M., & Karyotaki, E. (2022). From living systematic reviews to meta-analytical research domains. BMJ Ment Health, 25(4), 145–147. https://doi.org/ 10.1136/ebmental-2022-300509
20. Damanik, J., & Widodo, W. (2024). Unlocking teacher professional performance: exploring teaching creativity in transmitting digital literacy, grit, and instructional quality. Education Sciences, 14(4), 384.
21. Deveci Topal, A., Dilek Eren, C., & Kolburan Geçer, A. (2021). Chatbot application in a 5th grade science course. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr), 26(5), 6241–6265.
22. Dignum, V. (2019). Responsible artificial intelligence: how to develop and use AI in a responsible way (Vol. 2156). Cham: Springer.
23. Dignum, V. (2021). The role and challenges of education for responsible AI. London Review of Education, 19 (1), 1-11.
24. Dignum, V. (2023). Responsible artificial intelligence: Recommendations and lessons learned. In Responsible AI in Africa: Challenges and opportunities (pp. 195-214). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
25. Elkhodr, M., Gide, E., Wu, R., & Darwish, O. (2023). ICT students' perceptions towards ChatGPT: An experimental reflective lab analysis. STEM Education, 3(2), 70–88.
26. Erümit, AK, & Çetin, İ. (2020). Design and implementation of an adaptive intelligent tutoring system for physics education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(4), 456-471.
27. Feng, C. (2024). Analyzing student online learning behaviors and academic performance in science education using machine learning techniques. Applied and Computational Engineering. 112, 59-65.
28. Ferrarelli, P., & Iocchi, L. (2021). Learning Newtonian physics through programming robot experiments. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(4), 789–824.
29. Fu, Y., Weng, Z., & Wang, J. (2024). Examining AI use in educational contexts: A scoping meta-review and bibliometric analysis. International journal of artificial intelligence in education, 1-57.
30. Gerstein, H. C., Pogue, J., Mann, J. F. E., Lonn, E., Dagenais, G. R., McQueen, M., ... & Hope Investigators. (2005). The relationship between dysglycaemia and cardiovascular and renal risk in diabetic and non-diabetic participants in the HOPE study: a prospective epidemiological analysis. Diabetologia, 48(9), 1749-1755.
31. Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (Eds.). (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews(2nd ed.). SAGE.
32. Graesser, A.C., Hu, X., & Sottilare, R.A. (2022). Intelligent tutoring systems: a systematic review of applications in science education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 411-435.
33. Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. Sage Publications.
34. Han, S., & Lim, J. (2024). An exploratory study of elementary school teachers' AI competencies: based on teachers' experiences and perceptions. Educational Technology International. 25(2), 261-296.
35. Hardaker, G., & Glenn, L. E. (2025). Artificial intelligence for personalized learning: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 42 (1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-07-2024-0160 .
36. Hava, K., & Babayiğit, Ö. (2025). Exploring the relationship between teachers' competees in AI-TPACK and digital proficiency. Education and information technologies, 30(3), 3491-3508.
37. Henze J, Schatz C, Malik S & Bresges A (2022). How might we raise interest in robotics, coding, artificial intelligence, STEAM and sustainable development in university and on-the-job teacher training? Frontier Education, 7, 872637.
38. Henze, J., Bresges, A., & Becker-Genschow, S. (2024). AI-Supported data analysis boosts student motivation and reduces stress in physics education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.20951.
39. Hettiarachchilagea, K., & Haldolaarachchige, N. (2023). Effective model with personalized online teaching and learning science in the era of ChatGPT. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09545. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.09545arXiv
40. Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., & Pluye, P. (2018). The mixed methods appraisal tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285–291. https://doi.org/10.3233/efi-180221
41. Holmes, W., Porayska-Pomsta, K., Holstein, K., Sutherland, E., Baker, T., Shum, SB, ... & Koedinger, KR (2022). Ethics of AI in education: Towards a community-wide framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32 (3), 504-526.
42. Hotar, N., Baran, B., Tokuç, A., Güzel, EB, Akdoğan, FS, Karagöz, E., & Bozdağ, Ö. (2024). Designing adaptive learning space by integrating technology to a sustainable classroom. In Adaptive Learning Technologies for Higher Education (pp. 126-163). IGI Global.
43. Huang, Y., Wilson, J., & May, H. (2024). Exploring the long-term effects of the statewide implementation of an automated writing evaluation system on students' state test ELA performance. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1-32.
44. Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y. K. (2020). Utilizing learning analytics to support study success in higher education: a systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68 (4), 1961-1990.
45. Jose, B., Cherian, J., Verghis, A. M., Varghise, S. M., S, M., & Joseph, S. (2025). The cognitive paradox of AI in education: between enhancement and erosion. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1550621.
46. Kanthimathi, S., Nanda, P., Venkatraman, S., Renganayagan, V., & Eswaran, S. (2025). Transforming education through AI-Powered personalized assessment models. In Adopting Artificial Intelligence Tools in Higher Education (pp. 136-154). CRC Press.
47. Koć-Januchta, MM, Schönborn, KJ, Tibell, LAE, Chaudhri, VK, & Heller, HC (2020). Engaging with biology by asking questions: Investigating students' interaction and learning with an artificial intelligence-enriched textbook. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 58(6), 1190–1224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633120921581
48. Komalawardhana, N., & Panjaburee, P. (2024). Trends and development of technology-enhanced personalized learning in science education: a systematic review of publications from 2010 to 2022. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(3), 721-742.
49. Lademann, J., Henze, J., & Becker-Genschow, S. (2025). Augmenting learning environments using AI custom chatbots: Effects on learning performance, cognitive load, and affective variables. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 21(1), 010147.
50. Lee, J., An, T., Chu, H.E., Hong, H.G., & Martin, S.N. (2023). Improving science conceptual understanding and attitudes in elementary science classes through the development and application of a rule-based AI chatbot. Asia-Pacific Science Education. 9(2), 365-412.
51. Li, M., & Wu, X. (2025). Exploration of the path of artificial intelligence enabling science education. Open Access Library Journal. 12(4), 1-8.
52. Li, Q., Jung, Y., & Wise, A. F. (2025). How instructors use learning analytics: the pivotal role of pedagogy. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 1-29.
53. Maestrales, S., Zhai, X., Touitou, I. et al. (2021). Using machine learning to score multi-dimensional assessments of chemistry and physics. J Sci Educ Technol 30, 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09895-9
54. Merriam, S. B. (2015). Qualitative research: Designing, implementing, and publishing a study. In Handbook of research on scholarly publishing and research methods (pp. 125-140). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
55. Mnguni, L., Nuangchalerm, P., El Islami, RAZ, Sibanda, D., Sari, I. J., & Ramulumo, M. (2024). The behavioral intentions for integrating artificial intelligence in science teaching among pre-service science teachers in South Africa and Thailand. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100334. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, DG, & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 151(4), 264-269.
56. Murtaza, M., Ahmed, Y., Shamsi, J. A., Sherwani, F., & Usman, M. (2022). AI-Based personalized E-Learning systems: issues, challenges, and solutions. IEEE Access, 10, 81323-81342. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3193938
57. Mustafa, M. Y., Tlili, A., Lampropoulos, G., Huang, R., Jandrić, P., Zhao, J., ... & Saqr, M. (2024). A systematic review of literature reviews on artificial intelligence in education (AIED): a roadmap to a future research agenda. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 59.
58. Ng, DTK, Su, J., Leung, JKL, & Chu, SKW (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) literacy education in secondary schools: a review. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6204-6224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2255228
59. Nja, CO, Idiege, KJ, Uwe, UE, Meremikwu, AN, Ekon, EE, Erim, CM, & Cornelius-Ukpepi, BU (2023). Adoption of artificial intelligence in science teaching: From the advantage point of the African science teachers. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 42.
60. Nurhikmah, H., Lu'mu, L.M., & Ridwan, M. (2025). The influence of multimedia learning and students' learning motivation toward biology learning outcomes. Brilliant: Conceptual from Journal Riset. 10(1).
61. Ozdemir, G., & Unal, I. (2025). The effect of using virtual laboratories in science education on students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis study. International Journal of Education Science and Technology, 11(1), 66-86.
62. Pollock, A., & Berge, E. (2018). How to do a systematic review. International Journal of Stroke, 13 (2), 138–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493017743796
63. Rakisheva, A., & Witt, A. (2023). Digital competence frameworks in teacher education-A literature review. Issues and Trends in Learning Technologies, 11(1).
64. Roll, I., & Wylie, R. (2016). Evolution and revolution in artificial intelligence in education. International journal of artificial intelligence in education, 26(2), 582-599.
65. Sajja, R., Sermet, Y., Cwiertny, D., & Demir, I. (2023). Integrating AI and learning analytics for data-driven pedagogical decisions and personalized interventions in education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.09548.
66. Salas-Pilco, S. Z., Xiao, K., & Hu, X. (2022). Artificial intelligence and learning analytics in teacher education: a systematic review. Educational Sciences, 12(8), 569. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080569 .
67. Sezgin, S., and Yüzer, TV (2022). Analyzing adaptive gamification design principles for online courses. Behavior & information technology, 41(3), 485-501. Shneiderman, B. (2020). Human-centered artificial intelligence: Reliable, safe & trustworthy. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 36(6), 495-504.
68. Steinert, S., Krupp, L., Avila, K. E., Janssen, AS, Ruf, V., Dzsotjan, D., & Wehn, N. (2024). Lessons learned from designing an open-source automated feedback system for STEM education. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.10531. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.10531
69. Trajkovski, G., & Hayes, H. (2025). Innovative Question Types and Formats. In AI-Assisted Assessment in Education: Transforming Assessment and Measuring Learning (pp. 115-158). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
70. Tzafilkou, K., Perifanou, M., & Economides, A. A. (2023). Assessing teachers' digital competence in primary and secondary education: Applying a new instrument to integrate pedagogical and professional elements for digital education. Education and Information Technologies. 28(12), 16017-16040.
71. Wang, S., Christensen, C., Cui, W., Tong, R., Yarnall, L., Shear, L., & Feng, M. (2020). When adaptive learning is effective learning: comparison of an adaptive learning system to teacher-led instruction. Interactive Learning Environments, 31 (2), 793-803. DOI: 10.1080/10494820.2020.1808794
72. Vorobyeva, KI, Belous, S., Savchenko, NV, Smirnova, LM, Nikitina, SA, and Zhdanov, SP (2025). Personalized learning through AI: Pedagogical approaches and critical insights. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(2), ep574. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/16108
73. Yan, L., Martinez-Maldonado, R., & Gasevic, D. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in learning analytics: Contextualising opportunities and challenges through the learning analytics cycle. In Proceedings of the 14th learning analytics and knowledge conference (pp. 101-111).
74. Yannier, N., Hudson, S. E., & Koedinger, K. R. (2020). Active learning is about more than hands-on: A mixed-reality AI system to support STEM education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30, 74–96.
75. Yucesoy-Ozkan, S., Mart, S., Sayar, K., Altun, D. E., Gulboy, E., Kaya, F., & Oncul, N. (2024). The scoping review of systematic instruction literature for individuals with disabilities: Trends in Türkiye from 1983 to 2022. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 40(1), 1–15. https:// doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2024.2307282
76. Zafari, M., Bazargani, J. S., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A., & Choi, S. M. (2022). Artificial intelligence applications in K-12 education: A systematic literature review. Ieee Access, 10, 61905-61921.
77. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, VI, Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education–where are the educators?. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 16(1), 1-27.