Fen Bilimleri Derslerinde Ters Yüz Öğrenmeye Hazır Bulunuşluk ile Üstbilişsel Öz-Düzenleme Arasındaki İlişki

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 32, 531 - 548, 19.12.2025

Uluhan Kurt , Özlem Ağgül , İsmail Duman

https://doi.org/10.58689/eibd.1805422

Öz

Ters yüz öğrenme yaklaşımı, öğrencilerin kendi öğrenmelerinden daha fazla sorumluluk almalarına olanak tanıdığı ve daha yüksek düzeyde öz-düzenleme gerektirdiği için, bu çalışma bu iki yapı arasındaki olası ilişkiyi incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada nicel yöntemler çerçevesinde betimsel bir desen kullanılmış olup, ilişkisel tarama modeli uygulanmıştır. Çalışma grubu, 2025–2026 akademik yılında Türkiye’nin Erzurum ilinde yer alan iki farklı okulda öğrenim gören 130 ortaokul öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. Sonuçların analizi, öğrencilerin fen eğitimi bağlamındaki ters yüz öğrenmeye hazır bulunuşluk düzeyleri ile bilişüstü öz-düzenleme becerileri arasında cinsiyete dayalı anlamlı bir farklılık olmadığını ortaya koymuştur. Öğrencilerin fen derslerine hazırlanırken çevrimiçi kaynaklara erişimleri incelendiğinde, ters yüz öğrenmeye hazır bulunuşluk düzeylerine göre anlamlı bir fark görülmemiş, ancak bilişüstü öz-düzenleme düzeylerine göre farklılıklar tespit edilmiştir. Öğrencilerin fen derslerindeki akademik başarıları, ters yüz öğrenmeye hazır bulunuşlukları ve bilişüstü öz-düzenleme puanları birlikte incelendiğinde, akademik başarı ile her iki değişken arasında orta düzeyde ancak anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca, öğrencilerin ters yüz öğrenmeye hazır bulunuşlukları ile bilişüstü öz-düzenleme becerileri arasında pozitif ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Ters Yüz Öğrenme , Üstbilişsel Öz-Düzenleme , Fen Bilimleri Dersi

The Relationship Between Flipped Learning Readiness and Metacognitive Self-Regulation in Science Lessons

Öz

Because the flipped learning approach allows learners to take greater responsibility for their own learning and requires a higher degree of self-regulation, this study aims to examine the possible relationship between these two constructs. The research employed a descriptive design within the framework of quantitative methods, specifically utilizing a relational survey model. The study group included 130 middle school students enrolled in two different schools in Erzurum, Turkey, during the 2025–2026 academic year.Analysis of the results revealed no significant gender-based differences in either students’ flipped learning readiness or their metacognitive self-regulation skills in the context of science education. Regarding students’ access to online resources while preparing for science lessons, findings indicated no variation based on flipped learning readiness levels, although differences emerged in relation to metacognitive self-regulation levels.When students’ academic achievement in science was examined alongside their flipped learning readiness and metacognitive self-regulation scores, a moderate yet significant correlation was found between academic success and both variables. Furthermore, a positive and statistically significant relationship was identified between students’ flipped learning readiness and their metacognitive self-regulation skills.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Flipped learning readiness , Metacognitive self-regulation , Science lesson

Kaynakça

• Abeysekera, L., & Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336.
• Aslan, M. (2020). Ters yüz edilmiş öğrenme modeli. İ. Kozikoğlu (Ed.), Eğitimde güncel yaklaşımlar içinde (1. baskı, ss. 39-53). Pegem Akademi.
• Banarjee, P., & Kumar, K. (2014). A study on self-regulated learning and academic achievement among the science graduate students. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Approach and Studies, 1(6), 329-342. ISSN NO: 2348 – 537X
• Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006
• Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: Internal Society for Technology in Education.
• Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, K.E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.) Hillsdale, NJ: LawrenceErlbaumAssociates(http://www.lrdc.pitt.edu/schneider/p2465/Readings/Cohen,%201988%20(Statistical%20Power,%20273-406).pdf.
• Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E. (2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American journal of physics, 69(9), 970-977. https://web.mit.edu/jbelcher/www/TEALref/Crouch_Mazur.pdf
• Enfield, J. (2013). Looking at the impact of the flipped classroom model of instruction on undergraduate multimedia students at CSUN. TechTrends, 57(6), 14-27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0698-1
• Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri: Felsefe-yöntem-analiz. Ankara: Seçkin.
• Hao, Y. (2016). Exploring undergraduates' perspectives and flipped learning readiness in their flipped classrooms. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 82-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.032
• He, W., Holton, A., Farkas, G., & Warschauer, M. (2016). The effects of flipped instruction on out-of-class study time, exam performance, and student perceptions. Learning and Instruction, 45, 61-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.07.001
• Hung, H. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81-96. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/09588221.2014.967701
• İnan, B. (2013). The relationship between self-regulated learning strategies and academic achievement in a Turkish EFL setting. Educational Research and Reviews, 8 (17), 1544-1550. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2013.1561
• İpek, M. (2019). Ortaokul 8. sınıf öğrencilerin TEOG başarısının yordayıcısı olarak öz-düzenleme stratejileri ve motivasyon inançlarının sosyo-demografik özellikler ve teknoloji kullanımına göre değişimi [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi]. Amasya Üniversitesi.
• Jwair, A. (2018). Using self-regulated learning strategies in a flipped learning to improve students Metacognition. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education AACE, Waynesville, NC.
• Kaye M. (2022). OCTH212: Occupation through the lifespan (27 videos). YouTube. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLwPOQAIt1BDLciCqH6JI_Im4IJR71ws5E&si=ATlNECZYd2sCBNS1
• Kramarski, B., & Mizrachi, N. (2006). Online interactions in a mathematical classroom. Educational Media International, 43(1), 43–50. https://doi.org 10.1080/09523980500490778
• Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course. Computers & Education, 100, 126-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.006
• Lai, H. M., Hsieh, P. J., Uden, L., & Yang, C. H. (2021). A multilevel investigation of factors influencing university students’ behavioral engagement in flipped classrooms. Computers & Education, 175, 104318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104318
• Lee, S. W. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2011). Students’ perceptions of collaboration, self-regulated learning, and information seeking in the context of Internet-based learning and traditional learning. Computers in human behavior, 27(2), 905-914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.11.016
• Liu, S. H. J., Lan, Y. J., & Ho, C. Y. Y. (2014). Exploring the relationship between self-regulated vocabulary learning and web-based collaboration. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 404-419. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281024614_Exploring_the_Relationship_between_Self- Regulated_Vocabulary_Learning_and_Web-Based_Collaboration
• McGivney-Burelle, J. & Xue, F. (2013). Flipping calculus. PRIMUS: Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 23(5), 447-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511970.2012.757571
• Missildine, K., Fountain, R., Summers, L., & Gosselin, K. (2013). Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and Satisfaction. Journal of Nursing Education, 52(10), 597–599. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20130919-03
• Ng, E. M. (2018). Integrating self-regulation principles with flipped classroom pedagogy for first year university students. Computers & Education, 126, 65-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.07.002
• Öztürk, M. (2018). Ters yüz sınıf modelinde öğrencilerin öz-düzenleyici öğrenme becerilerinin gelişiminin incelenmesi: Yabancı dil dersi örneği [Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi]. Trabzon Üniversitesi.
• Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS kullanma klavuzu spss ile adım adım veri analizi. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Ranga J. S. (2020). Factors influencing student learning in semi-flipped general chemistry courses. Journal of
• Chemical Education, 97(8), 2130–2139. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b01165
• Samaila, K., Masood, M., & Chau, K. T. (2021). Using flipped classroom model: Factors influencing students’ satisfaction. European Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Education, 2(2), e02112. https://doi.org/10.30935/ejimed/11260
• Shih, H. C. J., & Huang, S. H. C. (2020). College students’ metacognitive strategy use in an EFL flipped classroom. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(7), 755-784. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1590420
• Sohrabi, B., & Iraj, H. (2016). Implementing flipped classroom using digital media: A comparison of two demographically different groups perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 514–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.056
• Sun, J. C. Y., Wu, Y. T., & Lee, W. I. (2017). The effect of the flipped classroom approach to OpenCourseWare instruction on students’ self‐regulation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(3), 713-729. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12444
• Turan, Z. (2015). Ters yüz sınıf yönteminin değerlendirilmesi ve akademik başarı, bilişsel yük ve motivasyona etkisinin incelenmesi [Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi]. Atatürk Üniversitesi.
• Toto, R., & Nguyen, H. (2009, October). Flipping the work design in an industrial engineering course. In 2009 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
• Tune, J.D., Sturek, M., & Basile, D. P. (2013). Flipped classroom model improves graduate student performance in cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal physiology. Advan in Physiol Edu, 37(4), 316-320. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00091.2013
• Uddin, M. M., and Laura M. (2024). “Flipping the traditional classroom in teaching classical literature in higher education: An experiment with oedipus rex by sophocles.” Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal 18(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18848/1835-9795/CGP/v18i01/1-26.
• Vauras, M., Salonen, P., Lehtinen, E. & Lepola, J. (2001) Long-term development of motivation and cognition in family and school contexts, in: S. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds) Motivation in learning contexts. London: Pergamon.
• Winters, F., Greene, J. ve Costich, C. (2008). Self-regulation of learning within computer- based learning enviroment: A critical analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 429-444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9080-9
• Zhou, X. (2023). A conceptual review of the effectiveness of flipped learning in vocational learners’ cognitive skills and emotional states. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1039025. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1039025
• Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational psychologist, 25(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2
• Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In A. C. Hacker D J, J. Dunlosky, & Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 299–315). Routledge.