EXAMINING TEACHING WITH DESIGN-ORIENTED THINKING APPROACH IN TERMS OF DIFFERENT VARIABLES

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 170 - 199, 25.06.2024

Yelda Karahan Üzülmez Figen Kılıç

https://doi.org/10.48166/ejaes.1487147

Öz

This mixed-methods study aimed to investigate the effect of the design thinking approach on vocabulary learning achievement, cooperative learning, and problem-solving skills of secondary school students in English language teaching. The research was conducted with 43 students studying in the 8th grade at a secondary school located in Turkey during the fall semester of 2020–2021. During the implementation process, the effect of the design thinking approach on the vocabulary learning achievement, cooperative learning perception, and problem-solving skills of the experimental group students was investigated. In the control group, all practices were the same except for the design thinking approach due to controlling for the dependent variables with the blended learning method. Qualitative data were used to support the quantitative data obtained. Measurement tools developed by the researchers were used to collect the quantitative data, and interview questions were prepared to collect the qualitative data from the students. As a result, the design thinking approach indicated a significant difference in favor of the experimental group in terms of students’ vocabulary learning achievement, cooperative learning perception, and problem-solving skill and had a positive effect on students.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Design Thinking-Based Learning, Blended Learning, Cooperative Learning, Problem Solving, Mixed-Methods Research.

Kaynakça

• Akgün, E. (2012). Students’ contribution and participation to case-based computer supported collaborative learning environment (Unpublished master thesis). Hacettepe University.
• Alavi, M. (1994). Computer-Mediated collaborative learning: An empirical evaluation. MIS Quarterly, 18(2), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/249763
• Artzt, A., & Newman, C. (1990). Implementing the standards: Cooperative learning. The Mathematics Teacher, 83(6), 448-452. https://doi.org/10.5951/MT.83.6.0448
• Bejarano, Y. (1987). A cooperative small-group methodology in the language classroom. Tesol Quarterly, 21(3), 483–504. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586499
• Bell, S. (2008). Design thinking. Philadelphia: Temple University Libraries.
• Brown, T., & Katz, B. (2019). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Business.
• Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems ın design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5–21.
• Chasanidou, D., & Gasparini, A.A., Lee, E. (2015). Design thinking methods and tools for innovation. In: Marcus, A. (eds), Design discourse lecture notes in computer science vol 9186. Springer, Cham.
• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. Routledge.
• Creswell, J. W. (2003). Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd Ed.). Sage Publications.
• Creswell, J., Vicki L., & Clark, V. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. (2nd Ed.). Sage Publications.
• Cross, N. (2011). A brief history of the design thinking research symposium series. Design Studies, 57(2018), 160–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2018.03.007.
• Demirel, Ö. (2011). Eğitimde yeni yönelimler [New trends in education] (5th Ed.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Eggen, P. D., & Kauchak, D. P. (1996). Strategies for teachers teaching content and thinking skills (5th Ed.). Wiley.
• Ghaith, G. (2003). Effects of the learning together model of cooperative learning on English as a foreign language reading achievement, academic self-esteem, and feelings of school alienation. Bilingual Research Journal, 27(3), 451–474.
• Ghazal, L. (2007). Learning vocabulary ın EFL contexts through vocabulary learning strategies. Novitas-Royal, 1(2), 84–91.
• Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language learning, 46(4), 643–679.
• Güneş, S., & Güneş, Ç. (2017). Design thinking as a sui generis professional knowledge. Journal of Art and Design, 19, 55–73.
• Kartal, Ş. (2014). The effects of cooperative learning method on students’ attitudes towards English classes and their achievements (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Inonu University.
• Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research (3rd Ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
• Koçkan, P. (2012). Design thinking and process in the context of design research (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hacettepe University.
• Koh, J. H., Chai, C. S., Wong, B., & Hong, H. Y. (2015). Design thinking and education. In design thinking for education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-444-3_1
• Mechlenborg, M., & Neergaard, M. de. (2024). Lefebvre’s spatial triad for children: a teaching model for spatial thinking in the classroom. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 33(2), 94–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2023.2298074
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.
• Melles, G., Howard, Z. & Thompson, S. (2012). Teaching design thinking: Expanding horizons in design education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 162–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.035
• Miles, M., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications.
• Öner, G., & Gedikoğlu, T. (2007). Foreign language anxiety affecting learning English of secondary school students in Gaziantep. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 67–78.
• Özekin, M. (2006). Evaluation of the effects on the 2., 3., 4., 5. and 6. Grade students who perform in the design thinking education model (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hacettepe University.
• Park, H., & McKilligan, S. (2018, July). A systematic literature review for human-computer interaction and design thinking process integration. design, user experience, and usability: Theory and practice. [Lecture Notes in Computer Science]. HCI International, Las Vegas, USA.
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd Ed.). Sage.
• Rauth, I., Köppen, E., Jobst, B., & Meinel, C. (2010, November). Design thinking: an educational model towards creative confidence. 1st International Conference on Design Creativity. London, England.
• Scheer, A. (2017). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design and technology education: An International Journal, 17(3), 8–19.
• Serin, O., Serin B., & Saygılı, G. (2010). Developing problem solving inventory for children at the level of primary education (PSIC). Elementary Education Online, 9(2), 446–458.
• Sheehan, N., Gujarathi, M., Jones, J., & Phillips, F. (2018). Using design thinking to write and publish novel teaching cases: Tips from experienced case authors. Journal of Management Education, 42(1), 135–160.
• Soylu, B. (2008). The effect of cooperative learning method on the academic achievements of the 6th grade students in English courses in primary education schools (Unpublished master’s thesis). Niğde University.
• Sözler, S. (2019). Developıng a desıgn thınkıng based open and dıstance learnıng model (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Anadolu University.
• Spencer, J., & Juliani, A. J. (2016). Launch: Using design thinking to boost creativity and bring out the maker in every student. Dave Burgess Consulting, Inc.