Eye movements in reading span tasks to working memory functions and second language reading
Abstract
In an eye-tracking experiment with late second language (L2) learners, the present study probed into the
relationship between eye-movement (EM) measures and the processing and storage outcomes of reading
span tasks (RST) to determine whether EM patterns actually reflect working memory (WM) functions in
the L2. Additionally, it examined the relationship between WM capacity as indexed by EMs and L2
reading comprehension to explore whether it was possible to map offline and online data as predictors of
L2 reading. The findings reveal that storage performance was negatively affected by fixation durations
within the “critical” region of each sentence, indicating a trade-off between processing and storage.
Additionally, regressions launched from the sentence-final region were negatively related to not only
storage and processing performance but also L2 reading comprehension. These results have implications
regarding whether EMs can be instrumental in validating offline span task outcomes and their
association with L2 reading.
Keywords
Kaynakça
- Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2010). The role of L1 and L2 working memory in literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33, 206–219. http://doi.org/fsfjxc
- Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2011). The effects of working memory capacity and content familiarity on literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 235–266. http://doi.org/dzdjjp
- Andrews, G., Birney, D., & Halford, G. S. (2006). Relational processing and working memory capacity in comprehension of relative clause sentences. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1325– 1340.
- Barrouillet, P., Bernardin, S., Portrat, S., Vergauwe, E., & Camos, V. (2007). Time and cognitive load in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 570–585. http://doi.org/cm22dw
- Barrouillet, P., Portrat, S., & Camos, V. (2011). On the law relating processing to storage in working memory. Psychological Review, 118, 175–192. http://doi.org/bq7rsv
- Beckman, J. F. (2010). Taming a beast of burden – On some issues with the conceptualisation and operationalisation of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 20, 250–264. http://doi.org/dmczgh
- Binder, K. S., & Morris, R. K. (2011). An eye-movement analysis of ambiguity resolution: Beyond meaning access. Discourse Processes, 48, 305-330. http://doi.org/cq35kp
- Boland, J. E. (2004). Linking eye movements to sentence comprehension in reading and listening. In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton (Eds.), The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERP, and beyond (pp. 51–76). New York: Psychology Press.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Dilbilim
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
17 Eylül 2015
Gönderilme Tarihi
1 Eylül 2015
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2015 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2
Cited By
The Role of Text Difficulty and Topic Familiarity in the Contribution of Working Memory to L2 Reading Comprehension
Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics
https://doi.org/10.15738/kjell.16.2.201606.143Working memory in L2 reading comprehension: The influence of prior knowledge
System
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.07.007How does working memory affect learning? The interrelationship among working memory, language learning, and mathematical achievement
International Journal of School & Educational Psychology
https://doi.org/10.1080/21683603.2024.2445703