Araştırma Makalesi

Eye movements in reading span tasks to working memory functions and second language reading

Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2 17 Eylül 2015
PDF İndir
EN

Eye movements in reading span tasks to working memory functions and second language reading

Abstract

In an eye-tracking experiment with late second language (L2) learners, the present study probed into the relationship between eye-movement (EM) measures and the processing and storage outcomes of reading span tasks (RST) to determine whether EM patterns actually reflect working memory (WM) functions in the L2. Additionally, it examined the relationship between WM capacity as indexed by EMs and L2 reading comprehension to explore whether it was possible to map offline and online data as predictors of L2 reading. The findings reveal that storage performance was negatively affected by fixation durations within the “critical” region of each sentence, indicating a trade-off between processing and storage. Additionally, regressions launched from the sentence-final region were negatively related to not only storage and processing performance but also L2 reading comprehension. These results have implications regarding whether EMs can be instrumental in validating offline span task outcomes and their association with L2 reading. 

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2010). The role of L1 and L2 working memory in literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33, 206–219. http://doi.org/fsfjxc
  2. Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2011). The effects of working memory capacity and content familiarity on literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. TESOL Quarterly, 45, 235–266. http://doi.org/dzdjjp
  3. Andrews, G., Birney, D., & Halford, G. S. (2006). Relational processing and working memory capacity in comprehension of relative clause sentences. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1325– 1340.
  4. Barrouillet, P., Bernardin, S., Portrat, S., Vergauwe, E., & Camos, V. (2007). Time and cognitive load in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 570–585. http://doi.org/cm22dw
  5. Barrouillet, P., Portrat, S., & Camos, V. (2011). On the law relating processing to storage in working memory. Psychological Review, 118, 175–192. http://doi.org/bq7rsv
  6. Beckman, J. F. (2010). Taming a beast of burden – On some issues with the conceptualisation and operationalisation of cognitive load. Learning and Instruction, 20, 250–264. http://doi.org/dmczgh
  7. Binder, K. S., & Morris, R. K. (2011). An eye-movement analysis of ambiguity resolution: Beyond meaning access. Discourse Processes, 48, 305-330. http://doi.org/cq35kp
  8. Boland, J. E. (2004). Linking eye movements to sentence comprehension in reading and listening. In M. Carreiras & C. Clifton (Eds.), The on-line study of sentence comprehension: Eyetracking, ERP, and beyond (pp. 51–76). New York: Psychology Press.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Dilbilim

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

17 Eylül 2015

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Eylül 2015

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2015 Cilt: 1 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2015). Eye movements in reading span tasks to working memory functions and second language reading. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 35-56. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.460617

Cited By