Examination of Applications to the Department of Rights of Patients from the Perspective of Medical Law

Öz

Objective: The concept of Patient Rights is a core aspect of health law. In modern medicine, while the doctor-patient relationship was historically physician-centric, the development of patient rights has shifted the focus towards a patient-centered approach. In Turkey, the Patient Rights Regulation (PRR) was enacted in 1998. Subsequent revisions were made in 2014 to align with international treaties. With the PRR, patient rights units were established in hospitals, designed to serve as centers for processing complaints, suggestions, and requests from patients and their relatives. Our study aims to evaluate the submissions made to these patient rights units. Method: The study was conducted as a single-center retrospective analysis. Applications submitted to the Patient Rights Unit were reviewed. Personal data were anonymized prior to use. Descriptive statistics were calculated in numbers and percentages (%). Categorical data were analyzed using the Pearson Chi-square test for both groups. A significance threshold of p < 0.05 was established. Findings: Individuals from various educational backgrounds predominantly lodged complaints against physicians. University graduates were the most frequent complainants against physicians (44.7%), nurses (52.5%), hospital administrators (45.4%), and other hospital staff (43.3%). Patients and their immediate relatives mainly lodged complaints against physicians (p=0.001). Conclusion: As individuals' educational levels increase, they are more likely to legally assert their rights. Services in outpatient clinics and emergency departments are frequently cited as sources of complaints. To resolve conflicts, patient rights units need to engage more effectively in mediation efforts.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Patient Rights
• Physician Mecical Law
• patient rights regulation

Kaynakça

1. 1. Syse A, Pasientrettigheter – jus og fag. Tidsskr Nor Legeforen. 2012,132:384.
2. 2. Heloe L A, Fra paternalisme til pasientrettigheter. Tidsskr Nor Legeforen nr.4,2012;132:434-6
3. 3. WMA Declaration of Lisbon on The Rights of Patient. www.wma.net [Access date: 01.01.2024]
4. 4. Dünya Hekimler Birliği Hasta Hakları Bildirgesi 1. www.ttb.org.tr [Access date: 24.12.2023]
5. 5. Fallberg L, consequences of the Amsterdam declaration- a Rights revolution in Europe? European Journal of Health Law. Vol.10,no.1(March 2003), pp.5-10
6. 6. Biyoloji ve Tıbbın Uygulanması Bakımından İnsan Hakları ve İnsan Haysiyetinin Korunması Sözleşmesi: İnsan Hakları ve Biyotıp Sözleşmesinin Onaylanmasının Uygun Bulunduğuna Dair Kanun www.tbmm.gov.tr [Erişim Tarihi: 11.12.2023]
7. 7. Miracle VA, Rights of Patients. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2004;23(3):129-130
8. 8. Rasmussen K, Rett til nødvendig helsehjelp – vår prioriteringshjemmel. Tidsskr Nor Lægeforen nr. 8, 2006; 126: 1073–5

9. 9. Hasta hakları yönetmeliği www.mevzuat.gov.tr [Erişim Tarihi: 22.12.2023]
10. 10. Kişisel verilerin korunması kanunu www.mevzuat.gov.tr [Erişim Tarihi: 13.12.2023]
11. 11. Resmî Gazete Tarihi: 12.09.2010 Resmî Gazete Sayısı: 27697. www.resmigazete.gov.tr [Erişim Tarihi: 12.01.2024]
12. 12. Hanganu B., manoilesku İ,. Why Are Patients Unhappy with Their Healthcare? A Romanian Physicians’ Perspective. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 9460.
13. 13. Adams M.,Maben J., ‘It’s sometimes hard to tell what patients are playing at’: How healthcare professionals make sense of why patients and families complain about care. Health 2018, Vol. 22(6) 603–623
14. 14. Yalçınkaya, D., & Güçlü̈, A. (2023). Hastanelerde Hasta Şikâyetlerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Bir Vakıf Üniversite Hastanesi Örneği. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 26(1): 65-84
15. 15. Yıldırım, R. F. & Kumru, S. (2021). Hasta şikâyetleri ve tatminin Sağlık Bakanlığı iletişim merkezine yapılan başvurular ile değerlendirmesi: İstanbul-Kadıköy örneği. Avrasya Sağlık Teknolojileri Değerlendirme Dergisi, 5(2), 124-137
16. 16. Hoşgör, H. & Tosun, N. (2020). Sağlık Sektöründe Hasta Memnuniyetini Ele Alan Lisansüstü̈ Tezlerin Tüketici Davranışları Çerçevesinde İçerik Değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 34(3), 973-999.
17. 17. Karačić, J., Viđak, M., & Marušić, A. (2021). Reporting violations of European Charter of Patients’ Rights: analysis of patient complaints in Croatia. BMC MedEthics, 22(1), 1-10.
18. 18. Ulusal eğitim istatistikleri 2022. www.data.tuik.gov.tr [Erişim Tarihi:31.01.2024]
19. 19. Acar, E., Alataş̧, Ö. D., Kırlı, U., & Kılınç, C. Y. (2015). Acil Servis Hasta Şikâyetlerinin Değerlendirilmesi. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Tıp Dergisi,2(2), 38-43.
20. 20. Case, J., Walton, M., Harrison, R., Manias, E., Iedema, R., & Smith-Merry, J. (2021). What drives patients’ complaints about adverse events in their hospital care? A data linkage study of Australian adults 45 years and older. Journal of Patient Safety, 17(8), 622-1632.