Evaluation of Prognostic Scores in Patients with Head Trauma in the Emergency Department

Year 2024, Volume: 6 Issue: 1, 1 - 6, 02.05.2024

Mücahit Şentürk , Öner Bozan , Edip Burak Karaaslan , Mehmet Esat Ferhatlar , Yavuzselim Koca , Ahmet Demirel , Dorukhan Kurnaz , Asım Kalkan

https://doi.org/10.55994/ejcc.1426948

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of Glasgow coma scale (GCS), GCS-motor component (mGCS), and FOUR (Full Outline of Un-responsiveness) Scores in predicting the prognosis of patients who presented to the emergency department with head trauma.

Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, was obtained to collected data of patients with head trauma, who presented to the emergency department. Participants’ demographic data, medical history, GCS, FOUR scores, the duration of emergency department stays, as well as 24-hour, 7-day, and 28-day mortality rates were recorded on the case report forms.

Results: Data from 302 patients were used to develop a risk score for detecting significant brain pathology via computed tomography (CT) scans. The regression model, incorporating total GCS and sex-based variables, explained 22.5% of variance and accurately classified 91.1% of cases. The model's area under the curve for detecting significant pathology via CT was 0.714.

Conclusion: GCS, mGCS, and FOUR scores did not achieve the necessary the diagnostic performance benchmark to be used alone to predict or exclude clinically significant brain injury in patients with head trauma.

Keywords

Glasgow Coma Scale, Head Trauma, Acute Brain Injuries, FOUR score

References

• 1. Rutland-Brown W, Langlois JA, Thomas KE, Xi YL. Incidence of traumatic brain injury in the United States, 2003. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21(6):544-8. DOI: 10.1097/00001199-200611000-00009
• 2. Meral Atis G, Altay T, Atis ŞE. Comparison of CATCH, PECARN, and CHALICE clinical decision rules in pediatric patients with mild head trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 01 August 2022;48(4):3123-30. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-021-01859-x
• 3. Puskulluoglu S, Acikalin A, Ay M, Kozaci N, Avci A, Gulen M, vd. Analysis of Adult Trauma Patients Admitted to Emergency Department. Cukurova Med J. 30 September 2015;40(3):569-79. https://doi.org/10.17826/cutf.68238
• 4. Stiell IG, Wells GA, Vandemheen K, Clement C, Lesiuk H, Laupacis A, vd. The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury. Lancet Lond Engl.05 May 2001;357(9266):1391-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04561-x 5. Stein SC, Fabbri A, Servadei F, Glick HA. A critical comparison of clinical decision instruments for computed tomographic scanning in mild closed traumatic brain injury in adolescents and adults. Ann Emerg Med. February 2009;53(2):180-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.01.002
• 6. Kasprowicz M, Burzynska M, Melcer T, Kubler A. A comparison of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) score and Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) in predictive modelling in traumatic brain injury. Br J Neurosurg. 03 March 2016;30(2):211-20. DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2016.1161173
• 7. Okasha AS, Fayed AM, Saleh AS. The FOUR score predicts mortality, endotracheal intubation and ICU length of stay after traumatic brain injury. Neurocrit Care. December 2014;21(3):496-504. DOI: 10.1007/s12028-014-9995-6
• 8. Kupas DF, Melnychuk EM, Young AJ. Glasgow Coma Scale Motor Component (“Patient Does Not Follow Commands”) Performs Similarly to Total Glasgow Coma Scale in Predicting Severe Injury in Trauma Patients. Ann Emerg Med. December 2016;68(6):744-750.e3. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.06.017
• 9. Gill MR, Reiley DG, Green SM. Interrater reliability of Glasgow Coma Scale scores in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. February 2004;43(2):215-23. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(03)00814-x
• 10. Advanced Trauma Life Support® Update 2019: Management and Applications for Adults and Special Populations - PubMed [Internet]. [accessed September 25th 2023]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30711226/ DOI: 10.1016/j.anclin.2018.09.009
• 11. Stiell IG, Clement CM, Rowe BH, Schull MJ, Brison R, Cass D, vd. Comparison of the Canadian CT Head Rule and the New Orleans Criteria in patients with minor head injury. JAMA. 28 September 2005;294(12):1511-8. DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.12.1511
• 12. Chou R, Totten AM, Carney N, Dandy S, Fu R, Grusing S, vd. Predictive Utility of the Total Glasgow Coma Scale Versus the Motor Component of the Glasgow Coma Scale for Identification of Patients With Serious Traumatic Injuries. Ann Emerg Med. August 2017;70(2):143-157.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.11.032
• 13. Wijdicks EFM, Bamlet WR, Maramattom BV, Manno EM, McClelland RL. Validation of a new coma scale: The FOUR score. Ann Neurol. October 2005;58(4):585-93. DOI: 10.1002/ana.20611
• 14. Wijdicks EFM, Rabinstein AA, Bamlet WR, Mandrekar JN. FOUR score and Glasgow Coma Scale in predicting outcome of comatose patients: a pooled analysis. Neurology. 05 July 2011;77(1):84-5. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318220ac06
• 15. Ma C, Wu X, Shen X, Yang Y, Chen Z, Sun X, vd. Sex differences in traumatic brain injury: a multi-dimensional exploration in genes, hormones, cells, individuals, and society. Chin Neurosurg J. 04 October 2019;5:24. doi: 10.1186/s41016-019-0173-8
• 16. Tagliaferri F, Compagnone C, Korsic M, Servadei F, Kraus J. A systematic review of brain injury epidemiology in Europe. Acta Neurochir (Wien). March 2006;148(3):255-68; discussion 268. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-005-0651-y
• 17. Washington CW, Grubb RL. Are routine repeat imaging and intensive care unit admission necessary in mild traumatic brain injury? J Neurosurg. March 2012;116(3):549-57. DOI: 10.3171/2011.11.JNS111092
• 18. Pasquale, Michael D; Cipolle, Mark D; Masiado, Tamara; Wasser, Thomas. Utilization Of National Trauma Data Bank (Ntdb) To Determine Impact Of Age And Comorbidity On Mortality Rates In Isolated Head Injury.: 151-S. Critical Care Medicine 33(12):p A40, December 2005.
• 19. O’Brien T, Mitra B, Le Sage N, Tardif PA, Emond M, D’Astous M, vd. Clinically significant traumatic intracranial hemorrhage following minor head trauma in older adults: a retrospective cohort study. Brain Injury. 11 May 2020;34(6):836-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2020.1753242
• 20. Uccella L, Zoia C, Bongetta D, Gaetani P, Martig F, Candrian C, vd. Are Antiplatelet and Anticoagulants Drugs A Risk Factor for Bleeding in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury? World Neurosurg. February 2018;110:e339-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.10.173
• 21. Nishijima DK, Gaona SD, Waechter T, Maloney R, Blitz A, Elms AR, vd. The Incidence of Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage in Head-Injured Older Adults Transported by EMS with and without Anticoagulant or Antiplatelet Use. J Neurotrauma. 01 March 2018;35(5):750-9. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2017.5232
• 22. Suresh V, Yaddanapudi LN, Podder S. Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score versus Glasgow Coma Scale in critically ill patients with altered sensorium: A comparison of inter-observer variability and outcomes. Indian J Anaesth. August 2019;63(8):640-7. DOI: 10.4103/ija.IJA_377_19