Küretaj Sonrası Tubal Ektopik Gebeliğe Bağlı Hemorajik Şok: Bir Olgu Sunumu

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2, 47 - 49, 01.09.2025

Ayşegül Akçebe , Onuralp Çalışkan , Tufan Akın Giray , Ali Sağlık , Tarık Ocak

https://doi.org/10.55994/ejcc.1767815

Öz

Bu makale, küretaj uygulanan ve sonrasında rüptüre olmuş tubal ektopik gebelik nedeniyle hemorajik şok gelişen genç bir kadında görülen nadir fakat yaşamı tehdit eden heterotopik gebelik vakasını sunmaktadır. Bu raporun, özellikle yanıltıcı klinik tabloların görüldüğü küretaj sonrası vakalarda, acil tıp ortamlarındaki tanı zorlukları ve kritik karar verme süreçleri hakkında önemli klinik bilgiler sunduğuna inanıyoruz.

Anahtar Kelimeler

heterotropik gebelik , ektopik gebelik , hemorajik şok , küretaj , salpinjektomi

Hemorrhagic Shock Due to Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy Following Curettage: A Case Report

Öz

This manuscript presents a rare but life-threatening case of heterotopic pregnancy in a young woman who underwent curettage and subsequently developed hemorrhagic shock due to a ruptured tubal ectopic pregnancy. We believe this report offers significant clinical insights into the diagnostic challenges and critical decision-making processes in emergency medicine settings, particularly in post-curettage cases with misleading clinical presentations.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Heterotopic Pregnancy , Ectopic Pregnancy , Hemorrhagic Shock , Curettage , Salpingectomy

Etik Beyan

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article. The authors declare the following financial or non-financial interests which may be considered as potential conflicts of interest: None. This declaration of interest statement has been completed by the corresponding author on behalf of all co-authors and is submitted as a separate file as required.

Kaynakça

• Bouyer J, Coste J, Fernandez H, Pouly JL, Job-Spira N. Sites of ectopic pregnancy: a 10year population-based study of 1800 cases. Hum Reprod. 2003;17(12):3224–30.
• Barnhart KT. Ectopic pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(4):379–87.
• ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 193: Tubal Ectopic Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2018;131(3): e91–e103.
• World Health Organization. Maternal mortality: Levels and trends 2000–2020. Geneva: WHO; 2021.
• Tal J, Haddad S, Gordon N, Timor-Tritsch I. Heterotopic pregnancy after assisted reproductive technologies: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1996;51(11):705–9.
• Reece EA, Petrie RH, Sirmans MF, Finster M, Todd WD. Combined intrauterine and extrauterine gestations: a review. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1983;146(3):323–30.
• Barrenetxea G, Barinaga-Rementeria L, Lopez de Larruzea A, Agirregoikoa JA, Mandiola M, Carbonero K. Heterotopic pregnancy: two cases and a comparative review. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(2): 417.e9–15.
• Kirk E, Bottomley C, Bourne T. Diagnosing ectopic pregnancy and current concepts in the management of pregnancy of unknown location. Hum Reprod Update. 2007;13(5):567–76.
• Nyberg DA, Filly RA, Mahony BS. Ectopic pregnancy: Doppler US findings. Radiology. 1991;178(3):557–60.
• Seeber BE, Sammel MD, Guo W, Zhou L, Hummel AC, Barnhart KT. Application of serum biomarkers in the diagnosis and prediction of ectopic pregnancy. Fertil Steril. 2006;86(5):1235–41.
• Hendriks E, MacNab M, Baird SM. Clinical guidelines for post-abortion care. Am Fam Physician. 2019;99(2):104–10.
• Kajdy A, et al. A unique case of diagnosis of a heterotopic pregnancy at 26 weeks–case report and literature review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):1–6