Content Analysis of the Postgraduate Theses Based on Wood Anatomy in Turkey

Abstract

This study examines master’s theses and doctoral dissertations on wood anatomy in Turkey in terms of completion year, thesis type, titles of advisors, gender of authors and advisors, universities, subject area, related subjects, samples, stain, and name of wood species. Content analysis was carried out on the theses selected through criterion sampling. The research data were collected through document analysis and analyzed using the SPSS 20.0 program. Within the scope of the research, it was determined that 33 master’s theses and 17 doctoral dissertations, which were found in the thesis scanning center of Higher Education Council (YÖK) of Turkey, were completed in the field of wood anatomy between 1990 and 2022. According to the results, the first thesis indexed by YÖK belongs to 1990 and is master’s thesis, and theses were mainly conducted by female researchers. It was seen that the highest number of postgraduate theses were prepared in Karadeniz Technical University and Istanbul/Istanbul-Cerrahpaşa University. The most studied subject is wood anatomy with fiber morphology, and the most studied other subject is ecological wood anatomy. Both microscopic and macroscopic investigations were done, and most of the theses were only investigated by microscopically. The most used stain was safranin and theses were made on solid wood samples which were cut from the trees or woody plants. This study is very important for scientific developments and will reveal the missing points in the country and provide a vision for future studies.

Keywords

• Wood structure
• wood anatomy
• higher education
• content analysis
• thesis

Kaynakça

1. Alkan, Ç., Eroğlu, H., Yaman, B. (2003). Türkiye’deki Bazı Odunsu Angiospermae Taksonlarının Lif Morfolojilaeri. ZKÜ Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi 5(5), 102-108. Alkan, G. (2014). Türkiye’de Muhasebe Alanında Yapılan Lisansüstü Tez Çalışmaları Üzerine Bir Araştırma (1984-2012). Muhasebe ve Finansman Dergisi 61, 41–52.
2. Alkar, E., Atasoy, E. (2020). A Content Analysis for Doctoral Dissertations on Migration in Tur-key. Turkish Journal of TESAM Academy 7(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.30626/tesamakademi.696174 (in Turkish).
3. Altaş, A., Acar, Y. (2018). Bibliometric Profile of the Postgraduate Dissertations Written in the Field of Gastronomy. Aksaray Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 10(3), 1–10. Aytuğ, B. (1959). Türkiye Göknar (Abies Tourn.) Türleri Üzerine Morfolojik Esaslar ve Anatomik Araştırmalar. İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi İstanbul.
4. Berelson, B. (1952). Content Analysis in Communication Research. Glence, III:Free Press, Newyork
5. Berkel, A. (1950). Orman Ağaç Ve Ağaçcıkları Odunlarını Teşhis Klavuzu. İÜ Yayınları, İstanbul.
6. Bowen, W.M., Bowen, C.C. (2002). Typologies, Indexing, Content Analysis, Meta-Analysis, and Scaling as Measurement Techniques. In: G. J. Miller & M. L. Whicker (Eds.), Handbook of Research Methods in Public Administration. New York, Marcel Dekker Inc., pp. 51–86.
7. Carruthers, S.P., Miller, F.A., Vaughan, C.M.A. (1994). Crops for Industry and Energy. CAS Re-port 15. Reading: Centre for Agricultural Study, University of Reading.
8. Cavlak, H., Cebeci, Y., Güneş, N., Tan, Ö.F. (2021). Analysis of Graduate Theses About Accoun-ting Education. Muhasebe ve Finansman Eğitimi 89, 75–100. https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.852083

9. Cleave, E., Arku, G., Chatwin, M. (2017). Cities’ Economic Development Efforts in a Changing Global Economy: Content Analysis of Economic Development Plans in Ontario, Canada. Area 49(3), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/area.12335
10. Çalık, M., Sözbilir, M. (2014). Parameters of Content Analysis. Education and Science 39(174), 33–38. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.3412
11. Dede, H., Uzun, H. (2020). Descriptive Content Analysis of Graduate Theses in the Field Of Preschool Science Education in Turkey. Elemantary Education Online 19(4), 2434–2447. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.764512
12. Demirok, M.S., Beşgül, M., Bağlama, B. (2016). A Content Analysis of the Postgraduate Thesis Written on Special Education in Turkey Based on Various Variables (2009-2014). Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences 11(2), 92–101.
13. Doğan, M., Çelik, S., Tomris, G. (2022). Analysis of Mixed Methods Graduate Thesis Studies in Special Education Programs in Turkey. Journal of Qualitative in Education 29, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.29.1
14. Drysdale, J.S., Graham, C.R., Spring, K.J., Halverson, L.R. (2013). An Analysis of Research Trends in Dissertations and Theses Studying Blended Learning. The Internet and Higher Education 17, 90–100. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.003 Durak, G., Çankaya, S., Yunkul, E., Urfa, M., Topraklıklıoğlu, K., Arda, Y., İnam, N. (2017). Trends in Distance Education: A Content Analysis of Master’s Thesis. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 16(1), 203–2018.
15. Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Educa-tion (7. ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Göncü, Serhatlıoğlu, S., Dolgun, G. (2019). The Overview of Postgraduate Thesis Within the De-partment of Midwifery Site (2004-2017) in Turkey. Journal of Health Science and Medicine 2(2), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.32322/jhsm.484290
17. Guthrie, T., Hussinki, H., Dumay, J. (2004). Using Content Analysis as a Research Method to İnquire into İntellectual Capital Reporting. Journal of Intellectual Capital 52(2), 282–293.
18. Hayashi, M.C.P.I, Maroldi, A.M., Hayashi, C.R.M. (2020). Bibliometric Study of Brazilian Theses and Dissertations (1996-2018) on Specific and Differentiated Teaching Materials for Indige-nous Populations. Revista Brasileira de Educcaçao do Campo 5, e9151. https://doi.org/10.20873/uft.rbec.e9151
19. Ilkım, M., Özoğlu, F., Karadağ, H, (2021). Graduate with Autism in Turkey on the Content Made in Sport Analysis of Theses (2013-2020). Journal of ROL Sport Sciences 2(1), 40–49.
20. Jensen, L., Allen, M. (1996). Meta-synthesis of qualitative findings. Qualitative Health Research 6(4), 553–560.
21. Jeffrey, E.C. (1917). The Anatomy of Woody Plants. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
22. Kankam, P.K., Okyere, E.K., Awuah, P. (2020). A Bibliometric Study of MPhill Theses at the Department of Information Studies, University Ghana (2000-2018). Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal) 4282. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4282
23. Karaman, E., Oksel, E., Akçiçek, S.F. (2020). Evaluation of Postgraduate Theses Related to Aging in Turkey. International Journal of Caring Science 13(1), 735–731.
24. Korkmaz, H., Çetinkaya, C. (2019). Post-graduate Theses on Logistics and Supply Chain in Tur-key: A bibliometric analysis. Gaziantep University Journal of Social Science 18(1), 479–493. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
25. López-Bonilla, L.M., Reyes-Rodriques, M.C., López-Bonilla, J.M. (2020). Golf Tourism and Susta-inability: Content Analysis and Directions for Future Research. Sustainability 12, 1–18.
26. Merev, N., 1998: Wood Anatomy of Native Angiospermae Taxa in the Eastern Black Sea Region (Vol. I). KTU Publisher No:27, Trabzon, Turkey. (in Turkish).
27. Miller, G., Whicker, M. (1999). Introduction. In: Handbook of research methods in public admi-nistration. NewYork, Marcel Dekker Inc., pp. 1- 2.
28. Mishra, D.K., Gawde, M., Solanki, M.S. (2014). Bibliometric Study of Ph.D. Thesis in English. Global Journal of Academic Librarianship 1(1), 19-36.
29. Mondal, S., Bandyopadhyay, A.K., Roy, B.K. (2017). Bibliometric Analysis of Doctoral Disserta-tions in Political Science: A Study of the University of Burdwan. Journal of Library and In-formation Science 7(3), 576–594.
30. Naycı, Ö. (2021). Content Analysis on the Graduate Theses Done About Flipped Classroom Model in Turkey. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 22(2), Article 13.
31. Nelson, J., Coorough, C. (1994). Content Analysis of the PhD Versus EdD Dissertation. Journal of Experimental Education 62(2), 158–168.
32. O’Leary, Z. (2004). The Essential Guide to Doing Research. London, England: Sage Publications.
33. Oruç, Ş., Teymuroğlu, B. (2011). Graduate Thesis Studies About Using Material at Social Science Education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 15, 3216–3221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.274
34. Özdemir, F., Tutuş, A., Bektaş, İ., Çiçekler, M. (2015). Fıstıkçamı ve Yalancı Akasya Türlerinde Öz odun-Diri Odun Kısımlarında Morfolojik Farklılıkların Belirlenmesi Türkiye Ormancılık Dergisi 16(1), 60-64.
35. Pekdoğan, S., Bozgün, K. (2017). Examination of Postgraduate Dissertations within the field of Gifted Education in Turkey: Content Analysis Study. Journal of Education of Gifted Young Scientists 54(29), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.2017.70
36. Randolph, Justus, J., Gaiek, Lura, S., White, Torian, A., Slappey, Lisa, A., Chastain, A.,
37. Prejean-Harris, R., Hansard, C. (2012). A Quantitative Content Analysis of Mercer University Theses. Georgia Educational Researcher 9(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.20429/ger.2012.090106
38. Spearing, W.E., Isenberg, J.H. (1947). The Maceration of Woody Tissue with Acetic Acid and Sodium Clorite Science 105-2721, 2014.
39. Tavşancıl, E., Çıtak, G.G., Kezer, F. (2011). The Investigation on the Abstracts of Theses and Dissertations in the Domain of Measurement and Evaluation. The International Journal of Educational Researches 3(1), 17–32. Temel, C., Kartal, M., Pehlevan, Z., Namlı, A. (2016). A Research on the Methods and Analysis Techniques of the Postgraduate Theses and Dissertations on Sports in Turkey. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences 8(1), 78–86.
40. Tezer, M., Kani Güldali Ş., Öznacar, B., Şensoy, Ş., Çaltıkuşu, Ç. (2019). Content Analysis of Master’s Degreee and Doctorate Theses Where Social Skills Training is Approached. Interna-tional Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE) 7(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.5937/ijcrsee1901043T
41. Tutcu, B., Talaş, H. (2021). A Research on Postgraduate Thesis Studies on Cost in Turkey Between 1990-2020. Malatya Turgut Özal University Journal of Business and Management Sciences 2(1), 47–60.
42. Uzun, E., Cingöz, E., Şata, E. (2022). Descriptive Content Analysis of Graduate Thesis Studies on Analogy in Science Education in Turkey. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences Internati-onal 12(2), 492–519. https://doi.org/10.18039/ajesi.926677
43. Ültay, E., Akyurt, H., Ültay, N. (2021). Descriptive Content Analysis in Social Science. IBAD Journal of Social Sciences 10: 188–201 (in Turkish). https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.871703
44. Ünal, S., Benzer, A.İ. (2021). The Examination of the Postgraduate Theses on Models and Model-ling in Science Education in Turkey. International Journal of Progressive Education 17(3), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.346.8
45. Wang, T., Lund, B., Dow, M. (2022). A Bibliometrics Study of Library and Information Scien-ce Doctoral Dissertations in China from 2011 to 2020. Education for Information 38(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-211545
46. Weber, R.P. (1990). Basic Content Analysis. 2 nd ed. Newbury Park, CA.
47. Wheeler, E.A., Baas, P., Rodgers, S. (2007). Variations in dicot anatomy: a global analysis based on the InsideWood database. IAWA Journal 28, 229–258.
48. Wise, E.L., Karl, H.L. (1962). Cellulose and Hemiellulose. In: Earl Libby C., Editor. Pulp and Paper Science and Technology, Vol:I, New York, USA:Mc Graw Book Co.
49. Yıldırım, A., Şimşek, H. (2006). Research Methods in Social Sciences. Ankara: Seckin Yayincilik.
50. Zin, T.H.E. (2017). Bibliometric Analysis on MA Thesis Submitted to the Department of Library and Information Studies, Yadanabon University (2013-2017). Yadanabon University Research Journal 8(1).