Comparative analysis of forestry systems in the United States and Turkey: Practices, technologies, and challenges

Öz

The current study provides a comprehensive comparative analysis of forestry systems in the United States (US) and Turkey, covering various aspects such as forest ownership, natural resources planning, fire management, technological applications, silviculture, forestry education and challenges faced by each country. The findings mainly stems from the author’s first-hand investigations, field observations, and experiences during a postdoctoral research period in the US from 2022 to 2024. Additionally, a variety of information sources, including US forest plans, publications from the US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, relevant peer-reviewed literature, and open-source data, was used in the work employing the verbal analysis method. While certain similarities emerge, particularly in technology utilization and the historical development of forestry education, significant disparities are evident in fire management strategies, land ownership structure, silvicultural practices, and forest planning approaches between the countries. These differences can be attributed to unique environmental and historical conditions, varying economic development levels, and distinct regulatory legislations. The outcomes of this study suggest that there are valuable forestry practices that each country can learn or adopt from the other, emphasizing the potential for mutual exchange and improvement in natural resources management practices.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Forestry
• forest sector
• public forests
• private forests
• forest carbon market
• Forest Inventory and Analysis National Program (FIA)
• the United States of America
• Türkiye.

Destekleyen Kurum

TÜBİTAK

Etik Beyan

N/A

Teşekkür

I would like to thank the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBİTAK) for providing me opportunity to visit the Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources (University of Georgia) with the 2219 Post-doctoral Research Fellowship Program, and thus, to get know US forestry firsthand. I am also thankful to Prof. Dr. Pete Bettinger who supported me with gaining versatile experience in several research projects in the US.

Kaynakça

1. AirNow (2024). Fire and Smoke Map (v3.1). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and U.S. Forest Service. https://fire.airnow.gov/ (Visited on date: 15/02/2024).
2. Akturk, E., Post, C., Mikhailova, E.A. (2020). Modeling and monitoring riparian buffer zones using LiDAR data in South Carolina. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 192:350.
3. Allen, H.L., Fox, T.R., Campbell, R.G. (2005). What is ahead for intensive pine plantation silviculture in the South? Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 29(2):62-69.
4. Álvarez, M. (2018). The State of America’s Forests: An Interactive Guide. Greenville, SC: U.S. Endowment for Forestry and Communities, Inc. https://usaforest.org (Visited on date: 27/11/ 2023).
5. Baker, J.B, Langdon, O.G. (1990). Lobllolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). USDA Publication. https://www.srs.fs.usda.gov/pubs/misc/ag_654/volume_1/pinus/taeda.htm (Visited on date: 15/12/2023).
6. Başsüllü, Ç., Tolunay, A. (2014). Development of an institutional model for emission trading system: An approach to the carbon market of Turkey. SDU Faculty of Forestry Journal 15:158-167.
7. Başsüllü, Ç., Tolunay, A. (2015). Adaptation of the administrative structure of the General Directorate of Forestry and some forestry legislation to the Turkish emissions trading system. Turkish Journal of Forestry 16(1):75-81.
8. BAYKAR (2024). Fighting Forest Fires. BAYKAR’s official website. https://baykartech.com/en/fighting-forest-fires/ (Visited on date: 16/02/2024).

9. Bettinger, P., Siry, J., Cieszewski, C., Merry, K.L., Zengin, H., Yeşil, A. (2013). Forest management issues of the southern United States and comparisons with Turkey. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 37:83–96.
10. Bilgili, E., Küçük, Ö., Sağlam, B., Coşkuner, K.A. (2021). Büyük Orman Yangınları: Sebepleri, Organizasyonu ve İdaresi. Chapter In: Orman Yangınları: Sebepleri, Etkileri, İzlenmesi, Alınması Gereken Önlemler ve Rehabilitasyon Faaliyetleri (Ed. Taşkın Kavzoğlu). TÜBA, Ankara Basım Yayın Hizmetleri, Ankara, pp. 1-23.
11. Birben, Ü., Güneş, Y. (2015). Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nde orman mülkiyeti. Anatolian Journal of Forest Research 1(1-2):22-32.
12. Congressional Research Service (2021). U.S. Forest Ownership and Management: Background and Issues for Congress. Congressional Research Service (CRS) Report R46976. https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46976#:~:text=Private%20forest%20owners%20can%20be,family%2C%20tribal%2C%20and%20other. (Visited on date: 28/11/2023).
13. Coşkuner, K.A., Çil, B., Bilgili, E., Berber, T. (2021). Orman yangınlarının uzaktan algılama teknikleri ve karar destek sistemleri ile analizi: 2021 yılı büyük Marmaris-Armutalan Yangını örneği. IV. Ulusal Karadeniz Ormancılık Kongresi, Trabzon, Turkey.
14. Cunningham, K. (2023). Managing Loblolly pine stands…from A to Z. Lecture note FSA5023. https://www.uaex.uada.edu/publications/PDF/FSA-5023.pdf (Visited on date: 28/11/2023).
15. Croom, D.B. (2023). The Biltmore Forest School and the Establishment of Forestry Education in America. Preprint. https://esploro.libs.uga.edu/esploro/outputs/preprint/The-Biltmore-Forest-School-and-the/9949521630402959/filesAndLinks?index=0 (Visited on date: 28/12/2023).
16. Demirci, U., Öztürk A. (2015). Carbon markets as a financial instrument in the forestry sector in Turkey. International Forestry Review 17(2):141-152.
17. Eker, R. (2023). Comparative use of PPK-integrated close-range terrestrial photogrammetry and a handheld mobile laser scanner in the measurement of forest road surface deformation. Measurement 206:112322 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2022.112322
18. FIA (2012). FIA reports. https://www.stateforesters.org/timber-assurance/legality/forest-ownership-statistics/#:~:text=There%20are%20three%20primary%20forest,conservation%2C%20production%2C%20and%20recreation (Visited on date: 29/11/2023).
19. FMNF (2017). Final Revised Land Management Plan of the Francis Marion National Forest. USDA Forest Service, Region 8, Virgina, USA, 268 p.
20. ForestryUSA (2022). Directory of American Universities and Colleges Offering Post-Secondary Education in Forestry and Forest Products Technology. ForestryUSA’s official website. https://www.forestryusa.com/universities-colleges.html (Visited on date: 8/11/2023).
21. Fry, A. (2023). We live with fire – Blending Tribal knowledge and science with western science. USDA Forest Service’s website. https://www.fs.usda.gov/features/we-live-fire (Visited on date: 17/12/2023).
22. Garabedian, J.E., McGaughey, R.J., Reutebuch, S.E., Parresol, B.R., Kilgo, J.C., Moorman, C.E., et al. (2014). Quantitative analysis of woodpecker habitat using high-resolution airborne LiDAR estimates of forest structure and composition. Remote Sensing of Environment 145:68–80.
23. Green, C.C. (2006). Forestry Education in the United States. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship. http://www.istl.org/46-supp/article7.html (Visited on date: 28/11/2023).
24. Gutierrez Garzon, A.R. Bettinger, P., Siry, J., Abrams, J., Cieszewski, C., Boston, K., Mei, B., Zengin, H., Yeşil, A. (2020). A comparative analysis of five forest certification programs. Forests 11:863.
25. Güneş, Y. (2004). Amerika Birleşik Devletleri çevre hukukunun gelişimi ve Türk çevre hukuku ile karşılaştırılması. Istanbul Law Review LXII:81-122.
26. Güneş, Y., Coşkun, A.A. (2008). Trends in forest ownership, forest resources tenure and institutional arrangements: Are they contributing to better forest management and poverty reduction? A case study from Turkey. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. www.fao.org/forestry/16407– 0c0665eddd86a68c9fbbc87cdde52501c.pdf (Visited on date: 28/11/2023).
27. Gümüş, C. (2016). Historical development of forestry education in the context of forest resources management in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Forestry 17(1):93-98.
28. GWNF (2014). Revised Land and Resource Management Plan of the George Washington National Forest. USDA Forest Service, Region 8, Virgina, USA, 374 p.
29. Hancock, B. (1998). Trent Focus for Research and Development in Primary Health Care: An Introduction to Qualitative Research, http://faculty.uccb.ns.ca/pmacintyre/course_pages/MBA603/MBA603_files/IntroQualitativeResearch.pdf (Visited on date: 25/12/2023).
30. Jacobo, J. (2023). You can buy a Christmas tree for as little as $5 if there's a national forest nearby. abcNews official website. https://abcnews.go.com/US/buy-christmas-tree-5-national-forest-nearby/story?id=105044086 (Visited on date: 28/11/2023).
31. Kadıoglu, B.M., Karatay, S., Cetinceviz, Y., Erken, F. (2023). Development of unmanned aerial vehicle for detecting the forest fires. Turkish Journal of Science & Technology 18(2):449-459.
32. Kayacan, B., Zengin, H., Kadiogullari, A.I. (2016). Chapter 44: Turkey. In: Vidal C, Alberdi I, Hernandez L, Redmond J (Eds). National Forest Inventories: Assessment of Wood Availability and Use. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 807-827.
33. Koç, K.H., Dilik, T., Kurtoğlu, A. (2017). Türkiye orman ürünleri endüstrisine stratejik bir bakış. Özden S. (Ed.), IV. Ulusal Ormancılık Kongresi: İnsan - Doğa Etkileşiminde Orman ve Ormancılık, The Foresters’ Association of Türkiye, Ankara, pp. 483-495.
34. Kömürlü, M., Atmiş, E., Alan, M., Ondaral, S. (2022). Forest Degradation in Turkey. In Turkish Forestry 2022: Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Turkey; Atmiş, E. (Ed.), The Foresters’ Association of Türkiye Publications: Ankara, Türkiye, p. 200.
35. Kutluk, H. (1957). Fransız Ormancıları Nasıl getirildi? Orman mektebi Kimlerin İsteğiile ve ne Suretle Açıldı? Türkiye Ormancılığı 100. Tedris Yılına Girerken, The Foresters’ Association of Türkiye, Ankara, pp. 18-21.
36. Lamichhane, S., Sun, C., Gordon, J.S., Grado, S.C., Poudel, K.P. (2021). Spatial dependence and determinants of conservation easement adoptions in the United States. Journal of Environmental Management 296:113164.
37. McGinley, K., Murray, L., Robertson, G., White, E.M. (2023). National report on sustainable forests, 2020. FS-1217. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office. 53 p. https://doi.org/10.2737/FS-1217.
38. McKeand, S. (2015). The success of tree breeding in the Southern US. BioResources 10(1):1-2.
39. Medina-Irizarry, N., Andreu, M., Cushing, T. (2022). A landowner’s introduction to the forest carbon market: FOR382/FR453, 3/2022. EDIS, 2:1-5.
40. NASA (2023). Fire Information for Resource Management System US/Canada (FIRMS). The National Aeronautics and Space Administration. https://firms.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/usfs/map/#d:24hrs;@-100.0,40.0,4.0z (Visited on date: 25/12/2023).
41. NASA (2024). Fire Information for Resource Management System (FIRMS). The National Aeronautics and Space Administration. https://firms.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/ (Visited on date: 15/02/2024).
42. NCWFMS (2014). The National Strategy: The Final Phase in the Development of the National Cohesive Wildland Fire Management Strategy. https://www.forestsandrangelands.gov/documents/strategy/strategy/CSPhaseIIINationalStrategyApr2014.pdf (Visited on date: 28/12/2023).
43. NFI (2024). Nationwide forest inventory. USDA’s Forest Inventory and Analysis Program. https://www.fs.usda.gov/research/programs/nfi#data-collection-and-inventory-methods (Visited on date: 15/02/2024).
44. NIFC (2023). Smoke management. National Interagency Fire Center. https://www.nifc.gov/programs/smoke-management (Visited on date: 18/12/2023).
45. OGM (2013). Türkiye Ormanlarının Sağlık Durumu (2008-2012). Orman Genel Müdürlüğü, Orman Zararlılarıyla Mücadele Dairesi Başkanlığı, OGM Publication, Ankara, 457 p.
46. OGM (2017). Ekosistem Tabanlı Fonksiyonel Orman Amenajman Planlarının Düzenlenmesine Ait Usul ve Esaslar (299 sayılı tebliğ−düzeltmeli son baskı), Orman İdaresi ve Planlama Dairesi Başkanlığı, OGM Publication, Ankara, 227 p.
47. OGM (2022). Forestry Statistics 2022. Orman Genel Müdürlüğü. https://www.ogm.gov.tr/tr/e-kutuphane/resmi-istatistikler (Visited on date: 15/02/2024).
48. OGM (2024). Misyonumuz. OGM’s official website. https://www.ogm.gov.tr/tr/kurulusumuz/genel-bilgiler (Visited on date: 15/02/2024).
49. OMO (2022). Meslek mensuplarının çalışma alanları ile uzmanlık konularının kazanılmasına ilişkin alt düzenleme. TMMOB Chamber of Forest Engineers. https://eski.ormuh.org.tr/uploads/dosya/3.01.2022-degisikligi-giydirilmis-6-nolu-duzenleme.pdf (Visited on date: 28/12/2023).
50. Oswalt, S.N., Smith, W. Miles, B., Patrick, D., Pugh, S.A. (2019). Forest Resources of the United States, 2017: a technical document supporting the Forest Service 2020 RPA Assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-97. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington Office. 223 p.
51. Özertan, G., Coşkun, A. (2021). Masif Ahşap Sektör Raporu 2021. General Directorate of Forest, OGM Publication, Ankara. https://www.ogm.gov.tr/tr/e-kutuphane-sitesi/Yayinlar/Masif%20Ah%C5%9Fap%20Sekt%C3%B6r%C3%BC%20Raporu.pdf (Visited on date: 8/12/2023).
52. Potter, K.M., Conkling, B.L. (2017). Forest Health Monitoring: National Status, Trends, and Analysis 2016. USDA Forest Service Research & Development Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS-222. 221 p.
53. Restrepo, H., Bullock, B.P., Montes, C.R. (2019). Growth and yield drivers of loblolly pine in the southeastern U.S.: A meta-analysis. Forest Ecology and Management 435:205-218.
54. Rizza, J., Berger, C. (2023). Prescribed fire basics: Ignition techniques and tools. Oregon State University Extension Fire Program. https://extension.oregonstate.edu/sites/default/files/documents/12581/osu-rx-modules-ignition-em9387_0.pdf (Visited on date: 8/12/2023).
55. Sayistay (2022). OGM 2021 yılı Sayıştay Denetim Raporu. https://www.sayistay.gov.tr/reports/download/EOQNR3kQP2-orman-genel-mudurlugu#:~:text=Orman%20Genel%20M%C3%BCd%C3%BCrl%C3%BC%C4%9F%C3%BC%20merkez%20ve,toplam%2038.702%20personel%20istihdam%20edilmektedir. (Visited on date: 16/02/2024).
56. Serengil, Y. (2020). Karbon Sertifikalandırma Sistemi Kavramsal Mimarisi Raporu. Sürdürülebilir Orman Yönetimi Kapsamında Karbon Sertifikalandırma Sisteminin Kavramsal Mimarisinin Geliştirilmesi ve İlgili Sivil Toplum Kuruluşlarının Güçlendirilmesi Projesi. Tohum Derneği, İstanbul, 30 p.
57. Siry, J.P., Bettinger, P., Merry, K., Grebner, D.L., Boston, K., Cieszewski, C. (2015). Forest Plans of North America. Academic Press, London, UK, 458 p.
58. Smart, L.S., Swenson, J.J., Christensen, N.L., and Sexton, J.O. (2012). Three-dimensional characterization of pine forest type and red-cockaded woodpecker habitat by small-footprint, discrete return lidar. Forest Ecology and Management 281:100–110.
59. Stambaugh, M.C., Varner, J.M., Jackson, S.T. (2018). Biogeography: An Interweave of Climate, Fire, and Humans. In: Kirkman L.C., Jack, S.B. (Eds.) Ecological Restoration and Management of Longleaf Pine Forests. CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 17–38.
60. Stober, J., Merry, K., Bettinger, P. (2020). Analysis of fire frequency on the Talladega National Forest, USA, 1998-2018. International Journal of Wildland Fire 29:919-925.
61. Şahin, A., Çağlayan, İ., Büyük, H., Karademir, H., Aksu, A., Şahin, H. (2022). Türkiye’nin ilk orman planlama nitesindeki teknik ve yapısal değişimlerin yüz yıllık değerlendirilmesi. Turkish Journal of Forestry Research 9(1):12-34.
62. The New York Times (2023). Maps: Tracking Air Quality and Smoke from Wildfires. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/us/smoke-maps-canada-fires.html (Visited on date: 28/11/2023).
63. Ucar, Z., Bettinger, P., Merry, M., Akbulut, R., Siry, J. (2018). Estimation of urban woody vegetation cover using multispectral imagery and LiDAR. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 29:248-260.
64. UGA (2023). UGA receives $18.5M from sale of Lake Blackshear property. Warnell News. https://warnell.uga.edu/news/stories/2023/uga-receives-185m-sale-lake-blackshear-property (Visited on date: 29/12/2023).
65. USDA Forest Service (2012). National Forest System Land Management Planning (Final Rule and Record of Decision); United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
66. USDA Forest Service (2019). This is who we are. United States Department of Agriculture Booklet FS-1124a, Washington D.C., ABD. https://www.fs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/This-is-Who-We-Are.pdf (Visited on date: 28/10/2023).
67. USDA Forest Service (2022a). Meet the Forest Service. https://www.fs.usda.gov/about-agency/meet-forest-service (Visited on date: 23/11/2023).
68. USDA Forest Service (2022b). Wildfire Crisis Strategy – Confronting The Wildfire Crisis: A Strategy for Protecting Communities and Improving Resilience in America’s Forests. United States Department of Agriculture Documentation FS-1187a.
69. USDA Forest Service (2023a). Prescribed fire. USDA Forest Service’s website. https://www.fs.usda.gov/managing-land/prescribed-fire (Visited on date: 18/12/2023).
70. USDA Forest Service (2023b). Fiscal Year 2024 Budget Justification. USDA Forest Service’s website. https://www.fs.usda.gov/sites/default/files/FS-FY24-Congressional-Budget-Justification.pdf (Visited on date: 16/02/2024).
71. USDA Forest Service (2024a). USDA Forest Service news release. USDA Forest Service’s website. https://www.fs.usda.gov/about-agency/newsroom/releases/usda-forest-service-and-national-park-service-seek-public-input (Visited on date: 15/02/2024).
72. USDA Forest Service (2024b). Forest Inventory and Analysis DataMart. USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis Program’s website. https://apps.fs.usda.gov/fia/datamart/datamart.html (Visited on date: 15/02/2024).
73. USDA NRCS (2024). Geospatial Data Gateway. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service’s website. https://datagateway.nrcs.usda.gov/ (Visited on date: 15/02/2024).
74. USDI Bureau of Land Management (2024). Online forest product permits. The U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management’s website. https://forestproducts.blm.gov/miscapi/getstatebackground?stateid=8 (Visited on date: 15/02/2024).
75. USDI NIFC (2024). National Interagency Coordination Center. The U.S. Department of the Interior National Interagency Fire Center’s website. https://www.nifc.gov/nicc/predictive-services/outlooks (Visited on date: 15/02/2024).
76. USDT Bureau of the Fiscal Service (2024). The secure way to pay U.S. Federal Government agencies. The U.S. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service’s website. https://www.pay.gov/public/home (Visited on date: 15/02/2024).
77. USGS (2024). 3DEP LidarExplorer. The U.S. Geological Survey’s website. https://apps.nationalmap.gov/lidar-explorer/#/ (Visited on date: 15/02/2024).
78. USGS WFSP (2024). WFPI-based Fire Spread Probability. The U.S. Geological Survey Wildland Fire Science Program’s website. https://www.usgs.gov/fire-danger-forecast/wfpi-based-fire-spread-probability-wfsp (Visited on date: 15/02/2024).
79. Vacchiano, G., Berretti, R., Romano, R., Motta, R. (2018). Voluntary carbon credits from improved forest management: policy guidelines and case study. iForest 11:1-10.
80. Vatandaşlar, C., Zeybek, M., Çankaya E.Ç., Demiraslan, T., Şahin, C., Gündüz, Y., Korkmaz, Ü., Avcı, M.L. (2022). Using handheld mobile LiDAR technology in forest inventories: Artvin-Şavşat case. Turkish Journal of Forestry Research 9(1):81-96.
81. Vatandaşlar, C., Bettinger, P., Gutierrez Garzon, A.R., Merry, K., Boston, K., Lee, T., Uzu, J. (2023). Sustainability language in forest management plans: A comparative analysis for public forests of the US and Turkey. Forests 14(3):447.
82. VCS (2012). Approved VCS Methodology VM0003: Methodology for Improved Forest Management through Extension of Rotation Age (IFM ERA). Verified Carbon Standard, Ecotrust, Portland OR, USA, 62 p.
83. WFAS (2024). Wildland Fire Assessment System. Official website. https://www.wfas.net/ (Visited on date: 15/02/2024).