Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of ASTER, contour lines and LiDAR based DEMs in terms of topographic differences in forested area

Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2 20 Ağustos 2019
PDF İndir
EN

Comparison of ASTER, contour lines and LiDAR based DEMs in terms of topographic differences in forested area

Abstract

DEMs (Digital Elevation Model) generated with different remote sensing techniques and technologies are used to determine the changes of vegetation in forests depending on topographical factors. The accuracy of DEMs has a major impact on the planning and management of forests.

In this study, the accuracy of two different DEM data sources, which are frequently used in the modeling of topographic changes in large field studies in forestry, was compared with the LiDAR-based DEM dataset on a forest site. In this context, three different DEM source were used. One of them was the 10 m interval contour lines of 1:25,000 scale aerial photogrammetry based standard topographical maps which are produced by National General Directorate of Mapping. Topomap contour lines are transformed to grid based DEMs by using TIN and ANUDEM based approaches at 2.5, 5, 10 and 30 m resolutions. The other data was ASTER GDEM (1 arc-second ASTER GDEM Version 2, approximately 30 m resolution). The final and reference data is the LiDAR based, 0.25 m resolution DEM. In total, 33 DEM datasets are compared with the LiDAR-based DEM dataset. For these data sets, five difference metrics were calculated: pixel based difference models, the areal and volumetric difference of surface models, the areal difference of slope classes and the areal difference of aspect classes. According to the results of the analysis, the resolution, according to the topographic characteristics of the area and selected interpolation approaches has an effect on DEM modeling and DEM –derived metrics. In addition, the forest structure has a major impact on the accuracy of ASTER GDEM data.



Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Akima H. (1978). A method of bivariate interpolation and smooth surface fitting for irregularly distributed data points. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS) 4:(2) 148-159. https://doi.org/10.1145/355780.355786.
  2. Ardiansyah P. O. D., Yokoyama R. (2002). DEM generation method from contour lines based on the steepest slope segment chain and a monotone interpolation function. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 57:(1) 86-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2716(02)00117-X.
  3. Aruga K., Chung W., Akay A., Sessions J., Miyata E. S. (2007). Incorporating Soil Surface Erosion Prediction into Forest Road Alignment Optimization. International Journal of Forest Engineering 18:(1) 24-32. 10.1080/14942119.2007.10702541.
  4. Aryal R. R., Latifi H., Heurich M., Hahn M. (2017). Impact of Slope, Aspect, and Habitat-Type on LiDAR-Derived Digital Terrain Models in a Near Natural, Heterogeneous Temperate Forest. PFG – Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science 85:(4) 243-255. 10.1007/s41064-017-0023-2.
  5. Aydın A., Tecimen H. B. (2010). Temporal soil erosion risk evaluation: a CORINE methodology application at Elmalı dam watershed, Istanbul. Environmental Earth Sciences 61:(7) 1457-1465. 10.1007/s12665-010-0461-2.
  6. Band L. E. (1986). Topographic partition of watersheds with digital elevation models. Water Resources Research 22:(1) 15-24
  7. Bater C. W., Coops N. C. (2009). Evaluating error associated with lidar-derived DEM interpolation. Computers & Geosciences 35:(2) 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2008.09.001.
  8. Behrens T., Schmidt K., MacMillan R. A., Viscarra Rossel R. A. (2018). Multi-scale digital soil mapping with deep learning. Scientific Reports 8:(1) 15244. 10.1038/s41598-018-33516-6.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

20 Ağustos 2019

Gönderilme Tarihi

26 Temmuz 2019

Kabul Tarihi

13 Ağustos 2019

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2019 Cilt: 7 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Yurtseven, H. (2019). Comparison of ASTER, contour lines and LiDAR based DEMs in terms of topographic differences in forested area. Eurasian Journal of Forest Science, 7(2), 166-186. https://doi.org/10.31195/ejejfs.597460

Cited By