Araştırma Makalesi

The available situation of meadows in Şanlıurfa and the usage areas of useful and harmful plants

Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3 2 Ekim 2020
PDF İndir
EN

The available situation of meadows in Şanlıurfa and the usage areas of useful and harmful plants

Abstract

Meadows and grasslands are one of the most important natural resources in the region. These areas are the cheapest sources of production where our need for animal nutrition is met, as well as where the need for roughage is met so that animals can produce high yields. As a result of continuous excessive and uncontrolled grazing of meadows and grasslands, losses have occurred in the existing vegetation cover. These areas are covered with plant communities where animals do not eat and have difficulty in digestion. To correct this situation and take necessary measures, a vegetation study was carried out in 2016. In the study carried out in the single and fatik mountains representing the city of Şanlıurfa, vegetation study was carried out with the wheel point method and it was studied in 12 determined areas. According to the results of the study, 32% of the pastures are covered with plants, while the remaining part is devastated by overgrazing and drought. Nowadays, plants that grow spontaneously in meadows and pastures are the food sources consumed by people in various ways. Plants that are beneficial according to the structure and properties of the plants collected by humans have been used by people for making food rather than medicine. Some of the plants have a poisonous effect and if the animals consume, the damage occurs. Useful and harmful plant species rates were determined as 19.3% and 32.5%, respectively. Poisonous herbs cause anorexia in animals, irreversible problems in excessive use, and even cause their death. As a result, the plants that are beneficial and harmful to human health in the meadow pastures of Şanlıurfa province, the existence of these plants should be protected and their properties and use should be explained to people, both medically and as a food. It was concluded that the pastures in two different mountains in Şanlıurfa province were degraded due to overgrazing and that they should be urgently protected by applying appropriate breeding methods.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Arıkan, R., 2007. Research Techniques and Report Preparation. 6.printing, ISBN:975-8784-35-8. Ankara.
  2. Baytop, T., 1963. Turkey's medicinal and poisonous plants. İsmail Akgün Press. Istanbul.
  3. Ergün, A., Çolpan, İ., Yıldız, G., Küçükersan S., Tuncer, D.Ş., Yalçın, S., Küçükersan, M.K. ve Şehu, A., 2002. Feed hygiene and Technology. Ankara University, Faculty Of Veterinary Medicine, Department Of Animal Nutrition And Nutrition Diseases, S: 12-55, 318-344. Ankara.
  4. Uygur, F.N., Koch, W., Walter, H., 1986. Description Of Important Weeds In The Wheat- Cotton October System Of Çukurova Region.
  5. Tögel ve Ayan, 2004. Effects On Some Harmful Plants And Animals Growing In Meadows And Pastures Of Samsun Province.
  6. Tükel T. ve R. Hatipoğlu, 2001. On the meadows Poisonous Plants and Animals Effects on. Stewart, G. B., & Pullin, A. S. (2008). The relative importance of grazing stock type and grazing intensity for conservation of mesotrophic ‘old meadow’pasture. Journal for Nature Conservation, 16(3), 175-185.
  7. Streeter, C. L., Rumburg, C. B., Hall, T. H., & Siemer, E. G. (1974). Meadow forage quality, intake, and milk production of cows. Rangeland Ecology & Management/Journal of Range Management Archives, 27(2), 133-135.
  8. Sargin, S. A. (2015). Ethnobotanical survey of medicinal plants in Bozyazı district of Mersin, Turkey. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 173, 105-126.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Orman Endüstri Mühendisliği

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

2 Ekim 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

19 Temmuz 2020

Kabul Tarihi

20 Ağustos 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 8 Sayı: 3

Kaynak Göster

APA
Çalık, A. (2020). The available situation of meadows in Şanlıurfa and the usage areas of useful and harmful plants. Eurasian Journal of Forest Science, 8(3), 152-162. https://doi.org/10.31195/ejejfs.771601

Cited By