Peace Education’s Effects on Aggression: A Mixed Method Study

Abstract

Problem Statement: Literature reviews clearly document that students still show a tendency to use violence in resolving interpersonal conflicts in school. Results from various research conducted in Turkey suggest that violence, aggression, and bullying behaviors are still rampant in the primary and high schools. Studies conducted in primary and middle schools toward decreasing aggression and preventing violence focus on programs such as violence prevention, conflict resolution, and peer mediation. While these programs are mainly based on peacemaking strategy, prevention programs based on positive peace and peacebuilding strategy with tested effectiveness are rather limited. Thus, a peace education program based on positive peace and peacebuilding strategy was developed and its effects on aggression levels of sixth grade students were investigated. Purpose of the Study: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of peace education program on sixth grade students’ aggression. Furthermore, students’ perspectives and experiences related to peace education program were examined. Method: In the research conducted in two low-SES middle schools, an embedded mixed method design was used. The qualitative study was embedded within a pretest-posttest control group using a quasi-experimental design to learn more about the experiences of students who receive peace education training. The peace education program was applied on experimental group, while the control group has not been provided any treatment related to the research topic. The experimental group included 84 girls (53.85%), 72 boys (46.15%), and 156 students (59.54%) in total. The control group included 54 girls (50.94%), 52 boys (49.06%), and 106 students (40.46%) in total. The Aggression Questionnaire was used to gather quantitative data. After the experimental treatment process was completed, a total of 20 students were interviewed and their perspectives and experiences related to the peace education program were examined. A semi-structured interview form was used to obtain qualitative data. Findings and Results: Research results indicated that aggression levels of the experimental group were significantly reduced compared to the control group students. Analyses of qualitative data provided evidence that the peace education program led to positive changes in student behaviors and improved relationships among and between students and teachers. Conclusions and Recommendations: In the research, it was determined that the peace education program was effective in decreasing aggression levels of the sixth grade students. The findings in this study are parallel with the findings of previous experimental studies. Thus, the research validated the assumptions that implementing peace education programs in schools will enable students to gain fundamental life skills to constructively resolve interpersonal conflicts. Keywords: Interpersonal conflict, violence, conflict resolution, negotiation, reconciliation.

Kaynakça

1. Akgun, S. & Araz, A. (2014). The effects of conflict resolution education on conflict
2. resolution skills, social competence, and aggression in Turkish elementary
3. school students. Journal of Peace Education, 11(1), 30-45. doi:
4. 1080/17400201.2013.777898
5. Alikasifoglu, M., Erginoz, E., Ercan, O., Uysal, O., Kaymak, D. A., & Ilter, O. (2004).
6. Violent behavior among Turkish high school students and correlates of
7. physical fighting. European Journal of Public Health, 14, 173-177.
8. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/14.2.173

9. Anderson, C. A. & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of
10. Psychology, 53(1), 27-51. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231
11. Arbuckle, J. L. (2010). IBM SPSS Amos 19 user’s guide. Crawfordville, FL: Amos
12. Development Corporation.
13. Atici, M., & Cekici, F. (2009). Ortaogretimdeki ogretmen ve ogrencilerin istenmeyen
14. davranislarla bas etme konusundaki goruslerinin karsilastirilmasi
15. [Comparison of teachers and students’ ideas about dealing with misbehavior
16. in secondary schools]. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yonetimi, 15(60), 495-522.
17. Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
18. Prentice-Hall.
19. Bentler, P. M. & Woodward, J. A. (1979). Nonexperimental evaluation research:
20. Contributions of causal modeling. In L. Datta & R. Perloff (Eds.), Improving
21. evaluations (pp. 71-102). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22. Berkowitz, L. (1993). Aggression: Its causes, consequences, and control. New York:
23. McGraw-Hill.
24. Card, N. A., & Little, T. D. (2006). Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and
25. adolescence: A meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial
26. adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(5), 466-480.
27. doi: 10.1177/0165025406071904
28. Crawford, P. A. (2005). Primarily peaceful: Nurturing peace in the primary grades.
29. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(5), 321-328. doi: 10.1007/s10643-004-1083-
30. Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods
31. research (2th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. Crick, N. R. & Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms in
33. reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67(3), 993-1002.
34. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01778.x
35. Damirchi, E. S. & Bilge, F. (2014). The effect of peace education program on the
36. seven-grade student’s conflict resolution and communication skills. Education
37. and Science, 39(175), 309-318. doi: 10.15390/EB.2014.2983
38. Diken, I. H., Cavkaytar, A., Batu, E. S., Bozkurt, F., & Kurtilmaz, Y. (2011).
39. Effectiveness of the Turkish version of “First Step to Success Program” in
40. preventing antisocial behaviors. Education and Science, 36(161), 145-158.
41. Dodge, K. A. (1991). The structure and function of reactive and proactive aggression.
42. In D. J. Pepler & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood
43. aggression (pp. 201-218). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
44. Dodge, K. A., & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social-information-processing factor in reactive
45. and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. Journal of Personality and
46. Social Psychology, 53(6), 1146-1158.
47. Erginoz, E., Alikasifoglu, M., Ercan, O., Uysal, O., Alp, Z., Ocak, S., … Albayrak
48. Kaymak, D. (2013). The role of parental, school, and peer factors in adolescent
49. bullying involvement: Results from the Turkish HBSC 2005/2006 study. AsiaPacific
50. Journal of Public Health, 20(10), 1-13. doi:10.1177/1010539512473144
51. Fite, P. J., Colder C. R., Lochman J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2008). Developmental
52. trajectories of proactive and reactive aggression from fifth to ninth grade.
53. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37(2), 412-421. doi:
54. 1080/15374410801955920
55. Fite, P. J., Raine, A., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Loeber, R., & Pardini, D. A. (2010).
56. Reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent males: Examining differential
57. outcomes 10 years later in early adulthood. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37(2),
58. -157. doi:10.1177/0093854809353051
59. Fite, P. J., Wimsatt, A. R., Elkins, S., & Grassetti, S. N. (2012). Contextual influences of
60. proactive and reactive subtypes of aggression. Child Indicators Research, 5(1),
61. -133. doi: 10.1007/s12187-011-9116-4
62. Galtung, J. (1983). Peace education: Learning to hate war, love peace, and to do
63. something about it. International Review of Education, 29(3), 281-287. doi:
64. 1007/BF00597972
65. Gay, L., Mills, G., & Airasian, P. (2005). Educational research: Competencies for analysis
66. and application (8th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
67. Griffin, R. S., & Gross, A. M. (2004). Childhood bullying: Current empirical findings
68. and future directions for research. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9(4), 379-
69. doi: 10.1016/S1359-1789(03)00033-8
70. Gultekin, F. (2008). Saldirganlik ve ofkeyi azaltma programi’nin ilkogretim ikinci kademe
71. ogrencilerinin saldirganlik ve ofke duzeyleri uzerindeki etkisi [The effect of
72. aggression and anger reduction program (SOAP) on level of aggression and
73. anger of middle school students]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,
74. Hacettepe University, Ankara.
75. Harris, I. M. & Morrison, M. L. (2003). Peace education (2nd ed.). Jefferson, NC:
76. McFarland and Company.
77. Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (2004). Implementing the “Teaching Students To Be
78. Peacemakers Program”. Theory Into Practice, 43(1), 68-79. doi:
79. 1207/s15430421tip4301_9
80. Johnson, D. W. & Johnson, R. T. (2005). This issue. Theory into Practice, 44(4), 275-279.
81. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4404_1
82. Kapci, E. G. (2004). Ilkogretim ogrencilerinin zorbaliga maruz kalma turunun ve
83. sikliginin depresyon, kaygi ve benlik saygisiyla iliskisi [Bullying type and
84. severity among elementary school students and its relationship with
85. depression, anxiety and self-esteem]. Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri
86. Fakultesi Dergisi, 37(1), 1-13.
87. Kartal, H. & Bilgin, A. (2009). Bullying and school climate from the aspects of the
88. students and teachers. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 36, 209-226.
89. Kaya, F., Bilgin, H., & Singer, M. I. (2012). Contributing factors to aggressive
90. behaviors in high school students in Turkey. The Journal of School Nursing,
91. (1), 56-69. doi: 10.1177/1059840511418669
92. Korkut, F. (2012). Okullarda onleyici rehberlik hizmetleri [Preventive guidance in the
93. schools]. Turk Psikolojik Danisma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 2(20), 27-40.
94. Kreidler, W. J. (1997). Conflict resolution in the middle school: A curriculum and teacher’s
95. guide (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: ESR Educators for Social Responsibility.
96. Kurt, G. & Sertel, J. M. (2006). Winpeace baris egitimi: Baris bireyde baslar (2. bs.)
97. [Winpeace peace education: Peace begins with the individual (2nd ed.)].
98. Istanbul: Ekspres Basim.
99. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand
100. Oaks, CA: Sage.
101. Reardon, B. A. (2000). Peace education: A review and projection. In B. Moon, M. BenPeretz,
102. & S. Brown (Eds.), Routledge international companion to education (pp.
103. -425). New York: Routledge.
104. Schrumpf, F., Crawford, D. K., & Bodine, R. J. (1997). Peer mediation: Conflict resolution
105. in schools: Program guide. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
106. Siyez, D. M. (2009). Liselerde gorev yapan ogretmenlerin istenmeyen ogrenci
107. davranislarina yonelik algilari ve tepkileri [High school teachers’ perceptions
108. of and reactions towards the student misbehaviors]. Pamukkale Universitesi
109. Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 25, 67-80.
110. Topcu Kabasakal, Z., Sagkal, A. S., & Turnuklu, A. (2015). Effects of peace education
111. program on the violence tendencies and social problem solving skills of
112. students. Education and Science, 40(182), 43-62. doi: 10.15390/EB.2015.4704
113. Turk, F., & Turnuklu, A. (2016). Akran arabuluculuk egitiminin lise ogrencilerinin
114. catisma cozme becerileri, empatik egilim ve saldirganlik duzeyleri uzerindeki
115. etkisinin incelenmesi [An analysis of the effect of peer mediation training on
116. high school students’ conflict resolutions, empathic tendency, and aggression
117. levels]. International Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 1589-1606.
118. doi:10.14687/ijhs.v13i1.3669
119. Turnuklu, A., Kacmaz, T., Gurler, S., Sevkin, B., Turk, F., Kalender, A., & Zengin, F.
120. (2010). The effects of conflict resolution and peer mediation training on
121. primary school students’ level of aggression. Education 3-13: International
122. Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 38(1), 13-22. doi:
123. 1080/03004270902760668
124. Turnuklu, A., Kacmaz, T., Ikiz, E., & Balci, F. (2009). Liselerde ogrenci siddetinin
125. onlenmesi: Anlasmazlik cozumu, muzakere ve akran – arabuluculuk egitim programi
126. [Preventing student violence in high schools: Conflict resolution, negotiation
127. and peer mediation training program]. Ankara: Maya Akademi.
128. Turnuklu, A., Kacmaz, T., Sunbul, D., & Ergul, H. (2009). Does peer mediation really
129. work? Effects of conflict resolution and peer-mediation training on high
130. school students’ conflicts. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 630-638.
131. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.112
132. Turnuklu, A., & Sahin, I. (2004). 13-14 yas grubu ogrencilerin catisma cozme
133. stratejilerinin incelenmesi [Examining 13-14th years old students’ conflict
134. resolution strategies]. Turk Psikoloji Yazilari, 7(13), 45-61.
135. Vitaro, F., Brendgen, M., & Barker, E. D. (2006). Subtypes of aggressive behaviors: A
136. developmental perspective. International Journal of Behavioral Development,
137. (1), 12-19. doi: 10.1177/0165025406059968
138. Weigert, K. M. (1989). Peace studies as education for nonviolent social change. The
139. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 504, 37-47.
140. Yildiz, D. G., Cetin, H., Turnuklu, A., Tercan, M., Cetin, C., & Kacmaz, T. (2016).
141. “Polatli Muzakereci-Arabulucu-Lider Ogrenci Yetisiyor” projesinin
142. degerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of “Polatli Negotiator Mediator Leader
143. Students” project]. Ilkogretim Online, 15(2), 650-670. doi:
144. http://dx.doi.org/10.17051/io.2016.84588