The Effect of Cooperative Learning: University Example

Abstract

Problem Statement: Motivation is a significant component of success in education, and it is best achieved by constructivist learning methods, especially cooperative Learning (CL). CL is a popular method among primary and secondary schools, but it is rarely used in higher education due to the large numbers of students and time restrictions. The literature does not give much space to the use of CL and its motivational effects. This study aimed to fill this gap in the literature and practice. Purpose of the Study: This study sought to investigate the effects of CL on students’ motivation and student products at university level. Method: With an implementation of CL at a university, this study was performed with mixed-method techniques. Jigsaw and Team-GameTournament techniques were implemented in two sections of a selective course at a state university in Istanbul, Turkey to outline the motivational effects of CL on students between the ages of 18 and 25. To reach more satisfying results, a mixed methodology was used and pre- and postmotivation questionnaires were supported with document analysis of students’ products. Findings: The study showed that the university level is not a hazardous place to implement CL. On the contrary, it is a fruitful level to see positive motivational effects. Both the qualitative and quantitative data supported the positive effect of CL on students’ motivation and cooperative learning strategies. Conclusion and Recommendations: Based on the findings, it could be asserted that CL is effective on students’ motivation and cooperative learning strategies. Especially for students at faculties of education, the use of CL was rather generous in terms of their own learning. As their profession involves teaching how to learn, it is important that they know the specific path.Keywords: Cooperative Learning, motivation, teacher training, higher education. 

Kaynakça

1. Adu, E. O., & Galloway, G. (2015). The effects of cooperative learning on students’
2. economics achievement and attitude towards economics. Journal of Economics,
3. (1), 30-36.
4. Ahmadpanah, M., Soheili, S., Jahangard, L., Bajoghli, H., Haghighi, M., HolsboerTrachsler,
5. E., & Keikhavandi, S. (2014). Cooperative learning improves social
6. skills and knowledge of science topics in pre-adolescent children in
7. Iran. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 4(8), 1029-1037.
8. Altun, S. & Erden, M. (2007). Ogrenmede motive edici stratejiler olceginin gecerlik ve

9. guvenilirlik çalismasi. Edu7, 2(3), 1-16.
10. Artut, P. D., & Tarim, K. (2007). The effectiveness of Jigsaw II on prospective
11. elementary school teachers. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 35(2), 129-
12. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and
13. functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
14. Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press.
15. Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (4th ed). Boston,
16. MA: Pearson.
17. Bergman, M. M. (2011). The good, the bad, and the ugly in mixed methods research
18. and design. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(4), 271-275.
19. Bunrasi, J. B. T. (2012). Algebra I achievement of eighth grade mexican american students
20. using cooperative learning versus traditional instruction. Doctoral dissertation,
21. Walden University.
22. Buyukozturk, S. (2013). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabi: Istatistik, arastirma
23. deseni SPSS uygulamalari ve yorum. Ankara: Pegem Academy.
24. Cadima, J., Doumen, S., Verschueren, K., & Buyse, E. (2015). Child engagement in the
25. transition to school: Contributions of self-regulation, teacher–child
26. relationships and classroom climate. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 32(1),
27. -12.
28. Can, A. (2013). SPSS ile bilimsel arastirma surecinde nicel veri analizi. Ankara: Pegem
29. Academy.
30. Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic
31. incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological
32. Bulletin, 140(4), 980-1008.
33. Chan, K. W. (2014). Cooperative learning in a Hong Kong primary school:
34. perceptions, problems and accommodation. Intercultural Education, 25(3), 216-
35. Cherry, K. (2015,nd ). Theories of motivation in psychology. Retrieved March 19, 2015,
36. from http://psychology.about.com/od/psychologytopics/tp/theories-ofmotivation.htm
37. Chow, S. J., & Yong, B. C. S. (2013). Secondary School Students' Motivation and
38. Achievement in Combined Science. Online Submission, 3(4), 213-228.
39. Clark, N. M., Gong, M., & Kaciroti, N. (2014). A model of self-regulation for control
40. of chronic disease. Health Education & Behavior, 41(5), 499-508.
41. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods
42. research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
43. Cubukcu, Z. (2012). The effect of hidden curriculum on character education process
44. of primary school students. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(2),
45. -1534.
46. Dandy, K., & Bendersky, K. (2014). Student and faculty beliefs about learning in
47. higher education: Implications for teaching. International Journal of Teaching &
48. Learning in Higher Education, 26(3), 358-380.
49. de Vries, S., van de Grift, W. J., & Jansen, E. P. (2014). How teachers’ beliefs about
50. learning and teaching relate to their continuing professional development.
51. Teachers and Teaching, 20(3), 338-357.
52. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2011). Self-determination theory. Handbook of Theories of
53. Social Psychology, 1(1), 416-433.
54. Deci, E., Vallerand, R., Pelletier, L., & Ryan, R. (1991). Motivation and education: The
55. self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346.
56. Retrieved November 21, 2011, from
57. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653137
58. Denscombe, M. (2008). Communities of practice a research paradigm for the mixed
59. methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 270-283.
60. Deutsch, M. (1949). An experimental study of the effects of cooperation and
61. competition upon group process. Human relations, 2(3), 199-231.
62. Freiberger, V., Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2012). Competence beliefs and perceived
63. ability evaluations: How do they contribute to intrinsic motivation and
64. achievement?. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(4), 518-522.
65. Gottfried, A. E., Marcoulides, G. A., Gottfried, A. W., & Oliver, P. H. (2013).
66. Longitudinal pathways from math intrinsic motivation and achievement to
67. math course accomplishments and educational attainment. Journal of Research
68. on Educational Effectiveness, 6(1), 68-92.
69. Hancock, D. (2004). Cooperative learning and peer orientation effects on motivation
70. and achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(3), 159-168.
71. Hatch, J. A. (2002). Doing qualitative research in education settings. New York: State
72. University of New York Press.
73. Hennessey, A., & Dionigi, R. A. (2013). Implementing cooperative learning in
74. Australian primary schools: Generalist teachers' perspectives. Issues in
75. Educational Research, 23(1), 52-68.
76. Jobs, S. (2005). The only way to do great work is to love what you do. Retrieved from
77. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=odEfLZ9HMZ8
78. John, K. K., & Ng’eno, J. K. (2014). Effects of cooperative mastery learning approach
79. on students’ motivation to learn chemistry by gender. Journal of Education and
80. Practice, 5(8), 91-97.
81. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2014). Cooperative learning in 21st century. Anales
82. de Psicología, 30(3), 841-851.
83. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research
84. paradigm whose time has come. Educational researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
85. Karacop, A., Doymus, K., Dogan, A., & Koc, Y. (2009). Ogrencilerin akademik
86. basarilarina bilgisayar bnimasyonlari ve jigsaw tekniginin etkisi. Gazi Egitim
87. Fakultesi Dergisi, 29(1), 211-235.
88. Keramati, M. (2010). Effect of cooperative learning on academic achievement of
89. physics course. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 29(2),
90. -173.
91. Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2015). Comparing relations of motivation, engagement,
92. and achievement among struggling and advanced adolescent readers. Reading
93. and Writing, 28(2), 239-269.
94. Koutselini, M. (2008). Teacher misconceptions and understanding of cooperative
95. learning: An intervention study. The Journal of Classroom Interaction, 43(2) 34-
96. Kus, M., Filiz, E., & Altun, S. (2014). Teacher and student thoughts on effectiveness of
97. cooperative learning in geography teaching. Educational Research and
98. Reviews, 9(11), 312-319.
99. Lee, W. & Reeve, J. (2012). Teachers' estimates of their students' motivation and
100. engagement: Being in synch with students. Educational Psychology, 32(6), 727-
101. Lei, S. A. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: Evaluating benefits and
102. drawbacks from college instructors' perspectives. Journal of Instructional
103. Psychology, 37(2), 153.
104. Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics II. Channels of group life; social
105. planning and action research. Human relations, 1(2), 143-153.
106. Martin, A. J. (2012). High school motivation and engagement: Gender and age
107. effects. Online Submission, 1-7. Retrieved from
108. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED532692.pdf
109. Martin, A. J., Yu, K., & Hau, K. T. (2014). Motivation and engagement in the ‘Asian
110. Century’: a comparison of Chinese students in Australia, Hong Kong, and
111. Mainland China. Educational Psychology, 34(4), 417-439.
112. Martin, M. R., & Pickett, M. T. (2013). The effects of differentiated instruction on
113. motivation and engagement in fifth-grade gifted math and music students.
114. Online Submission, Master of Arts Action Research Project, Saint Xavier
115. University, 1-92. Retrieved from
116. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541341.pdf
117. Maslow, A., & Herzeberg, A. (1954). Hierarchy of needs. AH Maslow. ea., Motivation
118. and Personality. Harper, New York.
119. Nakiboglu, C. (2001). Maddenin yapisi unitesinin isbirlikli ogrenme yontemi
120. kullanilarak kimya ögretmen adaylarina ogretilmesinin ogrenci basarisina
121. etkisi. Gazi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, 21(3), 131-143.
122. Nichols, J. D., & Hall, N. (1996). The effects of cooperative learning on student
123. achievement and motivation in a high school geometry class. Contemporary
124. Education, 21(1), 467-476.
125. Nichols, J. D., & Miller, R. B. (1994). Cooperative learning and student
126. motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(2), 167-178.
127. Ning, H., & Hornby, G. (2014). The impact of cooperative learning on tertiary EFL
128. learners’ motivation. Educational Review, 66(1), 108-124.
129. Obenland, C. A., Munson, A. H., & Hutchinson, J. S. (2012). Silent students'
130. participation in a large active learning science classroom. Journal of College
131. Science Teaching, 42(2), 90-98.
132. Orora, W., Keraro, F. N., & Wachanga, S. W. (2014). Using cooperative e-learning
133. teaching strategy to enhance students’ creativity in secondary school biology:
134. A study of selected schools in Nakuru County, Kenya. International Journal of
135. Education and Practice, 2(6), 137-146.
136. Pajares, F., & Miller, M. D. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in
137. mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational
138. Psychology, 86(2), 193-203.
139. Park, E. L., & Choi, B. K. (2014). Transformation of classroom spaces: traditional
140. versus active learning classroom in colleges. Higher Education, 68(5), 749-771.
141. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning
142. components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational
143. psychology, 82(1), 33.
144. Ray, N. L. (1992). Motivation in education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
145. Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED349298), 1-27.
146. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED349298.pdf
147. Ray, P. S., Leeper, J., & Amini, M. O. (2014). Proceedings from ASEE-E ’14: Effects of
148. cooperative learning as a teaching method for an introductory course in
149. engineering statistics. Macon, GA: USA.
150. Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., & Segers, M. (2009). The role
151. of academic motivation in computer-supported collaborative
152. learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 1195-1206. Retrieved March 7,
153. Rowell, L., & Hong, E. (2013). Academic motivation: Concepts, strategies, and
154. counseling approaches. Professional School Counseling, 16(3), 158-171.
155. Ruan, Y., Duan, X., & Du, X. Y. (2015). Tasks and learner motivation in learning
156. Chinese as a foreign language. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(2), 170-
157. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of
158. intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American
159. Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
160. Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (1991). A Motivational Approach to self: Integration in
161. personality. In Diensthier, R. A. (Ed.), Perspectives on motivation (pp. 237-288).
162. Nebraska: The University of Nebraska Press.
163. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic
164. definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-
165. Sahin, A. (2011). Effects of Jigsaw III technique on achievement in written
166. expression. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(3), 427-435.
167. Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (2014, January). Cognition, affect, and self‐regulation.
168. In Affect and cognition: 17th annual carnegie mellon symposium on cognition (pp.
169. . Psychology Press.
170. Seyler, D. L., Holton III, E. F., Bates, R. A., Burnett, M. F., & Carvalho, M. A. (1998).
171. Factors affecting motivation to transfer training. International Journal of
172. Training and Development, 2(1), 2-16.
173. Simoneau, H., & Bergeron, J. (2003). Factors affecting motivation during the first six
174. weeks of treatment. Addictive Behaviors, 28(7), 1219-1241.
175. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (1993). Motivation in the classroom: Reciprocal
176. effects of teacher behavior and student engagement across the school
177. year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 571-581.
178. Slavin, R. E. (1987). Cooperative learning: Student teams. What research says to the teacher.
179. Washington: National Education Association.
180. Tarhan, L., Ayyildiz, Y., Ogunc, A., & Sesen, B. A. (2013). A jigsaw cooperative
181. learning application in elementary science and technology lessons: Physical
182. and chemical changes. Research in Science & Technological Education, 31(2), 184-
183. Taylor, G., Jungert, T., Mageau, G. A., Schattke, K., Dedic, H., Rosenfield, S., &
184. Koestner, R. (2014). A self-determination theory approach to predicting school
185. achievement over time: the unique role of intrinsic motivation. Contemporary
186. Educational Psychology, 39(4), 342-358.
187. Temiz, T., & Topcu, M. S. (2013). Preservice teachers’ teacher efficacy beliefs and
188. constructivist-based teaching practice. European Journal of Psychology of
189. Education, 28(4), 1435-1452.
190. Thompson, V. C. (1987). Methodologies to motivate students. Abstract. Retrieved from
191. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED296955
192. Topping, K. J., Thurston, A., Tolmie, A., Christie, D., Murray, P., & Karagiannidou, E.
193. (2011). Cooperative learning in science: Intervention in the secondary school.
194. Research in Science & Technological Education, 29(1), 91-106.
195. Tran, V. D. (2014). The effects of cooperative learning on the academic achievement
196. and knowledge retention. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(2), 131-
197. Unrau, N. J., & Quirk, M. (2014). Reading motivation and reading engagement:
198. clarifying commingled conceptions. Reading Psychology, 35(3), 260-284.
199. Wadsworth, B. J. (1996). Piaget's theory of cognitive and affective development:
200. Foundations of constructivism . London: Longman Publishing.
201. Wiggins, G. P. &, McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA:
202. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
203. Yildirim, A. & Simsek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastirma yontemleri. Ankara:
204. Seckin Publishing.
205. Zhao, D. B., Dou, Z. Y., & Kong, Q. M. (2014). The effect of cooperative learning on
206. college students' personality and mentality in their taking tennis as an
207. optional course. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University (Social Sciences
208. Edition), 5(1), 604-607.
209. Zhou, H. (2012). Enhancing non-english majors’ EFL motivation through cooperative
210. learning. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 12(1), 1317-1323.
211. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary
212. Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82-91.
213. Zumbrunn, S., McKim, C., Buhs, E., & Hawley, L. R. (2014). Support, belonging,
214. motivation, and engagement in the college classroom: A mixed method
215. study. Instructional Science, 42(5), 661-684.