An Analysis of University Students’ Levels of Self-control According to Their Ego States

Abstract

Problem Statement: Although it is well known that parents’ methods of raising their children significantly affect their children’s personalities and how they face life, this study has been designed because there is a lack of specific research on which ego states of adults are associated with selfcontrol. In the present study, self-control and ego states have been taken into consideration together and answers to the following questions were sought. Is there any association between the subdimensions of ego states and self-control? Do ego states predict self-control? Purpose of the Study: The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between ego states of university students and their levels of self-control, and to determine whether or not ego states predict their levels of self-control. Methods: Since this study aims to investigate whether subdimensions of ego states and self-control are correlated, an associational survey model was used. The study was conducted with 290 participating university students. The data were collected using an ego states scale and a selfcontrol scale. The results suggested that the parent ego state, adult ego state, and child ego state dimensions are significantly correlated with the experiential self-control reformative self-control and redressive selfcontrol subdimensions of the self-control scale. Findings and Results: Based on the findings, it was concluded that the parent ego state is associated with reformative self-control, the adult ego state is associated with reformative and redressive self-control, and the child ego state is associated with experiential self-control. According to the results of the one way ANOVA, which tested the significance of the regression model, ego states predict the self-control levels of individuals significantly, F3-274: 6.356; p < .001. Conclusion and Recommendations: Results suggest that students with high parent ego states make decisions using reformative self-control; students with high adult ego states make decisions using reformative and redressive self-control; and students with high child ego states make decisions using experiential self-control. Keywords: Ego states, self-control, experiential self-control.

Kaynakça

1. Akbag, M., & Deniz, L (2003). Ogretim elemani ve ogretmen adaylarinin birbirlerine
2. yonelik algilari: Transaksiyonel analiz acisindan bir degerlendirme. [ The
3. perception of student-teachers and their instructors toward each other: A
4. transactional analysis evaluation]. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 3(2),
5. -292.
6. Akkoyun, F. (2001). Psikolojide islemsel cozumleme yaklasimi. Transaksiyonel analiz.
7. [Transactional analysis: Transactional analysis approach in psychology.]
8. Ankara, Turkey: Nobel Press.

9. Baumeister. R. F., Heatherton. T. F., & Tice. D. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why
10. people fail at self-regulation. San Diego: Academic Press. Inc.
11. Berne, E. (2001). Hayat denen oyun. [Games people play]. (S. Sargut, Cev.). Istanbul,
12. Turkey: Kariyer Press.
13. Chudek, J., Skrzypulec-Plinta, V., & Olszanecka-Glinianowicz, M. (2014). Coping
14. with overweight strategies, self-esteem and body-esteem in the context of
15. transactional analysis. Psychiatr. Pol, 48(3), 477-487.
16. Ciucur, D. (2013). The ego states and the “big five” personality factors. Procedia-Social
17. and Behavioral Sciences, 78, 581-585.
18. DeLisi, M., Beaver, K.M., Vaughn, M.G., Trulson, C.R., Kosloski, A. E., Alan J. Drury,
19. A. J., & Wright, J. P. (2010). Personality, gender, and self-control theory
20. revisited: results from a sample of institutionalized juvenile delinquents.
21. Applied Psychology in Criminal Justice, 6(1), 31- 46.
22. Dokmen, U. (2013). Iletisim catismalari ve empati. [Communication conflicts and
23. empathy]. Istanbul, Turkey: Remzi Press.
24. Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Self-discipline outdoes IQ predicting
25. academic performance in adolescents. Psychological Science, 16, 939-944
26. Duyan, V., Gulden, C., & Gelbal, S. (2012). Oz-Denetim Olcegi - ODO: Guvenirlik ve
27. gecerlik calismasi. [Self-Control Scale – SCS: Reliability and validity study].
28. Society and Social Work, 23(1), 25-38.
29. Engels, R., Finkenauer, C., den Exter Blokland, E. A. W. & Baumeister. R. F. (2000).
30. Parental influences on self-control and juvenile delinquency. Manuscript in
31. preparation. Utrecht University. Netherlands.
32. Englert, C., & Bertrams, A. (2015). Integrating attentional control theory and the
33. strength model of self-control. Frontiers in Psychology, 6.
34. Eslinger, P.J., Flaherty-Craig, C.V., & Benton, A.L. (2004) Developmental outcomes
35. after early prefrontal cortex damage. Brain and Cognition, 55, 84–103.
36. Finkel, E., & Campbell, W. K. (2000). Ego depletion and accommodation in romantic
37. relationships. Poster presented at the Society for Personality and Social
38. Psychology. Nashville. TN.
39. Fitzsimons, G. M., & Bargh, J. A (2004). Automatic self-regulation. In R. F.Baumeister
40. & K. D. Vohs (Ed.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research theory and applications
41. (pp. 151 -170). New York: Guilford Press.
42. Fujita. K. (2011). On conceptualizing selfcontrol as more than the effortful inhibition
43. of impulses. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 15(4), 352–366.
44. Gencoglu, C. (2006). Universite ogrencilerinin iyimserlik duzeyleri ile kisilik
45. ozellikleri arasindaki iliskinin incelenmesi [Examination of relationship
46. between university students' level of optimism and their personality traits].
47. Unpublished master thesis, Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey.
48. Jackson, J. J., Bog, T., Walton, K.E., Wood, D., & Harms, P.D. (2009) Not all
49. conscientiousness scales change alike: A multimethod multisample study of
50. age differences in the facets of conscientiousness. Journal of Personality and
51. Social Psychology, 96, 446–459.
52. James. M., & Jongeward, D. (1993). Kazanmak icin dogariz. [Born to win]. (T. Şenruh
53. Cev.). Istanbul, Turkey: Inkilap Press.
54. Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel arastirma yontemleri. [Scientific research methods]. Ankara,
55. Turkey: Nobel Press.
56. Kochanska, G., Coy, K.C., & Murray, K. T. (2001). The development of selfregulation
57. in the first four years of life. Child Development, 72, 1091–1111.
58. Mahone, E. M., Cirino. P. T., Cutting, L. E., Cerrone, P. M., Hagelthorn, K. M.,
59. Hiemenz, J. R., Singer, H. S., & Denckla, M. B. (2002). Validity of the
60. behavior rating inventory of executive function in children with ADHD
61. and/or tourette syndrome. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17 (7), 643 –
62. Mehta, R. (2010). Exploring self-control: Moving beyond depletion hypothesis.
63. Advances in Consumer Research, 37, 174-178.
64. Mitchell, J.P., Macrae, C.N., Schooler, J.. Rowe. A.C., & Milne. A.B. (2002). Directed
65. remembering: Subliminal cues alter nonconscious memory strategies.
66. Memory, 10, 381-388.
67. Moffitt et al. (2011). A gradient of childhood self-control predicts health, wealth, and
68. public safety. PNAS, 108(7), 2693-2698.
69. Ozpolat, A., Kaygusuz, C., & Duyan, V. (2015). Ego durumlari olceginin gecerlilik ve
70. guvenirlik calismasi. [Psychometric features of ego states scale]. Turkish
71. Journal of Family Medicine & Primary Care, 9(4), 150-157, doi:
72. 5455/tjfmpc.186239
73. Rosenbaum, M. (1993). The three functions of self-control behavior: Redressive,
74. reformative, and experiential. Work and Stress, 7, 33-46.
75. Rothbaum, F., Weisz, J. R. & Snyder, S. S. (1982). Changing the world and changing
76. the self: A two-process model of perceived control. Journal of Personality and
77. Social Psychology, 42, 5–37.
78. Sumer, N. Akturk, G.E. & Helvaci, E. (2010). Anne-baba tutum ve davranislarinin
79. psikolojik etkileri: Turkiye'de yapilan calismalara toplu bakis. [The relations
80. between perceived parental support and peer bullying/victimization in male
81. adolescents: The role of friendship quality]. Turkish Journal of Psychology, 13
82. (25), 42-61.
83. Sencer, M. (1989). Toplumbilimlerinde yontem. [Methods in sociology]. Istanbul, Turkey:
84. Beta Press.
85. Sahin, F. T., & Ozyurek, A. (2008). 5-6 yas grubu cocuga sahip ebeveynlerin
86. demografik ozelliklerinin cocuk yetistirme tutumlarina etkisinin incelenmesi.
87. [Examining of the effects to child raising attitudes of demographic
88. characteristics of parents that have 5-6 years children group]. Journal of Turkish
89. Educational Sciences, 6(3), 395-414.
90. Tangney, J.P., Baumeister, R.F., & Boone, A.L. (2004). High self-control predicts good
91. adjustment. Less pathology. Better grades and interpersonal success. Journal of
92. Personality, 72(2), 271-324.
93. Tudor, K. (2010). The state of the ego: Then and now. Transactional Analysis Journal,
94. (3-4), 261-277.
95. Tufekci, S. (2008). Romantik iliskilerde genc yetiskinlerin aska iliskin tutumlari ve kisilik
96. ozellikleri: Transaksiyonel analiz ego durumlari acisindan bir degerlendirme. [An
97. assessment of love attitudes and characteristics of young adults in romantic
98. relationships in terms of transactionaol analaysis ego states]. Unpublished master
99. thesis, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
100. Wolfe, R. N. & Johnson. S. D. (1995). Persotnality as a predictor of college
101. performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55, 177–185.
102. Yildiz, M. & Dilmac, B. (2012). Ogretmen adaylarinin sahip olduklari degerler ile
103. kisilik ozellikleri arasindaki iliskilerini incelenmesi [Analysis of the relation
104. between values and personality traits held by candidate teachers]. Mersin
105. University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 8(3), 122-134.